|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 21, 2017 0:04:24 GMT
The title has been changed to Iron Man 4: Babysitting Spider-Kid.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jun 21, 2017 0:07:51 GMT
The title has been changed to Iron Man 4: Babysitting Spider-Kid.  |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 21, 2017 0:09:11 GMT
You gonna see it? I'm not.
|
|
barkingbaphomet
Junior Member
all backlit and creepysmoking
@barkingbaphomet
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Jun 21, 2017 0:10:59 GMT
they've really jumped the shark with this one. what does Tony Stark need with babysitting money? smh
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jun 21, 2017 0:12:26 GMT
they've really jumped the shark with this one. what does Tony Stark need with babysitting money? smh He's getting it on the side from Spider-Boy's hot aunt. |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Jun 21, 2017 0:15:21 GMT
You gonna see it? I'm not. well I want to see it, but I can't for well established reasons. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 21, 2017 0:15:57 GMT
they've really jumped the shark with this one. what does Tony Stark need with babysitting money? smh Tony isn't doing it for the money. Tony is doing it so he can get inside Aunt May's panties. |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jun 21, 2017 0:34:05 GMT
Pathetic dude. You could at least have come up with a wittier title.
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 21, 2017 2:23:24 GMT
The title has been changed to Iron Man 4: Babysitting Spider-Kid. All those times of you claiming you're never biased against Marvel just became utter bullshit after this thread. You're a DC fanboy jerkoff, plain and simple |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 21, 2017 2:28:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 21, 2017 3:11:03 GMT
The title has been changed to Iron Man 4: Babysitting Spider-Kid. All those times of you claiming you're never biased against Marvel just became utter bullshit after this thread. You're a DC fanboy jerkoff, plain and simple I am unbiased. I'm just reporting what I read on another website.
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 21, 2017 3:26:48 GMT
All those times of you claiming you're never biased against Marvel just became utter bullshit after this thread. You're a DC fanboy jerkoff, plain and simple I am unbiased. I'm just reporting what I read on another website.
Bullshit! You're just upset because Spider-Man will be another success for Marvel, but you're too chickenshit to admit it |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 21, 2017 3:34:27 GMT
I am unbiased. I'm just reporting what I read on another website.
Bullshit! You're just upset because Spider-Man will be another success for Marvel, but you're too chickenshit to admit it No, I read that breaking news on another website. And Spider-Man looks like it'll be a huge disappointment. The initial OW tracking was for $135 million, but more recent tracking numbers estimate a $90 million to $100 million OW for Spider-Man. That's not only less than Wonder Woman's OW but also less than Spider-Man and Spider-Man 3's OW from 15 and 10 years ago. That would be a huge disappointment. |
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 21, 2017 3:41:51 GMT
Bullshit! You're just upset because Spider-Man will be another success for Marvel, but you're too chickenshit to admit it No, I read that breaking news on another website. And Spider-Man looks like it'll be a huge disappointment. The initial OW tracking was for $135 million, but more recent tracking numbers estimate a $90 million to $100 million OW for Spider-Man. That's not only less than Wonder Woman's OW but also less than Spider-Man and Spider-Man 3's OW from 15 and 10 years ago. That would be a huge disappointment. Show a link then. And if you really want to judge the quality of a film based on how much it makes, then you're really grasping straws to try and defend the DCEU because you can't properly defend the films. I can care less how much a film makes, first reactions for Spider-Man are already calling it amazing! |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 21, 2017 3:48:27 GMT
No, I read that breaking news on another website. And Spider-Man looks like it'll be a huge disappointment. The initial OW tracking was for $135 million, but more recent tracking numbers estimate a $90 million to $100 million OW for Spider-Man. That's not only less than Wonder Woman's OW but also less than Spider-Man and Spider-Man 3's OW from 15 and 10 years ago. That would be a huge disappointment. Show a link then. And if you really want to judge the quality of a film based on how much it makes, then you're really grasping straws to try and defend the DCEU because you can't properly defend the films. I can care less how much a film makes, first reactions for Spider-Man are already calling it amazing! I wrote that post from my cell phone and I don't know how to copy and paste a link from my cell phone yet.
As for first reactions calling Spider-Man amazing, that is a lie. It's not "reactions"; it's only "reaction". As in 1 singular reaction. Pretty odd that there's no other reactions except for this 1 pro-MCU reaction. Did this 1 guy get a private screening all by himself with no one else there?
Or was this 1 single "reaction" just some BS made up by an MCU fan who hasn't even seen the movie yet? Probably the same guy who wrote a couple months ago that the Wonder Woman movie was a "complete mess".
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 21, 2017 3:56:53 GMT
Show a link then. And if you really want to judge the quality of a film based on how much it makes, then you're really grasping straws to try and defend the DCEU because you can't properly defend the films. I can care less how much a film makes, first reactions for Spider-Man are already calling it amazing! I wrote that post from my cell phone and I don't know how to copy and paste a link from my cell phone yet.
As for first reactions calling Spider-Man amazing, that is a lie. It's not "reactions"; it's only "reaction". As in 1 singular reaction. Pretty odd that there's no other reactions except for this 1 pro-MCU reaction. Did this 1 guy get a private screening all by himself with no one else there? Or was this 1 single "reaction" just some BS made up by an MCU fan who hasn't even seen the movie yet?
Bullshit still, because if you posted with your cell phone, it'd say via mobile next to the date and time of the post. Just stalling because you really don't have a link and it's full of shit and you're just upset that Spider-Man will be successful. And it's still a positive reaction. What you think of the review, whether it's biased or not, that's all subjective, but for you though, it's clearly butthurtness because Spider-Man will be successful |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 21, 2017 4:08:15 GMT
I wrote that post from my cell phone and I don't know how to copy and paste a link from my cell phone yet.
As for first reactions calling Spider-Man amazing, that is a lie. It's not "reactions"; it's only "reaction". As in 1 singular reaction. Pretty odd that there's no other reactions except for this 1 pro-MCU reaction. Did this 1 guy get a private screening all by himself with no one else there? Or was this 1 single "reaction" just some BS made up by an MCU fan who hasn't even seen the movie yet?
What you think of the review, whether it's biased or not, that's all subjective If that guy hasn't even seen the movie yet, then it's not a review. It's propaganda.
I'm questioning if the guy actually saw the movie since there are no other reactions. Did the guy get a private screening all by himself with no one else there?
Or was this 1 single "reaction" just some BS made up by an MCU fan who hasn't even seen the movie yet? Probably the same guy who wrote a couple months ago that the Wonder Woman movie was a "complete mess". I bet that when he wrote his "review" a couple months ago about Wonder Woman being "a complete mess", he hadn't seen Wonder Woman yet either.
|
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Jun 21, 2017 4:15:11 GMT
What you think of the review, whether it's biased or not, that's all subjective If that guy hasn't even seen the movie yet, then it's not a review. It's propaganda.
I'm questioning if the guy actually saw the movie since there are no other reactions. Did the guy get a private screening all by himself with no one else there?
Or was this 1 single "reaction" just some BS made up by an MCU fan who hasn't even seen the movie yet? Probably the same guy who wrote a couple months ago that the Wonder Woman movie was a "complete mess". I bet that when he wrote his "review" a couple months ago about Wonder Woman being "a complete mess", he hadn't seen Wonder Woman yet either.
Again, it's all subjective. You can believe what you want, but because you're a butthurt DC fanboy, obviously you're going to believe its bullshit. And I'm still waiting on that link where Spider-Man supposedly changed their title. Or was that just a load a crap, as usual?? And before you say its because you're on your phone, you're not, because it would say via mobile. Might as well come out and admit you're lying |
|
barkingbaphomet
Junior Member
all backlit and creepysmoking
@barkingbaphomet
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Jun 21, 2017 4:38:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 21, 2017 8:13:22 GMT
The title has been changed to Iron Man 4: Babysitting Spider-Kid. Ladies & gentlemen, the comedy stylings of DC-Fan Is this a new direction? Are now trying to consciously make amusing posts? You are actually funnier when you are trying not to be. |
|
