|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 25, 2017 0:48:26 GMT
gods, i hope they really landed it. Spider-Man is my favorite.  |
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Jun 25, 2017 2:46:19 GMT
I'm starting to think of "overwhelmingly positive" early reactions as a bit of a jinx. I'm not reading them because they're likely too shilly. We'll know the truth soon enough. Hoping for something at least on the level of Spider-Man 2. Don't care what it earns as the take can't be added to the MCU cume anyway. Spider-Man 2 is a well made and great film. Being good as that is High Standard. It's gonna be hard to top that movie. |
|
|
|
Post by Atom(ica) Discord on Jun 25, 2017 3:04:36 GMT
I'm starting to think of "overwhelmingly positive" early reactions as a bit of a jinx. I'm not reading them because they're likely too shilly. We'll know the truth soon enough. Hoping for something at least on the level of Spider-Man 2. Don't care what it earns as the take can't be added to the MCU cume anyway. Spider-Man 2 is a well made and great film. Being good as that is High Standard. It's gonna be hard to top that movie. Never said it had to top it. I'm hoping it's just as good. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 25, 2017 4:04:01 GMT
Spider-Man 2 is a well made and great film. Being good as that is High Standard. It's gonna be hard to top that movie. Never said it had to top it. I'm hoping it's just as good. If Spider-Man: Homecoming isn't as good as Spider-Man 2, then Spider-Man: Homecoming is a huge disappointment. Because it'll mean that a non-MCU connected Spider-Man movie was better than a Spider-Man movie that's connected to the MCU. That would be a huge blow to MCU and a huge blow to MCU dictator Kevin Feige's massive ego. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 4:23:28 GMT
Never said it had to top it. I'm hoping it's just as good. If Spider-Man: Homecoming isn't as good as Spider-Man 2, then Spider-Man: Homecoming is a huge disappointment. Because it'll mean that a non-MCU connected Spider-Man movie was better than a Spider-Man movie that's connected to the MCU. That would be a huge blow to MCU and a huge blow to MCU dictator Kevin Feige's massive ego. So you talk about someone else's supposedly massive ego? Lol. You present the dogpoo delusions about CBM's that you call hopes and dreams as absolute truths and facts. Newsflash (and not from the fake media Donald): you only ridicule yourself when you post. Not the MCU, not its fans. Only you get to be portrayed as trash by your own posts. Calling us dumb makes you look stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Jun 25, 2017 5:27:51 GMT
So as long as you are happy with watching a movie revolving around high school histrionics that at best is inferior to the first 2 Raimi Spidey movies then you might be satisfied? And that somehow is enough to make sycophants on this board break into a circle jerk? Y'all really set that bar of expectation high, huh? Also no opinion is more reliable than some unknown blogger desperate to see her name on some other morons twitter account, right?
Let the celebration begin. Now I understand why the long time Marvel victory cry is "Make Mine Mediocre"
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 25, 2017 5:36:37 GMT
So as long as you are happy with watching a movie revolving around high school histrionics that at best is inferior to the first 2 Raimi Spidey movies then you might be satisfied? And that somehow is enough to make sycophants on this board break into a circle jerk? Y'all really set that bar of expectation high, huh? Also no opinion is more reliable than some unknown blogger desperate to see her name on some other morons twitter account, right? Let the celebration begin. Now I understand why the long time Marvel victory cry is "Make Mine Mediocre" Excellent post! It just goes to show how moronic MCU fans are. As long as a movie says it's connected to MCU, MCU fans will think it's 1 of the best movies ever made. If MCU said that the Howard the Duck movie from 1986 was connected to MCU, then MCU fans would say Howard the Duck is 1 of the greatest movies ever made. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 25, 2017 6:34:11 GMT
So as long as you are happy with watching a movie revolving around high school histrionics that at best is inferior to the first 2 Raimi Spidey movies then you might be satisfied? And that somehow is enough to make sycophants on this board break into a circle jerk? Y'all really set that bar of expectation high, huh? Also no opinion is more reliable than some unknown blogger desperate to see her name on some other morons twitter account, right? Let the celebration begin. Now I understand why the long time Marvel victory cry is "Make Mine Mediocre" So you're upset that it appears to be a good movie? Why? I'm looking forward to it myself.
Were you upset when WW wasn't quite as good as First Avenger?
|
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Jun 25, 2017 6:42:53 GMT
good lordy have we not seen this crap before and dont all mcu films get so called good reviews? sounds to me that it is another silly generic mcu movie. people need to read the reviews. all are saying it is lots of fun, hardly anything about if the plot is strong or compelling or a game changer like X2 was in 2003 or TDK in 2008 or Logan in 2017
we cant take this seriously anymore as it is more than clear that the internet will eat up any crapfest mcu gives them.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 25, 2017 6:49:53 GMT
good lordy have we not seen this crap before and dont all mcu films get so called good reviews? sounds to me that it is another silly generic mcu movie. people need to read the reviews. all are saying it is lots of fun, hardly anything about if the plot is strong or compelling or a game changer like X2 was in 2003 or TDK in 2008 or Logan in 2017 we cant take this seriously anymore as it is more than clear that the internet will eat up any crapfest mcu gives them. yeah those awesome marvel movies!! DAMN THEM, LET'S MAKE UP STUFF TO COMPLAIN ABOUT!!!! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 7:01:50 GMT
good lordy have we not seen this crap before and dont all mcu films get so called good reviews? sounds to me that it is another silly generic mcu movie. people need to read the reviews. all are saying it is lots of fun, hardly anything about if the plot is strong or compelling or a game changer like X2 was in 2003 or TDK in 2008 or Logan in 2017 we cant take this seriously anymore as it is more than clear that the internet will eat up any crapfest mcu gives them. Okay then why are you here? |
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Jun 25, 2017 7:17:02 GMT
good lordy have we not seen this crap before and dont all mcu films get so called good reviews? sounds to me that it is another silly generic mcu movie. people need to read the reviews. all are saying it is lots of fun, hardly anything about if the plot is strong or compelling or a game changer like X2 was in 2003 or TDK in 2008 or Logan in 2017 we cant take this seriously anymore as it is more than clear that the internet will eat up any crapfest mcu gives them. Okay then why are you here? because I like spiderman and I dont like what mcu has turned him into. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 25, 2017 7:24:04 GMT
Okay then why are you here? because I like spiderman and I dont like what mcu has turned him into. His greatest version ever? Yeah that's really a shame. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jun 25, 2017 10:11:43 GMT
good lordy have we not seen this crap before and dont all mcu films get so called good reviews? sounds to me that it is another silly generic mcu movie. people need to read the reviews. all are saying it is lots of fun, hardly anything about if the plot is strong or compelling or a game changer like X2 was in 2003 or TDK in 2008 or Logan in 2017 we cant take this seriously anymore as it is more than clear that the internet will eat up any crapfest mcu gives them. X2 wasn't that good, it's just that back in 2003 there wasn't much competition. And nowadays it's got nostalgia blinding people. Same with SM2 to an extent, it's hardly the perfect film it's made out to be. As for Logan, critics went easy on it because it was Jackman's swan song and because they had the "guts" to kill him in the end (cowardly, waiting until some film set in the future to do this). As for Dark Knight, it also had little competition and had a special something that protected it from negative critics. And no, it wasn't any acting. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 10:34:39 GMT
Okay then why are you here? because I like spiderman and I dont like what mcu has turned him into. So you have decided on a 20 minute appearance as a side character that you dont like this version of Spider-man. You are really prejudiced arent you. I pity your sad little mind. |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jun 25, 2017 13:00:22 GMT
I don't even mind if they didn't make one big shared universe (which that would be since it's 3 studios, the MCU is just sequels of one movie line). As long as the other studios tried to make good movies and not use it for the popular IP and revenue only. You can tell that ASM (which I actually liked) was basically Raimi's Spider-man mixed with what would have been Spider-man 4 with little changes (webshooters and Ben's death). I do mind if it's not a shared universe. If Venom isn't shared, I can't honestly say I won't be in any hurry to watch it, even if it's really good. It just won't have any purpose to me.
I do agree that Amazing 1 was basically just Spiderman 4. It was clear Lizard was going to be the next villain.
But that's the thing: if they aren't making good movies then what is the point? All that does is soil the main part of the universe. |
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on Jun 25, 2017 13:01:14 GMT
Seriously can we just ban DC fan? He has no idea what he's talking about and every time a marvel movie comes out he always has to complain about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lee on Jun 25, 2017 13:06:24 GMT
good lordy have we not seen this crap before and dont all mcu films get so called good reviews? sounds to me that it is another silly generic mcu movie. people need to read the reviews. all are saying it is lots of fun, hardly anything about if the plot is strong or compelling or a game changer like X2 was in 2003 or TDK in 2008 or Logan in 2017 we cant take this seriously anymore as it is more than clear that the internet will eat up any crapfest mcu gives them. X2 wasn't that good, it's just that back in 2003 there wasn't much competition. And nowadays it's got nostalgia blinding people. Same with SM2 to an extent, it's hardly the perfect film it's made out to be. As for Logan, critics went easy on it because it was Jackman's swan song and because they had the "guts" to kill him in the end (cowardly, waiting until some film set in the future to do this). As for Dark Knight, it also had little competition and had a special something that protected it from negative critics. And no, it wasn't any acting. Same bullshit as always. TDK and Logan are two of the best comic book movies ever. They have anything, what a real movie fan wants, about a good film. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 25, 2017 13:47:18 GMT
But that's the thing: if they aren't making good movies then what is the point? All that does is soil the main part of the universe. So Venom is a bad movie? I haven't seen it yet.
Listen, if they're bothering to work together, I'm going to give them credit for attempting to produce a quality product. Homecoming looks solid for instance, so let's give it a run and see what happens. If it's shit, we'll ignore it, and that's why they're going for loose continuity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 13:49:02 GMT
X2 wasn't that good, it's just that back in 2003 there wasn't much competition. And nowadays it's got nostalgia blinding people. Same with SM2 to an extent, it's hardly the perfect film it's made out to be. As for Logan, critics went easy on it because it was Jackman's swan song and because they had the "guts" to kill him in the end (cowardly, waiting until some film set in the future to do this). As for Dark Knight, it also had little competition and had a special something that protected it from negative critics. And no, it wasn't any acting. Same bullshit as always. TDK and Logan are two of the best comic book movies ever. They have anything, what a real movie fan wants, about a good film. TDK is not a good film. There is no story there. What is the point of the film? To show that some people are just crazy and want to make people suffer? Whats the point in that? Its just lazy writing by people who had no clue what to make this film about. It all looks awesome but its all very thin. The love for this movie comes from one thing and that is because its Ledgers great goodbye. I found his performance over the top and not good at all. He adds to the pointlesness of the complete film. Batman Begins is the only good film in The Dark Knight Triology. |
|
