|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 17:20:01 GMT
tpfkar The irony of your yt "busts" on "shady", your eagerness to "believe", and the icing being your most "sincere" suggestion that you didn't get the point.  You just make up things at will.  1) The staged footage shown there was used by the BBC. 2) The picture in a different location uses the same people doing the same thing with the same signs in a different location, with the same CNN staffers in the shot. The fact that I confused a still with the leaked footage is neither here nor there. I gave an incorrect example. Fact is you have CNN setting up protests and reporting them like they are genuine, which are promoted by the BBC as real events. I expect better from a service I have to legally pay for whether I use it or not. Oh and I was referred to as "sincere" by Cine, not by myself, so you're mocking him, not me by quoting that.
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 17:27:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 17:44:26 GMT
By the fact that the same people are in the picture that are in the video.....And how many people do you think are wondering around London in blue jeans with a plain white "Lindasaraour" t shirt hold a stack of "Pray for London" A4 sheets of paper? Lets compare the pic to the video Woman in pink pants, brown coat black hijab. Check. Old white guy with white beard. Check Asian guy in all light grey t shirt and fleece pants. Check Asian guy in jeans with navy top with grey piping. Check. Imam in green rope. Check White guy in Linda Sarsour T shirt, check Could be just a massive coincidence..... Okay, I'm insane, what actually happened? So this morning, Cine referred to my post as "Sincere" then suddenly you start using it sarcastically at me and it had nothing to do with Cine describing my post as sincere. Totes believable, fam.
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 18:00:16 GMT
tpfkar At least a couple with different skin tones or they popped out for a bit to treat themselves to a good spray tan. And again, So what. No idea who these guys are or how these things got organized. I don't believe you regardless, or at this point have any idea which videos/pics you're comparing or if there were common people anywhere, who they were and what it's supposed to mean, dun dun DUNN. It's a safe bet any interpretation that you make will be "inadvertently" skewed, but there's no telling what happened with your presentation, nor am I one to guess without backing. Dude, your full handle is thorsinsincerehairspray, a constant theme in any discussion with you and I really could n't care less what kind of paranoia you suffer from. If I wanted to make a comment on something Cinemachinery said, I'd have replied to him. But feel free to "sincerely" agonize on! loves me some nazi pug guy
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 18:07:04 GMT
tpfkar At least a couple with different skin tones or they popped out for a bit to treat themselves to a good spray tan. And again, So what. No idea who these guys are or how these things got organized. I don't believe you regardless, or at this point have any idea which videos/pics you're comparing or if there were common people anywhere, who they were and what it's supposed to mean, dun dun DUNN. It's a safe bet any interpretation that you make will be "inadvertently" skewed, but there's no telling what happened with your presentation, nor am I one to guess without backing. Dude, your full handle is thorsinsincerehairspray, a constant theme in any discussion with you and I really could n't care less what kind of paranoia you suffer from. If I wanted to make a comment on something Cinemachinery said, I'd have replied to him. But feel free to "sincerely" agonize on! loves me some nazi pug guyWhat? I'm comparing the video I posted to the picture I posted. The same people are in both. EEH said they are different locations and I have no reason to disbelieve him. Now, you could take 30 seconds to compare the two and see I am right, or you could just continue to argue a point for the sake of it even though anybody who chooses to check can see the same people are in both the video and the picture and you just look like a petulant child. Pkay, fam its totally a coincindence that you started doing that just hours after Cine called my post sincere. We all believe you Cupcake, honestly, we all believe you.....
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 18:21:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 18:57:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 19:27:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 20:08:56 GMT
Back to so what? The CNN staffer in the Sarsour T shirt is in both locations, in both shoots. So are others, but I can't be arsed taking and uploading multiple screenies because you can't be bothered to watch the film. The so what? is that this is staged. The job of the media is to report the news, not make it or manipulate it. Understand the BBC is paid for by the British public and we have no choice in that. I expect them to to maintain a degree of ethic that this falls short of.
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 20:20:29 GMT
tpfkar Since that's who we were specifically talking about, why did you give screens that were not of them?  And how did you come to conclude that a person or people in a "Sarsour T" is/are (a) "CNN staffer"(s)? Of course you can't.  What is "staged" for you? Moving them into a good shot? Calling a bunch of people and putting together a gathering? Numbing the sheeple with "unity" and "love" chemtrails? I don't care for editorial massaging myself. But especially when the great Muslimlovers conspiracy puts it together.  Masculinity was just fine until regressives decided White Straight Men were somewhere between Hitler and fecal matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 22:29:45 GMT
tpfkar Since that's who we were specifically talking about, why did you give screens that were not of them?  And how did you come to conclude that a person or people in a "Sarsour T" is/are (a) "CNN staffer"(s)? Of course you can't.  What is "staged" for you? Moving them into a good shot? Calling a bunch of people and putting together a gathering? Numbing the sheeple with "unity" and "love" chemtrails? I don't care for editorial massaging myself. But especially when the great Muslimlovers conspiracy puts it together.  Masculinity was just fine until regressives decided White Straight Men were somewhere between Hitler and fecal matter.The guy in the Sarsour T shirt is directing the other people where to stand and where to place flowers. He is in the BBC pic, first on the left. I;m not uploading multiple creengrabs because you can't be arsed to watch a 2 minute video you somehow insist I'm wrong about. [/quote] Staged: Contrived for a desired impression.
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 22:35:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 22:41:02 GMT
Except I just stated why in the previous post. And in a post earlier to Superdude. And what did I lie about this time? If you could be bothered to watch the video that I didn't actually film or upload to Twitter, you can see why I assume he is staff. That there was a concerted effort by the Muslim community to protest this attack.
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 22:47:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 23:02:04 GMT
Oh dear. Yes, in the post preceding you saying I hadn't done so. No I didn't. I told you I would not be bothering to take multiple screen shot and uploading and posting them when the people can be seen in the video already posted. How can that be a lie? I made the claim they were staff. You asked why they were staff. I said because they were directing the people were to stand and place flowers. So either you don't bother to read threads, or are really thick. You said "And how did you come to conclude that a person or people in a "Sarsour T" is/are (a) "CNN staffer"(s)? " Which I quoted and replied."The guy in the Sarsour T shirt is directing the other people where to stand and where to place flowers. He is in the BBC pic, first on the left. " So no, I'm not lying or avoiding anything. No I didn't, the op contain the argument "they don't represent Islam" which is a not all argument. Impressive list of fail by you, beaten only by your spectacular use of English.
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 5, 2017 23:18:03 GMT
tpfkar Get 'em, Cody!  You surely didn't say anything about why they would be "CNN staffers". You just said they were guys in a particular T passing out flyers and "directing the other people where to stand and where to place flowers", Nothing about CNN. No, we were talking about guys in Ts and you posted pics of other people. You're lying about "can't be arsed" or you just would have posted what we were talking about in the first place. I suppose I couldn't fathom that you were so thick that T's and flyers and directing couldn't easily be done by peeps from whoever got the other peeps to show up. I suppose I couldn't guess the CNNtrails you got soaked in.  Which is an Erj-level non sequitur.  Well, it may be pure halfwittery in this specific case, but then you go and blow it with your "I'm not lying or avoiding anything".   So the opposite of "the terrorists don't represent Islam" is all Muslims are terrorists? Speaking of deluded, petulant children. Nice crash so bad you have to "sincerely" pretend you can't read. You just make up things at will. 
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 7, 2017 8:40:43 GMT
Enjoy. I'm still in disgust over CNN's "rebuttal." There's nothing to rebut. They got caught. Imagine a burglar who gets caught breaking into a building and as the cop starts to arrest him he says, "Wait! I have a rebuttal."
|
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Jun 7, 2017 13:02:41 GMT
I don't get it, "protesting against London Bridge"? Why would someone protest against the bridge? Or even more inexplicably, why would someone fake a protest against the bridge? I couldn't make out the audio in that clip, but what it looks like to me is not that this is meant to look like some kind of protest. Of course it is staged, but I doubt it's by the media. It is not uncommon for people to organize such events and call the media because they want to get their message out. If this message is, as I suspect, a condemnation of the recent attack, then I don't see what the problem is. Aren't you guys always complaining that the Muslims aren't vocal enough against extremism?
|
|