|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jun 21, 2017 0:39:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by outrider127 on Jun 21, 2017 0:44:01 GMT
yep, doesn't sound good
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 21, 2017 1:15:05 GMT
Ouch.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Jun 21, 2017 1:15:29 GMT
There went any interest I had in it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jun 21, 2017 1:25:45 GMT
Haha yep. They want to make him a weak goof who needs women to teach him how to be a pirate. I actually dont mind that in theory, but there is so much of it already.
But then I am not interested in a young Han Solo movie.
Old Han was always a loser.
He was a bad smuggler, he didnt pay his debts to the biggest crime boss around, even after he got the money he STILL didnt pay him, and he likes to shoot people from behind or under tables. Poor Greedo, he tells Han that he may be able to get by without paying off Jabba by taking the Falcon, which was a piece of junk anyway. And Han kills him.
No wonder Greedo needed to approach him with a blaster, Han is a double crossing maniac!
He takes his friends to a hideout where the guy running it is black and betrays him, and who I might add, only agrees to help them because he realizes Vader wasn't going to be a bro about their gangsta pact.
and Han needed his girlfriend to rescue him.
Oh and when he beats the bounty hunter that caught him--he did it by accident while blind.
A hero he ain't.
|
|
|
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Jun 21, 2017 1:29:16 GMT
He takes his friends to a hideout where the guy running it is black  |
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jun 21, 2017 1:33:02 GMT
Well it is true isn't it? He is like: Hey we need a place to hide--oh I know, there's this black guy I beat in gambling--he has a lot of money now, I am sure he will be honorable and keep us safe. Not to mention he has a lobotimized white guy as a servant. I don't miss any of the propaganda tidbits.  |
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jun 21, 2017 1:52:34 GMT
Haha yep. They want to make him a weak goof who needs women to teach him how to be a pirate. I actually dont mind that in theory, but there is so much of it already. But then I am not interested in a young Han Solo movie. Old Han was always a loser. He was a bad smuggler, he didnt pay his debts to the biggest crime boss around, even after he got the money he STILL didnt pay him, and he likes to shoot people from behind or under tables. Poor Greedo, he tells Han that he may be able to get by without paying off Jabba by taking the Falcon, which was a piece of junk anyway. And Han kills him. No wonder Greedo needed to approach him with a blaster, Han is a double crossing maniac! He takes his friends to a hideout where the guy running it is black and betrays him, and who I might add, only agrees to help them because he realizes Vader wasn't going to be a bro about their gangsta pact. and Han needed his girlfriend to rescue him. Oh and when he beats the bounty hunter that caught him--he did it by accident while blind. A hero he ain't. That summary was shitty and unnecessarily focused on race. You just don't "get" Star Wars or Han Solo. |
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jun 21, 2017 2:37:46 GMT
Lobot is a white slave. George Lucas wasn't kidding when he described Corporate Disney as "white slavers." |
|
|
|
Post by darkknightofgotham on Jun 21, 2017 2:48:48 GMT
Very bad news. They probably wanted to make a good film, but it couldn't get in the way of Disney's corporate/political views. I guess they're weren't enough female or non-white characters for Kennedy's liking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jun 21, 2017 2:57:00 GMT
I'm reminded of the reshoots Rogue One from last year. At least we still got a good movie from it. Having the directors leave during filming is obviously much more problematic.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jun 21, 2017 3:24:20 GMT
I wonder if Gareth Edwards (Director of "ROGUE ONE") is Available.
|
|
|
|
Post by NewtJorden on Jun 21, 2017 3:29:01 GMT
Isnt most of the filming done? How can they suddenly have creative difference?
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jun 21, 2017 3:33:26 GMT
Disney is shitting all over their director's visions. First Edwards' vision for Rogue One was axed by the studio, now it's obvious that Miller and Lord wanted something that the studio didn't.
Disney needs to let go and allow their directors to make their own movies. What a joke. They've botched these first two anthology films and their treatment of the respective directors. They're so lucky that Rogue One turned out good.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jun 21, 2017 3:36:00 GMT
Disney is shitting all over their director's visions. First Edwards' vision for Rogue One was axed by the studio, now it's obvious that Miller and Lord wanted something that the studio didn't. Disney needs to let go and allow their directors to make their own movies. What a joke. They've botched these first two anthology films and their treatment of the respective directors. They're so lucky that Rogue One turned out good. Gareth Edwards Vision for "ROGUE ONE" was Not Completely axed. He still had a lot of stuff in it including the end scene when Darth Vader killed all of those Rebel Crewman in the hall (Yeah that idea came from Gareth Edwards, Not Tony Gilroy). |
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jun 21, 2017 3:37:03 GMT
How about Jordan Vogt-Roberts ?
He Directed "KONG: SKULL ISLAND" and I think he is available to direct right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by jakesully on Jun 21, 2017 3:39:06 GMT
Reminds me of Edgar Wright leaving Ant Man due to creative differences which pissed me off cause we ended up getting a "safe" Ant Man film that played into the MCU's safe story line.
Oh well, I wasn't really looking forward to this Han Solo cash grab from Disney anyways.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jun 21, 2017 3:40:47 GMT
Disney is shitting all over their director's visions. First Edwards' vision for Rogue One was axed by the studio, now it's obvious that Miller and Lord wanted something that the studio didn't. Disney needs to let go and allow their directors to make their own movies. What a joke. They've botched these first two anthology films and their treatment of the respective directors. They're so lucky that Rogue One turned out good. Gareth Edwards Vision for "ROGUE ONE" was Not Completely axed. He still had a lot of stuff in it including the end scene when Darth Vader killed all of those Rebel Crewman in the hall (Yeah that idea came from Gareth Edwards, Not Tony Gilroy). But the entire fleeing on the beach with the plans scene was axed, his original ending was axed (Vader kills a barely-breathing Krennic), Krennic on the beach was deleted, and some of the action was reshot. I liked Rogue One a lot, but I could tell that it wasn't Edwards' movie. That frustrates me. |
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Jun 21, 2017 4:06:26 GMT
The people theorizing this was the result of feminazism and that Lord and Miller are rogue, MRA heroes should probably watch The Lego Movie again.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jun 21, 2017 16:31:11 GMT
Kathleen Kennedy:"Hey guys, ya know how the plan was to have Han make a heroic move at the end of the movie? Well, "Wonder Woman" is a hit right now, so Emilia Clarke is going to save Han instead."
|
|
