|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Dec 11, 2022 11:39:10 GMT
So I guess this film didn't go broke after all.
But I was told that it was woke!
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Dec 11, 2022 14:51:36 GMT
So I guess this film didn't go broke after all. But I was told that it was woke! $400M domestic ain't no joke!
|
|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Dec 11, 2022 14:59:08 GMT
Is it really only at 700 mil? That seems pretty low, no?
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Dec 11, 2022 16:01:59 GMT
Is it really only at 700 mil? That seems pretty low, no? for Marvel , yes, Avatar coming for it next weekend , should have been an easy billion
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Dec 11, 2022 18:02:25 GMT
Marvel movies print money and that coupled with the Paul Walker effect to see if any of the cast breaks down in tears during filming contributed to whatever success it got. The cast pretending they were doing this for Chadwick's memory and not the money prior to release was funnier than any MCU movie and they're pretty funny.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Dec 12, 2022 8:15:31 GMT
Is it really only at 700 mil? That seems pretty low, no? No China or Russia release, and no Chadwick. Considering those things, it's doing fine.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Dec 26, 2022 21:18:02 GMT
It hit $800 million.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Dec 28, 2022 6:57:34 GMT
big drop , not a bomb, but diznee disappointed , i don't know what hits a billion anymore besides a avenger flick , maybe deadpool 3
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Dec 29, 2022 13:22:24 GMT
Nearly a three hour runtime and it didn't even feature the title character. $800M, I'd call that a win.
|
|
|
Post by Spike Del Rey on Dec 29, 2022 13:50:08 GMT
Nearly a three hour runtime and it didn't even feature the title character. $800M, I'd call that a win. And no China, no Russia.
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Dec 29, 2022 14:08:53 GMT
big drop , not a bomb, but diznee disappointed , i don't know what hits a billion anymore besides a avenger flick , maybe deadpool 3 Avatar 2 maybe? The film currently in cinemas now? Right under your nose?
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Dec 29, 2022 14:12:55 GMT
Nearly a three hour runtime and it didn't even feature the title character. $800M, I'd call that a win. Don't go crazy the title character Black Panther did feature just not played by the same character. You could put Ben Shapiro in a Black Panther costume and people would still watch. Name the movie Shuri next time and then see if it brings in as much.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 29, 2022 14:30:18 GMT
Nearly a three hour runtime and it didn't even feature the title character. $800M, I'd call that a win. Don't go crazy the title character Black Panther did feature just not played by the same character. You could put Ben Shapiro in a Black Panther costume and people would still watch. Name the movie Shuri next time and then see if it brings in as much. That's like saying that only Jay Garrick can be the Flash and movies about Barry Allen should just be called "Barry".
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Dec 29, 2022 14:36:39 GMT
Nearly a three hour runtime and it didn't even feature the title character. $800M, I'd call that a win. Don't go crazy the title character Black Panther did feature just not played by the same character. You could put Ben Shapiro in a Black Panther costume and people would still watch. Name the movie Shuri next time and then see if it brings in as much.Choose an argument. The first bolded sentence leads me to believe people would watch as long as Shuri wore the Black Panther costume. Not the same character, and it isn't even a top tier MCU flick in my opinion. Speculation on why, or how it would do next time doesn't change the fact that this movie made $800M. Personally, I don't care how much it made, I'm not a Disney stockholder. I just think it's interesting how people keep insisting it's a box office failure when its performance suggests otherwise. In an era where movies come and go, it's still going strong in theaters nearly two months after its initial release. It made over five and a half million dollars from Dec 25th through the 27th, going up against Avatar 2.
People are still going to see it 47 days after its release, when they could be seeing the biggest phenomenon in the history of film instead. There's simply no arguing that it wasn't as successful as the first, but it is equally inarguable that it was a success.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Dec 29, 2022 17:49:19 GMT
Pretty good numbers everything considered (no China release, no Chadwick, etc.). I think we (the audience) need to get back to more realistic box office expectations. Not so long ago a $1 billion BO was lightning in a bottle and $800 million would have been considered a massive success. People just got used to MCU movies that kept breaking the $1 billion mark but the reality is that very very few blockbusters can reach that. $800 million is more than enough of a win.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Dec 29, 2022 18:29:42 GMT
big drop , not a bomb, but diznee disappointed , i don't know what hits a billion anymore besides a avenger flick , maybe deadpool 3 Avatar 2 maybe? The film currently in cinemas now? Right under your nose? i was thinking about Marvel only , used to be an easy billion for them , Marvel probably outgrossed by the little fish girl next year too
|
|
havenless
Sophomore
@havenless
Posts: 715
Likes: 311
|
Post by havenless on Dec 31, 2022 2:51:26 GMT
Avatar 2 maybe? The film currently in cinemas now? Right under your nose? i was thinking about Marvel only , used to be an easy billion for them , Marvel probably outgrossed by the little fish girl next year too hmm, that’ll be tough to say outright. I think Guardians will be their biggest movie from here until Kang Dynasty
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Dec 31, 2022 4:33:16 GMT
i was thinking about Marvel only , used to be an easy billion for them , Marvel probably outgrossed by the little fish girl next year too hmm, that’ll be tough to say outright. I think Guardians will be their biggest movie from here until Kang Dynasty the last movie only made in 800m range, the next film will likely have China and Russia missing from box office , i think it will struggle to hit 900m , where will the box office growth come from ?
|
|
havenless
Sophomore
@havenless
Posts: 715
Likes: 311
|
Post by havenless on Jan 2, 2023 17:25:30 GMT
hmm, that’ll be tough to say outright. I think Guardians will be their biggest movie from here until Kang Dynasty the last movie only made in 800m range, the next film will likely have China and Russia missing from box office , i think it will struggle to hit 900m , where will the box office growth come from ? marvel’s natural progressions of their franchises. Iron Man to Iron Man 2 to Iron Man 3 made increasingly more money until the third made over a billion dollars even without China Captain America to Winter Soldier to Civil War made increasingly more money until the third made over a billion dollars, and still made way more than Winter Soldier without China Thor to Dark World to Ragnarok made increasingly more money until the third didn’t make a billion, but was 60% more successful than the first. Avengers to Infinity War. IW didn’t make the 500m$ difference in China alone. Ant-Man, AMATW, undoubtedly Quantumania. Unless the movie is critically panned, it’ll be marketed as the swan song for the team and more than likely way outgross Vol. 2, even missing China’s gross. And Russia has minimal impact on worldwide grosses of these movies. Strange 2 nearly broke a billion, No Way Home nearly had 2 Billion all without China. These are still highly demanded enterprises for viewing public. Guardians are arguably Marvel’s biggest franchise after Spider-Man and outside of the Avengers tent pole movies now, just depends on how successful little mermaid is (and if that is okay’d for a China release. The way they reacted to the Halle Bailey casting may persuade the government to give a BS reason to ban it)
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jan 3, 2023 15:36:18 GMT
|
|