|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 10, 2017 17:05:00 GMT
I've got seven reviews of Mitchum at RKO films on hand; I thought I'd post one a day here.
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 10, 2017 17:06:58 GMT
I already posted this one in the John Brahm thread. I think the others will be new. The Locket (1946)
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 11, 2017 11:21:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 11, 2017 12:46:04 GMT
Great pictures and a wonderful review, wmcclain. I think you captured the dark, noirish beauty of Out of the Past perfectly. Credit goes to the great Nicholas Musuraca. He's not as well known as other cinematographers, but always produces films of great beauty.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Jun 11, 2017 14:08:57 GMT
Oh, I know you didn't create the images, wm - and I agree that Nicholas Musuraca did an amazing job shooting the film - but I do think you deserve some credit for the ways in which you so beautifully assemble the images for others to see. I, for one, am very grateful to you for the time you take to do it. It adds a lot to each of your posts. I like the collages.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Jun 11, 2017 14:12:03 GMT
I've not heard the dvd commentary but this would be a top 10 film noir for me, I could never leave it off my list (were I to make one). Roy Webb's music, those stunning visuals, three emphatic leads. Great movie.
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 12, 2017 12:20:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 13, 2017 11:58:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Jun 14, 2017 2:07:57 GMT
wmcclainOn the Decades channel today they highlighted Mitchum in one of their "fill the time between movies" mini-biography / filmographies. Mitchum. They show many of the trailers. The film they were leading up to was The Friends of Eddie Coyle (1973) Unfortunately the number and length of the commercials was too much for me and I gave up on it after the third break for "several words from our sponsors". Next time it's on I may tape it and fast forward. Have heard it's one of his better pictures. I too applaud your photo presentations ! Thanks !
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 14, 2017 11:39:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 14, 2017 13:55:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Jun 14, 2017 16:17:25 GMT
I have posted elsewhere how Out of the Past (1947) was probably the first adult film I (at the age of 8 or 9) appreciated more or less as an adult, and how I used to flout it in front of my contemporaries who were enthusing about their favorite cowboy or pirate movies. The start of my lifelong posing as a film connoisseur.
It remains my favorite American film and one of only two (worldwide) to which I award a 10.
Soon after re-discovering it as adult I sought out other Mitchum titles hoping for a similar experience. The Big Steal and Where Danger Lives were sad disappointments.
My runner-up (though a long way behind) is a film wmcclain omitted though also from RKO: Angel Face (1953), but then it stars Jean Simmons so I am biased. Preminger's direction is (as usual) a bit heavy-handed but still a fine film and one of the last genuine Noirs.
I think wmcclain has exaggerated the "complications" of the plot. I found it easy enough to follow even as a child. Certainly modern neo-noirs routinely exceed it in that respect, with their now obligatory scrambled time sequences and "twist and twist again" denouements.
On the other hand, while wmcclain has referenced the snappy dialog, I would go further and say that it has the most memorable and quotable dialog of any movie, even exceeding Bogie's wonderful lines in The Maltese Falcon (1941) and The Big Sleep (1946). The difference being that those movies are intentionally more lighthearted, while Out of the Past probes deeper into the human condition and its one-liners give Nietzsche's aphorisms a run for their money.
Even though I give it a 10, I am not sure that is a perfect movie (nor is my other "10", by the way). There are two possible areas of criticism.
1) When the action switches to San Francisco and we meet Rhonda Fleming and others, there is a change of style back to earlier film noirs like Laura (1944) full of luxury apartments and sophisticated people, but claustrophobic and studio-set bound. It is almost as though shot by a different unit. It may be this change of gear that causes people to say it is complicated.
2) The scenes with Virginia Huston are dull. I get it that she has to be dull to make his continue infatuation with Jane Greer more believable. After all, who would chase after a murderous thieving psycho when they had an attractive, wholesome and very loyal woman on hand? But during these scenes we are restless and anxious to get back to where the action is, while a "perfect" film would enthrall us in every scene. And Huston's other suitor, played by Richard Webb, is worse than dull. He is wooden. This film was the only high spot in either of their unremarkable careers.
Only Double Indemnity (1944) rivals it as a Noir and is probably a more perfectly constructed film. But MacMurray does not have Mitchum's star power and, while Stanwyck may be a weightier actress than Greer, it is less believable than anyone could fall for her so hard as to commit harakiri.
The next year Musuraca was cameraman on another RKO Mitchum film, Blood on the Moon (1948), a western with distinctly noir touches.
Talking of perfection, Noir, and directors of photography reminds me of Sweet Smell of Success (1957) shot by the great James Wong Howe. This may nearer approach perfection, and the two leads easily match Mitchum and Douglas, but then again the two young lovers played by Susan Harrison and Martin Milner are little more than token figures.
No, there is no such thing as a perfect film. Unless it is something like one of Wes Anderson's fairy-tales where everything has been brilliantly pre-planned and immaculately realized. But they are like some exquisite french pastry. No substitute for a three-course meal. Life has rough edges, and the truly great movies have a few as well.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Jun 14, 2017 16:56:25 GMT
Well, petro, let it be said that you are pretty darned good at adding images to this board also. I'm grateful to you and everyone else who's able to accomplish this (for me) daunting feat. Hi spiderwort. You can click on an image on google "images" and then you can then enlarge this image with a "view image" option. You can then copy the "http" address link in the top bar and paste this link with the assistance of a clickable icon on imdbv2.0 that looks like a picture frame (when you hover over it, it says "Insert Image"). You just paste the "http" picture address into the box marked "Image URL :" that pops up when you click on the picture frame. When you post your topic this picture will appear inside your post (there are also line sets you can click on that allow you to move the picture across the page from left to centre to right). I find the best way to learn is to hover over all the options alongside "Font Face" & "Font Size" to see what you can do. The clapper board for example allows you to post a video the same way. You can always give it a try if you're interested and edit it out if it goes wrong. That's what I did when I was practising stuff having just arrived here lol.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Jun 14, 2017 17:12:26 GMT
Hi spiderwort. You can click on an image on google "images" and then you can then enlarge this image with a "view image" option. You can then copy the "http" address link in the top bar and paste this link with the assistance of a clickable icon on imdbv2.0 that looks like a picture frame (when you hover over it, it says "Insert Image"). You just paste the "http" picture address into the box marked "Image URL :" that pops up when you click on the picture frame. When you post your topic this picture will appear inside your post (there are also line sets you can click on that allow you to move the picture across the page from left to centre to right). I find the best way to learn is to hover over all the options alongside "Font Face" & "Font Size" to see what you can do. The clapper board for example allows you to post a video the same way. You can always give it a try if you're interested and edit it out if it goes wrong. That's what I did when I was practising stuff having just arrived here lol. Thanks, petro. I'll give it a shot, but I'm a little retarded with these technical things. I do appreciate the information, however. I'm pretty good at deleting my mistakes though, thank God. I'm terrible with computers - it's all trial and error with me. Best of luck!
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 15, 2017 11:05:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 16, 2017 11:18:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 16, 2017 11:20:23 GMT
That's all I have for this series at the moment. There a few more I haven't seen for a long time. If I can get back to them soon I'll post more reviews.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Jun 17, 2017 1:37:33 GMT
'Angel Face' has some extraordinary camera motion in it. Not showy but subtle movements, like sitting on a see-saw with someone of roughly the same weight.
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Jun 17, 2017 14:21:09 GMT
That's all I have for this series at the moment. There a few more I haven't seen for a long time. If I can get back to them soon I'll post more reviews. Thank you for reminding us this of great legend, The coolest man that ever walked this earth!
|
|