|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 16, 2017 9:42:38 GMT
Huh... discarded your line of questioning entirely. Alright, then. Actually he set in place some mediocre strictures and several research and energy programs spawned by his spending currently exist. You made this same general statement months ago and were handed several examples. This "never read rebuttal and keep repeating the same question" thing is chronic. ::no:: Sweet baby Jesus. Trump is not "to blame" for anthropomorphic emissions or current PPM, nor is Obama "blameless" in that he could have done more during his time in the seat. Obama had, and Trump has, the opportunity to take action. Obama did to some weak degree. Trump, conversely, is literally just tossing bones to coal and oil execs. Don't see him setting the nation on the path to less emissions. Hope he proves me wrong. If anything proves you wrong, it'll be Nibiru. It's going to do things to the earth that the "global warming" farce never dreamed of doing.  You are in serious need of adult supervision. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 16, 2017 9:45:44 GMT
If anything proves you wrong, it'll be Nibiru. It's going to do things to the earth that the "global warming" farce never dreamed of doing. You are in serious need of adult supervision. RATTLED YOUR CHAIN! |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 16, 2017 9:46:08 GMT
If anything proves you wrong, it'll be Nibiru. It's going to do things to the earth that the "global warming" farce never dreamed of doing.  You literally can't offer counterpoints. You just keep switching to some new random statement. I deserve a better nemesis. You need to make points in order to get counterpoints, dude. And yeah, you deserve a better nemesis, but Ada is gone now, so you'll just have to make do with me.  |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 16, 2017 9:46:48 GMT
If anything proves you wrong, it'll be Nibiru. It's going to do things to the earth that the "global warming" farce never dreamed of doing. You are in serious need of adult supervision. You are in serious need of euthanasia. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 16, 2017 9:52:14 GMT
You literally can't offer counterpoints. You just keep switching to some new random statement. I deserve a better nemesis. You need to make points in order to get counterpoints  Yeah, ok... your statements about Obama, questions about action re- climate change, responsibility in that regard, etc - all are visibly quoted and addressed above. If you get past playing cutesy-shits in response I'll be back. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 16, 2017 9:57:35 GMT
You need to make points in order to get counterpoints Stop. Your statements about Obama, questions about action re- climate change, responsibility in that regard, etc - all are visibly quoted and addressed above. If you just want to play cutesy shits I'll leave you to it. Don't give me that bull. You played cutesy shits when you started this thread. Ice melting in Antarctica. Must be fossil-fuel global warming. Can't possibly be anything else. To suggest otherwise would be "anti-intellectual," yes? |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jun 16, 2017 10:21:29 GMT
LOL at people who can't believe human beings have affected the Earths climate.
LOL at stupid people!
|
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 16, 2017 10:24:16 GMT
You are in serious need of adult supervision. You are in serious need of euthanasia. Little chickenshit say what? |
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jun 16, 2017 12:46:30 GMT
We'll find out if Nazis/Cthulhu/Atlantis/NWO/YouTube have a base there! Hey, if you and your comrades are right, and it's manmade global warming, what can I do about it? If I lower my electric bill can I save some penguins, or something like that? Nuke Antarctica, before it's too late. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 16, 2017 22:00:01 GMT
Stop. Your statements about Obama, questions about action re- climate change, responsibility in that regard, etc - all are visibly quoted and addressed above. If you just want to play cutesy shits I'll leave you to it. Don't give me that bull This type of evasion would work better in an unrecorded physical conversation. It would still be dishonest, but there'd be no quotes to cite. In a text conversation, however, when you're denying the existence of statements right above you, it just looks like the inability to defend your points drove you to some weird and craven lunacy. |
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Jun 16, 2017 22:41:29 GMT
You are in serious need of euthanasia. Little chickenshit say what? Did the admittedly 'christian' Erjen just say that someone needed to be KILLED? Hmmmm... what would jesus do? |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 4:54:55 GMT
Little chickenshit say what? Did the admittedly 'christian' Erjen just say that someone needed to be KILLED? Hmmmm... what would jesus do? Thoughtcrime, right? |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 17, 2017 5:07:29 GMT
Did the admittedly 'christian' Erjen just say that someone needed to be KILLED? Hmmmm... what would jesus do? Thoughtcrime, right? Because stating something is just "thinking" it! Alt-language! |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 17, 2017 5:18:26 GMT
Because stating something is just "thinking" it! Alt-language! Cine, when I want to talk to you, I'll rattle your chain. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 17, 2017 5:22:10 GMT
Later that night:
Liquor Store Employee: "Here's your change."
Erjen: "I gave you a ten."
Liquor Store Employee: "Actually this is a five."
Erjen: "Thought crime?"
Liquor Store Employee: "Sir, you just said tha--"
Erjen: "RATTLED THAT CHAIN!"
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 17, 2017 8:23:15 GMT
|
|
