|
|
Post by forca84 on Feb 25, 2021 22:13:57 GMT
Hondo
The last house on the left (original)
Bad Words
The Hobbit: an unexpected Journey
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 26, 2021 10:01:00 GMT
Tunnels (1989) by Mark Byers Aka Criminal Act, follows a couple of nosy female reporters on the lookout for a big story, down below the city streets and into the sewers. Yeah, I guess my luck with picking out impulsive gems and winners these recent weeks, have finally "caught up" with me, as now it seems to be back to "usual". Here I browsed through Youtube, looking for a good time, or at least some enjoyable b-movie fun, and this one, titled Tunnels, came with quite a promising theme of potential giant man eating rats, down below the streets. That, and knowing the great John Saxon had a part in there as well, was more than enough to convince me, to give it a go. Sadly, I kind of got the feeling, far too early on, where it might lead me. As this was really had more of a low budget, almost tv-production over it, like someone made an 90 minutes pilot episode of some crime-comedy show, that just never went any further. Sure, the leading women are beautiful and fine, they even have a certain charm and chemistry going, but there is not gigant man eating rats to be seen, only a big fat guy, a small angry midget, some long haired skinny dude, crawling around and a slimy yuppie business guy, and that is just a very misleading title and movie poster, and I got suckered into it. Yeah, Criminal Act might have suited it better, but still, it was not god awful, as it thankfully moved rather fast forward, and as already mentioned, the ladies were cute, but for fans of Saxon, he is probably in this mess, for no more than a few minutes in total. All in all, a good reminder to myself, that I really need to be a bit more picky when it comes to not only search up, but deciding which films to watch at night, as this was certainly not one I would recommend to anyone. Still, I guess I am not the only one who got fooled by the title and movie poster, but done is done, and it is time to move one, and hopefully be a bit more lucky with the next ones. 3/10
|
|
|
|
Post by mgmarshall on Feb 26, 2021 10:40:02 GMT
 Vampire CircusI've long heard that this one had a strong reputation and cult following, but like a lot of the later Hammer movies, it kinda fell a bit flat for me. Sure, there's more gore and tits (which I certainly won't complain about), but the production values are noticeably cheaper than their earlier works and the overall plot is pretty slapdash and sloppy. That being said, this one does have a little more creativity and energy than most of the later Dracula flicks Hammer churned out. The opening few minutes are very fun (and honestly feel like the ending to a better vampire movie); I really like the were-panther the lead vampire turns into; The lead vampire himself (who I swear is a dead ringer for Brian May) is pretty fun and hammy too, and is supported by a great henchwoman in Adrienne Corri, who just about carries the movie; the plague aspect of the story is an interesting wrinkle, but hardly exploited; there's likeable supporting turns from dwarf extraordinaire Skip Martin and future-Darth Vader David Prowse, who spends the entirety of his screen time pretty close to naked (which I'm also not complaining about); the human leads are all essentially bland and forgettable except for Thorley Walters and Robin Hardy, but the movie isn't afraid to get really downbeat and kill off most of its cast (including a bunch of child characters), which is an impulse that always earns my respect. All in all, I came away thinking it was nothing special, but I'll take it over, say, Lust for a Vampire or Dracula A.D. 1972.
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 26, 2021 10:57:03 GMT
Vampire CircusI've long heard that this one had a strong reputation and cult following, but like a lot of the later Hammer movies, it kinda fell a bit flat for me. Sure, there's more gore and tits (which I certainly won't complain about), but the production values are noticeably cheaper than their earlier works and the overall plot is pretty slapdash and sloppy. That being said, this one does have a little more creativity and energy than most of the later Dracula flicks Hammer churned out. The opening few minutes are very fun (and honestly feel like the ending to a better vampire movie); I really like the were-panther the lead vampire turns into; The lead vampire himself (who I swear is a dead ringer for Brian May) is pretty fun and hammy too, and is supported by a great henchwoman in Adrienne Corri, who just about carries the movie; the plague aspect of the story is an interesting wrinkle, but hardly exploited; there's likeable supporting turns from dwarf extraordinaire Skip Martin and future-Darth Vader David Prowse, who spends the entirety of his screen time pretty close to naked (which I'm also not complaining about); the human leads are all essentially bland and forgettable except for Thorley Walters and Robin Hardy, but the movie isn't afraid to get really downbeat and kill off most of its cast (including a bunch of child characters), which is an impulse that always earns my respect. All in all, I came away thinking it was nothing special, but I'll take it over, say, Lust for a Vampire or Dracula A.D. 1972. Been a while since I went on a Hammer Horror ride, might do so later this year, as watching them during fall at night time, is the time I usually prefer to see that kind of entertainment, as it fits so right with the time of the year and have a "cosy" atmosphere to it, at times. But yeah, I did notice from my last visit of the Hammer Horror DVD box-set I picked up, I think contained 18-20 of their releases, most were british made, but a few actually was american releases, or so I remembered, and I sure enjoyed the ones from the 50s and 60s the most, where those moving towards the 70s or beyond, never quite reached the same impact on me. Never heard of Vampire Circus, but then again, I have not been looking up any Hammer films of recently either. I did however notice, that the further to the 70s their films came, the bigger the "assets" of the female actresses got, and we sure did get a whole lot of cleavage, not that is a bad thing, but it felt like they went for something familiar with the Russ Meyer style and approach.  From The Horror of Frankenstein (1970), which I remember to be quite an enjoyable film, not only because of the beautiful women, but again, have not visited since fall of 2012 or 13, so I should probably do something about that, soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by mgmarshall on Feb 26, 2021 11:32:11 GMT
Vampire CircusI've long heard that this one had a strong reputation and cult following, but like a lot of the later Hammer movies, it kinda fell a bit flat for me. Sure, there's more gore and tits (which I certainly won't complain about), but the production values are noticeably cheaper than their earlier works and the overall plot is pretty slapdash and sloppy. That being said, this one does have a little more creativity and energy than most of the later Dracula flicks Hammer churned out. The opening few minutes are very fun (and honestly feel like the ending to a better vampire movie); I really like the were-panther the lead vampire turns into; The lead vampire himself (who I swear is a dead ringer for Brian May) is pretty fun and hammy too, and is supported by a great henchwoman in Adrienne Corri, who just about carries the movie; the plague aspect of the story is an interesting wrinkle, but hardly exploited; there's likeable supporting turns from dwarf extraordinaire Skip Martin and future-Darth Vader David Prowse, who spends the entirety of his screen time pretty close to naked (which I'm also not complaining about); the human leads are all essentially bland and forgettable except for Thorley Walters and Robin Hardy, but the movie isn't afraid to get really downbeat and kill off most of its cast (including a bunch of child characters), which is an impulse that always earns my respect. All in all, I came away thinking it was nothing special, but I'll take it over, say, Lust for a Vampire or Dracula A.D. 1972. Been a while since I went on a Hammer Horror ride, might do so later this year, as watching them during fall at night time, is the time I usually prefer to see that kind of entertainment, as it fits so right with the time of the year and have a "cosy" atmosphere to it, at times. But yeah, I did notice from my last visit of the Hammer Horror DVD box-set I picked up, I think contained 18-20 of their releases, most were british made, but a few actually was american releases, or so I remembered, and I sure enjoyed the ones from the 50s and 60s the most, where those moving towards the 70s or beyond, never quite reached the same impact on me. Never heard of Vampire Circus, but then again, I have not been looking up any Hammer films of recently either. I did however notice, that the further to the 70s their films came, the bigger the "assets" of the female actresses got, and we sure did get a whole lot of cleavage, not that is a bad thing, but it felt like they went for something familiar with the Russ Meyer style and approach. From The Horror of Frankenstein (1970), which I remember to be quite an enjoyable film, not only because of the beautiful women, but again, have not visited since fall of 2012 or 13, so I should probably do something about that, soon. Did you ever see Captain Clegg (or Night Creatures)? It's one of theirs I've always thought was really underrated. It's not strictly horror, but it's got a lot of atmosphere and is action-packed.
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 26, 2021 11:46:43 GMT
Captain Clegg? I guess with a title like that, I would probably have remembered it.
Well, I did search it up, and no. Have never seen it, nor heard about it before.
Looks like one which comes along with a strong cast, but judging from the usual high ratings (IMDb) of these Hammer titles, I often try not to let that get me too excited, as I have sadly experiences that the higher the ratings, the chances for bigger disappointments, have sadly often been what I got in return.
However, The Horror of Frankenstein and a few others, that is not as high rated, have done the exact opposite, and impressed or entertained me very much. In fact, way more than some of the highest rated Hammer titles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dramatic Look Gopher on Feb 27, 2021 4:57:32 GMT
 Blackenstein (1973) Eddie, a black Vietnam veteran who lost his limbs by stepping on a landmine, becomes a doctor's radical experiment of limb reattachment. But when a lab assistant tampers with DNA injections, Eddie becomes a deformed creature going on a murderous rampage. A dreary run-of-the-mill monster movie that lacks style and creativity, and with actors who perform like robots. The director has no idea how to effectively set up the attack scenes, just does a lot of quick cutting. And then there were those dramatic music cues that were used at inappropriate times, which was really annoying. Oh well, I'm sure fans of campy bad movies will enjoy this. |
|
|
|
Post by mgmarshall on Feb 27, 2021 6:50:25 GMT
Blackenstein (1973) Eddie, a black Vietnam veteran who lost his limbs by stepping on a landmine, becomes a doctor's radical experiment of limb reattachment. But when a lab assistant tampers with DNA injections, Eddie becomes a deformed creature going on a murderous rampage. A dreary run-of-the-mill monster movie that lacks style and creativity, and with actors who perform like robots. The director has no idea how to effectively set up the attack scenes, just does a lot of quick cutting. And then there were those dramatic music cues that were used at inappropriate times, which was really annoying. Oh well, I'm sure fans of campy bad movies will enjoy this. Eh, they can't all be as good as Blacula or Ganja & Hess...
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 27, 2021 11:55:09 GMT
Blackenstein (1973) Eddie, a black Vietnam veteran who lost his limbs by stepping on a landmine, becomes a doctor's radical experiment of limb reattachment. But when a lab assistant tampers with DNA injections, Eddie becomes a deformed creature going on a murderous rampage. A dreary run-of-the-mill monster movie that lacks style and creativity, and with actors who perform like robots. The director has no idea how to effectively set up the attack scenes, just does a lot of quick cutting. And then there were those dramatic music cues that were used at inappropriate times, which was really annoying. Oh well, I'm sure fans of campy bad movies will enjoy this. Damn, I guess I missed out this, sure I have watched both of the Blacula titles, the first one was actually kind of fun, however the second one was not, but I do have a soft spot for Blaxploitation cinema, specially during the early 70s, and also being reminded of the hilarious Doctor Funkenstein parodies by MADtv much later on, I wonder if the original might be worth to check up on.
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 27, 2021 12:08:22 GMT
Nightmare City (1980) by Umberto Lenzi Just as with the New York Ripper I saw a while ago, I seemed to have purchased this film twice. Once through a Anchor Bay release, then later on a Scandinavian uncut remastered 2007 DVD. Anyway, I know I have seen it earlier, but must be a very long time, as I had not rated it, through either my older IMDb account nor the Letterboxd one, so I decided to give it another go. Well, the film sure do not waste its time on building much of a story or "deep" character backgrounds, as just within a few minutes in, and we are introduced to a bunch of crazy, murdering, axe, knife and gun wielding lunatics, who is the recent result of an radioactive leak, and where a tv journalist and his crewman arrives at an large airport, expecting some German expert to arrive, instead, well we get total madness. Yeah, I kind of dig these kind of rapid moving and surprisingly clever zombies/mutants/creatures, who has a taste for human blood, but where some sure enjoy a bit of female titties as well, but who can blame them? I only wished the film would try to slow things down a bit, like maybe adding some creepy atmosphere, once in a while, but instead we get a bunch of unlikeable and rather dull characters, who I could not care any less of what happened to, and the main anti-hero, is almost more of zombie-looking creature, than the zombies themselves, I mean talk about showing your "emotions". Okay, so I did not expect some Academy Award acting here, but could it have hurt, to hire a more likeable couple in the lead? I almost wished the creatures would kill them off, as soon as possible. Anyway, the film sure moves, one rapid and violent attack, after another. Sadly, for one who seems to prefer the slower and more atmospheric zombie releases, or have a bit more interesting and enjoyable main leads, this film got a bit too much of the same stuff, happening, again and again. Sure, for those more interested in gruesome special effects, killings and cheese, might love this, far more than me. But once again, another hyped up italian zombie/mutant film that just never really got a hold of me, but I gotta give it some credits, as I sure enjoyed the pacy zombies, but they just looked too silly and never scary, at all. More like someone attempted on re-creating the Wolfman style from the 40s and 50s, but forgot to add the hair on their face and hands. Still, it was not all bad, and I am probably a bit too generous, but I think it lies somewhere around: 6/10
|
|
|
|
Post by gspdude on Feb 27, 2021 13:48:15 GMT
 The Eternal(1998) Odd movie about a Woman who takes her husband and young son to Ireland to meet her aging grandmother at her family's estate. Finds her Uncle(Christopher Walken) has been keeping the mummified corpse of an ancient witch in the basement. Hmmm, what are the odds he plans to revive it? Sufficiently creepy. 6.5/10. |
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 27, 2021 13:59:47 GMT
The Eternal(1998) Odd movie about a Woman who takes her husband and young son to Ireland to meet her aging grandmother at her family's estate. Finds her Uncle (Christopher Walken) has been keeping the mummified corpse of an ancient witch in the basement. Hmmm, what are the odds he plans to revive it? Sufficiently creepy. 6.5/10. Well, now I just have to see it. Hm, somehow I ended up going from Walken and mummified stiffs, into a similar named film (The Eternal/Trance) well, at least the Trance part that is, and that stars Martin Kove and Robert Z'Dar, if I continue on further, I will never manage to ge through and finish off my watchlist. Anyway, I guess since the Walken film is nowhere to find on Youtube, I might have to check up on that later on, still it sounds very interesting for sure, the Kove film however, I might actually visit later this night.
|
|
|
|
Post by gspdude on Feb 27, 2021 14:18:20 GMT
The Eternal(1998) Odd movie about a Woman who takes her husband and young son to Ireland to meet her aging grandmother at her family's estate. Finds her Uncle (Christopher Walken) has been keeping the mummified corpse of an ancient witch in the basement. Hmmm, what are the odds he plans to revive it? Sufficiently creepy. 6.5/10. Well, now I just have to see it. Hm, somehow I ended up going from Walken and mummified stiffs, into a similar named film (The Eternal/Trance) well, at least the Trance part that is, and that stars Martin Kove and Robert Z'Dar, if I continue on further, I will never manage to ge through and finish off my watchlist. Anyway, I guess since the Walken film is nowhere to find on Youtube, I might have to check up on that later on, still it sounds very interesting for sure, the Kove film however, I might actually visit later this night. The original title of this movie was Trance, however it is on Youtube as Eternal 1998, which is where I watched it.
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 27, 2021 14:24:50 GMT
Thanks, I need to look it up, as Walken is among my favorite actors, and it sounded like a good/entertaining midnight flick, and I am in bad need of a few of those right now. Have not been exactly too "lucky" with my recent impulsive choices, so maybe this time I might be more successful.
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 27, 2021 14:30:17 GMT
Well, easier said than done. Sadly for me, the video of The Eternal 1998 (full version), is blocked or unavailable.  The blocked video part, is something that is happening far too often these last few months, and I also noticed that every other comment section, is completely wiped out, and that is half the fun gone. Still, I guess it might show up some day later, I hope. |
|
|
|
Post by gspdude on Feb 27, 2021 14:39:48 GMT
Well, easier said than done. Sadly for me, the video of The Eternal 1998 (full version), is blocked or unavailable. The blocked video part, is something that is happening far too often these last few months, and I also noticed that every other comment section, is completely wiped out, and that is half the fun gone. Still, I guess it might show up some day later, I hope. Too bad, I guess availability depends on where you live. I see it is on TubiTV, if that is available to you. Good Luck!
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 27, 2021 14:59:56 GMT
Thanks. I guess I cannot complain, as there is so damn much lying around for free, and I do not have the time to watch everything and all, but when all of a sudden one learns about a new or unwatched, interesting title, containing one of my favorite actors, then that is something I really want to see. But, I guess I can wait out a little longer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dramatic Look Gopher on Feb 27, 2021 15:37:05 GMT
Blackenstein (1973) Eddie, a black Vietnam veteran who lost his limbs by stepping on a landmine, becomes a doctor's radical experiment of limb reattachment. But when a lab assistant tampers with DNA injections, Eddie becomes a deformed creature going on a murderous rampage. A dreary run-of-the-mill monster movie that lacks style and creativity, and with actors who perform like robots. The director has no idea how to effectively set up the attack scenes, just does a lot of quick cutting. And then there were those dramatic music cues that were used at inappropriate times, which was really annoying. Oh well, I'm sure fans of campy bad movies will enjoy this. Eh, they can't all be as good as Blacula or Ganja & Hess... And this one was trying to cash in on the success of Blacula.
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Feb 28, 2021 7:48:00 GMT
Zombie Flesh Eaters (1979) by Lucio Fulci Another late 70s/early 80s italian zombie release, one that went under several titles. In fact, a whole bunch, but is probably most known as Zombie 2, which seems to be a name or "franchise" that has caused a lot of confusion among horror fans and buyers. I should know, as these Zombie titles, have fooled me several times over when browsing through movie stores during the 00s, and by that, I mean, in either buying the same film, over and over, because of very (some ridiculously so) different artwork/titles, or I have stayed away, thinking that I was about to double-dip once more. Anyway, Zombie 2 or whatever the title most people refer to it as, was from the early go, something quite different, in style, atmosphere, acting and quality from Nightmare City (1980), and even if they kind of "shared" a similar introduction, but not through a big military airplane, full of murdering lunatic, instead we are meet up with an seemingly abandoned boat or luxury yacth, which has arrived New York City and when the local Police come insvestigating, well, damn talk about your nasty and down right nightmarish looking (and sounding) zombie. Quite a big difference to goofy looking fast paced bastards from Nightmare City, sure it had the pace and lots of violence, but something were missing, and I am glad Zombie 2 succeeded much better in creating the right tone, setting and also including a far superior cast, where a lot of praise must be delivered to the creepy as hell, looking zombies, who even if they were slow as hell, when they first attacked, it was brutal and gory, like I want my zombies to be, not a bunch of goofy clowns. Sure, the film kind of ends up with some rather annoying clichees, a zombie suddenly walks infront of the car, the car crashes, a guy damages his leg, the rest of the gang must carry him along, but the final siege with the three remaining characters, desperately fighting for their lives, that was some real good stuff. Also, the underwater scenes (one of the zombies even tried to wrestle and take a few bites out of a shark, reminded me of a similar scene with Jaws in one of the late 70s James Bond titles) and again, knowing it was a Fulci film, some incredible beautiful and stunning looking women included, but that is usually bad news for their part, as they got some gruesome and evil death scenes. Also, again, the atmosphere is also so heavy, because of the quality of the main score, done by Fabrio Frizzi and Giorgio Cascio. All in all, I might need another go at it, some day, but I am pretty sure this is one of the better or best of the late 70s and early 80s italian zombie releases, and a keeper for sure. 7,5/10 The Hitcher II: I’ve Been Waiting (2003) by Louis Morneau This DTV sequel, featuring C. Thomas Howell, back again as Jim Halsey, and older and more cynical version, who seems to have a talent of killing people in his line of duty, now working as cop. This leads his girlfriend (Kari Wuhrer) and his co-workers to start wonder, if he might be burnt out, and in need a long rest. Sure, he takes it, unwillingly, packs up and along with his girl, they settle out to the old dusty playgrounds of some 15 years ago, where John Ryder made Jim's life a nightmare, one that still seems to haunt him, and it does not get any better, when about to visiting an old friend, as a new creepy hitcher takes a seat in their car, and once again, the evils of the past is back. Well that was bad, real bad. I kind of went in, maybe a bit too naive and hopeful, that with the names of the main trio, Howell, Wuhrer and Jake Busey as the new baddie, might turn into an more enjoyable ride, than the terrible 2007 remake, well, sadly, that did not happen. In fact, I had to shut of the last 10-15 minutes, as I just completely lost my interest and was not gonna waste more time, on this piece of shit movie, I mean talk about letting the original down, big time. I understand that Howell probably had his personal problems, or at least of what I have heard/read, but those expecting the same kind of acting, as back in 1986, well, I did not think he was bad, just as the rest of the crew, either completely dry and uninspired, or just dull/hammy action and delivery, where some of the lines were used, again and again, as how many times did Kari Wuhrer ask her boyfriend if he was crazy? Almost turned into a drinking game at times, and Busey also disappointed, not a whole lot, but then again, coming up after Rutger Hauer, very few with such a bad movie script handed to them, would get much out of that part. Also, be prepared for lots and lots or flashy, flashbacks, and when halfway through: Jim is killed off then all my hopes of this turning around, and maybe into a mediocre movie, were lost, and time stood completely still. I am not sure how it all ended, as I turned it off, and have no plans of going back, and re-watching or checking up on those last 10-15 minutes, but I guess the chances of them, all of a sudden, to boost the rating up a few notches, ain't gonna appen, so yeah, this one is just for the real "die hard" fans, but more of C. Thomas Howell, Kari Wuhrer and Busey, as if you are, like me, a big admirer of the original, stay the hell away of anything that came after, with the Hitcher name, as the original is just one a complete different level. At least, the 2007 version managed to be slightly "better", but that is not saying much, and the 2003 sequel is sadly a "good" reminder of that, or so I believe. 3/10
|
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Mar 1, 2021 8:46:15 GMT
Zombie Holocaust (1980) by Marino Girolami Well, I have had quite an enjoyable, sleazy, gory and at times, in a weird way, "cozy" times re-watching these late 70s and early 80s italian zombie titles, as watching them late at night, for the past few days kind of makes me want to just dig into way more of the same movies, at least for a bit while longer. Anyway, this one also seems to be relased under several other titles (no shock there, as I guess most italian horror films always had a few extra ones, which of course did not always make it easy to look them up, or find the right film you were looking for) where the most known alternative title is that of Doctor Butcher, which I kind if like. However, I guess with the success of Cannibal Holocaust and Zombie Flesh Eaters, both released in 1979, there were big money in these gruesome and gory italian relases, and someone wanted to make sure of trying to combine the cannibal and zombie genre, into one film, cashing in big time. Of course, that is not hard to miss out, by the title of Zombie Holocaust. Sure, Lucio Fulci did not make this one, but it still feels very much like a "sequel" or kind of a cheaper remake of Zombie 2, and where also a few of the same familiar names and faces, shows up for a second time, with Ian McCulloch once again in the lead, and where the story begins in New York City, before it once more ends up into a nightmarish adventure, towards a tropical island, full of flesh eating cannibals, zombies and to top it all, a mad scientist, who seems to be on the verge of creating his final "masterpiece", but something which means bad news to for the unlucky and recently arrived "guests". Yeah, the film is nowhere near the same quality or creepy atmosphere of Zombie 2, as it feels like a pretty cheap and vulgar attempt, which I guess it was, to cash in on the success of far superior films, but still, it offers lots of cheese, sleaze and gore, and I kind of liked the main cast, always nice with a bit of crazy doctor, in the middle of nowhere, along with a very beautiful and sexy Alexandra Delli Colli, who shows off the goods, and at times I was wondering if it would turn into some kind of erotic zombie relase, as I remember "stumbling" upon a few of those, back in the day, when I pretty much purchased on impulsive, anything that were italian horror related DVDs from the 70s and 80s. I love the tagline it has going: "HE’S A DEPRAVED, HOMICIDAL KILLER…AND HE MAKES HOUSE CALLS!"Makes me think of Dr. Giggles (1992) with Larry Drake, but those expecting a similar lunatic Doc, might be a bit disappointed, as he sure delivers some nasty scenes, but has not very much time on the screen. My DVD version, is part of the zombie numbered 1-7 Scandinavian uncut releases of AWE (Anotherworldentertainment) and comes with som neat bonus features, and an informative booklet, which said that Fulci were expected to direct this film, but were too busy, so they hired another director, and re-used a few scenes along with some new ones, too make up for the short runtime, as the original lasted for about an hour, and so they managed to include around 20-25 minutes extra. Also quite fun to learn that the "actors" who portrayed the cannibals, were in fact vegetarians, and had a hard time covering up their disgust during the flesh eating scenes. All in all, never in the same league as Zombie 2 or Zombie Flesh Eaters, but still some fun and entertainment to be found here, and again I end up with a very kind: 6/10
|
|
The blocked video part, is something that is happening far too often these last few months, and I also noticed that every other comment section, is completely wiped out, and that is half the fun gone.