|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 16, 2017 13:09:41 GMT
You're so spoiled. This is awesome as shit, go fuck your mother.
This isn't you, ArArArchStanton . If the man is "bored" he should seek other pursuits, it's that simple. SaveSaveYou're right, it's not. I had a long day. Long ass week opening a new account in Atlanta, late flight, and then I had to replace a battery in my car and clear off my grand parents property so we can try and sell it. Come back, see some awesome Black Order shit, and some clown has to tell us how bored he is. It's funny really. I'm amazed that anybody would is geek enough to be on this site would be bored over that. No clue what he's looking for, this is the best stuff I've ever seen. |
|
skribb
Sophomore
IMDb since June 2005
@skribb
Posts: 767
Likes: 204
 
|
Post by skribb on Jul 17, 2017 3:45:21 GMT
Practical effects didn't help Apocalypse. When a character needs too much make-up, like Thanos and Apocalypse and a bunch of other alien-types, you can see it in their acting. They get overly stiff trying to work around the make-up. Thanos would need way more make-up than Apocalypse and look how stiff Apocalypse was. You convinced me, thanks. The Black Order consists of a group of black aliens that work for Black Thanos. Black Swan Black Midnight Black Glaive Ebony Black Superblack Black Black SaveSave[/quote] |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jul 17, 2017 23:42:18 GMT
Looking at those pictures I think only the big guy will be mostly CGI. None of the women. Black Glaive can be done with make-up. The other guy looks like they'll do him like Voldemort. Did they even announce actors for them yet?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2017 0:01:52 GMT
Thanos is boring. They should have used makeup over cgi. He looked like a cartoon in the glimpses from GOTG or where else he was shown. I'm always puzzled when movies feature humanoid characters as CGI. Prosthetics will always look more believable. Snoke in Star Wars 7 is another great example of this. Both he and Thanos should've been real actors with makeup/prosthetics. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2017 0:04:35 GMT
Thanos is boring. They should have used makeup over cgi. He looked like a cartoon in the glimpses from GOTG or where else he was shown. You're so spoiled. This is awesome as shit, go fuck your mother.
Overreact much? |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 18, 2017 0:56:15 GMT
You're so spoiled. This is awesome as shit, go fuck your mother.
Overreact much? On purpose. It's absolutely hilarious that anybody would complain about this stuff. So awesome. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jul 18, 2017 1:30:02 GMT
You're so spoiled. This is awesome as shit, go fuck your mother.
No. Children like you, do not appreciate practical effects, because you are spoiled by the CGI. Thanks for insulting every CGI FX Artist out there. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Jul 18, 2017 1:34:02 GMT
On purpose. It's absolutely hilarious that anybody would complain about this stuff. So awesome. So now you're saying you were not actually upset? But in a different post you claimed spewing that vile vitriol was because you had a tough week at work AND had car trouble AND had to do some yard work AND etc... all of which made you upset. Pick a story for being so angry over someone not liking the look of a comic book character you love and stick with it. Your rampant disingenuousness and constantly being hyperbolic is why your posts are impossible to take seriously. If it's the MCU then in your opinion it's AAAAMMMMAAAAZZZZZINGGGGGG and EVERYONE in the world loves it just as blindly and inability to see obvious glaring flaws as you do. If it's anything else you hate it because it's not the MCU. It's pointless to read your posts but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and read one occasionally anyway. I'm always disappointed because it's the same tired cut and paste circle jerk every time. "Whoa dudes. Look at those AAAMMMAAAZZZZZING props!!!!! OH MY GAWD!!! Those are THE MOST anticipated props for THE MOST anticipated comic book movie EEEEVVVVVEEERRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! Seriously dudes I LOVE IT MORE THAN ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!!!!!! I had to change my panties 3 times because I shit and nutted so many times in happiness. HOOOORRRAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!" I toned it down a bit but otherwise that's you every day prattling about MCU. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jul 18, 2017 1:43:52 GMT
On purpose. It's absolutely hilarious that anybody would complain about this stuff. So awesome. So now you're saying you were not actually upset? But in a different post you claimed spewing that vile vitriol was because you had a tough week at work AND had car trouble AND had to do some yard work AND etc... all of which made you upset. Pick a story for being so angry over someone not liking the look of a comic book character you love and stick with it. Your rampant disingenuousness and constantly being hyperbolic is why your posts are impossible to take seriously. If it's the MCU then in your opinion it's AAAAMMMMAAAAZZZZZINGGGGGG and EVERYONE in the world loves it just as blindly and inability to see obvious glaring flaws as you do. If it's anything else you hate it because it's not the MCU. It's pointless to read your posts but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and read one occasionally anyway. I'm always disappointed because it's the same tired cut and paste circle jerk every time. "Whoa dudes. Look at those AAAMMMAAAZZZZZING props!!!!! OH MY GAWD!!! Those are THE MOST anticipated props for THE MOST anticipated comic book movie EEEEVVVVVEEERRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! Seriously dudes I LOVE IT MORE THAN ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!!!!!! I had to change my panties 3 times because I shit and nutted so many times in happiness. HOOOORRRAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!"
I toned it down a bit but otherwise that's you every day prattling about MCU. That's him in a nutshell. "Nut" being the operative word. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jul 18, 2017 1:46:02 GMT
No. Children like you, do not appreciate practical effects, because you are spoiled by the CGI. Thanks for insulting every CGI FX Artist out there. Thanks for doing your usual tactic of lobbing out a brainless broad generalization that doesn't apply here; you're... (wait for it...) WRONG AGAIN, BJ! |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jul 18, 2017 1:47:56 GMT
Thanks for insulting every CGI FX Artist out there. Thanks for doing your usual tactic of defending the industry. Fixed. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jul 18, 2017 1:50:24 GMT
Thanks for doing your usual tactic of defending the industry. Fixed. Nah, you falsely accused him of insulting CGI (and somehow "the industry") by praising and pointing out the legitimacy of practical effects. One doesn't equal the other, and even if it did -- which it doesn't -- who appointed your dumb ass the "defender" of "the industry"? You're a goob. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 18, 2017 3:28:05 GMT
On purpose. It's absolutely hilarious that anybody would complain about this stuff. So awesome. So now you're saying you were not actually upset? But in a different post you claimed spewing that vile vitriol was because you had a tough week at work AND had car trouble AND had to do some yard work AND etc... all of which made you upset. Pick a story for being so angry over someone not liking the look of a comic book character you love and stick with it. Your rampant disingenuousness and constantly being hyperbolic is why your posts are impossible to take seriously. If it's the MCU then in your opinion it's AAAAMMMMAAAAZZZZZINGGGGGG and EVERYONE in the world loves it just as blindly and inability to see obvious glaring flaws as you do. If it's anything else you hate it because it's not the MCU. It's pointless to read your posts but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and read one occasionally anyway. I'm always disappointed because it's the same tired cut and paste circle jerk every time. "Whoa dudes. Look at those AAAMMMAAAZZZZZING props!!!!! OH MY GAWD!!! Those are THE MOST anticipated props for THE MOST anticipated comic book movie EEEEVVVVVEEERRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! Seriously dudes I LOVE IT MORE THAN ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!!!!!! I had to change my panties 3 times because I shit and nutted so many times in happiness. HOOOORRRAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!" I toned it down a bit but otherwise that's you every day prattling about MCU. I honestly didn't read any of this. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jul 18, 2017 3:44:29 GMT
So now you're saying you were not actually upset? But in a different post you claimed spewing that vile vitriol was because you had a tough week at work AND had car trouble AND had to do some yard work AND etc... all of which made you upset. Pick a story for being so angry over someone not liking the look of a comic book character you love and stick with it. Your rampant disingenuousness and constantly being hyperbolic is why your posts are impossible to take seriously. If it's the MCU then in your opinion it's AAAAMMMMAAAAZZZZZINGGGGGG and EVERYONE in the world loves it just as blindly and inability to see obvious glaring flaws as you do. If it's anything else you hate it because it's not the MCU. It's pointless to read your posts but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and read one occasionally anyway. I'm always disappointed because it's the same tired cut and paste circle jerk every time. "Whoa dudes. Look at those AAAMMMAAAZZZZZING props!!!!! OH MY GAWD!!! Those are THE MOST anticipated props for THE MOST anticipated comic book movie EEEEVVVVVEEERRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! Seriously dudes I LOVE IT MORE THAN ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!!!!!! I had to change my panties 3 times because I shit and nutted so many times in happiness. HOOOORRRAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!" I toned it down a bit but otherwise that's you every day prattling about MCU. I honestly didn't read any of this. You're honestly a worthless dipshit. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Jul 18, 2017 6:55:58 GMT
So now you're saying you were not actually upset? But in a different post you claimed spewing that vile vitriol was because you had a tough week at work AND had car trouble AND had to do some yard work AND etc... all of which made you upset. Pick a story for being so angry over someone not liking the look of a comic book character you love and stick with it. Your rampant disingenuousness and constantly being hyperbolic is why your posts are impossible to take seriously. If it's the MCU then in your opinion it's AAAAMMMMAAAAZZZZZINGGGGGG and EVERYONE in the world loves it just as blindly and inability to see obvious glaring flaws as you do. If it's anything else you hate it because it's not the MCU. It's pointless to read your posts but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and read one occasionally anyway. I'm always disappointed because it's the same tired cut and paste circle jerk every time. "Whoa dudes. Look at those AAAMMMAAAZZZZZING props!!!!! OH MY GAWD!!! Those are THE MOST anticipated props for THE MOST anticipated comic book movie EEEEVVVVVEEERRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! Seriously dudes I LOVE IT MORE THAN ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!!!!!! I had to change my panties 3 times because I shit and nutted so many times in happiness. HOOOORRRAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!" I toned it down a bit but otherwise that's you every day prattling about MCU. I honestly didn't read any of this. No reason for you to read it. You live it every day. Mores the pity. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2017 18:48:58 GMT
On purpose. It's absolutely hilarious that anybody would complain about this stuff. So awesome. You owe that man an apology, Señor Stanton! |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jul 18, 2017 18:57:11 GMT
Thanos is boring. They should have used makeup over cgi. He looked like a cartoon in the glimpses from GOTG or where else he was shown. And what, end up making him look like Apocalypse? Thanks but no. |
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jul 18, 2017 19:04:37 GMT
And what, end up making him look like Apocalypse? Thanks but no. Have you seen Galaxy Quest? There is a makeup created bad guy with a similar gait as Thanos--impressive enough. CGI is fine if it is top of the line--and the glimpses I saw were not. To do CGI of someone who has a face that is almost totally humanoid is a waste of technology. Like spending all that money on Ghost Rider's cgi flames when they could have comped it over a practical effect and made it look more realistic. And though Brolin is no Frank Langella, the latter's performance in Masters of the Universe didn't hurt at all due to the makeup. Best toy character performance ever. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jul 18, 2017 19:18:52 GMT
Nah, you falsely accused him of insulting CGI (and somehow "the industry") by praising and pointing out the legitimacy of practical effects. One doesn't equal the other, and even if it did -- which it doesn't -- who appointed your dumb ass the "defender" of "the industry"? You're a goob. He says that people are spoiled on CGI, implying CGI in and of itself is wrong, thereby insulting all CGI FX Artists. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jul 18, 2017 20:37:35 GMT
Nah, you falsely accused him of insulting CGI (and somehow "the industry") by praising and pointing out the legitimacy of practical effects. One doesn't equal the other, and even if it did -- which it doesn't -- who appointed your dumb ass the "defender" of "the industry"? You're a goob. He says that people are spoiled on CGI, implying CGI in and of itself is wrong, thereby insulting all CGI FX Artists. He wasn't implying; you were inferring. Incorrectly. |
|
