|
|
Post by darkpast on Jun 16, 2017 4:57:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 16, 2017 5:28:19 GMT
Interestingly, most of the others ended up in the 800 range. I'll be curious where this one ends up. |
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Jun 16, 2017 5:33:10 GMT
Interestingly, most of the others ended up in the 800 range. I'll be curious where this one ends up. i'm guessing anything less than 900m is a disappointment since they rebooted after the last one made over 700m. They paid RDJ a lot to appear. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 16, 2017 7:50:15 GMT
Interestingly, most of the others ended up in the 800 range. I'll be curious where this one ends up. i'm guessing anything less than 900m is a disappointment since they rebooted after the last one made over 700m. They paid RDJ a lot to appear. They also have to pay a percentage of the profits to Sony. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 16, 2017 11:51:03 GMT
Interestingly, most of the others ended up in the 800 range. I'll be curious where this one ends up. i'm guessing anything less than 900m is a disappointment since they rebooted after the last one made over 700m. They paid RDJ a lot to appear. I wouldn't say that necessarily. Nobody is crying if it makes 850 I wouldn't think. I would probably agree if it makes less than 800, but then again there isn't a whole lot of precedent for 6th film, 3rd reboot movies, and there are a lot of other things going on and to look forward to like GOTG2, WW, Thor, Star Wars, Pirates, etc. It's a bit of a crowded year. That effects things too. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 16, 2017 14:35:34 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2017 15:54:19 GMT
Why? If he keeps this up he may become President of the United States. Maybe he already is... |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 17, 2017 8:30:43 GMT
That would be a huge disappointment. That's less than Spider-Man and Spider-Man 3. If MCU can't even make a Spider-Man movie that outgrosses Sony's movies from 15 and 10 years ago, then MCU should just quit making Spider-Man movies and let Sony make them instead. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 9:54:35 GMT
That would be a huge disappointment. That's less than Spider-Man and Spider-Man 3. If MCU can't even make a Spider-Man movie that outgrosses Sony's movies from 15 and 10 years ago, then MCU should just quit making Spider-Man movies and let Sony make them instead. Weltrusten Mijnheer de President. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 17, 2017 11:52:32 GMT
That would be a huge disappointment. That's less than Spider-Man and Spider-Man 3. If MCU can't even make a Spider-Man movie that outgrosses Sony's movies from 15 and 10 years ago, then MCU should just quit making Spider-Man movies and let Sony make them instead. They should stop making them altogether for another decade and a half. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2017 7:49:51 GMT
I just hope for a fun movie. I saw a trailer yesterday before Wonder Woman for this and it is looking nore than ok to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 18, 2017 12:33:46 GMT
I just hope for a fun movie. I saw a trailer yesterday before Wonder Woman for this and it is looking nore than ok to me. Oh man was it that international trailer which was cut to shit? I don't think they lingered more than a second per scene. It looked rushed and edited by a crackhead. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 13:14:52 GMT
If the tracking numbers are true, Sony may have made the mistake of giving up Spider-man to Disney. Sony gets all the money as far as I know. Marvel may get a cut, but basically their stake is they get to use the character so it's a win-win. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2017 14:50:25 GMT
I just hope for a fun movie. I saw a trailer yesterday before Wonder Woman for this and it is looking nore than ok to me. Oh man was it that international trailer which was cut to shit? I don't think they lingered more than a second per scene. It looked rushed and edited by a crackhead. Dont know. I watch the teaser and the first major trailer. Than I stop watching those until I have seen the movie. I hadnt seen this trailer before. |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Jun 18, 2017 17:53:48 GMT
not too shabby, granted I sadly won't be a part of it  |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 18, 2017 18:43:56 GMT
If the tracking numbers are true, Sony may have made the mistake of giving up Spider-man to Disney. Sony gets all the money as far as I know. Marvel may get a cut, but basically their stake is they get to use the character so it's a win-win.
Why do people insist on perpetuating this bullshit?
SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 18:51:24 GMT
Sony gets all the money as far as I know. Marvel may get a cut, but basically their stake is they get to use the character so it's a win-win.
Why do people insist on perpetuating this bullshit?
SaveSaveSo I'm correct in saying Marvel isn't getting much money out of it right? Or am I misinformed? |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 18, 2017 19:04:48 GMT
Why do people insist on perpetuating this bullshit?
SaveSaveSo I'm correct in saying Marvel isn't getting much money out of it right? Or am I misinformed? Forgive my frustration here, ArArArchStanton. NO ONE IS GETTING ANY MONEY ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT THE WERE ALREADY ENTITLED TO IN THIS DEAL. Marvel has long wanted to put Spider-Man in its movies, but since Sony Pictures controlled the rights to the character since 1999, the web-slinger has been off limits. Making a crossover could have been costly, since Disney would have been expected to shell out millions. But the actual deal turns out to much cheaper — more like free.
Marvel Studios won’t pay Sony Pictures for the rights to put Spider-Man in “Captain America: Civil War,” the “Avengers” franchise or its other superhero films, as part of its new partnership with the studio, according to sources with knowledge of the deal. At the same time, Marvel won’t receive a cut of the box office for any of Sony’s films that feature Spider-Man. Sony won’t receive a percentage of the revenue Disney makes from Marvel’s films that have Spider-Man, either.
There MAY be some opportunities for Marvel to benefit financially from the Sony films, with payments tied to certain box office milestones. The financial relationship is likened by sources to the kind of compensation structure a producer would receive.
Marvel had originally wanted to buy back Spider-Man from Sony. But its resulting partnership, which was in the works since October, is just that — an arrangement that enables both Sony and Marvel to mutually benefit at the box office by having Spider-Man appear in their movies.
The deal actually benefits both sides significantly.
Sony needed to breathe life into its “Spider-Man” franchise; by lending its character to Marvel, it has a way to generate more exposure for its bigscreen hero. Doing so also creates some serious goodwill among Spider-Man fans, who have wanted to see the character become part of the Avengers.SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 19:23:57 GMT
So I'm correct in saying Marvel isn't getting much money out of it right? Or am I misinformed? Yeah I already know all of that. That's what I said. |
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Jun 18, 2017 19:31:07 GMT
They should finally rename this movie in "Iron Man & his little protégé.
|
|
