|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Oct 3, 2018 22:36:58 GMT
Never seen them.
|
|
|
|
Post by QueenB on Oct 3, 2018 22:40:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Oct 3, 2018 23:56:44 GMT
Scream 3.
That movie was just so...tepid. Tepid and contrived. Not remotely scary and devoid of humour, it proved a complete waste of time IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2018 6:29:15 GMT
3 was the worst, but I wouldn’t say it sucked. It at least had some expansion on the lore of the series and I’ll admit Ronan is a pretty badass antagonist. Too bad the movie felt smarter than it was, and tried the movie-within-a-movie technique.  |
|
|
|
Post by hitchcockthelegend on Oct 5, 2018 18:12:25 GMT
Scream 4. For all its faults, Scream 3 at least gave the series a somewhat respectable conclusion. Scream 4 just has no reason for existing and is so far up its ass thinking it's being clever that it borders on unwatchable. BRAVO!  |
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Oct 6, 2018 17:21:15 GMT
Scream 4. For all its faults, Scream 3 at least gave the series a somewhat respectable conclusion. Scream 4 just has no reason for existing and is so far up its ass thinking it's being clever that it borders on unwatchable. The slasher genre changed, and where 2 was commenting on sequels and 3 trilogies, 4 was commenting on modern slashers and remakes. That's its reason for existing. It is a pretty smug movie, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous Andy on Oct 6, 2018 17:27:23 GMT
Scream 4. For all its faults, Scream 3 at least gave the series a somewhat respectable conclusion. Scream 4 just has no reason for existing and is so far up its ass thinking it's being clever that it borders on unwatchable. The slasher genre changed, and where 2 was commenting on sequels and 3 trilogies, 4 was commenting on modern slashers and remakes. That's its reason for existing. It is a pretty smug movie, though. I mean from a storytelling perspective, it has no reason to exist. The story had already been told and there was nothing being done with the main three that I felt justified continuing with a fourth film. And the less said about the new characters, the better. |
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Oct 6, 2018 19:18:11 GMT
The slasher genre changed, and where 2 was commenting on sequels and 3 trilogies, 4 was commenting on modern slashers and remakes. That's its reason for existing. It is a pretty smug movie, though. I mean from a storytelling perspective, it has no reason to exist. The story had already been told and there was nothing being done with the main three that I felt justified continuing with a fourth film. And the less said about the new characters, the better. I think it added to Sidney's arc. She's made peace with everything and no longer a victim. Dewey and Gale have kind of been running in place since the second one. I'm with you on the new characters, though 3's weren't a lot better. |
|
