|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 23, 2017 22:26:28 GMT
^ Damn, I actually believe in all 10! Oh Shit, the Nazi thought-police have complete control of your mind. There may not even be anything of the real you remaining.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jun 23, 2017 22:38:22 GMT
^ Damn, I actually believe in all 10! There may not even be anything of the real you remaining. Help me, I'm disappearing The doors are breathing Floorboards are bowing Remind me if I'm not saying anything There's just so much I can't see I feel misplaced Like a moth trapped in the window blinds After wings came apart into pieces Who knows who I am anymore? One day I entered the room of my mind Shut the thick door behind my bed Although there was no life I felt safe here I decided to draw some pictures in the air And the darkness drawings of all my imaginations They were creeping and you told me -- I want to live forever
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 24, 2017 5:16:14 GMT
Too bad the scientific community can't do the same with the manmade global warming hoax You seemed to have missed the point of the OP. If manmade global warming was a result of "gangster science" like you claim, then why is it that the Koch brothers, who wanted manmade global warming disproved, paid for a study to be done by one of the most outspoken climate change skeptic scientists, and even HE came to the conclusion that manmade global warming was real? If you're theory was right, this shouldn't have happened. Here you have a blatant example of a study being paid for to produce a certain result, and the result wasn't obtained, and the result even changed the mind of those doing the study. Ask them.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 13:59:32 GMT
You seemed to have missed the point of the OP. If manmade global warming was a result of "gangster science" like you claim, then why is it that the Koch brothers, who wanted manmade global warming disproved, paid for a study to be done by one of the most outspoken climate change skeptic scientists, and even HE came to the conclusion that manmade global warming was real? If you're theory was right, this shouldn't have happened. Here you have a blatant example of a study being paid for to produce a certain result, and the result wasn't obtained, and the result even changed the mind of those doing the study. Ask them. ^Classic Erjen, make a claim and refuse to support it because he knows he's full of shit. Now let's see how long it takes for the other fuckwit to beg for attention.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 24, 2017 14:02:27 GMT
^Classic Erjen, make a claim and refuse to support it because he knows he's full of shit. Now let's see how long it takes for the other fuckwit to beg for attention. You don't say?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 19:44:06 GMT
^Classic Erjen, make a claim and refuse to support it because he knows he's full of shit. Now let's see how long it takes for the other fuckwit to beg for attention. You don't say? Do you have anything to say about the fact that you've never once been able to support any of your claims about science? It's almost as bad as the ridiculous claims that your fellow fuckwit, Blade, makes about me lying and yet he can't show one instance of me telling a lie. Both of you fuckwits seem to think that you can just make claims and not be questioned or expected to support them. Now let's see how long it takes for the other fuckwit to show up and start his ridiculous projecting again. I won't be able to read it, but I can still tell when he's the last to respond to a thread. That must be something they can't fix with the block feature. But the fact his posts never even show up when I read a thread is a decent feature. I can just picture him now stomping his feet and yelling upstairs, "Mommy, this mean guy on the internet won't answer me. He just tells other people what a fuckwit I am and I can't do anything to stop it! Mommy, am I really a fuckwit?" "Yes son, you really are a fuckwit. Now clean the basement or you'll have to find somewhere else to live." "Yes mommy."
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 24, 2017 19:47:45 GMT
^Classic Erjen, make a claim and refuse to support it because he knows he's full of shit. Now let's see how long it takes for the other fuckwit to beg for attention. Cash, still being a massive hypocrite.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 19:48:02 GMT
Your pal poisoned dragon denied well established theories due to the scientific method where was the call out thread for him?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 19:53:56 GMT
Your pal poisoned dragon denied well established theories due to the scientific method where was the call out thread for him? A) Why would I post a call-out thread for someone who doesn't even post here? B) What "well established theories" are you talking about or is this going to be another case of you not remembering but just because you can't remember doesn't mean it didn't happen? C) Do you ever stop and think before you decide to post and make a total fool of yourself?
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 19:59:16 GMT
Your pal poisoned dragon denied well established theories due to the scientific method where was the call out thread for him? A) Why would I post a call-out thread for someone who doesn't even post here? B) What "well established theories" are you talking about or is this going to be another case of you not remembering but just because you can't remember doesn't mean it didn't happen? C) Do you ever stop and think before you decide to post and make a total fool of yourself? I meant in IMDB v1 He denied the linguistic theory of the Proto-Indo European language. PIE is considered one of the most significant discoveries in the history of linguistics. PIE is the equivalent to Darwin's theories in biology or Emile Durkheim in sociology.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:14:52 GMT
A) Why would I post a call-out thread for someone who doesn't even post here? B) What "well established theories" are you talking about or is this going to be another case of you not remembering but just because you can't remember doesn't mean it didn't happen? C) Do you ever stop and think before you decide to post and make a total fool of yourself? I meant in IMDB v1 He denied the linguistic theory of the Proto-Indo European language. PIE is considered one of the most significant discoveries in the history of linguistics. PIE is the equivalent to Darwin's theories in biology or Emile Durkheim in sociology. I've never taken part in any such discussion because linguistics is not a field in which I have any background. Seriously, do you think I'm supposed to call out anybody who is wrong even about academic disciplines where I have no expertise? Please THINK BEFORE POSTING.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 20:18:55 GMT
I meant in IMDB v1 He denied the linguistic theory of the Proto-Indo European language. PIE is considered one of the most significant discoveries in the history of linguistics. PIE is the equivalent to Darwin's theories in biology or Emile Durkheim in sociology. I've never taken part in any such discussion because linguistics is not a field in which I have any background. Seriously, do you think I'm supposed to call out anybody who is wrong even about academic disciplines where I have no expertise? Please THINK BEFORE POSTING. So you are an expert in Climate change now? Please don't make me laugh.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 24, 2017 20:23:05 GMT
I've never taken part in any such discussion because linguistics is not a field in which I have any background. Seriously, do you think I'm supposed to call out anybody who is wrong even about academic disciplines where I have no expertise? Please THINK BEFORE POSTING. So you are an expert in Climate change now? Please don't make me laugh. Cash believes the government-controlled news media. That's what makes him an expert.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:25:13 GMT
I've never taken part in any such discussion because linguistics is not a field in which I have any background. Seriously, do you think I'm supposed to call out anybody who is wrong even about academic disciplines where I have no expertise? Please THINK BEFORE POSTING. So you are an expert in Climate change now? Please don't make me laugh. You're an expert in strawmen. Okay, I retract that, expertise was a wrong choice of words. I have a background in the physical sciences that's sufficient to understand most of the research. What I don't understand, I defer to those who do. Of course, this is nothing but another example of you being a time-wasting little shitstain.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 20:27:22 GMT
So you are an expert in Climate change now? Please don't make me laugh. You're an expert in strawmen. Okay, I retract that, expertise was a wrong choice of words.I have a background in the physical sciences that's sufficient to understand most of the research. What I don't understand, I defer to those who do. Of course, this is nothing but another example of you being a time-wasting little shitstain. So it wasn't a strawman then.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:27:26 GMT
So you are an expert in Climate change now? Please don't make me laugh. Cash believes the government-controlled news media. That's what makes him an expert. Evidence? I believe in the scientific method. You believe in conspiracy theory videos by your fellow uneducated simpletons and pure lunatics. Which one of us do you think is doing science correctly?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:28:37 GMT
You're an expert in strawmen. Okay, I retract that, expertise was a wrong choice of words.I have a background in the physical sciences that's sufficient to understand most of the research. What I don't understand, I defer to those who do. Of course, this is nothing but another example of you being a time-wasting little shitstain. So it wasn't a strawman then. Congratulations, you know what retract means, that means you comprehend at least one word more than blade understands.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 24, 2017 20:31:17 GMT
It's funny watching Cash get slapped around like a little bitch.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 20:35:04 GMT
So it wasn't a strawman then. Congratulations, you know what retract means, that means you comprehend at least one word more than blade understands. "A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.[1]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manSo you didnt claim you were an expert in Climate change then? This thread is about climate change and you said you make call out threads about things you are an expert in. What was the strawman?
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:35:06 GMT
My question has been answered - less than an hour.
|
|