|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:36:32 GMT
Congratulations, you know what retract means, that means you comprehend at least one word more than blade understands. "A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.[1]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manSo you didnt claim you were an expert in Climate change then? This thread is about c!image change and you said you make call out threads about things you are an expert in. I've already answered that before you even asked. Stop being a time-wasting little shitstain. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
 
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 20:39:05 GMT
"A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent.[1]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manSo you didnt claim you were an expert in Climate change then? This thread is about c!image change and you said you make call out threads about things you are an expert in. I've already answered that before you even asked. Stop being a time-wasting little shitstain. What was the strawman? You have not answered this. |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:46:02 GMT
I've already answered that before you even asked. Stop being a time-wasting little shitstain. What was the strawman? You have not answered this. "You're an expert in strawmen. Okay, I retract that," ^What part of that are you having trouble with? It's consecutive sentences, 10 words when you seperate "you're into "you are" and only thee of those words have over four letters. You need to have the IQ of an eggplant (so only ten points above Blade) not to understand what I said there. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 20:50:20 GMT
What was the strawman? You have not answered this. "You're an expert in strawmen. Okay, I retract that," ^What part of that are you having trouble with? It's consecutive sentences, 10 words when you seperate "you're into "you are" and only thee of those words have over four letters. You need to have the IQ of an eggplant (so only ten points above Blade) not to understand what I said there. Cash:I'm a climate change expert Me: You're a climate change expert? Cash: Ok I admit I called myself a climate change expert but I retract that. That's a strawman btw, yes I claimed I was an expert and yes you claimed I said I was an expert in your response but that is still a strawman even though I admit to making the claim. |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 20:57:21 GMT
"You're an expert in strawmen. Okay, I retract that," ^What part of that are you having trouble with? It's consecutive sentences, 10 words when you seperate "you're into "you are" and only thee of those words have over four letters. You need to have the IQ of an eggplant (so only ten points above Blade) not to understand what I said there. Cash:I'm a climate change expert Me: You're a climate change expert? Cash: Ok I admit I called myself a climate change expert but retract that. That's a strawman btw, yes I claimed I was an expert and yes you claimed I said I was an expert in your response but that is still a strawman even though I admit to making the claim. It might help if you actually read the posts in order and the sentences of each individual post in order. You're an imbecile but you're not as big an imbecile as you're pretending right now. You do this time-wasting shit on purpose and attempt to imply somebody said nearly the opposite of what they actually said. I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it. In case you haven't noticed, I put Blade on ignore for his long history of this same kind of dishonest horseshit and I'll gladly put you on ignore if you insist on being a dishonest piece of shit. He can't help it whereas you do it on purpose. If you want to be taken seriously and not relegated to the ranks of the terminally stupid then stop the time-wasting bullshit games that cause me to have to type out extra long paragraphs to explain something I had already explained in a few short sentences that should have never needed a fucking explanation. Also, stop twisting the order of events because that's just more proof that you're an intentional liar and all that nonsense from yesterday was just more time-wasting bullshit because you know you're a liar. At no point did I clam to be an expert on climate change specifically and you also know exactly what i said as far as my background because it's in this damn thread and you responded to it only a short time ago. STOP THE FUCKING LYING AND THE INTENTIONAL TIME_WASTING BULLSHIT. Do you fucking understand now, you pathetic imbecile? |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 24, 2017 21:04:17 GMT
Cash:I'm a climate change expert Me: You're a climate change expert? Cash: Ok I admit I called myself a climate change expert but retract that. That's a strawman btw, yes I claimed I was an expert and yes you claimed I said I was an expert in your response but that is still a strawman even though I admit to making the claim. It might help if you actually read the posts in order and the sentences of each individual post in order. You're an imbecile but you're not as big an imbecile as you're pretending right now. You do this time-wasting shit on purpose and attempt to imply somebody said nearly the opposite of what they actually said. I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it. In case you haven't noticed, I put Blade on ignore for his long history of this same kind of dishonest horseshit and I'll gladly put you on ignore if you insist on being a dishonest piece of shit. He can't help it whereas you do it on purpose. If you want to be taken seriously and not relegated to the ranks of the terminally stupid then stop the time-wasting bullshit games that cause me to have to type out extra long paragraphs to explain something I had already explained in a few short sentences that should have never needed a fucking explanation. Also, stop twisting the order of events because that's just more proof that you're an intentional liar and all that nonsense from yesterday was just more time-wasting bullshit because you know you're a liar. At no point did I clam to be an expert on climate change specifically and you also know exactly what i said as far as my background because it's in this damn thread and you responded to it only a short time ago. STOP THE FUCKING LYING AND THE INTENTIONAL TIME_WASTING BULLSHIT. Do you fucking understand now, you pathetic imbecile? MELTDOWN ALERT! MELTDOWN ALERT! |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 21:05:50 GMT
It might help if you actually read the posts in order and the sentences of each individual post in order. You're an imbecile but you're not as big an imbecile as you're pretending right now. You do this time-wasting shit on purpose and attempt to imply somebody said nearly the opposite of what they actually said. I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it. In case you haven't noticed, I put Blade on ignore for his long history of this same kind of dishonest horseshit and I'll gladly put you on ignore if you insist on being a dishonest piece of shit. He can't help it whereas you do it on purpose. If you want to be taken seriously and not relegated to the ranks of the terminally stupid then stop the time-wasting bullshit games that cause me to have to type out extra long paragraphs to explain something I had already explained in a few short sentences that should have never needed a fucking explanation. Also, stop twisting the order of events because that's just more proof that you're an intentional liar and all that nonsense from yesterday was just more time-wasting bullshit because you know you're a liar. At no point did I clam to be an expert on climate change specifically and you also know exactly what i said as far as my background because it's in this damn thread and you responded to it only a short time ago. STOP THE FUCKING LYING AND THE INTENTIONAL TIME_WASTING BULLSHIT. Do you fucking understand now, you pathetic imbecile? MELTDOWN ALERT! MELTDOWN ALERT! Fuck off, shit-for-last-brain-cell. |
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 24, 2017 21:09:39 GMT
Cash:I'm a climate change expert Me: You're a climate change expert? Cash: Ok I admit I called myself a climate change expert but retract that. That's a strawman btw, yes I claimed I was an expert and yes you claimed I said I was an expert in your response but that is still a strawman even though I admit to making the claim. It might help if you actually read the posts in order and the sentences of each individual post in order. You're an imbecile but you're not as big an imbecile as you're pretending right now. You do this time-wasting shit on purpose and attempt to imply somebody said nearly the opposite of what they actually said. I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it. In case you haven't noticed, I put Blade on ignore for his long history of this same kind of dishonest horseshit and I'll gladly put you on ignore if you insist on being a dishonest piece of shit. He can't help it whereas you do it on purpose. If you want to be taken seriously and not relegated to the ranks of the terminally stupid then stop the time-wasting bullshit games that cause me to have to type out extra long paragraphs to explain something I had already explained in a few short sentences that should have never needed a fucking explanation. Also, stop twisting the order of events because that's just more proof that you're an intentional liar and all that nonsense from yesterday was just more time-wasting bullshit because you know you're a liar. At no point did I clam to be an expert on climate change specifically and you also know exactly what i said as far as my background because it's in this damn thread and you responded to it only a short time ago. STOP THE FUCKING LYING AND THE INTENTIONAL TIME_WASTING BULLSHIT. Do you fucking understand now, you pathetic imbecile? No, you're pretending to have me on ignore because I called you out on your lies and hypocrisy. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 21:29:59 GMT
Cash:I'm a climate change expert Me: You're a climate change expert? Cash: Ok I admit I called myself a climate change expert but retract that. That's a strawman btw, yes I claimed I was an expert and yes you claimed I said I was an expert in your response but that is still a strawman even though I admit to making the claim. It might help if you actually read the posts in order and the sentences of each individual post in order. You're an imbecile but you're not as big an imbecile as you're pretending right now. You do this time-wasting shit on purpose and attempt to imply somebody said nearly the opposite of what they actually said. I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it. In case you haven't noticed, I put Blade on ignore for his long history of this same kind of dishonest horseshit and I'll gladly put you on ignore if you insist on being a dishonest piece of shit. He can't help it whereas you do it on purpose. If you want to be taken seriously and not relegated to the ranks of the terminally stupid then stop the time-wasting bullshit games that cause me to have to type out extra long paragraphs to explain something I had already explained in a few short sentences that should have never needed a fucking explanation. Also, stop twisting the order of events because that's just more proof that you're an intentional liar and all that nonsense from yesterday was just more time-wasting bullshit because you know you're a liar. At no point did I clam to be an expert on climate change specifically and you also know exactly what i said as far as my background because it's in this damn thread and you responded to it only a short time ago. STOP THE FUCKING LYING AND THE INTENTIONAL TIME_WASTING BULLSHIT. Do you fucking understand now, you pathetic imbecile? PERSON A: I am X Person B: You are X? Person A: Ok fine I am not X. Nice strawman. Was I wrong in claiming you said you were an expert (Yes I know you retracted it later, not relevant)? Yes or no? If not how the fuck is that a strawman? I literally am feeling a numbing sensation in my skull due to all the mental effort I am putting in to understanding why the fuck yiu think that was a strawman. |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 22:10:56 GMT
It might help if you actually read the posts in order and the sentences of each individual post in order. You're an imbecile but you're not as big an imbecile as you're pretending right now. You do this time-wasting shit on purpose and attempt to imply somebody said nearly the opposite of what they actually said. I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it. In case you haven't noticed, I put Blade on ignore for his long history of this same kind of dishonest horseshit and I'll gladly put you on ignore if you insist on being a dishonest piece of shit. He can't help it whereas you do it on purpose. If you want to be taken seriously and not relegated to the ranks of the terminally stupid then stop the time-wasting bullshit games that cause me to have to type out extra long paragraphs to explain something I had already explained in a few short sentences that should have never needed a fucking explanation. Also, stop twisting the order of events because that's just more proof that you're an intentional liar and all that nonsense from yesterday was just more time-wasting bullshit because you know you're a liar. At no point did I clam to be an expert on climate change specifically and you also know exactly what i said as far as my background because it's in this damn thread and you responded to it only a short time ago. STOP THE FUCKING LYING AND THE INTENTIONAL TIME_WASTING BULLSHIT. Do you fucking understand now, you pathetic imbecile? PERSON A: I am X Person B: You are X? Person A: Ok fine I am not X. Nice strawman. Was I wrong in claiming you said you were an expert (Yes I know you retracted it later, not relevant)? Yes or no? If not how the fuck is that a strawman? I literally am feeling a numbing sensation in my skull due to all the mental effort I am putting in to understanding why the fuck yiu think that was a strawman. "I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it." ^How many times do you think you will need to read that before you understand it? |
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Jun 24, 2017 22:16:12 GMT
PERSON A: I am X Person B: You are X? Person A: Ok fine I am not X. Nice strawman. Was I wrong in claiming you said you were an expert (Yes I know you retracted it later, not relevant)? Yes or no? If not how the fuck is that a strawman? I literally am feeling a numbing sensation in my skull due to all the mental effort I am putting in to understanding why the fuck yiu think that was a strawman. "I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it." ^How many times do you think you will need to read that before you understand it? WHen are you going to own up to your lies? Oh, I forgot, you can't...because you're a coward. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 22:26:59 GMT
PERSON A: I am X Person B: You are X? Person A: Ok fine I am not X. Nice strawman. Was I wrong in claiming you said you were an expert (Yes I know you retracted it later, not relevant)? Yes or no? If not how the fuck is that a strawman? I literally am feeling a numbing sensation in my skull due to all the mental effort I am putting in to understanding why the fuck yiu think that was a strawman. "I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it." ^How many times do you think you will need to read that before you understand it? How the fuck would that make me think it was facetious? |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 24, 2017 22:28:58 GMT
"I made the comment "you're an expert on strawmen" facetiously and you already know this because i IMMEDIATELY IN THE FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE OF THE SAME DAMN POST said I retracted it." ^How many times do you think you will need to read that before you understand it? How the fuck would that make me think it was facetious? That's it, you just went full Bladetard. We're done here. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 24, 2017 22:29:24 GMT
tpfkar What is the point of all this idiot jabbering? Nobody knows or cares what you distorted, made up, willfully "misremembered" about what a poster not on this board supposedly posted on the old board.
Actually I had forgotten I had called him an idiot in the post. I have short term memory problems. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jun 24, 2017 22:34:01 GMT
How the fuck would that make me think it was facetious? That's it, you just went full Bladetard. We're done here. See ya later climate change expert. |
|
