Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2017 1:12:46 GMT
9
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jun 2, 2017 1:16:42 GMT
10. One of my favorite films.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 2, 2017 2:50:10 GMT
4/10. Really didn't care for its unintentional goofiness. Reeves ruined it.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Jun 2, 2017 3:14:40 GMT
4/10
|
|
|
|
Post by rateater on Jun 2, 2017 4:50:45 GMT
9. it's not perfect but i'm glad it exists.
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Jun 2, 2017 9:44:27 GMT
3/10
It's just laughable enough to make parts of it sort of entertaining. I've tried to like it and every few years will give it a chance but it's really shitty. Bad acting all over the place. Scenery chewing galore. Painful accents. It seems like everyone & everything is trying too hard. One of the worst Dracula movies ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raimo47 on Jun 2, 2017 10:40:07 GMT
10/10. The best movie I have ever seen.
|
|
maxwellperfect
Junior Member
@maxwellperfect
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 1,683
|
Post by maxwellperfect on Jun 2, 2017 15:50:01 GMT
8/10 for effects/costuming/design.
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Jun 2, 2017 18:26:40 GMT
6/10
Not even Winona Ryder or Keaunu Reeves terrible "acting" could make this into a bad film, at least not for me, which I guess is a pretty good compliment, but compared to several other Dracula versions, this is probably one of the more ok, or decent ones.
Of course it did not help me much by having just seen Leslie Nielsen as Count Dracula in Mel Brooks Dracula: Dead and Loving It (1995), before I got to watch Dracula (1992) for the first time.
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Jun 2, 2017 19:06:16 GMT
The Story is confusing but maybe it was so already when Bram Stoker wrote it, Thanks to seeing Bela and Chris Lee's version (and Nosferatu with Max Schreck) I got the story, and visually I rate this among Coppolas best movies, and for once Keannu Revves usual stiffness in acting worked 9/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 0:27:08 GMT
There were a few things that really dragged this one down for me. First was the casting of Oldman. I think he is a great actor but totally wrong for this role. Not once was convinced he was Dracula. Not as important but maybe more painful was the casting of Keanu Reeves as Harker. His attempts at an English accent were baffling. Again, in the right role he can be very good but totally wrong in every way for this one.
5/10
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 3, 2017 1:37:12 GMT
6/10Not even Winona Ryder or Keaunu Reeves terrible "acting" could make this into a bad film, at least not for me, which I guess is a pretty good compliment, but compared to several other Dracula versions, this is probably one of the more ok, or decent ones. Of course it did not help me much by having just seen Leslie Nielsen as Count Dracula in Mel Brooks Dracula: Dead and Loving It (1995), before I got to watch Dracula (1992) for the first time. Dracula: Dead and Loving It is a fucking masterpiece! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2017 11:07:38 GMT
It's ok, but not much more than that. A 6 for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by sjg on Jun 5, 2017 13:15:27 GMT
6/10
|
|
|
|
Post by chalk2 on Jul 21, 2017 4:00:30 GMT
I enjoyed it enough for 9/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Nov 27, 2018 17:08:28 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 27, 2018 19:39:44 GMT
7/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 27, 2018 19:51:07 GMT
7/10. Dracula was way too sympathetic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Nov 27, 2018 22:04:42 GMT
7/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2018 2:49:10 GMT
8
I really enjoyed it. Had a silly campy vibe that hit me just right.
|
|
