|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 6, 2017 16:28:01 GMT
If Fox wanted to, they could easily make an Xmen film in the mould of a Gotg or Thor 3 with vibrant colour and excess comedy. Doubt it, they don't have the skill to pull that off successfully. It's a wannabe, it's self-important. And people are finally waking up to that. NOW they're trying to use an R Rating to substitute blood and gore and cursing for substance.
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Nov 6, 2017 16:35:26 GMT
Doubt it, they don't have the skill to pull that off successfully. Well theyve not attempted to make a outright "fun" film like Suicide Squad and I hope it stays that way with the exception of Deadpool. Because the themes in the X-films so far have been self important,which is what they are known for from the comics. How are you meant to make a Gotg/Thor 3 type film with discrimination as the backbone of your story. It would demean it, but thats what MCU-Disney is best at doing, taking serious themes and watering them down. And people haven't woken up to anything, they just flock to see these films because they have good cgi and are funny - no other reason whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 6, 2017 17:37:30 GMT
Well theyve not attempted to make a outright "fun" film like Suicide Squad and I hope it stays that way with the exception of Deadpool. Right right right...actually having fun at the movies is bad unless it's a R rated parody. There have been plenty of times where the X-Men comics weren't drowning in their own self-importance and just had the X-Men be treated like normal heroes...the Dark Phoenix Saga for example. Do what the X-Men comics themselves did whenever they told stories about aliens or demons or the Savage Land.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 6, 2017 17:42:46 GMT
It's Thor. And more people love Thor 3 than they do the X-men movies. Also, you can be intellectual and be humorous at the same time. Being intelligent doesn't be * you have to be boring and stuffy. Its a film designed to cheer up audiences with little intensity and little effort. Just cheap thrills. If Fox wanted to, they could easily make an Xmen film in the mould of a Gotg or Thor 3 with vibrant colour and excess comedy. Its not difficult or revolutionary to do. Its just playing it safe. You cant "turn off your brain" watching it like half these Disney films. Xmen is intelligent, not boring. DC films take that crown. And X-Men first Class should be the tone of X-films going forward, sufficiently light hearted but with solid drama and articulate dialogue. Not the Marvel stuff pandering to audiences and fan service. The only thing MCu has over Xmen is production value. Could they, though? I mean really... They made ID4:R. They also made X-men Apocalypse. Could that be the problem? You guys see these movies as movies that you have to turn your brain off and don't get what is happening. (And yes DC movies, besides Wonder Woman, are boring.) Try your hardest to fight through the humor of the movies. There is lots of information in the lines and moments that may come off as funny. That's the difference between the X-men's humor and the humor in the MCU. The X-men's humor is self deprecating most of the time. You don't get character building or plot movement in the humor from X-men. It's just lines for the sake of humor. Cyclops likes N*Sync. Constantly cutting off Nightcrawler. Quicksilver. 3rd movie is always the worst. Yellow spandex. Cyclops is a dick. Logan being on acid. Really, I think First Class was the only one that had organic humor. Stuff like Banshee being afraid of trying to fly and falling out of the window. But thinking about it, I really think it is Singer. Because it's his movies that has all those inorganic "try hard" moments. *Meant to say "doesn't have to be" right there.
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Nov 6, 2017 18:13:59 GMT
Right right right...actually having fun at the movies is bad unless it's a R rated parody. Fun is subjective, not everyone enjoys watching mindless action and pretty moving pictures with little substance. . The stories of Xavier/Magneto, the cure, Stryker, dark Phoenix, origins and Apocalypse all needed to be done first because they are the most presentable and relevant. And theres still more stuff and characters to explore like X force, Sinister and Gambit before aliens and demons are introduced - although theyve started that with Dark Phoenix. And i dont know why you put magic and aliens on a higher platform, its no more valid than the humanistic grounded stories.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 6, 2017 18:45:38 GMT
Fun is subjective, not everyone enjoys watching mindless action and pretty moving pictures with little substance. And yet you brought up Deadpool. No they didn't. Not if Fox was willing to push the envelope.
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Nov 6, 2017 18:59:25 GMT
Could that be the problem? You guys see these movies as movies that you have to turn your brain off and don't get what is happening. (And yes DC movies, besides Wonder Woman, are boring.) Try your hardest to fight through the humor of the movies. ID4 was a cash grab which plenty of studio's are guilty for. And they tried too hard with Apocalypse to compete with BvS and Civil War. And its hard to fight through the humor in modern MCU flicks when theyr being shoved in your face constantly and undercutting serious scenes. Thats why I prefer phase 1 + Winter Soldier/Thor TDW. They are imo the most balanced movies in juggling drama action and comedy whilst getting villains right. The modern stuff has overloaded on the comedy at expense of drama because of how successful GOTG1 was at the box office. MCU humor is the definition of inorganic. Its cringey, needless and forced most of the time. Thor 3 is the perfect example. I was watching the scene when Thor is trying to convince Valkiry to join him and help save Asguard in a desperate plea. Then immediatly after, he throws the ball against the window and it bounces to knock him down. So needless and undercuts the dramatic tension in thr dialogue seconds before. And there was a similar one with Quill in Gotg1 dropping the orb. Would any adult laugh at this stunt, or is it just aimed for children. Its like Xavier convincing Magneto not to kill Shaw whilst playing chess, then right after Magneto annoyed, levitates a chess piece into Xavier and knocks him over for laughs. I could see something similar happening in an MCU Xmen film. Thor in TDW and Ragnarok is a completely different character. Marvel-disney's solution is, if it aint working, thow in jokes and that's what they reduced Thor too. Its like if they made Cyclops into a wise cracking quip machine after his serious demeanor in the Xfilms. Would be unnatural. Humor and more importantly comedic timing is superior in X films. There is no slapstick comedy, people falling over or slipping or dancing to villains. If you enjoy that stuff, then good for you but if MCU-Disney got theie hands on Xmen franchise it would be curtains for dramatic superhero films with stakes.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 6, 2017 19:17:21 GMT
And its hard to fight through the humor in modern MCU flicks when theyr being shoved in your face constantly and undercutting serious scenes. Thats why I prefer phase 1 + Winter Soldier/Thor TDW. You must seriously hate the Back to the Future movies and Ghostbusters. You could say the same about the juvenile humor in Deadpool, which you didn't mind. I'd be happy if FOX gave Cyclops any character. No, there's just "make fun of the source material" insulting humor.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 6, 2017 19:33:09 GMT
Could that be the problem? You guys see these movies as movies that you have to turn your brain off and don't get what is happening. (And yes DC movies, besides Wonder Woman, are boring.) Try your hardest to fight through the humor of the movies. ID4 was a cash grab which plenty of studio's are guilty for. And they tried too hard with Apocalypse to compete with BvS and Civil War. And its hard to fight through the humor in modern MCU flicks when theyr being shoved in your face constantly and undercutting serious scenes. Thats why I prefer phase 1 + Winter Soldier/Thor TDW. They are imo the most balanced movies in juggling drama action and comedy whilst getting villains right. The modern stuff has overloaded on the comedy at expense of drama because of how successful GOTG1 was at the box office. MCU humor is the definition of inorganic. Its cringey, needless and forced most of the time. Thor 3 is the perfect example. I was watching the scene when Thor is trying to convince Valkiry to join him and help save Asguard in a desperate plea. Then immediatly after, he throws the ball against the window and it bounces to knock him down. So needless and undercuts the dramatic tension in thr dialogue seconds before. And there was a similar one with Quill in Gotg1 dropping the orb. Would any adult laugh at this stunt, or is it just aimed for children. Its like Xavier convincing Magneto not to kill Shaw whilst playing chess, then right after Magneto annoyed, levitates a chess piece into Xavier and knocks him over for laughs. I could see something similar happening in an MCU Xmen film. Thor in TDW and Ragnarok is a completely different character. Marvel-disney's solution is, if it aint working, thow in jokes and that's what they reduced Thor too. Its like if they made Cyclops into a wise cracking quip machine after his serious demeanor in the Xfilms. Would be unnatural. Humor and more importantly comedic timing is superior in X films. There is no slapstick comedy, people falling over or slipping or dancing to villains. If you enjoy that stuff, then good for you but if MCU-Disney got theie hands on Xmen franchise it would be curtains for dramatic superhero films with stakes. That's because you are actively trying to hate the humor. It also shows you how strong the window was. That was the point. The ball bouncing off the window wasn't to undercut the tension, but to undercut expectations. Thor never actually checked that window for how strong it was. You know the ball is suppose to go through the window. Thor thought the ball would go through the window. But against expectations it didn't. It's the same with some Banner/Hulk scenes. They do the same thing on the show The Orville. There was a scene that made fun of Star Trek when they tell them to hail another ship then immediately start talking. In The Orville, the captain starts talking and the security officer says it wasn't ready yet. Funny scene because it undercut expectations. And stuff like Peter juggling the orb shows that they are actual people and not "scripted". If they would have done something like that in an X-men movie, they would have found some meaning to it. Like they find a note or insight that would help them stop the villain. They move from spot to spot spouting exposition and semi-philosophy to make them sound important. There is no fun in the X-men movies unless they schedule it (Quicksilver). Are they 2 different characters? Or is it a character that has grown? You forget that Thor was on Earth after that during Age of Ultron. It it shows that he's acclimated himself to being more like that. And when did Thor start making lots of quips and wise cracking? The only time you can say that was when he was flirting with the Valkyrie. Like I said before, he was saying things at certain times that we would find funny. You mean like how they made Cyclops better in Apocalypse? There are no scenes in any MCU movie that would equate to Magneto knocking Xavier over with a chess piece. But there is the deleted scene of Xavier making Angel see Magneto in lingerie. Played for laughs. So you are saying the only time a movie can have stakes is if the character is frowny face? Even Nightcrawler? A character that is the comedy relief of the X-men. Or Beast? What about Iceman? These characters are the fun characters. They are known to make jokes and be light-hearted. During fight scenes. Why do you think people see Beast and Iceman as versions of Cyclops? Get out of here with your semi serious, not serious, but serious thinking of X-men. You guys want to see it a certain way that it is not.
|
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Nov 6, 2017 20:07:37 GMT
You are a singularity who has done nothing but tell lies and ignore hard facts.You are not ‘’everyone’’. Everyone knows the world of xmen is compelling and intellectual. Reasons everyone wants to keep it separate from the rest of the marvel world in film and television. You know what would have been intellectual? As an example? Not making thor 3 a slapstick mindless comedy but making a real serious movie about the end of the world since that is what the title means. Thor 3 is dumb so it follows the GOTG formula Thor 3 as intellectual would have been following Lord of the Rings footsteps. As I said, to be intellectual is easy, especially when you have many other things to be inspired by. I sure know if fox wants to do a Starjammers movie, I will rather have them make it like Nolan’s Interstellar, Star Trek TNG or Stanley KubricK’s A Space Odessey than GOTG .See, its not hard at all to be intellectual. MCU just subscribes to dumb. Okay most people here are telling you what's what. I think you are just ignoring people and focusing on me because I'm giving you a modicum of attention. Lonely? Actually, it wouldn't follow Lord of the Rings because it is not Lord of the Rings. It's Thor. It's not Interstellar, it's not TNG, it's not 2001. It's Thor. And more people love Thor 3 than they do the X-men movies. Also, you can be intellectual and be humorous at the same time. Being intelligent doesn't be you have to be boring and stuffy. Being intelligent doesn't mean you have to sit in a corner smoking a pipe while reading a book. Thor 3 was about being who you are. If you didn't sit there hating humor then you would have gotten that. You see, Thor Ragnarok was not specifically about Ragnarok. Yes it was something in the movie that had to be prevented, but it wasn't about it. I am not focusing on anyone. you replied to something I posted, I replied back, like now. More people love Thor 3 more than xmen movies. maybe kids or the brain dead Transformers/MCU mass audience, not actual real people and most importantly definitely not X-Men fans or marvel fans before the disney marvel stuff. You have yet to find any marvel/spiderman fan that loves homecoming more than the original spiderman movies. From what I can see so far, even the level headed mcu fans don't like the film much because of the jokes,silly plot and disney comedy. If thor Ragnarok was not about Ragnarok so why is it called Ragnarök? lol. the excuses you give for MCU. oh dear. Ragnarok as in more like return of the king...stop the world from ending hard drama. that is the real story of the comics that should have had the influence, the source material demands it. .
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 6, 2017 20:14:12 GMT
More people love Thor 3 more than xmen movies. maybe kids or the brain dead Transformers/MCU mass audience No, just people. Normal everyday people. Thanks to the MCU people aren't ashamed of CBMs anymore. There are plenty. It WAS about Ragnarok, you just misunderstood what Ragnarok is. It's NOT the same thing as the apocalypse.
|
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Nov 6, 2017 20:17:05 GMT
Could that be the problem? You guys see these movies as movies that you have to turn your brain off and don't get what is happening. (And yes DC movies, besides Wonder Woman, are boring.) Try your hardest to fight through the humor of the movies. ID4 was a cash grab which plenty of studio's are guilty for. And they tried too hard with Apocalypse to compete with BvS and Civil War. And its hard to fight through the humor in modern MCU flicks when theyr being shoved in your face constantly and undercutting serious scenes. Thats why I prefer phase 1 + Winter Soldier/Thor TDW. They are imo the most balanced movies in juggling drama action and comedy whilst getting villains right. The modern stuff has overloaded on the comedy at expense of drama because of how successful GOTG1 was at the box office. MCU humor is the definition of inorganic. Its cringey, needless and forced most of the time. Thor 3 is the perfect example. I was watching the scene when Thor is trying to convince Valkiry to join him and help save Asguard in a desperate plea. Then immediatly after, he throws the ball against the window and it bounces to knock him down. So needless and undercuts the dramatic tension in thr dialogue seconds before. And there was a similar one with Quill in Gotg1 dropping the orb. Would any adult laugh at this stunt, or is it just aimed for children. Its like Xavier convincing Magneto not to kill Shaw whilst playing chess, then right after Magneto annoyed, levitates a chess piece into Xavier and knocks him over for laughs. I could see something similar happening in an MCU Xmen film. Thor in TDW and Ragnarok is a completely different character. Marvel-disney's solution is, if it aint working, thow in jokes and that's what they reduced Thor too. Its like if they made Cyclops into a wise cracking quip machine after his serious demeanor in the Xfilms. Would be unnatural. Humor and more importantly comedic timing is superior in X films. There is no slapstick comedy, people falling over or slipping or dancing to villains. If you enjoy that stuff, then good for you but if MCU-Disney got theie hands on Xmen franchise it would be curtains for dramatic superhero films with stakes. I heard about mcu playing this off for laughs IMDB2.freeforums.net/thread/67423/disney-marvel-alcoholism-laughs-ragnarokMakes me miss Xavier all hippie in the 70s in DOFP. Funny thing with the comedy. Batman Begins, Road to Perdition,, TDK, X2, X-men, SPIDERMAN 2, Blade, The Crow, Batman 89.None were obsessed about mindless comedy until the marvel's children's universe came along. the good thing is real comic book fans are not buying it any more because we all know comics books were deeper than fun,cgi and jokes. the thor 3 backlash is well deserved. The MCU fans defence here is comedy only, at least batman vs superman fans could defend the great visionary plot not executed well.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 6, 2017 20:29:24 GMT
Makes me miss Xavier all hippie in the 70s in DOFP. You mean the Xavier who got over his alcoholism in ONE scene?
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 6, 2017 21:17:02 GMT
Okay most people here are telling you what's what. I think you are just ignoring people and focusing on me because I'm giving you a modicum of attention. Lonely? Actually, it wouldn't follow Lord of the Rings because it is not Lord of the Rings. It's Thor. It's not Interstellar, it's not TNG, it's not 2001. It's Thor. And more people love Thor 3 than they do the X-men movies. Also, you can be intellectual and be humorous at the same time. Being intelligent doesn't be you have to be boring and stuffy. Being intelligent doesn't mean you have to sit in a corner smoking a pipe while reading a book. Thor 3 was about being who you are. If you didn't sit there hating humor then you would have gotten that. You see, Thor Ragnarok was not specifically about Ragnarok. Yes it was something in the movie that had to be prevented, but it wasn't about it. I am not focusing on anyone. you replied to something I posted, I replied back, like now. More people love Thor 3 more than xmen movies. maybe kids or the brain dead Transformers/MCU mass audience, not actual real people and most importantly definitely not X-Men fans or marvel fans before the disney marvel stuff. You have yet to find any marvel/spiderman fan that loves homecoming more than the original spiderman movies. From what I can see so far, even the level headed mcu fans don't like the film much because of the jokes,silly plot and disney comedy. If thor Ragnarok was not about Ragnarok so why is it called Ragnarök? lol. the excuses you give for MCU. oh dear. Ragnarok as in more like return of the king...stop the world from ending hard drama. that is the real story of the comics that should have had the influence, the source material demands it. Heh, you are delusional. I like Homecoming better because I don't like Raimi's filmmaking style when added to Spider-man. Was never a fan of his Spider-man movies. Because it is surrounding the events of it. Ragnarok is not the main point of the movie. It's just an event in the movie. Just like Spider-man Homecoming less than 5 minutes of homecoming. Also, he stopped Ragnarok from happening. Again, Ragnarok was just an event in the movie and was not the main point of it. No you demand it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 6, 2017 21:21:47 GMT
ID4 was a cash grab which plenty of studio's are guilty for. And they tried too hard with Apocalypse to compete with BvS and Civil War. And its hard to fight through the humor in modern MCU flicks when theyr being shoved in your face constantly and undercutting serious scenes. Thats why I prefer phase 1 + Winter Soldier/Thor TDW. They are imo the most balanced movies in juggling drama action and comedy whilst getting villains right. The modern stuff has overloaded on the comedy at expense of drama because of how successful GOTG1 was at the box office. MCU humor is the definition of inorganic. Its cringey, needless and forced most of the time. Thor 3 is the perfect example. I was watching the scene when Thor is trying to convince Valkiry to join him and help save Asguard in a desperate plea. Then immediatly after, he throws the ball against the window and it bounces to knock him down. So needless and undercuts the dramatic tension in thr dialogue seconds before. And there was a similar one with Quill in Gotg1 dropping the orb. Would any adult laugh at this stunt, or is it just aimed for children. Its like Xavier convincing Magneto not to kill Shaw whilst playing chess, then right after Magneto annoyed, levitates a chess piece into Xavier and knocks him over for laughs. I could see something similar happening in an MCU Xmen film. Thor in TDW and Ragnarok is a completely different character. Marvel-disney's solution is, if it aint working, thow in jokes and that's what they reduced Thor too. Its like if they made Cyclops into a wise cracking quip machine after his serious demeanor in the Xfilms. Would be unnatural. Humor and more importantly comedic timing is superior in X films. There is no slapstick comedy, people falling over or slipping or dancing to villains. If you enjoy that stuff, then good for you but if MCU-Disney got theie hands on Xmen franchise it would be curtains for dramatic superhero films with stakes. I heard about mcu playing this off for laughs IMDB2.freeforums.net/thread/67423/disney-marvel-alcoholism-laughs-ragnarokMakes me miss Xavier all hippie in the 70s in DOFP. Funny thing with the comedy. Batman Begins, Road to Perdition,, TDK, X2, X-men, SPIDERMAN 2, Blade, The Crow, Batman 89.None were obsessed about mindless comedy until the marvel's children's universe came along. the good thing is real comic book fans are not buying it any more because we all know comics books were deeper than fun,cgi and jokes. the thor 3 backlash is well deserved. The MCU fans defence here is comedy only, at least batman vs superman fans could defend the great visionary plot not executed well. Spider-man 2? What the hell are you on? Raimi's style is all about corny comedy. Dude, real comic book fans weren't even going to see those movies. Only The Dark Knight was getting fans into theaters. And there is no Thor 3 backlash. All in your head.
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Nov 6, 2017 21:27:11 GMT
hate the humor. It also shows you how strong the window was. That was the point. The ball bouncing off the window wasn't to undercut the tension, but to undercut expectations. Thor never actually checked that window for how strong it was. You know the ball is suppose to go through the window. Thor thought the ball would go through the window. But against expectations it didn't. It's the same with some Banner/Hulk scenes. They do the same thing on the show The Orville. There was a scene that made fun of Star Trek when they tell them to hail another ship then immediately start talking. In The Orville, the captain starts talking and the security officer says it wasn't ready yet. Funny scene because it undercut expectations. And stuff like Peter juggling the orb shows that they are actual people and not "scripted". If they would have done something like that in an X-men movie, they would have found some meaning to it. Like they find a note or insight that would help them stop the villain. They move from spot to spot spouting exposition and semi-philosophy to make them sound important. There is no fun in the X-men movies unless they schedule it (Quicksilver). Are they 2 different characters? Or is it a character that has grown? You forget that Thor was on Earth after that during Age of Ultron. It it shows that he's acclimated himself to being more like that. And when did Thor start making lots of quips and wise cracking? The only time you can say that was when he was flirting with the Valkyrie. Like I said before, he was saying things at certain times that we would find funny. You mean like how they made Cyclops better in Apocalypse? There are no scenes in any MCU movie that would equate to Magneto knocking Xavier over with a chess piece. But there is the deleted scene of Xavier making Angel see Magneto in lingerie. Played for laughs. So you are saying the only time a movie can have stakes is if the character is frowny face? Even Nightcrawler? A character that is the comedy relief of the X-men. Or Beast? What about Iceman? These characters are the fun characters. They are known to make jokes and be light-hearted. During fight scenes. Why do you think people see Beast and Iceman as versions of Cyclops? Get out of here with your semi serious, not serious, but serious thinking of X-men. You guys want to see it a certain way that it is not. Im not hating the humor, its forcing me tp hate it. I can watch the Dark World or Guardian's 2 and ignore the lame humor because the dramatic side of those films are heavy. But Thor 3 is an insult to a viewer. Theres no tension whatsoever when jokes are being made every 5 minutes. The scene at the end where Thor visualises Odin for inspiration falls short because it didnt earn that moment. Old xavier meeting young xavier face to face is truly earned and is better than any dramatic MCU Disney scene you can name because the surrounding context is consistent. And come on guyson, you're over analizing the window break scene. Its only meant for comedic relief, nothing more. Its actually insulting to Thor as other parts of the film with him screaming like a girl and begging. Yeah spouting exposition and semi philosophy is such a sin with a film centred around bigotry and persecution. They should be cracking jokes and falling over right? Is that how you people define fun. No i dont want all characters with frowny faces, that would be ridiculous. A good balance is the best. But seems you're happy to make xmen like the guardian's or thor 3 cast.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 6, 2017 21:35:09 GMT
Im not hating the humor, its forcing me tp hate it. Could have fooled us. Oh, you mean the bit where Xavier gets over 10 years of alcoholism in one scene? Thor more than earned his "The power was with you all along" thing compared to that.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 6, 2017 23:42:49 GMT
hate the humor. It also shows you how strong the window was. That was the point. The ball bouncing off the window wasn't to undercut the tension, but to undercut expectations. Thor never actually checked that window for how strong it was. You know the ball is suppose to go through the window. Thor thought the ball would go through the window. But against expectations it didn't. It's the same with some Banner/Hulk scenes. They do the same thing on the show The Orville. There was a scene that made fun of Star Trek when they tell them to hail another ship then immediately start talking. In The Orville, the captain starts talking and the security officer says it wasn't ready yet. Funny scene because it undercut expectations. And stuff like Peter juggling the orb shows that they are actual people and not "scripted". If they would have done something like that in an X-men movie, they would have found some meaning to it. Like they find a note or insight that would help them stop the villain. They move from spot to spot spouting exposition and semi-philosophy to make them sound important. There is no fun in the X-men movies unless they schedule it (Quicksilver). Are they 2 different characters? Or is it a character that has grown? You forget that Thor was on Earth after that during Age of Ultron. It it shows that he's acclimated himself to being more like that. And when did Thor start making lots of quips and wise cracking? The only time you can say that was when he was flirting with the Valkyrie. Like I said before, he was saying things at certain times that we would find funny. You mean like how they made Cyclops better in Apocalypse? There are no scenes in any MCU movie that would equate to Magneto knocking Xavier over with a chess piece. But there is the deleted scene of Xavier making Angel see Magneto in lingerie. Played for laughs. So you are saying the only time a movie can have stakes is if the character is frowny face? Even Nightcrawler? A character that is the comedy relief of the X-men. Or Beast? What about Iceman? These characters are the fun characters. They are known to make jokes and be light-hearted. During fight scenes. Why do you think people see Beast and Iceman as versions of Cyclops? Get out of here with your semi serious, not serious, but serious thinking of X-men. You guys want to see it a certain way that it is not. Im not hating the humor, its forcing me tp hate it. I can watch the Dark World or Guardian's 2 and ignore the lame humor because the dramatic side of those films are heavy. But Thor 3 is an insult to a viewer. Theres no tension whatsoever when jokes are being made every 5 minutes. The scene at the end where Thor visualises Odin for inspiration falls short because it didnt earn that moment. Old xavier meeting young xavier face to face is truly earned and is better than any dramatic MCU Disney scene you can name because the surrounding context is consistent. And come on guyson, you're over analizing the window break scene. Its only meant for comedic relief, nothing more. Its actually insulting to Thor as other parts of the film with him screaming like a girl and begging. Yeah spouting exposition and semi philosophy is such a sin with a film centred around bigotry and persecution. They should be cracking jokes and falling over right? Is that how you people define fun. No i dont want all characters with frowny faces, that would be ridiculous. A good balance is the best. But seems you're happy to make xmen like the guardian's or thor 3 cast. But these aren't dramas. They. Are. Action/Adventure. Movies. These movies are in the same vein as Star Wars, Indiana Jones and other pulp movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by egon1982 on Nov 7, 2017 1:46:05 GMT
Apparently with thor 3, I will skip it because from all the feedbacks. we are told to leave our brains at the door and enjoy the comedy and just have fun with the movie. No, just don't expect it to be ashamed of itself. All ashamed films, except Sin City. Deadpool wasn't ashamed
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 7, 2017 4:02:42 GMT
No, just don't expect it to be ashamed of itself. All ashamed films, except Sin City. Deadpool wasn't ashamed Yeah, because Ryan Reynolds was in charge and not FOX. Now they're paying attention...which doesn't bode well.
|
|