|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 14, 2017 19:11:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Superdude6091 on Jul 14, 2017 19:36:49 GMT
That former Muslims who left the religion because of its rampant homophobia and appalling treatment of gay people have been reported to police and face prosecution under the same law as the burger van man was prosecuted under. They were carrying signs saying things like "Allah is gay" and "fuck Islamic homophobia" among others. So protesting homophobia at gay pride event is a criminal offence if the target is Islam. Notice the part where people who held up signs about Jesus being gay and him having two dads weren't bothered while the ex Muslims who held up signs about Allah were converged upon by police. Just another example of free speech and free expression being punished.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 14, 2017 19:48:56 GMT
tpfkar Superdude6091 said:People reporting to the police means what exactly? The article was about complaints to the march organizers who are supposedly assessing whether they want "Fuck Islam" / "Fuck Islamophobia" and the like in their parade, and statements by a Ms Namazie that are shown in the article as being at least partially disingenuous. If the parade does something about "Allah being gay and him having two dads" and not "Jesus being gay and him having two dads" then they can rightly be held up as being hypocrites. What does "converged upon by the police" mean? Were they arrested? Just another slanted muddled poor example of anything except the lengths people will go to mislead. There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white).
|
|
|
Post by Superdude6091 on Jul 14, 2017 19:55:19 GMT
tpfkar Superdude6091 said:People reporting to the police means what exactly? The article was about complaints to the march organizers who are supposedly assessing whether they want "Fuck Islam" / "Fuck Christianity" and the like in their parade, and statements by a Ms Namazie that are shown in the article as being at least partially disingenuous. If the parade does something about "Allah being gay and him having two dads" and not "Jesus being gay and him having two dads" then they can rightly be held up as being hypocrites. What does "converged upon by the police" mean? Were they arrested? Just another slanted muddled poor example of anything except the lengths people will go to mislead. There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white).Converged upon means they confiscated their signs rabbit. And of course the signs must mirror each other exactly for there to be any merit to the apparent double standard shown by police and event organisers. And with that I'm done you aren't worth the effort any longer Rabbit. You attempt to twist and undermine everything I say when my posts couldn't be clearer. Go and play with the pedophile you bore me.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 14, 2017 19:59:54 GMT
tpfkar Superdude6091 said:Where does it say signs were confiscated? Your second line is gibberish. I don't care what you're "done with" umpteen million repeated times, amack-axios-superrager, you're a nutcase. Why don't you keep your pedo fantasies to yourself, you schmuck with no floor. I'm for internment without trial of any Muslim who is deemed a threat to the safety and security of the UK.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jul 14, 2017 20:35:11 GMT
tpfkar Superdude6091 said:People reporting to the police means what exactly? The article was about complaints to the march organizers who are supposedly assessing whether they want "Fuck Islam" / "Fuck Christianity" and the like in their parade, and statements by a Ms Namazie that are shown in the article as being at least partially disingenuous. If the parade does something about "Allah being gay and him having two dads" and not "Jesus being gay and him having two dads" then they can rightly be held up as being hypocrites. What does "converged upon by the police" mean? Were they arrested? Just another slanted muddled poor example of anything except the lengths people will go to mislead. There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white).Converged upon means they confiscated their signs rabbit. And of course the signs must mirror each other exactly for there to be any merit to the apparent double standard shown by police and event organisers. And with that I'm done you aren't worth the effort any longer Rabbit. You attempt to twist and undermine everything I say when my posts couldn't be clearer. Go and play with the pedophile you bore me. I did like "PRIDE will not tolerate Islamophbia" Brilliant, go do a Pride march in Saudia Arabia or Iran.
|
|
|
Post by Superdude6091 on Jul 14, 2017 20:46:17 GMT
Converged upon means they confiscated their signs rabbit. And of course the signs must mirror each other exactly for there to be any merit to the apparent double standard shown by police and event organisers. And with that I'm done you aren't worth the effort any longer Rabbit. You attempt to twist and undermine everything I say when my posts couldn't be clearer. Go and play with the pedophile you bore me. I did like "PRIDE will not tolerate Islamophbia" Brilliant, go do a Pride march in Saudia Arabia or Iran. Well the largest source of homophobia on the planet is Islam. The amount of gays crushed under the boot of Islam as I write this probably runs into the tens of millions. And here we have gay people who live in a country where that type of persecution is almost unheard of thanks in large part to the secularists and atheists who beat back Christian homophobia. Now they want to embrace a religion that is far worse in its treatment of gays than modern Christianity could ever hope to be. They may as well be Jews carrying signs saying "Judaism will not tolerate Naziphobia".
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Jul 14, 2017 20:50:13 GMT
I did like "PRIDE will not tolerate Islamophbia" Brilliant, go do a Pride march in Saudia Arabia or Iran. Well the largest source of homophobia on the planet is Islam. The amount of gays crushed under the boot of Islam as I write this probably runs into the tens of millions. And here we have gay people who live in a country where that type of persecution is almost unheard of thanks in large part to the secularists and atheists who beat back Christian homophobia. Now they want to embrace a religion that is far worse in its treatment of gays than modern Christianity could ever hope to be. They may as well be Jews carrying signs saying "Judaism will not tolerate Naziphobia". You've gotta hand it to the people behind "Islamophobia" they found a great way to stifle criticism of a religion by conflating Islam with Muslims.
|
|
|
Post by Superdude6091 on Jul 14, 2017 20:59:54 GMT
Well the largest source of homophobia on the planet is Islam. The amount of gays crushed under the boot of Islam as I write this probably runs into the tens of millions. And here we have gay people who live in a country where that type of persecution is almost unheard of thanks in large part to the secularists and atheists who beat back Christian homophobia. Now they want to embrace a religion that is far worse in its treatment of gays than modern Christianity could ever hope to be. They may as well be Jews carrying signs saying "Judaism will not tolerate Naziphobia". You've gotta hand it to the people behind "Islamophobia" they found a great way to stifle criticism of a religion by conflating Islam with Muslims. Yes in making the definition of incitement to religious hatred so deliberately broad and vague,it is remarkably easy for individuals and agenda driven groups to report unpalatable opinions to the police and pressure them into bringing prosecutions to try and silence valid criticism of their religion.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 14, 2017 21:20:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 17, 2017 15:10:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jul 17, 2017 19:17:27 GMT
tpfkar Superdude6091 said:People reporting to the police means what exactly? The article was about complaints to the march organizers who are supposedly assessing whether they want "Fuck Islam" / "Fuck Christianity" and the like in their parade, and statements by a Ms Namazie that are shown in the article as being at least partially disingenuous. If the parade does something about "Allah being gay and him having two dads" and not "Jesus being gay and him having two dads" then they can rightly be held up as being hypocrites. What does "converged upon by the police" mean? Were they arrested? Just another slanted muddled poor example of anything except the lengths people will go to mislead. There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white).Go and play with the pedophile you bore me. He isn't "playing with the pedophile," he's playing with someone who, much like yourself, is trying to point out his various idiocies.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 17, 2017 19:20:59 GMT
tpfkar Topline: none of the surrounding wankery escapes the advocates criteria + criteria subject 4 year-olds to sexual use by adults. Nor the community service for rape thing. Eva Yojimbo said:Do tell what my idiocies with superdude are, my empathetic brother. Keep reading. but from what I remember it was journalofeddi who advocated for sex with children as young as 4 years old
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jul 17, 2017 19:28:03 GMT
tpfkar Eva Yojimbo said:Do tell what my idiocies with superdude are, my empathetic brother. I have no idea as I haven't read this thread, but I have no reason to think your idiocies are checked at the door when you leave the thread we're involved in.
|
|
|
Post by Superdude6091 on Jul 17, 2017 19:37:26 GMT
Go and play with the pedophile you bore me. He isn't "playing with the pedophile," he's playing with someone who, much like yourself, is trying to point out his various idiocies. Eva I have great respect for your intellect but we argued this point on the old board. I am well aware of Rabbit's deficiencies but on the issue he and I are in agreement. I know you think pedophilia is a subject to be discussed coldly clinically and dispassionately but most of us are not like that. You are casually taking about the rape and violation of young children as if it were some type of discussion about a philosophical position or scientific theory. It's unseemly particularly when Sadorah gets so much enjoyment from it in a really perverse and sickening way. Pedophilia discussion should not be used to maximize the attention a poster receives or the subsequent enjoyment they derive from it. You are doing just that Eve and frankly as a parent I find it repellent.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 17, 2017 19:41:19 GMT
tpfkar Topline: none of the surrounding wankery escapes the advocates criteria + criteria subject 4 year-olds to sexual use by adults. Nor the community service for rape thing. Eva Yojimbo said: Sounds like you guys. Person before actual post content 4-evah! Readin', readin, readin'. but from what I remember it was journalofeddi who advocated for sex with children as young as 4 years old
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 17, 2017 19:46:57 GMT
He isn't "playing with the pedophile," he's playing with someone who, much like yourself, is trying to point out his various idiocies. Eva I have great respect for your intellect but we argued this point on the old board. I am well aware of Rabbit's deficiencies but on the issue he and I are in agreement. I know you think pedophilia is a subject to be discussed coldly clinically and dispassionately but most of us are not like that. You are casually taking about the rape and violation of young children as if it were some type of discussion about a philosophical position or scientific theory. It's unseemly particularly when Sadorah gets so much enjoyment from it in a really perverse and sickening way. Pedophilia discussion should not be used to maximize the attention a poster receives or the subsequent enjoyment they derive from it. You are doing just that Eve and frankly as a parent I find it repellent. ethics is a subfiElD of philosophy and so any discussion about thE morality of pEDophilia is philosophical. why Did you call Eva a pEDophile though? that DoEsnt make much sÈnse. so much enjoymEnt? lol what? onE thing I Do very much Enjoy is you making a fool of yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jul 17, 2017 20:12:54 GMT
He isn't "playing with the pedophile," he's playing with someone who, much like yourself, is trying to point out his various idiocies. Eva I have great respect for your intellect but we argued this point on the old board. I am well aware of Rabbit's deficiencies but on the issue he and I are in agreement. I know you think pedophilia is a subject to be discussed coldly clinically and dispassionately but most of us are not like that. You are casually taking about the rape and violation of young children as if it were some type of discussion about a philosophical position or scientific theory. It's unseemly particularly when Sadorah gets so much enjoyment from it in a really perverse and sickening way. Pedophilia discussion should not be used to maximize the attention a poster receives or the subsequent enjoyment they derive from it. You are doing just that Eve and frankly as a parent I find it repellent. Several things here. 1. Rabbit and I are in agreement on the pedophile issue! My issue with him is in precisely the idiocies he insists on dragging along with him beyond our agreement. Both phludowin and AJ have pointed out the same thing as well. 2. I have no issues with people bringing emotions into a discussion, as long as they don't let those emotions get in the way of facts and rational arguments. Rabbit has let his emotion cloud his mind so much that he refuses to acknowledge basic facts and continues to utter logical fallacies like they're going out of style. THAT'S what I'm objecting to. (Not to mention he has no compunction with lying about me because we disagree. What did you say about him? "You attempt to twist and undermine everything I say when my posts couldn't be clearer." You really think he only does that to you?) 3. Ethics is a sub-branch of philosophy, so it IS a philosophical issue, and there are pertinent scientific matters that pertain to rape. You don't get to pretend it's not a philosophical debate just because you are emotional about it. 4. Criticizing someone for discussing something because posters you don't like get pleasure out of it is bordering on a rabbit-level argument. Ada was about as disgusting a human being as they come and you had no problem engaging her endlessly. Same with Blade. 5. Finally, and most importantly, you had no business calling me a pedophile just because we disagree on how to discuss the issue.
|
|
|
Post by Superdude6091 on Jul 17, 2017 20:20:43 GMT
Eva I have great respect for your intellect but we argued this point on the old board. I am well aware of Rabbit's deficiencies but on the issue he and I are in agreement. I know you think pedophilia is a subject to be discussed coldly clinically and dispassionately but most of us are not like that. You are casually taking about the rape and violation of young children as if it were some type of discussion about a philosophical position or scientific theory. It's unseemly particularly when Sadorah gets so much enjoyment from it in a really perverse and sickening way. Pedophilia discussion should not be used to maximize the attention a poster receives or the subsequent enjoyment they derive from it. You are doing just that Eve and frankly as a parent I find it repellent. ethics is a subfiElD of philosophy and so any discussion about thE morality of pEDophilia is philosophical. why Did you call Eva a pEDophile though? that DoEsnt make much sÈnse. so much enjoymEnt? lol what? onE thing I Do very much Enjoy is you making a fool of yourself. There is no morality to pedophilic acts Sadorah they are grossly immoral no great philosophical debate needed or ethics lesson. People like you who advocate such things should be beaten and jailed those that commit the actual acts castrated and killed So continue to play your silly little word games as you derive pleasure in debating when children can be raped by sick adults.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 17, 2017 20:34:22 GMT
ethics is a subfiElD of philosophy and so any discussion about thE morality of pEDophilia is philosophical. why Did you call Eva a pEDophile though? that DoEsnt make much sÈnse. so much enjoymEnt? lol what? onE thing I Do very much Enjoy is you making a fool of yourself. There is no morality to pedophilic acts Sadorah they are grossly immoral no great philosophical debate needed or ethics lesson. People like you who advocate such things should be beaten and jailed those that commit the actual acts castrated and killed So continue to play your silly little word games as you derive pleasure in debating when children can be raped by sick adults. are you now going to get into a huff anD DelEte your account like you diD last time?
|
|