|
|
Post by gspdude on Aug 9, 2021 12:00:55 GMT
 Motel Hell(1980) Hadn't seen this in a very long time, probably the 80s, so I didn't remember a lot of it and was happily surprised many times. A horror-comedy with just enough horror to keep me interested and just enough (dark) comedy to keep me amused. Rory Calhoun does a good job as Farmer Vincent who waylays travelers to supply his thriving meat business. Nancy Parsons is his even crazier sister and Nina Axelrod is the pretty girl protagonist. I enjoyed the hour and a half more than I thought I would. 6/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Aug 9, 2021 19:56:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Aug 12, 2021 2:24:21 GMT
Some movies come along that make you wonder if existence is but a cruel joke played on us measly mortals by capricious gods. 88 Minutes (2007, dir. Jon Avnet) is a good piece of evidence in favor of that theory.  This is fabulously, fantastically bad. Every single thing in it is so unintentionally hilarious that it seems like director Jon Avnet, writer Gary Scott Emerson, and 19—count ’em, 19!—other producers, executive producers, associate producers, line producers, and co-producers were trying to get it wrong. Do I even need to say Pacino is dreadful? He gives a long monologue on his sister’s death and then snaps, “OK, time to go home.” Somehow, his performance here is even worse than in the equally bad—but less fun— Hangman (2017), in which he’s clearly there just for a paycheck. Here it feels like he’s sorta trying in some scenes but failing to deliver a single good moment or even line reading. Speaking of lines, I don’t know Gary Scott Emerson, but he apparently thinks human beings speak in shouty exposition to each other. (It’s not only Pacino who gets to get shouty either!) Pacino has this one gem of a line when a university dean, whom he knows well, enters the room: “ Ah, Dean Johnson.” She gets to speak the equally scintillating “Someone called in a bomb threat. Everyone evacuate the building immediately. Thank you.” That thank you just adds the perfect, beautiful bad-movie touch. Avnet’s direction is so bad that, as the late, great critic Ken Hanke pointed out in his review, the viewer thinks it took nine years for a seaplane to take off. Note that the seaplane has nothing to do with the movie. It is in there simply to make the flick seem more artsy. The pretentiousness, needless to say, is just the icing on the cake. This is a masterpiece of bad movie making. It should be used in the dictionary to define “so bad it’s good.” EDIT: Forgot to note that I know why Pacino agreed to the project. He gets to surround himself with hot women, all of whom find a 67-year-old, disco-haired, paunchy, unshaven psychology professor the man of their dreams.
|
|
|
|
Post by theravenking on Aug 12, 2021 13:19:27 GMT
Mystery on Monster Island (1981; Juan Piquer Simón)  Very losely based on Jules Verne's classic The Mysterious Island, this notorious stinker is one of those "so bad it's almost good" type of "classics". Wealthy William T. Kolderup (Peter Cushing) buys an island at an auction, outbidding his sinister rival Taskinar (Terence Stamp). He decides to send his young nephew Jeff Morgan (Ian Sera) who is just about to get married, but would love to go on an adventure, to explore the island. Along for the ride is professor Thomas Artelect (David Hatton), a quixotic weirdo. On their journey they get shipwrecked and end up on an island full of bizarre and frightening creatures. The opening scene throws the viewer into the midst of some action. Apparantly some sort of treasure hunt has gone out of control with various fractions of hunters fighting each other. It's so shoddily directed and confusing that it's difficult to make out what's happening exactly. Soon we are introduced to terence Stamp's character playing the cold-hearted antagonist who is after a great treasure on the island. Sadly Stamp's role turns out to be more of a cameo, just like Peter Cushing's contribution. So we are left with far weaker actors to carry the movie. Clearly helmer Simon wasn't concerned too much with directing his actors, who get free reign to overperform, David Hatton's professor is Razzie-worthy in this regard. The monsters are cheaply made, badly animated and provide source for much hilarity. There is also a chimp wearing shoes and some inane attempts at delivering genuine scares which end up as utterly pedestrian. It has a 3.8 imdb score, but I didn't think it was one of the worst films ever made like some reviewers seem to suggest. Okay it IS bad, but not offensively so. Overall it's worth checking out if you are in the right mood and like cheap fantasy trash. 4/10
|
|
|
|
Post by theravenking on Aug 12, 2021 13:34:39 GMT
Some movies come along that make you doubt if existence is but a cruel joke played on us measly mortals by capricious gods.
Oh dear, I know I've seen this, but it must've gotten relegated to the part of my brain where memories of nightmares and really unpleasant experiences are stored. It had the lovely Alicia Witt, that's the only positive thing I remember about it.
On the other hand it must be great to be Al Pacino, being able to afford sleepwalking through trash like this and still worshipped as a legend.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Aug 12, 2021 14:01:07 GMT
Some movies come along that make you doubt if existence is but a cruel joke played on us measly mortals by capricious gods.
Oh dear, I know I've seen this, but it must've gotten relegated to the part of my brain where memories of nightmares and really unpleasant experiences are stored. It had the lovely Alicia Witt, that's the only positive thing I remember about it.
On the other hand it must be great to be Al Pacino, being able to afford sleepwalking through trash like this and still worshipped as a legend.
 Witt is indeed in it, and indeed very lovely. I can easily say she’s the best thing about the movie. (The movie also includes Amy Brenneman, who played my favorite of Frasier’s girlfriends.) Re: Pacino, I just feel bad for anyone younger than I am who only sees him in these horrible movies. He can act, really, honestly, no foolin’!
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 12, 2021 15:54:14 GMT
Some movies come along that make you wonder if existence is but a cruel joke played on us measly mortals by capricious gods. 88 Minutes (2007, dir. Jon Avnet) is a good piece of evidence in favor of that theory.  This is fabulously, fantastically bad. Every single thing in it is so unintentionally hilarious that it seems like director John Avnet, writer Gary Scott Emerson, and 19—count ’em, 19!—other producers, executive producers, associate producers, line producers, and co-producers were trying to get it wrong. Do I even need to say Pacino is dreadful? He gives a long monologue on his sister’s death and then snaps, “OK, time to go home.” Somehow, his performance here is even worse than in the equally bad—but less fun— Hangman (2017), in which he’s clearly there just for a paycheck. Here it feels like he’s sorta trying in some scenes but failing to deliver a single good moment or even line reading. Speaking of lines, I don’t know Gary Scott Emerson, but he apparently thinks human beings speak in shouty exposition to each other. (It’s not only Pacino who gets to get shouty either!) Pacino has this one gem of a line when a university dean, whom he knows well, enters the room: “ Ah, Dean Johnson.” She gets to speak the equally scintillating “Someone called in a bomb threat. Everyone evacuate the building immediately. Thank you.” That thank you just adds the perfect, beautiful bad-movie touch. Avnet’s direction is so bad that, as the late, great critic Ken Hanke pointed out in his review, the viewer thinks it took nine years for a seaplane to take off. Note that the seaplane has nothing to do with the movie. It is in there simply to make the flick seem more artsy. The pretentiousness, needless to say, is just the icing on the cake. This is a masterpiece of bad movie making. It should be used in the dictionary to define “so bad it’s good.” EDIT: Forgot to note that I know why Pacino agreed to the project. He gets to surround himself with hot women, all of whom find a 67-year-old, disco-haired, paunchy, unshaven psychology professor the man of their dreams. They covered this movie on How Did This Get Made? and it's one of their funniest episodes. It made me sit down and watch this. I had a good time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Aug 12, 2021 16:46:36 GMT
They covered this movie on How Did This Get Made? and it's one of their funniest episodes. It made me sit down and watch this. I had a good time. Oh, I hadn’t even heard of that podcast! Will have to listen to that episode. Yes, it’s a very enjoyable movie—not for the reasons the filmmakers intended, one assumes, but very enjoyable just the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Aug 12, 2021 16:51:30 GMT
Mystery on Monster Island (1981; Juan Piquer Simón) Overall it's worth checking out if you are in the right mood and like cheap fantasy trash. 4/10 The only thing I liked in it was the monster scene where they used forced perspective--it was like one of those Amicus giant monster movies but with better camera work. The eccentric sidekick guy was so annoying-I was hoping Peter Cushing would give him a slap.
I wanted to rewatch it again though.
Interesting Kevin Connor directed all those McClure fantasy movies before he did Motel Hell. I think it was his last feature film. I think I would have liked Motel Hell better if it was serious.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 12, 2021 17:02:43 GMT
They covered this movie on How Did This Get Made? and it's one of their funniest episodes. It made me sit down and watch this. I had a good time. Oh, I hadn’t even heard of that podcast! Will have to listen to that episode. Yes, it’s a very enjoyable movie—not for the reasons the filmmakers intended, one assumes, but very enjoyable just the same. Yeah, it's run by Paul Scheer, June Diane Raphael, and Jason Mantzoukas. They look back on movies that were either bad or insane or both. Some episodes actually compelled me to watch some of the films discussed just for giggles.
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Aug 12, 2021 18:39:02 GMT
The Hidden Hand 1942 with Milton Parsons and Cecil Cunningham as siblings, he has escaped from an insane asylum with her help, to scare other relatives away who is just waiting for her to die and inherit money. She lives in a big house filled with trap doors and secret passages. The hero is played by the future star of 1950'sTV-series Peter Gunn, Craig Stevens. This is mostly played for laughs, and is quit entertaining for it's 65 minutes or so. This actor Milton Parsons (1904-1980), is one of those actors whose face seems to be made for playing insane characters, though maybe not in all 99 movies he acted in. 
|
|
|
|
Post by lostinlimbo on Aug 13, 2021 5:24:38 GMT
  Had a back-to-back sitting of Howling II: Your Sister is a Werewolf & IV: The Original Nightmare. Been some time since I’ve watched these two Howling sequels. Part 2 was just as ridiculous as I remembered. Werewolf orgies, new wave music, lousy werewolf costumes and over-the-top gore filmed mostly in Czechoslovakia. Christopher Lee, Sybil Danning and Reb Brown just kicking back. Probably enjoyed it more than last time. While Part 4 (a virtual po-faced remake of the original that was supposedly more faithful to the novel) remained just as bland except for the impressive final 10 minutes of oozing make-up fx and varied werewolf designs. Romy Windsor was a likeable lead which made the uneventfulness bearable.     Aw, you skipped over The Marsupials? I don’t know if my brain could handle a double shot of Philippe Mora. Before this Howling double shot. Part 3 was actually the last howling film I had watched. And it’s probably the entry I’ve seen more often.
|
|
|
|
Post by gspdude on Aug 14, 2021 1:19:34 GMT
 The City of the Dead (1960) aka Horror Hotel. Atmospheric B&W horror about devil worshiping witches in a small (and very foggy) New England town who must make 2 human sacrifices a year. Christopher Lee has a supporting role. 6/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Aug 16, 2021 2:23:16 GMT
 As a teen I really liked this one but not so much now. Too silly and and I hated that Springwood became a crazy town. The last 20 minutes or so is decent though. Love that end credits montage. 5/10
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Aug 16, 2021 2:28:10 GMT
 Surprisingly not a bad flick. Slow to start but a decent thriller. 6/10
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Aug 16, 2021 2:29:33 GMT
 Look I found the worst horror movie ever! Nothing happens in this horribly boring nothing of a film. Just walking around. Thats it really. 1/10
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Aug 16, 2021 2:31:00 GMT
 Horrible but almost charming its so bad. Gory as hell but the guts all looks like raw chicken. 2/10
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Aug 16, 2021 2:32:38 GMT
 One of my favorite horror films! 10/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous Andy on Aug 16, 2021 14:53:27 GMT
 A refreshingly demented experience. Susan Tyrell knocks it out of the park as the crazy aunt who loves her nephew just a little too much, while Bo Svenson just spews filth everywhere, increasing the "ick" factor by at least 50% every time he is on screen. This film also features a badass logging truck death that predates Final Destination 2 by two decades as well as a surprisingly competent portrayal of a gay man who is just... a character in the movie and not a source for cheap jokes. 8/10
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Aug 17, 2021 17:35:43 GMT
When a Stranger Calls 1979 It starts good, with Carol Kane as a babysitter who is terrorized by a persistent caller on a telephone repeating "Have you checked the children?", and up to when a policeman who she has called for help earlier calls back and tells her "Listen to me. We've traced the call... it's coming from inside the house". Then when the story moves forward 7 years I kind of lost interest, until the last 20 minutes or so when Carol Kane's character returns. For being a well known slasher movie, it was surprisingly slasher free, at least visually. Can't help but being a bit disappointed, though nice to see Kane in something different than her usual roles.
|
|