maxwellperfect
Junior Member
@maxwellperfect
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 1,683
|
Post by maxwellperfect on Jul 27, 2018 22:31:11 GMT
Rewatched 'Triangle.'
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 1, 2018 0:17:52 GMT
The Descent (2005) - 8/10
Pretty darn good flick. A claustrophobic setting and tone and the creatures were pretty creepy. It also does a good job at making us feel like we're with the characters in these caves. The ending however, was a letdown. I'm not sure whether it is altered or not, but I was watching the Unrated Cut. I guess it is a suspenseful ending that is used once in a while in a horror movie for the audience to wonder what'll happen next. Carpenter's The Thing did this as well but it was executed better.
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on Aug 1, 2018 0:56:38 GMT
The Descent (2005) - 8/10 Pretty darn good flick. A claustrophobic setting and tone and the creatures were pretty creepy. It also does a good job at making us feel like we're with the characters in these caves. The ending however, was a letdown. I'm not sure whether it is altered or not, but I was watching the Unrated Cut. I guess it is a suspenseful ending that is used once in a while in a horror movie for the audience to wonder what'll happen next. Carpenter's The Thing did this as well but it was executed better. Actually jamesbamesy the ending on this film The Descent from 2005 is really " an open-ended / cliffhanger type one " because it's been set up for the sequel The Descent Part 2 from 2009 ( definitely to be picked up where the last film left off - most clever indeed - IMPO ) . IMPO - I also would recommend watching both these films back to back because it flows really well together and it definitely fills in the blanks from the first film as well . I totally agree " The Descent " really is an effectively creepy & intense film and I gave this one ( and it's sequel ) a rating of 9 each . As for John Carpenter's The Thing from 1982 IMPO - I believe the ending of that film was to be left entirely up to the viewer most likely because there was to be no sequel made for it at all . Thanks so much for your reply .
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 1, 2018 8:23:51 GMT
The Descent (2005) - 8/10 Pretty darn good flick. A claustrophobic setting and tone and the creatures were pretty creepy. It also does a good job at making us feel like we're with the characters in these caves. The ending however, was a letdown. I'm not sure whether it is altered or not, but I was watching the Unrated Cut. I guess it is a suspenseful ending that is used once in a while in a horror movie for the audience to wonder what'll happen next. Carpenter's The Thing did this as well but it was executed better. Actually jamesbamesy the ending on this film The Descent from 2005 is really " an open-ended / cliffhanger type one " because it's been set up for the sequel The Descent Part 2 from 2009 ( definitely to be picked up where the last film left off - most clever indeed - IMPO ) . That's what I meant, but you're welcome!
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Aug 1, 2018 19:20:43 GMT
Knowing very well that this is not a horror movie, but there is a lot of references that he looks like Boris Karloff: Raymond Massey in Arsenic and Old Lace 1944
|
|
|
Post by lostinlimbo on Aug 3, 2018 7:32:25 GMT
Just chilling out with the Ghoulies (1985). Puppets, black rituals and glowing (wonky) green eyes... takes awhile to get to the good stuff, but this headcase horror-comedy is harmless fluff when it finally kicks into gear with a few nice effects and outlandish thrills.
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 3, 2018 18:27:18 GMT
The Howling (1981) - 8/10 I saw this on TV some years ago, but never got fully into it till now. In my opinion, I think it's a little better than An American Werewolf in London. Both are great don't get me wrong, but this one had the better looking werewolves and I actually dug the ending in this movie. Too bad the online service I used to watch it kept on buffering repeatedly.
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 4, 2018 20:43:43 GMT
The Fly (1986) - 8/10
I never saw the 50's original, but I did hear this was possibly even better than the original. It is quite great, I must say. Jeff Goldblum puts in a good performance and the practical effects are spectacular.
|
|
|
Post by forca84 on Aug 4, 2018 22:51:30 GMT
"The 5th Wave" based on a Book. It was okay. Apocalypse/Alien invasion. It's more geared towards Teenagers. No word on a sequel. There are two other books in the series. Wondering if it will go the way of "Ender's Game" and never film a sequel.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Aug 6, 2018 2:56:23 GMT
Vampire in Brooklyn. It was the first time I've seen it and I was pleasantly surprised. It's not as good as Fright Night but it is in the same vein and is pretty well done.
|
|
|
Post by lostinlimbo on Aug 6, 2018 13:04:50 GMT
Re-watched Blood Beach (1980). The film’s poster artwork along with the tagline sells it; ”Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... you can't get to it!". Nice. However the end result isn’t as striking.
Simply an okay creature-feature that squanders it’s concept, possibly a little too dry and lackadaisical headed by charmless leads. Not enough of John Saxon as cranky police captain and Burt Young as a sarcastic detective. Most of the time they’re standing around clueless and bickering to what’s going on, but I actually enjoyed all their scenes. Can’t say the same for everything else, including some of the repetitive, if rib-tickling attack sequences. In the end it doesn’t add up to much with the decent looking monster design (when we finally see it) wasted for quite a lame, and unimpressive climax, but at least it had wicked closing shots.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Aug 7, 2018 14:54:28 GMT
The Snowman (2017)
Considering all the terrible reviews it got, I did not think this movie was anywhere close to being such an "awful" final product as so many seemed to think of it. I gotta be honest, I went in expecting the "worst" but what I ended up with was far off anything close to that as it was to be more of a mediocre/forgettable thriller which I guess once had some potential, as it had been hyped up for a long while by the norwegian media where people like Martin Scorsese would direct and Leonardo Di Caprio would star as detective Harry Hole.
While writer Jo Nesbø is among the most popular and best selling authors in my country, I have never read any of his books and went in with absolutely no background upon the main character Harry Hole, well beside that I know it is based upon Snømannen and that I have seen one other film based upon his books, which was the 2011 crime-thriller Headhunters. Maybe that was for the best, as I guess if I had a personal interest with the book series, then I might have been far more critical. However, this I think is taken from the 5th or 6th book based upon Harry Hole and we do not get to know much of him rather than he is yet another cliche ridden rough outsider cop/detective who has lots of private and personal problems, a broken up marriage and that seems to be it. His co-workers are neither that interesting or get much chances of getting to know them well either.
I thought Fassbender did a okay job with what little he got, but it was a sad sight to behold the once great Val Kilmer in such a depressive part where I am surprised they could not get any other actor, as it was not the biggest one and it all looked clumsy and amateurish. The film never really gets under my skin and become any close of exciting or thrilling, but it do contain some very beautiful scenes and use of locations, and I cannot understand why so many seemed to focus negatively on the nature shots used in the film, as that was probably one of the things the film actually did well. Not too much and not too litle, just about the right amount of time used on trying to create some much needed atmosphere.
Looking up all of the talented people involved along with the budget, The Snowman could have been so much better, however I wished they had used more scandinavian actors but I guess if so, this movie would maybe never be made which might have been the best way for everyone involved. Considering how good Headhunters in many parts was, it is a shame how things ended up with The Snowman as it had so much potential going, but somewhere along the way it all went very wrong.
For me, this was not even close of being one of the worst movies of 2017, instead I thought it was just another mediocre and disposable but still somewhat fairly entertaining movie which was much "better" than what I had feared and I ended up rating it a very kind:
5/10
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on Aug 7, 2018 19:20:05 GMT
I'm watching the movie The Others from 2001 on the channel IFC right now . This is one of my top favorite new-ish yet memorable ghostly horror flicks as well . This one definitely makes my list of Halloween films to watch on the month of October also .
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 7, 2018 21:41:29 GMT
I'm watching the movie The Others from 2001 on the channel IFC right now . This is one of my top favorite new-ish yet memorable ghostly horror flicks as well . This one definitely makes my list of Halloween films to watch on the month of October also . Solid movie. I saw it not too long ago and enjoyed it. It has an interesting twist, as well.
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on Aug 7, 2018 23:13:49 GMT
I'm watching the movie The Others from 2001 on the channel IFC right now . This is one of my top favorite new-ish yet memorable ghostly horror flicks as well . This one definitely makes my list of Halloween films to watch on the month of October also . Solid movie. I saw it not too long ago and enjoyed it. It has an interesting twist, as well. I quite agree here jamesbamesy . IMPO - If I were to give this film a rating it would definitely be a 10 also . Thanks so much for your reply .
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 7, 2018 23:55:28 GMT
Solid movie. I saw it not too long ago and enjoyed it. It has an interesting twist, as well. I quite agree here jamesbamesy . IMPO - If I were to give this film a rating it would definitely be a 10 also . Thanks so much for your reply . Actually I think I gave it 7.5 or 8. It isn't perfect but it's enjoyable.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Aug 10, 2018 8:19:26 GMT
Dracula (2006)
British BBC TV movie which seems to have taken certain liberties in changing a little of the story line/plot and recuding some of the main characters into almost, well having not exactly much time on screen, if any. I did not expect too much of it, as the DVD artwork made it look like a very cheap product, and it surely do suffers from some bad special effects and awful editing, and is never any close of reaching into an mediocre rating. However, I thought Marc Warren portrayed a good or creepy version of Count Dracula, but was let down by the lousy make up, but then again he come off as much more intimidating without it, and I remember him also for his nasty part in the Hogfather (2006). Some of the actors invovled are just not up for it, and look clumsy and amtaurish in how they delivered their lines and not even the great David Suchet has much to work with here, and I think manages to clock in about 5-8 minutes of time on screen.
All in all, a below average b-movie which I just picked up on sheer impulse, and will never watch again.
4/10
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Aug 13, 2018 2:50:13 GMT
I just watched "Animal" 2014. It was an average monster killing pretty people in the woods movie but enjoyable enough. 6/10
|
|
|
Post by James on Aug 14, 2018 15:26:44 GMT
Candyman: Farewell to the Flesh (1995) - 6.5/10
Well, it isn't nearly as good as the first one, but it's fine for what it is. Tony Todd steals the show of course, and the atmosphere and score carried from the original is still solid. However, its biggest flaw is the plot; we get so much to explore but it isn't explored very much. Also, the entire flashback where we get to see Candy's origin feels a bit pointless since we already know what had happened: showing it won't make much difference. And as for the character of Ethan (William O'Leary), he was completely wasted for a final confrontation between him and the titular villain, because his motives and story was very interesting up until he got killed for false assumptions of a death. Then again, I did see the last 20 min or so on TV one time, so I'm not too surprised since I already know what happened at the end.
Overall, not great, but okay if you're a fan of the predecessor. It at least keeps the same spirit and tone of the original with some decent kills (although they tend to be the same throughout - stab in the back).
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on Aug 14, 2018 22:30:10 GMT
I'm right now watching from my DVD Collection this film - Homicidal from 1961 . One of my top favorite William Castle films and definitely never tire of this intense film either .
|
|