|
|
Post by forca84 on Sept 23, 2022 17:39:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Sept 23, 2022 20:10:05 GMT
Does anyone care at this point?
They tried an interesting approach to making more movies in this psudo-sequel type of way, and it kinda worked once and failed miserably a second time. Going back to do a 'direct sequel' now seems like very weak approach at this stage.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Sept 23, 2022 23:34:37 GMT
Does anyone care at this point? They tried an interesting approach to making more movies in this psudo-sequel type of way, and it kinda worked once and failed miserably a second time. Going back to do a 'direct sequel' now seems like very weak approach at this stage. *worked for 80 minutes of one movie. And no, can't say that I care about this. |
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Sept 24, 2022 6:27:40 GMT
Does anyone care at this point? They tried an interesting approach to making more movies in this psudo-sequel type of way, and it kinda worked once and failed miserably a second time. Going back to do a 'direct sequel' now seems like very weak approach at this stage. most comments i see online,say they want a direct sequel, but is it always best to do what internet wants, considering these are relatively low budget the risk is low, paramount wants content for streaming , its a win for everyone
|
|
|
|
Post by forca84 on Sept 24, 2022 17:17:06 GMT
Exactly... I don't want another movie set in Space. That one was awful.. People have wanted a direct sequel for years. "Cloverfield lane" was decent. But no need to do another retread of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Sept 25, 2022 12:27:16 GMT
Does anyone care at this point? They tried an interesting approach to making more movies in this psudo-sequel type of way, and it kinda worked once and failed miserably a second time. Going back to do a 'direct sequel' now seems like very weak approach at this stage. most comments i see online,say they want a direct sequel, but is it always best to do what internet wants, considering these are relatively low budget the risk is low, paramount wants content for streaming , its a win for everyone I think those other sequels are relatively low budget productions, but another movie like the first, assuming that's the approach they'd take, would be quite pricey. A giant CGI monster attacking a city with crumbling buildings and lots of locations and huge effects, etc., is a costly affair. The last one in space was absolutely terrible, but the notion of doing these separate stories in different genres with only a distant event connecting them was a very novel idea. It's just that none of the movies were particularly good. It was an interesting experiment, but it didn't pan out. At this point, it just feels like another way for studio to keep IP going so that the rights don't lapse or something. Going back to do a traditional sequel at this point seems particularly bereft of creativity. But maybe there will be an audience that cares. I just don't imagine that at this stage this title carries much weight. |
|
