|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jun 19, 2017 5:05:34 GMT
Would it be as good or... possibly better?
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Jun 19, 2017 5:09:48 GMT
Why are you trolling?
And to answer your fake question, it would be one of the worst movies ever made. I trully believe that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jun 19, 2017 5:12:07 GMT
This is a film discussion board, right? or whether you *don't* hear me typing, or whatever the *fuck* you hear me doing; when I'm in here, it means that I am working, *that* means don't come in. Now, do you think you can handle that? Oh, I can see Megan Fox playing Wendy.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Jun 19, 2017 5:13:03 GMT
This is a film discussion board, right? or whether you *don't* hear me typing, or whatever the *fuck* you hear me doing; when I'm in here, it means that I am working, *that* means don't come in. Now, do you think you can handle that? Oh, I can see Megan Fox playing Wendy. I don't usually see you making joke posts, so it just threw me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jun 19, 2017 5:14:35 GMT
This is a film discussion board, right? or whether you *don't* hear me typing, or whatever the *fuck* you hear me doing; when I'm in here, it means that I am working, *that* means don't come in. Now, do you think you can handle that? Oh, I can see Megan Fox playing Wendy. I don't usually see you making joke posts, so it just threw me. 
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Jun 19, 2017 5:16:43 GMT
Would it be as good or... possibly better? Would he be using the same exact shot set ups and lighting and all that? Same exact set decoration? Same exact music? Just curious. Starring Shia Labeouf as Jack Torrence?
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jun 19, 2017 5:19:49 GMT
Would it be as good or... possibly better? Would he be using the same exact shot set ups and lighting and all that? Same exact set decoration? Same exact music? Just curious. Starring Shia Labeouf as Jack Torrence? Just apply the same shitty formula as Gus Van Sant did for Psycho but probably have some Linkin Park playing when Jack meets Grady in the Gold Room.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Jun 19, 2017 5:30:32 GMT
Would he be using the same exact shot set ups and lighting and all that? Same exact set decoration? Same exact music? Just curious. Starring Shia Labeouf as Jack Torrence? Just apply the same shitty formula as Gus Van Sant did for Psycho but probably have some Linkin Park playing when Jack meets Grady in the Gold Room. LOL. I kind of want this to happen now. Look what you've done.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jun 19, 2017 5:48:59 GMT
LOL, I have a feeling that Michael Bay would cast Ben Affleck in the "Jack Nicholson role" and Samuel L. Jackson in the "Scatman Crothers role".
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jun 19, 2017 5:52:06 GMT
LOL, I have a feeling that Michael Bay would cast Ben Affleck in the "Jack Nicholson role" and Samuel L. Jackson in the "Scatman Crothers role". "Larry, just between you and me, we got a very serious problem with the people taking care of the place. They turned out to be completely unreliable motherfuckers!"
|
|
|
|
Post by Xcalatë on Jun 19, 2017 8:17:01 GMT
Nature would not allow such an abomination, there would be super volcanic eruptions and fire would rain from the sky!
|
|
|
|
Post by ghostintheshell on Jun 19, 2017 8:31:09 GMT
I believe he would hire some Victoria's Secret models to strut around the screen showing their goods while Jack Torrence is chasing his wife around the hotel with his advanced tactical laser equipped CGI axe-launcher.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jun 19, 2017 12:21:05 GMT
LOL, I have a feeling that Michael Bay would cast Ben Affleck in the "Jack Nicholson role" and Samuel L. Jackson in the "Scatman Crothers role". "Larry, just between you and me, we got a very serious problem with the people taking care of the place. They turned out to be completely unreliable motherfuckers!" LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Jun 19, 2017 15:59:13 GMT
I subscribe to the theory that King secretly likes Kubrick's version and did his TV movie remake with the bad CGI and the living hedges to ward off any potential attempts for a remake.
I mean, I know that's not true, but I hope it is. I can't see Kubrick's ever being topped.
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Jun 19, 2017 17:59:11 GMT
There would absolutely HAVE to be a few changes. The hotel would EXPLODE as it did in the book but not just from a boiler explosion. It would be like a thermonuclear explosion for sure.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2017 18:06:29 GMT
It would be literally impossible for him to do it. He would want to pan the camera around endlessly and have quick edits and it would drive him crazy.
In fact, you could make a great horror movie out of watching him slowly lose his mind like Jack Torrence during the production.
|
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on Jun 19, 2017 18:30:18 GMT
I subscribe to the theory that King secretly likes Kubrick's version and did his TV movie remake with the bad CGI and the living hedges to ward off any potential attempts for a remake. I mean, I know that's not true, but I hope it is. I can't see Kubrick's ever being topped. I couldn't even finish the remake. I see why Kubrick changed the book so much. What worked in the book definitely did not work on screen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on May 25, 2020 0:15:03 GMT
I'm sure any differences would be subtle. Take Wendy, for example: 
|
|
|
|
Post by Dramatic Look Gopher on May 25, 2020 0:38:30 GMT
Remember, this is Michael Bay's idea of making a "good" movie...
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on May 25, 2020 0:43:32 GMT
And nearly three years later: no.
|
|