|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 18, 2017 19:50:52 GMT
Yeah I already know all of that. That's what I said. Okay, but you and everyone else here is missing the point. The primary goal of this deal was not for Marvel to make any money. It was to get Spider-Man into the MCU which they accomplished that without spending a dime. Will or if they make any money in this deal is beside the point. SaveSaveSaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 19:53:58 GMT
Yeah I already know all of that. That's what I said. Okay, but you and everyone else here is missing the point. The primary goal of this deal was not for Marvel to make any money. It was to get Spider-Man into the MCU which they accomplished without spending a dime. Will or if they make any money in this deal is beside the point. SaveSaveNo I got that. I think it's brilliant on their part. Don't fight Sony for the money, let them have it, get to use the character, and use Sony to make some additional films they wouldn't make otherwise. Both studies hype eachother both on screen and in the press, Sony get's their coin, makes some tie in films and everybody wins. It's fantastic. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 18, 2017 20:06:52 GMT
Okay, but you and everyone else here is missing the point. The primary goal of this deal was not for Marvel to make any money. It was to get Spider-Man into the MCU which they accomplished without spending a dime. Will or if they make any money in this deal is beside the point. SaveSaveNo I got that. I think it's brilliant on their part. Don't fight Sony for the money, let them have it, get to use the character, and use Sony to make some additional films they wouldn't make otherwise. Both studies hype eachother both on screen and in the press, Sony get's their coin, makes some tie in films and everybody wins. It's fantastic. It is fantastic and mutually beneficial. I acknowledge that Marvel really needed this deal but, Sony needed it more. A third reboot of a disconnected Spider-Man franchise in a market place where consumers want shared universes would not have worked out for them - no matter how many fucking Sinister Six or Venom movies they planned to put in the pipeline. There are some ill-informed (aka shit) narratives about Sony "regretting" giving Disney the rights to Spider-Man if Homecoming underperforms. That's bullshit, and it makes me sick. Sony produced a Spider-Man movie like they always do, the only difference this time around is the bought in some troubleshooters to iron out the kinks. End of story. SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 18, 2017 20:08:47 GMT
They should finally rename this movie in "Iron Man & his little protégé. It's too bad they won't, my sword swinging, one star friend. Maybe next time. SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 18, 2017 20:09:56 GMT
It is fantastic and mutually beneficial. I acknowledge that Marvel really needed this deal but, Sony needed it more. A third reboot of a disconnected Spider-Man franchise in a market place where consumers want shared universes would not have worked out for them - no matter how many fucking Sinister Six or Venom movies they planned to put in the pipeline. There are some ill-informed (aka shit) narratives about Sony "regretting" giving Disney the rights to Spider-Man if Homecoming underperforms. That's bullshit, and it makes me sick. Sony produced a Spider-Man movie like they always do, the only difference this time around is the bought in some troubleshooters to iron out the kinks. End of story. SaveSaveHomecoming will be fine. It's looking like they did it justice, and I'm actually more confident that RDJ is there because he probably wouldn't have signed on if there was something amiss. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 18, 2017 20:59:43 GMT
It is fantastic and mutually beneficial. I acknowledge that Marvel really needed this deal but, Sony needed it more. A third reboot of a disconnected Spider-Man franchise in a market place where consumers want shared universes would not have worked out for them - no matter how many fucking Sinister Six or Venom movies they planned to put in the pipeline. There are some ill-informed (aka shit) narratives about Sony "regretting" giving Disney the rights to Spider-Man if Homecoming underperforms. That's bullshit, and it makes me sick. Sony produced a Spider-Man movie like they always do, the only difference this time around is the bought in some troubleshooters to iron out the kinks. End of story. SaveSaveHomecoming will be fine. It's looking like they did it justice, and I'm actually more confident that RDJ is there because he probably wouldn't have signed on if there was something amiss. You really think he cares THAT much about the quality of the script if the price is right? I wouldn't. Jus' sayin'... |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 19, 2017 5:07:08 GMT
Homecoming will be fine. It's looking like they did it justice, and I'm actually more confident that RDJ is there because he probably wouldn't have signed on if there was something amiss. You really think he cares THAT much about the quality of the script if the price is right? I wouldn't. Jus' sayin'... Tom Cruise didn't care that The Mummy was a bad movie and RDJ sure as hell doesn't care that Spider-Man: Homecoming could be a bad movie. They get paid the same amount of money whether the movie is good or bad so they don't care. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 19, 2017 5:26:24 GMT
You really think he cares THAT much about the quality of the script if the price is right? I wouldn't. Jus' sayin'... Tom Cruise didn't care that The Mummy was a bad movie and RDJ sure as hell doesn't care that Spider-Man: Homecoming could be a bad movie. They get paid the same amount of money whether the movie is good or bad so they don't care. Tom Cruise is just awful. I'm watching Eyes Wide Shut, and he's totally ruining it. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 19, 2017 6:35:29 GMT
You really think he cares THAT much about the quality of the script if the price is right? I wouldn't. Jus' sayin'... Tom Cruise didn't care that The Mummy was a bad movie and RDJ sure as hell doesn't care that Spider-Man: Homecoming could be a bad movie. They get paid the same amount of money whether the movie is good or bad so they don't care. RDJ has a lot of money. Do you think his sole purpose on Earth is to accumulate more of it? Is he the boy who was granted three wishes and then used his first wish to wish for three more wishes? I don't know RDJ personally so I would never presume to know his thought process. However, I would surmise that his primary goal in life is protecting the RDJ brand. He likes the spotlight, and he loves being associated with successful ventures - like every other human being on Earth. Why would he not care if Homecoming, a film which he is in, besmirches his name and continuing legacy as Iron Man? SaveSave |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 19, 2017 8:10:52 GMT
Tom Cruise didn't care that The Mummy was a bad movie and RDJ sure as hell doesn't care that Spider-Man: Homecoming could be a bad movie. They get paid the same amount of money whether the movie is good or bad so they don't care. I would surmise that his primary goal in life is protecting the RDJ brand. He likes the spotlight, and he loves being associated with successful ventures - like every other human being on Earth. Why would he not care if Homecoming, a film which he is in, besmirches his name and continuing legacy as Iron Man? SaveSaveRDJ has no legacy. MCU movies are forgettable. In 10 years, no one is going to remember MCU or Iron Man. |
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 19, 2017 13:31:58 GMT
I would surmise that his primary goal in life is protecting the RDJ brand. He likes the spotlight, and he loves being associated with successful ventures - like every other human being on Earth. Why would he not care if Homecoming, a film which he is in, besmirches his name and continuing legacy as Iron Man? SaveSaveRDJ has no legacy. MCU movies are forgettable. In 10 years, no one is going to remember MCU or Iron Man. In 10 years, Marvel will still be making movies. Meanwhile, when Justice League flops (which it probably will, at least with critic reviews) they're most likely going to reboot the DCEU. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2017 14:09:51 GMT
RDJ has no legacy. MCU movies are forgettable. In 10 years, no one is going to remember MCU or Iron Man. In 10 years, Marvel will still be making movies. Meanwhile, when Justice League flops (which it probably will, at least with critic reviews) they're most likely going to reboot the DCEU. Marvel will own DC Comics by then. Just imagine the butt hurt. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 19, 2017 14:23:58 GMT
I would surmise that his primary goal in life is protecting the RDJ brand. He likes the spotlight, and he loves being associated with successful ventures - like every other human being on Earth. Why would he not care if Homecoming, a film which he is in, besmirches his name and continuing legacy as Iron Man? SaveSaveRDJ has no legacy. MCU movies are forgettable. In 10 years, no one is going to remember MCU or Iron Man. Okay love, I was just checking. I hope your weekend went well. SaveSave |
|
