|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 26, 2017 0:54:48 GMT
www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/homecoming/spider-man-homecoming-5-things-marvel-studios-is-doing-wrong-with-the-wall-crawler-a151387
5. Spider-Man Is Iron Man's B*tch
It's clear that Peter idolises his new mentor, but Iron Man repays that by treating him the same way he did that kid in Iron Man 3. That's not bad for a few laughs, but Spider-Man deserves more respect than that. having his costume confiscated and a number of its abilities made off limits is far from the best way to handle the character's reintroduction in this movie and him reporting to Iron Man
4. Peter Parker's Fancy New Costume
Marvel appears to have forgotten the essence of what makes Spidey great. That is the fact he comes up with his own solutions and inventions, this just feels like a lazy storytelling decision.
3. Spider-Man Is A Loser
Peter Parker has always been a bit of a loser, but that's what makes him so endearing. When he puts the Spider-Man costume on, however, things change and he becomes a cockier, brash hero who will do anything to save the day. Sure, he doesn't always get it right and makes mistakes, but Spider-Man: Homecoming appears to be portraying the wall-crawler as a joke.
seeing him treated like a numbskull by Tony Stark and helping old ladies cross the street and stopping bicycle thieves may not be quite as funny as Marvel thinks. Hell, the trailer makes it clear that he can't even put an end to a bank robbery without screwing up pretty much an entire neighbourhood, and while him tackling street level crime is a smart move, it just doesn't seem like the young - and dumb - hero can even get that right.
2. A Shared, But Non-Shared, Spider-Man Universe
The news that Tom Hardy will be suiting up as Venom is massively exciting, but it's disappointing that his Eddie Brock will more than likely never get to cross paths with Tom Holland's Peter Parker.
1. One Too Many Ties To The Avengers
everything we've seen from Spider-Man: Homecoming points to the reboot being crammed with mostly unnecessary references to this shared universe.
it makes Spidey feel like something of an afterthought as he basically cleans up a mess Earth's Mightiest Heroes are too important or busy to deal with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on May 26, 2017 1:02:37 GMT
www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/homecoming/spider-man-homecoming-5-things-marvel-studios-is-doing-wrong-with-the-wall-crawler-a151387
5. Spider-Man Is Iron Man's B*tch
It's clear that Peter idolises his new mentor, but Iron Man repays that by treating him the same way he did that kid in Iron Man 3. That's not bad for a few laughs, but Spider-Man deserves more respect than that. having his costume confiscated and a number of its abilities made off limits is far from the best way to handle the character's reintroduction in this movie and him reporting to Iron Man
4. Peter Parker's Fancy New Costume
Marvel appears to have forgotten the essence of what makes Spidey great. That is the fact he comes up with his own solutions and inventions, this just feels like a lazy storytelling decision.
3. Spider-Man Is A Loser
Peter Parker has always been a bit of a loser, but that's what makes him so endearing. When he puts the Spider-Man costume on, however, things change and he becomes a cockier, brash hero who will do anything to save the day. Sure, he doesn't always get it right and makes mistakes, but Spider-Man: Homecoming appears to be portraying the wall-crawler as a joke.
seeing him treated like a numbskull by Tony Stark and helping old ladies cross the street and stopping bicycle thieves may not be quite as funny as Marvel thinks. Hell, the trailer makes it clear that he can't even put an end to a bank robbery without screwing up pretty much an entire neighbourhood, and while him tackling street level crime is a smart move, it just doesn't seem like the young - and dumb - hero can even get that right.
2. A Shared, But Non-Shared, Spider-Man Universe
The news that Tom Hardy will be suiting up as Venom is massively exciting, but it's disappointing that his Eddie Brock will more than likely never get to cross paths with Tom Holland's Peter Parker.
1. One Too Many Ties To The Avengers
everything we've seen from Spider-Man: Homecoming points to the reboot being crammed with mostly unnecessary references to this shared universe.
it makes Spidey feel like something of an afterthought as he basically cleans up a mess Earth's Mightiest Heroes are too important or busy to deal with.
An excellent find, DC-Fan . I don't follow basketball but this has to be the equivalent of a three-pointer if not a four pointer. Homecoming will lose one million off of this post alone. Keep up the good work. SaveSave |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 7:45:38 GMT
www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/homecoming/spider-man-homecoming-5-things-marvel-studios-is-doing-wrong-with-the-wall-crawler-a151387
5. Spider-Man Is Iron Man's B*tch
It's clear that Peter idolises his new mentor, but Iron Man repays that by treating him the same way he did that kid in Iron Man 3. That's not bad for a few laughs, but Spider-Man deserves more respect than that. having his costume confiscated and a number of its abilities made off limits is far from the best way to handle the character's reintroduction in this movie and him reporting to Iron Man
4. Peter Parker's Fancy New Costume
Marvel appears to have forgotten the essence of what makes Spidey great. That is the fact he comes up with his own solutions and inventions, this just feels like a lazy storytelling decision.
3. Spider-Man Is A Loser
Peter Parker has always been a bit of a loser, but that's what makes him so endearing. When he puts the Spider-Man costume on, however, things change and he becomes a cockier, brash hero who will do anything to save the day. Sure, he doesn't always get it right and makes mistakes, but Spider-Man: Homecoming appears to be portraying the wall-crawler as a joke.
seeing him treated like a numbskull by Tony Stark and helping old ladies cross the street and stopping bicycle thieves may not be quite as funny as Marvel thinks. Hell, the trailer makes it clear that he can't even put an end to a bank robbery without screwing up pretty much an entire neighbourhood, and while him tackling street level crime is a smart move, it just doesn't seem like the young - and dumb - hero can even get that right.
2. A Shared, But Non-Shared, Spider-Man Universe
The news that Tom Hardy will be suiting up as Venom is massively exciting, but it's disappointing that his Eddie Brock will more than likely never get to cross paths with Tom Holland's Peter Parker.
1. One Too Many Ties To The Avengers
everything we've seen from Spider-Man: Homecoming points to the reboot being crammed with mostly unnecessary references to this shared universe.
it makes Spidey feel like something of an afterthought as he basically cleans up a mess Earth's Mightiest Heroes are too important or busy to deal with.
5 - He did just that in the comics. He was Iron-mans biaaaatch in civil war, until he changed sides. 4 - Iron Spider 3- They capture spidey perfectly, those shenanigans are the essence of the character, but that money shot of him holding the ferry shows that they know what they are doing. Read a comic. 2- Yes it's a shame that Eddie is not in the MCU. A standalone venom movie is just stupid. 1- The interaction with the avengers, FF, Wolverine etc were always one of the best stories of the character. Also they need this to solidify the character in the MCU instead of another ball droped by the incompetents at SONY. The same that are bringing to life VENOM (i'm so excited for that NOT) |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jun 7, 2017 14:40:28 GMT
www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/homecoming/spider-man-homecoming-5-things-marvel-studios-is-doing-wrong-with-the-wall-crawler-a151387
5. Spider-Man Is Iron Man's B*tch
It's clear that Peter idolises his new mentor, but Iron Man repays that by treating him the same way he did that kid in Iron Man 3. That's not bad for a few laughs, but Spider-Man deserves more respect than that. having his costume confiscated and a number of its abilities made off limits is far from the best way to handle the character's reintroduction in this movie and him reporting to Iron Man
4. Peter Parker's Fancy New Costume
Marvel appears to have forgotten the essence of what makes Spidey great. That is the fact he comes up with his own solutions and inventions, this just feels like a lazy storytelling decision.
3. Spider-Man Is A Loser
Peter Parker has always been a bit of a loser, but that's what makes him so endearing. When he puts the Spider-Man costume on, however, things change and he becomes a cockier, brash hero who will do anything to save the day. Sure, he doesn't always get it right and makes mistakes, but Spider-Man: Homecoming appears to be portraying the wall-crawler as a joke.
seeing him treated like a numbskull by Tony Stark and helping old ladies cross the street and stopping bicycle thieves may not be quite as funny as Marvel thinks. Hell, the trailer makes it clear that he can't even put an end to a bank robbery without screwing up pretty much an entire neighbourhood, and while him tackling street level crime is a smart move, it just doesn't seem like the young - and dumb - hero can even get that right.
2. A Shared, But Non-Shared, Spider-Man Universe
The news that Tom Hardy will be suiting up as Venom is massively exciting, but it's disappointing that his Eddie Brock will more than likely never get to cross paths with Tom Holland's Peter Parker.
1. One Too Many Ties To The Avengers
everything we've seen from Spider-Man: Homecoming points to the reboot being crammed with mostly unnecessary references to this shared universe.
it makes Spidey feel like something of an afterthought as he basically cleans up a mess Earth's Mightiest Heroes are too important or busy to deal with.
So you're pissed they didn't forget they built a larger Universe, and you're pissed they decided to try something new? Geez, leave it to you we'd still be reading by candlelight. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 7, 2017 14:54:09 GMT
www.comicbookmovie.com/spider-man/homecoming/spider-man-homecoming-5-things-marvel-studios-is-doing-wrong-with-the-wall-crawler-a151387
5. Spider-Man Is Iron Man's B*tch
It's clear that Peter idolises his new mentor, but Iron Man repays that by treating him the same way he did that kid in Iron Man 3. That's not bad for a few laughs, but Spider-Man deserves more respect than that. having his costume confiscated and a number of its abilities made off limits is far from the best way to handle the character's reintroduction in this movie and him reporting to Iron Man
4. Peter Parker's Fancy New Costume
Marvel appears to have forgotten the essence of what makes Spidey great. That is the fact he comes up with his own solutions and inventions, this just feels like a lazy storytelling decision.
3. Spider-Man Is A Loser
Peter Parker has always been a bit of a loser, but that's what makes him so endearing. When he puts the Spider-Man costume on, however, things change and he becomes a cockier, brash hero who will do anything to save the day. Sure, he doesn't always get it right and makes mistakes, but Spider-Man: Homecoming appears to be portraying the wall-crawler as a joke.
seeing him treated like a numbskull by Tony Stark and helping old ladies cross the street and stopping bicycle thieves may not be quite as funny as Marvel thinks. Hell, the trailer makes it clear that he can't even put an end to a bank robbery without screwing up pretty much an entire neighbourhood, and while him tackling street level crime is a smart move, it just doesn't seem like the young - and dumb - hero can even get that right.
2. A Shared, But Non-Shared, Spider-Man Universe
The news that Tom Hardy will be suiting up as Venom is massively exciting, but it's disappointing that his Eddie Brock will more than likely never get to cross paths with Tom Holland's Peter Parker.
1. One Too Many Ties To The Avengers
everything we've seen from Spider-Man: Homecoming points to the reboot being crammed with mostly unnecessary references to this shared universe.
it makes Spidey feel like something of an afterthought as he basically cleans up a mess Earth's Mightiest Heroes are too important or busy to deal with.
So you're pissed they didn't forget they built a larger Universe, and you're pissed they decided to try something new? Geez, leave it to you we'd still be reading by candlelight. Are you kidding? The sun shines out of DC-Fan's behind. SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 7, 2017 16:31:28 GMT
Meanwhile, in the shadowy corridors of Marvel HQ, Kevin Feige nervously ponders when the mysterious "Fan" will strike again with yet another scathing expose on the MCU.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 7, 2017 18:56:45 GMT
Meanwhile, in the shadowy corridors of Marvel HQ, Kevin Feige nervously ponders when the mysterious "Fan" will strike again with yet another scathing expose on the MCU. Kevin Feige is probably holed up in his office at MCU HQ crying that he refused to give Patty Jenkins the creative freedom to make a better Thor: Dark World movie. If Feige had only given Patty Jenkins the creative freedom, then not only would she have made a better Thor: Dark World movie but also MCU could've let her direct Captain Marvel. But Feige refused to give Patty Jenkins the creative freedom so she went to DCEU and made the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 7, 2017 19:20:00 GMT
Meanwhile, in the shadowy corridors of Marvel HQ, Kevin Feige nervously ponders when the mysterious "Fan" will strike again with yet another scathing expose on the MCU. If Feige had only given Patty Jenkins the creative freedom, then not only would she have made a better Thor: Dark World movie but also MCU could've let her direct Captain Marvel. But Feige refused to give Patty Jenkins the creative freedom so she went to DCEU and made the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. Do you really imagine that is what he is doing? Is that what makes your sadistic fantasy live? Images of Kevin Feige crying - alone - about a disposable piece of entertainment made years ago? You're like the troll version of the Tooth Fairly. "Look at me everyone. Kevin is crying because I willed it to be so. I'm a god!"  SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 7, 2017 19:29:38 GMT
Meanwhile, in the shadowy corridors of Marvel HQ, Kevin Feige nervously ponders when the mysterious "Fan" will strike again with yet another scathing expose on the MCU. Kevin Feige is probably holed up in his office at MCU HQ crying that he refused to give Patty Jenkins the creative freedom to make a better Thor: Dark World movie. If Feige had only given Patty Jenkins the creative freedom, then not only would she have made a better Thor: Dark World movie but also MCU could've let her direct Captain Marvel. But Feige refused to give Patty Jenkins the creative freedom so she went to DCEU and made the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. Poor Kevin. Still, I bet his $50 milliom net worth is some consolation |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 7, 2017 19:39:57 GMT
Kevin Feige is probably holed up in his office at MCU HQ crying that he refused to give Patty Jenkins the creative freedom to make a better Thor: Dark World movie. If Feige had only given Patty Jenkins the creative freedom, then not only would she have made a better Thor: Dark World movie but also MCU could've let her direct Captain Marvel. But Feige refused to give Patty Jenkins the creative freedom so she went to DCEU and made the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. Poor Kevin. Still, I bet his $50 milliom net worth is some consolation Kevin Feige is a control freak who needs to be in control of everything. Money is no consolation to control freaks like that.
Patty Jenkins not only left Thor: The Dark World (resulting in Thor: the Dark World being a disappointingly bad movie) but also signed on with the DCEU and made Wonder Woman the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. For Feige, that's like adding insult to injury.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jun 7, 2017 19:49:12 GMT
Poor Kevin. Still, I bet his $50 milliom net worth is some consolation Kevin Feige is a control freak who needs to be in control of everything. Money is no consolation to control freaks like that.
Patty Jenkins not only left Thor: The Dark World (resulting in Thor: the Dark World being a disappointingly bad movie) but also signed on with the DCEU and made Wonder Woman the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. For Feige, that's like adding insult to injury.
Nah, Jenkins' ideas for Thor weren't that good. She got lucky with Wonder Woman because audiences went easy on it. |
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 7, 2017 19:52:36 GMT
Poor Kevin. Still, I bet his $50 milliom net worth is some consolation Kevin Feige is a control freak who needs to be in control of everything. Money is no consolation to control freaks like that.
Patty Jenkins not only left Thor: The Dark World (resulting in Thor: the Dark World being a disappointingly bad movie) but also signed on with the DCEU and made Wonder Woman the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. For Feige, that's like adding insult to injury.
It is so endearing that you continue to repeat this statement. With Supergirl, Cat Woman and Elektra being the only other ones I can think of, it's faint praise. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 7, 2017 21:14:24 GMT
Kevin Feige is a control freak who needs to be in control of everything. Money is no consolation to control freaks like that.
Patty Jenkins not only left Thor: The Dark World (resulting in Thor: the Dark World being a disappointingly bad movie) but also signed on with the DCEU and made Wonder Woman the greatest female-led superhero movie ever. For Feige, that's like adding insult to injury.
It is so endearing that you continue to repeat this statement. With Supergirl, Cat Woman and Elektra being the only other ones I can think of, it's faint praise. And yet, MCU still can't even make a female-led superhero movie that's better Supergirl, Catwoman, and Elektra. That's even more pathetic. You claim the bar was really low, but it's a bar that's still too high for MCU to even reach. LOL!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jun 7, 2017 21:27:58 GMT
Spiderman only did one thing wrong: forcing diversity for diversity's sake.
|
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 7, 2017 21:37:58 GMT
It is so endearing that you continue to repeat this statement. With Supergirl, Cat Woman and Elektra being the only other ones I can think of, it's faint praise. And yet, MCU still can't even make a female-led superhero movie that's better Supergirl, Catwoman, and Elektra. That's even more pathetic. You claim the bar was really low, but it's a bar that's still too high for MCU to even reach. LOL!!! There is a difference between "can't" and "haven't". Not quite as pathetic as taking 4 attempts to make a film that is appreciated by both public and critics, eh. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 7, 2017 21:38:01 GMT
Spiderman only did one thing wrong: forcing diversity for diversity's sake. I don't know dude... If you've ever been to a public High School in NYC, it isn't all white faces. It just isn't. SaveSaveSaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jun 7, 2017 22:11:05 GMT
Spiderman only did one thing wrong: forcing diversity for diversity's sake. I don't know dude... If you've ever been to a public High School in NYC, it isn't all white faces. It just isn't. SaveSaveSaveSaveYes it isn't, caucasians only amount to more than 50%, with the next biggest population being hispanics. That still doesn't excuse changing the traits of established characters just to claim that they're being diverse. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jun 7, 2017 22:19:34 GMT
I don't know dude... If you've ever been to a public High School in NYC, it isn't all white faces. It just isn't. SaveSaveSaveSaveYes it isn't, caucasians only amount to more than 50%, with the next biggest population being hispanics. That still doesn't excuse changing the traits of established characters just to claim that they're being diverse. It's either that or make up new characters, which would just piss off the audience as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jun 7, 2017 23:04:19 GMT
Yes it isn't, caucasians only amount to more than 50%, with the next biggest population being hispanics. That still doesn't excuse changing the traits of established characters just to claim that they're being diverse. It's either that or make up new characters, which would just piss off the audience as well. When has introducing new characters piss off audiences more than changing already established characters? |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 7, 2017 23:15:35 GMT
I don't know dude... If you've ever been to a public High School in NYC, it isn't all white faces. It just isn't. SaveSaveSaveSaveYes it isn't, caucasians only amount to more than 50%, with the next biggest population being hispanics. That still doesn't excuse changing the traits of established characters just to claim that they're being diverse. It doesn't excuse it but, it certainly does help to put it in perspective. I'm not a proponent or detractor of race swapping. All I can say is that when you are trying to introduce a 60-year-old character to a new generation of fans, you have to create a world that resembles the one they live in. It's a no-win situation. If you do, you're pandering (Fantastic Four). If you don't, you're not inclusive (Ghost in the Shell). eSaveSaveSave |
|
