|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 13, 2017 18:50:30 GMT
The majority of RFS posters are blasphemers, globalists, ridiculous SJWs, and their sock accounts. This was pointed out to puvo many times whenever he tried to implement his limp "majority of the RFS board" angle. What makes you think you can do better with it than he did?
Y'know. Before Ada was banished she gave me an idea. I'm going to suggest to the Admin that an SJW board be started. That way, you and your comrades will have a place where you can piss and moan and not be bothered by the religious, faithful, and spiritual. Would you support the addition of such a board?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 18:50:45 GMT
No matter what you think about examples, the people mentioned constantly post in a manner that reflects badly on Christianity, this cannot help but sway peoples opinions on the religion as a whole. Says you, but even if we are bad examples for Christianity, the point Cody made still stands. There's no maybe about it Erjen,you and your cohorts are not just bad examples of Christianity but humanity in general. I'll leave the final word to Ghandi: "I like your Christ,I do not like your Christians.Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jun 13, 2017 18:56:24 GMT
Non-Christian like behaviour does not mean that you behave like Erjen, Blade or Ada. A non-christian may be good or bad. A non-Christian's behaviour may be good or bad depending on individual.Only those who see Christian values as being synonymous with morally good will say that it is non-christian like thing to behave as Blade or Ada. I dont agree with that logic, if you see that there is a belief set that sets out certain tenets for morality and behaviour and you see someone who claims to follow that belief set not following those tenets, then you can call out those people for those actions, it does not matter what you believe, only what the other claims to believe and if they follow that. Take for example honesty, I think we can all agree that Christianity holds that one should be honest, Ada and Blade have been caught out in numerous lies, Erjen defends Ada when it has to be obvious that she is lying (so I guess bearing false witness, or at the very least being dishonest about the information you have received). This behaviour is contrary to the tenets of the belief they claim to follow. Meaning they are behaving in a 'non-Christian' manner (to be fair I don't like the phrase 'non-Christian' as it goes does the no true scotsman path, but as long as the mentioned posters claim they are one thing and demonstratably do things opposed to that then their adherence to the belief set is open to question). Bear in mind that Blade, Erjen and Ada all accuse me of not being a Christian, the difference being that they are unable to demonstrate that my behaviours and writing are not opposed to what I claim to believe. Well then I disagree. If you create such terms as "non-Christian behaviour" then it simply means you divide people into two categories. Those who follow Christian values and those who don't follow Christian values. Sure, there are some areas where many non-Christians will agree with Christian values but those areas are pretty limited in scope. To exclusively classify bad behaviour as non-Christian is nothing but an indicator of Christian supremacy. May be Bryce is a new non-Christian but it's fact that his statement indicated that he holds Christian values on a very high moral ground. So much that he classifies dishonesty, lying and cheating as a non-Christian behaviour.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 18:59:37 GMT
The majority of RFS posters are blasphemers, globalists, ridiculous SJWs, and their sock accounts. This was pointed out to puvo many times whenever he tried to implement his limp "majority of the RFS board" angle. What makes you think you can do better with it than he did? Y'know. Before Ada was banished she gave me an idea. I'm going to suggest to the Admin that an SJW board be started. That way, you and your comrades will have a place where you can piss and moan and not be bothered by the religious, faithful, and spiritual. Would you support the addition of such a board? There you go again thinking you have any influence over anybody here. Why don't you fuck off Erjen? With your endless conspiracy theories and infantile youtube videos that have precisely jack shit to do with religion,faith and spirituality.There are multiple conspiracy theory boards on the web why don't you converse with your fellow tin foil hat nutters? No arrogant prick that you are you think it's the rest of us that should leave. Pure unadulterated unwarranted Hubris on your part.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 13, 2017 19:11:02 GMT
I dont agree with that logic, if you see that there is a belief set that sets out certain tenets for morality and behaviour and you see someone who claims to follow that belief set not following those tenets, then you can call out those people for those actions, it does not matter what you believe, only what the other claims to believe and if they follow that. Take for example honesty, I think we can all agree that Christianity holds that one should be honest, Ada and Blade have been caught out in numerous lies, Erjen defends Ada when it has to be obvious that she is lying (so I guess bearing false witness, or at the very least being dishonest about the information you have received). This behaviour is contrary to the tenets of the belief they claim to follow. Meaning they are behaving in a 'non-Christian' manner (to be fair I don't like the phrase 'non-Christian' as it goes does the no true scotsman path, but as long as the mentioned posters claim they are one thing and demonstratably do things opposed to that then their adherence to the belief set is open to question). Bear in mind that Blade, Erjen and Ada all accuse me of not being a Christian, the difference being that they are unable to demonstrate that my behaviours and writing are not opposed to what I claim to believe. Well then I disagree. If you create such terms as "non-Christian behaviour" then it simply means you divide people into two categories. Those who follow Christian values and those who don't follow Christian values. Sure, there are some areas where many non-Christians will agree with Christian values but those areas are pretty limited in scope. To exclusively classify bad behaviour as non-Christian is nothing but an indicator of Christian supremacy. May be Bryce is a new non-Christian but it's fact that his statement indicated that he holds Christian values on a very high moral ground. So much that he classifies dishonesty, lying and cheating as a non-Christian behaviour. But dishonesty, lying and cheating IS non-Christian behaviour, it goes against the tenets of the Christian faith. It may also be non-Muslim behaviour but given that the people in question claim to be Christian, it is correct to hold them up to the standards they purport to follow. Just to be clear, you CAN divide people into two groups, those who follow Christian values and those who don't follow Christian values, and depending on the context it can be a valuable distinction, but the same can be said with any boolean that you use to catagorise people
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 13, 2017 19:13:19 GMT
I dont agree with that logic, if you see that there is a belief set that sets out certain tenets for morality and behaviour and you see someone who claims to follow that belief set not following those tenets, then you can call out those people for those actions, it does not matter what you believe, only what the other claims to believe and if they follow that. Take for example honesty, I think we can all agree that Christianity holds that one should be honest, Ada and Blade have been caught out in numerous lies, Erjen defends Ada when it has to be obvious that she is lying (so I guess bearing false witness, or at the very least being dishonest about the information you have received). This behaviour is contrary to the tenets of the belief they claim to follow. Meaning they are behaving in a 'non-Christian' manner (to be fair I don't like the phrase 'non-Christian' as it goes does the no true scotsman path, but as long as the mentioned posters claim they are one thing and demonstratably do things opposed to that then their adherence to the belief set is open to question). Bear in mind that Blade, Erjen and Ada all accuse me of not being a Christian, the difference being that they are unable to demonstrate that my behaviours and writing are not opposed to what I claim to believe. Well then I disagree. If you create such terms as "non-Christian behaviour" then it simply means you divide people into two categories. Those who follow Christian values and those who don't follow Christian values. Sure, there are some areas where many non-Christians will agree with Christian values but those areas are pretty limited in scope. To exclusively classify bad behaviour as non-Christian is nothing but an indicator of Christian supremacy. May be Bryce is a new non-Christian but it's fact that his statement indicated that he holds Christian values on a very high moral ground. So much that he classifies dishonesty, lying and cheating as a non-Christian behaviour. Ahh this is the point where we differ I think: "To exclusively classify bad behaviour as non-Christian is nothing but an indicator of Christian supremacy. " I dont read bryce as exclusively saying bad-behaviour is non-Christian, but rather that the behaviour these people engage in is incongruous with their claims of being a Christian.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jun 13, 2017 19:20:40 GMT
Well then I disagree. If you create such terms as "non-Christian behaviour" then it simply means you divide people into two categories. Those who follow Christian values and those who don't follow Christian values. Sure, there are some areas where many non-Christians will agree with Christian values but those areas are pretty limited in scope. To exclusively classify bad behaviour as non-Christian is nothing but an indicator of Christian supremacy. May be Bryce is a new non-Christian but it's fact that his statement indicated that he holds Christian values on a very high moral ground. So much that he classifies dishonesty, lying and cheating as a non-Christian behaviour. Ahh this is the point where we differ I think: "To exclusively classify bad behaviour as non-Christian is nothing but an indicator of Christian supremacy. " I dont read bryce as exclusively saying bad-behaviour is non-Christian, but rather that the behaviour these people engage in is incongruous with their claims of being a Christian. Yes, that is where we differ. In any case, Bryce has ceased to embrace Christian tag. Going by his posts on this thread there is still a chance that he believes in Christian values and may be a follower of Christ. I remember a post by another member whose overall behaviour was that of a Christian but who went on to say that "I am not a Christian but I am a follower of Christ."
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 13, 2017 19:31:52 GMT
Ahh this is the point where we differ I think: "To exclusively classify bad behaviour as non-Christian is nothing but an indicator of Christian supremacy. " I dont read bryce as exclusively saying bad-behaviour is non-Christian, but rather that the behaviour these people engage in is incongruous with their claims of being a Christian. Yes, that is where we differ. In any case, Bryce has ceased to embrace Christian tag. Going by his posts on this thread there is still a chance that he believes in Christian values and may be a follower of Christ. I remember a post by another member whose overall behaviour was that of a Christian but who went on to say that "I am not a Christian but I am a follower of Christ." Actually to be honest, Bryce can be a bit black and white so i accept he could have meant it like you suggest. I think the point still stands though, the posters that are most vocal about Christian morality and what a Christian is are the ones that are least likely to follow those behaviour, and yes Erjen, Blade and Ada, I must confess I have not had many interactions with Cody,so I cannot comment on him.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jun 13, 2017 19:35:01 GMT
Yes, that is where we differ. In any case, Bryce has ceased to embrace Christian tag. Going by his posts on this thread there is still a chance that he believes in Christian values and may be a follower of Christ. I remember a post by another member whose overall behaviour was that of a Christian but who went on to say that "I am not a Christian but I am a follower of Christ." I think the point still stands though, the posters that are most vocal about Christian morality and what a Christian is are the ones that are least likely to follow those behaviour, and yes Erjen, Blade and Ada I do agree very strongly on this part. It is especially true on message boards where such people outnumber polite and less opinionated Christians that are far more prevalent in real world in terms of percentage.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 13, 2017 19:38:17 GMT
I think the point still stands though, the posters that are most vocal about Christian morality and what a Christian is are the ones that are least likely to follow those behaviour, and yes Erjen, Blade and Ada I do agree very strongly on this part. It is especially true on message boards where such people outnumber polite and less opinionated Christians that are far more prevalent in real world in terms of percentage. I am glad we agree, I did not want to have to challenge you to a duel
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 13, 2017 19:42:26 GMT
One of the most ridiculous posts I've read on here in a while. Dude, Erjen, Ada, Blade, etc are not supposed to be your examples. Jesus Christ is. Stop making excuses for your unwillingness to deny yourself and taking up your cross and following Him in favour of living for yourself and your own self-gratification. No matter what you think about examples, the people mentioned constantly post in a manner that reflects badly on Christianity, this cannot help but sway peoples opinions on the religion as a whole. You guys are probably just unfamiliar with Jesus' lesser-known tenets-for-online-activity: 1) Though shalt post multitudinous Youtube links. 2) Though shalt dub others "faggot" and "filth" 3) Though shalt endeavor to find out where other's kids sleep 4) Though shalt make up a whole new sister, admit to lying habitually, profit 5) Though shalt stem the tide of secular infection by posting bravely on an obscure and moderately populated discussion forum
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 19:42:49 GMT
This is really silly. I'm not a fan of 'blade', but there's nothing wrong with a parody account as long as it's clear that it is a parody account and not an impersonation intended to be mistaken for the actual user. And Steve Allaby uses his full name in his screenname, so no infraction there at all. You're as bad as or worse than Ada regarding wanting heavy censorship here. And what happened to those parody accounts Mic? Is using another persons picture as an avatar acceptable in your world? Parody accounts are against the T's and C's which is why the admin removed the resembled Ada's screen name. So when is consistence and adherence to already established rules "censorship" Mic? When has that useless waste of skin Blade said anything worth censoring. I can't stand your idiotic quasi suicidal ramblings but I wouldn't censor them or report you for the saying them. Blade has reported me for breaking the rules I thought it's only fair I do the same. If it's a personal photograph that they've shared publically with people on that message forum, then it's fine. If it was found by 'doxxing', then I'd say no and it is worthy of reporting. And I think that impersonation accounts should be against the rules, if the impersonator is intended to be mistaken for the person that they're impersonating (for example, if the user had an 'l' in their screenname and the impersonator had the same name except replacing the 'l' for a '1'.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jun 13, 2017 19:49:53 GMT
I do agree very strongly on this part. It is especially true on message boards where such people outnumber polite and less opinionated Christians that are far more prevalent in real world in terms of percentage. I am glad we agree, I did not want to have to challenge you to a duel If there is a duel between me and you then there can be only one winner and that will be you. You are far too polite and honest person for me too keep insisting on my own stance. Either you will convince me that I am wrong or I will bow off from debate because I wouldn't like to keep challenging you for more than 5 or 6 posts.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 13, 2017 19:50:23 GMT
No matter what you think about examples, the people mentioned constantly post in a manner that reflects badly on Christianity, this cannot help but sway peoples opinions on the religion as a whole. You guys are probably just unfamiliar with Jesus' lesser-known tenets-for-online-activity: 1) Though shalt post multitudinous Youtube links. 2) Though shalt dub others "faggot" and "filth" 3) Though shalt endeavor to find out where other's kids sleep 4) Though shalt make up a whole new sister, admit to lying habitually, profit 5) Though shalt stem the tide of secular infection by posting bravely on an obscure and moderately populated discussion forum In my defence the gospel of dumb was never my favourite book in the bible
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 13, 2017 20:05:37 GMT
Admin can you tell the idiot SuperDude that SlimeySteve is not me. SlimeySteve does not appear to be you.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 13, 2017 20:07:04 GMT
Admin can you tell the idiot SuperDude that SlimeySteve is not me. SlimeySteve does not appear to be you. Thank you. Once again SuperDude is wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 20:25:33 GMT
Admin can you tell the idiot SuperDude that SlimeySteve is not me. SlimeySteve does not appear to be you. First time was a conidence fair enough. Second time no way. So I'm to believe that a new poster found this obscure board and created a parody account of someone who was a regular poster on the old board but has barely posted on this one? I smell a rat. If this poster isn't Blade then it's an existing RFS user from this board. Does this account match any of the existing users on this site?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2017 20:26:56 GMT
One of the most ridiculous posts I've read on here in a while. Dude, Erjen, Ada, Blade, etc are not supposed to be your examples. Jesus Christ is. Stop making excuses for your unwillingness to deny yourself and taking up your cross and following Him in favour of living for yourself and your own self-gratification. No matter what you think about examples, the people mentioned constantly post in a manner that reflects badly on Christianity, this cannot help but sway peoples opinions on the religion as a whole. I don't doubt that it does. The point is it shouldn't. Particularly not a Christians opinion. A Christian not acting Christlike doesn't change the gospel message or the teachings of Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 13, 2017 20:32:10 GMT
SlimeySteve does not appear to be you. First time was a conidence fair enough. Second time no way. So I'm to believe that a new poster found this obscure board and created a parody account of someone who was a regular poster on the old board but has barely posted on this one? I smell a rat. If this poster isn't Blade then it's an existing RFS user from this board. Does this account match any of the existing users on this site? Given SlimeySteve's post history, I'm not sure why it's even a concern. The question was whether or not it's Blade, and the answer is that according to the obtainable information, it does not appear to be so.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 13, 2017 20:37:57 GMT
No matter what you think about examples, the people mentioned constantly post in a manner that reflects badly on Christianity, this cannot help but sway peoples opinions on the religion as a whole. I don't doubt that it does. The point is it shouldn't. Particularly not a Christians opinion. A Christian not acting Christlike doesn't change the gospel message or the teachings of Jesus. We re in agreement, the message is not changed, however if all the followers of a particular belief set are seen as hypocritical and not adhering to the belief set then one is unlikely to give that belief set any creedence, it is a fact of life that the followers of a belief reflect on that belief. in other words if Christianity is so great, how can these people follow it and still be so bad at following it's tenets? Just to be clear, I do agree, it shouldn't, that does not change the fact that it does.
|
|