Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2017 22:41:15 GMT
Well IMDB v2 really is just like IMDB. It's full of people who can't accept that someone has a different opinion and that it doesn't make them inferior. Well, it is all the same people....
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Feb 28, 2017 13:40:14 GMT
Yes, because it's impossible for someone else who watches movies to have a different opinion from yours.... You are allowed to have a different opinion. It doesn't make you any less wrong, but no one said you couldn't have a different opinion Good job Kuato, you demonstrate again that you do not understand the concept of opinions vis-a-vis the concepts of facts and assessments. Maybe you should go home and rethink your life...
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Feb 28, 2017 14:04:27 GMT
You are allowed to have a different opinion. It doesn't make you any less wrong, but no one said you couldn't have a different opinion Sure it's wrong, in your opinion.... That's the thing though, it's not just my opinion. -Google users give the movie 69%. -IMDb has it rated as a 6.7. -Metacritic has it at a 54%. -At Rotten Tomatoes it has a 65% from critics and a 57% from fans. You can like it. You can like whatever you want. But it's not a well-received movie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 14:13:28 GMT
That's the thing though, it's not just my opinion. So? You can like it. You can like whatever you want. But it's not a well-received movie. OK. That's obviously the point of this whole thread, so I'm not sure what you're really trying to say here....
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Feb 28, 2017 14:27:09 GMT
That's the thing though, it's not just my opinion. So?
You can like it. You can like whatever you want. But it's not a well-received movie. OK. That's obviously the point of this whole thread, so I'm not sure what you're really trying to say here.... So, you can't keep saying, "Well, that's just your opinion." It's not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 16:12:37 GMT
So, you can't keep saying, "Well, that's just your opinion." It's not. I'm pretty sure it's still your opinion, whether it's shared by others or not. I never said it's only your opinion....
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Feb 28, 2017 17:34:08 GMT
Sure it's wrong, in your opinion.... That's the thing though, it's not just my opinion. -Google users give the movie 69%. -IMDb has it rated as a 6.7. -Metacritic has it at a 54%. -At Rotten Tomatoes it has a 65% from critics and a 57% from fans. You can like it. You can like whatever you want. But it's not a well-received movie. Well, it seems like you, kuatorises, would rate this movie below 50% which means you would be in the minority of everyone of those measures you quoted. That does not make your opinion less valid but it does mean that a great many do not share your opinion.
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Feb 28, 2017 18:28:14 GMT
That's the thing though, it's not just my opinion. -Google users give the movie 69%. -IMDb has it rated as a 6.7. -Metacritic has it at a 54%. -At Rotten Tomatoes it has a 65% from critics and a 57% from fans. You can like it. You can like whatever you want. But it's not a well-received movie. Well, it seems like you, kuatorises, would rate this movie below 50% which means you would be in the minority of everyone of those measures you quoted. That does not make your opinion less valid but it does mean that a great many do not share your opinion. Whether I rate it below 50% or above it, it doesn't change any of the facts I listed. It has no relevance whatsoever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 18:35:13 GMT
Whether I rate it below 50% or above it, it doesn't change any of the facts I listed. It has no relevance whatsoever. Neither do the facts you listed....
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Feb 28, 2017 19:09:55 GMT
Whether I rate it below 50% or above it, it doesn't change any of the facts I listed. It has no relevance whatsoever. Neither do the facts you listed.... Stop it Jan.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 19:15:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Feb 28, 2017 21:00:41 GMT
Well, it seems like you, kuatorises, would rate this movie below 50% which means you would be in the minority of everyone of those measures you quoted. That does not make your opinion less valid but it does mean that a great many do not share your opinion. Whether I rate it below 50% or above it, it doesn't change any of the facts I listed. It has no relevance whatsoever. The facts you listed don't support your position. They show that the majority of critics and audience members have a positive opinion of this movie. A small majority but still a majority.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2017 22:25:09 GMT
The facts you listed don't support your position. They show that the majority of critics and audience members have a positive opinion of this movie. A small majority but still a majority. It's all moot anyway. The OP's point is that they feel the movie is undeservedly hated. This acknowledges that a lot of people don't like it. Posting links, sources, stats, etc that show the movie isn't liked by a lot of people is kind of a waste of time when no one here has disputed that.... Still not sure why he even wasted the time digging all that up.
|
|
mrbeale
New Member
@mrbeale
Posts: 41
Likes: 24
|
Post by mrbeale on Feb 28, 2017 22:26:21 GMT
Agreed. It's quite underrated.
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Mar 1, 2017 0:00:06 GMT
I personally don't like it that much. It's not terrible but I don't think it's very good. And I would disagree with most of what you listed as being good aspects of the movie, of which it does have.
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 1, 2017 14:50:20 GMT
Whether I rate it below 50% or above it, it doesn't change any of the facts I listed. It has no relevance whatsoever. The facts you listed don't support your position. They show that the majority of critics and audience members have a positive opinion of this movie. A small majority but still a majority. My position was that it is not a well-received movie and the information I posted proved just that. You keep combining two separate arguments with all this "majority" talk. I never said anything about that.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Mar 9, 2017 17:46:38 GMT
B-
I prefer it to TPM because Obi-Wan + Dooku's side scenes are very good. The rain fight is excellent.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Mar 11, 2017 12:29:25 GMT
Personally I'm undecided on whether Episode 1 is actually better than Episode 2.
|
|
|
Post by Oh My Aching Ackbar-Raddus! on Mar 11, 2017 22:45:18 GMT
No, it's just an objectively bad film. You obviously don't know the definition of objectively.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 11, 2017 23:17:19 GMT
Obviously, you don't, if you think this was an acceptable movie. Yes, because it's impossible for someone else who watches movies to have a different opinion from yours.... no, don't you understand, your opinion is wrong.
|
|