|
Post by Arlon10 on Jul 7, 2017 16:03:49 GMT
That would all be wonderful news if you happen to be a goldfish. The arguments for intelligent design in that video are over 50 years old. That is not to say they aren't good arguments, they are. They just have not been effective against popular opinion and the courts. Err... wouldn't a 'good argument' be one which was effective in exactly these sort of places? One would hope so, yes. Hopes have been dashed before.
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Jul 7, 2017 16:52:37 GMT
sold sam simes
Had presented a cosmologist's opinion on the case for intelligent design. Since I assume that you are not of that occupation, how can you intelligently argue their findings?
No you didn't. You presented a video made by a lying creationist. There's a difference.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 7, 2017 17:11:32 GMT
Vernuf
How do we know that he is lying? That means that without a doubt you know all of the facts---the reality.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jul 7, 2017 18:08:45 GMT
Vernuf
How do we know that he is lying? That means that without a doubt you know all of the facts---the reality.
How do we know that he is correct? That means that without a doubt you know all the facts---the reality.
You seriously could not see that your own argument applies to you too?
Pull your head out of your ass.
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Jul 7, 2017 19:13:37 GMT
Vernuf
How do we know that he is lying? That means that without a doubt you know all of the facts---the reality.
I don't need to know all the facts. As pointed out earlier, his summary is completely false and the falsity of his statements there are such there's no excuse for him to have made them other than lying.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 7, 2017 19:21:38 GMT
osv
Add illiteracy to your line of accomplishments.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jul 7, 2017 19:34:29 GMT
osv
Add illiteracy to your line of accomplishments.
Look at your thread title. Not very ambiguous is it? Seriously, you are one vapid, idiotic moron. Practically every post you make is stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jul 7, 2017 23:03:14 GMT
![](https://s26.postimg.org/tek3suwt5/laugh.gif) Poor Molar.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jul 8, 2017 1:34:08 GMT
Pseudoscience, just as I predicted. Finely tuned universe, prime mover, watchmaker argument, these are hardly new arguments and they've already been debunked.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jul 8, 2017 5:19:29 GMT
![](https://s26.postimg.org/tek3suwt5/laugh.gif) Poor Molar. It's too easy. I think she responds to me without quoting because she hopes I won't notice her stupid replies.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jul 8, 2017 8:08:40 GMT
One other way of creating this thread would be to title it as:
"Cosmologists claim that they have proven the existence of God". That way it will appear less as a fact and more as opinion.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 9, 2017 18:29:24 GMT
osv
Add illiteracy to your line of accomplishments.
Please explain how I insulted you.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 9, 2017 18:49:39 GMT
gadreel
Why not simply let it go. I am not angry with you.
I honestly believe that you can be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 9, 2017 19:08:44 GMT
gadreel
Why not simply let it go. I am not angry with you.
I honestly believe that you can be interesting. You accused me of insulting you and then accused me of lying by not being true to my word. I am interested in what exactly you think I did that insulted you so that if it is a valid point I can apologise, of course if it turned out not to be a valid issue you have I would expect an acknowledgement from you of that. I personally don't care if you are angry or not, you made an accusation that I feel is unfounded, I am guessing you realise that as you seem to be trying to steer the conversation away from the responsibility of your statement.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jul 10, 2017 8:38:47 GMT
Err... wouldn't a 'good argument' be one which was effective in exactly these sort of places? One would hope so, yes. Hopes have been dashed before. Indeed. And how is your copyrighted appeal against the Dover trial proceeding?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2017 11:37:21 GMT
One would hope so, yes. Hopes have been dashed before. Indeed. And how is your copyrighted appeal against the Dover trial proceeding? "Your honour, I have irrefutable evidence of intelligent design!" "What is the evidence?" "Oh, you think you have the right to demand evidence from me? Ha! You have no authority over me." "But... what's the evidence?" "There's mountains of evidence, it's just not for the likes of you. You will undoubtedly ignore all the evidence anyway, but just because you do that, that doesn't mean it's bad." "To be clear, then, you're not going to present any evidence?" "See, the atheists always ignore all the evidence! They're so stupid!" "Case dismissed." "They're trying to take away our religious freedom! We have to have traditional marriage and property rights or we're all DOOOOOMED!!!!"
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 10, 2017 18:09:46 GMT
gadreel
Why not simply let it go. I am not angry with you.
I honestly believe that you can be interesting. I am still interested in hearing how on earth you think I insulted you, or are you planning to just dodge away from the fact that you have accused me of something I did not do.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 10, 2017 18:33:17 GMT
gadreel
You do not have the scruples to EVER apologize. Therefore, no matter what I post you will find some fault. You have been acting in Renfaires too long. Next, you ve beheading me as if I were Anne Boleyn. Guilty before my "trial".
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 10, 2017 18:40:58 GMT
LoldLamLimes
WOW!!! So I substituted the word Cosmologists (its a science) for Science. The title is the YouTuber's. I guess in your perfection, you could not figure that out.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 10, 2017 18:41:19 GMT
gadreel
You do not have the scruples to EVER apologize. Therefore, no matter what I post you will find some fault. You have been acting in Renfaires too long. Next, you ve beheading me as if I were Anne Boleyn. Guilty before my "trial".
And now you are directly lying about me, I have apologised multiple times when I have been in the wrong, I take it this is an indication that you feel I should just wear your accusations against me? Tell me, would you?
|
|