filmfan95
Sophomore
@filmfan95
Posts: 383
Likes: 141
 
|
Post by filmfan95 on Jul 25, 2017 1:54:24 GMT
It was so awesome! I felt like I was reading the comics, it was so accurate in tone. They even managed to fit in an issue #33 moment, and it nearly made me cry.
If there's anything I would change, I would tone down some of the uses of profanity, as a lot of families with kids will probably be seeing this movie (since Spider-Man is the superhero most little kids want to see), but other than that, it was a great movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 25, 2017 2:21:15 GMT
It was so awesome! I felt like I was reading the comics, it was so accurate in tone. They even managed to fit in an issue #33 moment, and it nearly made me cry. If there's anything I would change, I would tone down some of the uses of profanity, as a lot of families with kids will probably be seeing this movie (since Spider-Man is the superhero most little kids want to see), but other than that, it was a great movie. It was awesome, I loved it!!!! Best Spidey film evvvvvvvva lol. |
|
filmfan95
Sophomore
@filmfan95
Posts: 383
Likes: 141
|
Post by filmfan95 on Jul 25, 2017 2:22:52 GMT
It was so awesome! I felt like I was reading the comics, it was so accurate in tone. They even managed to fit in an issue #33 moment, and it nearly made me cry. If there's anything I would change, I would tone down some of the uses of profanity, as a lot of families with kids will probably be seeing this movie (since Spider-Man is the superhero most little kids want to see), but other than that, it was a great movie. It was awesome, I loved it!!!! Best Spidey film evvvvvvvva lol. I'm not sure if that's sarcasm or if you actually feel that way about that movie, but thanks for replying. I'm still undecided if it's the best or not, as I still have a lot of fond memories of the Sam Raimi films (though this does at lest beat out Spider-Man 3). I'll have to give it a few more views before I can make a definitive decision, but my first impressions were very good. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jul 25, 2017 2:26:14 GMT
It was awesome, I loved it!!!! Best Spidey film evvvvvvvva lol. I'm not sure if that's sarcasm or if you actually feel that way about that movie, but thanks for replying. Oh I absolutely loved it. I've seen it twice and might go again. It was even better the second time, I love Vulture, I loved how he's dealing with growing up, I loved how he acts like a kid just full of excitement, and I especially love how well it integrates itself into the MCU. The fact that we got this behind the scenes look at what Damage Control was doing was fantastic. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jul 25, 2017 2:59:09 GMT
I'm not sure if that's sarcasm or if you actually feel that way about that movie, but thanks for replying. Oh I absolutely loved it. I've seen it twice and might go again. It was even better the second time, I love Vulture, I loved how he's dealing with growing up, I loved how he acts like a kid just full of excitement, and I especially love how well it integrates itself into the MCU. The fact that we got this behind the scenes look at what Damage Control was doing was fantastic. What a loser. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 25, 2017 11:44:27 GMT
It was awesome, I loved it!!!! Best Spidey film evvvvvvvva lol. I'm still undecided if it's the best or not, as I still have a lot of fond memories of the Sam Raimi films (though this does at lest beat out Spider-Man 3). I'll have to give it a few more views before I can make a definitive decision, but my first impressions were very good. most people that saw it twice (ie SM fans) say it does not hold up and gets somewhat boring second time. This is also supported by the fact that the movie has no real legs, dropping quicker per week than any MCU movies before (62%, 50%). Also, rule of thumb: if at the time of hype you are not sure if it's better than/on par with the classics (SM 1 and 2), then it is not, and will later be regarded worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jul 25, 2017 11:50:28 GMT
I'm still undecided if it's the best or not, as I still have a lot of fond memories of the Sam Raimi films (though this does at lest beat out Spider-Man 3). I'll have to give it a few more views before I can make a definitive decision, but my first impressions were very good. most people that saw it twice (ie SM fans) say it does not hold up and gets somewhat boring second time. This is also supported by the fact that the movie has no real legs, dropping quicker per week than any MCU movies before (62%, 50%). Also, rule of thumb: if at the time of hype you are not sure if it's better than/on par with the classics (SM 1 and 2), then it is not, and will later be regarded worse.
I saw it a second time and still thoroughly enjoyed it. For me, it stood up to second viewing a lot better than Wonder Woman did. On par with "the classics"? I thought so. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 25, 2017 12:13:40 GMT
most people that saw it twice (ie SM fans) say it does not hold up and gets somewhat boring second time. This is also supported by the fact that the movie has no real legs, dropping quicker per week than any MCU movies before (62%, 50%). Also, rule of thumb: if at the time of hype you are not sure if it's better than/on par with the classics (SM 1 and 2), then it is not, and will later be regarded worse.
I saw it a second time and still thoroughly enjoyed it. For me, it stood up to second viewing a lot better than Wonder Woman did. On par with "the classics"? I thought so. and that is fine, but it will count more what the broad general public thinks in time than some nerds and fanboys.
Speaking of the latter: I found SMH insipid, juvenile and redundant and would not watch it a second time. But then again I never liked any of the SM movies that much (not even the heralded classics), I dislike (most) teen highschool movies, and am fed up with that fattening MCU formula.
As for WW, not my favorite either, but gimme some corny old fashioned "love heals everything" storytelling anytime over these pointless, unispired character re-reboots. This one will be a classic for sure, just watch those legs fly!
|
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Jul 25, 2017 12:31:26 GMT
Its ok at best at best. There are times it feels like a disney channel movie.
There is not much thats new or intresting
|
|
filmfan95
Sophomore
@filmfan95
Posts: 383
Likes: 141
|
Post by filmfan95 on Jul 25, 2017 14:17:37 GMT
I'm still undecided if it's the best or not, as I still have a lot of fond memories of the Sam Raimi films (though this does at lest beat out Spider-Man 3). I'll have to give it a few more views before I can make a definitive decision, but my first impressions were very good. most people that saw it twice (ie SM fans) say it does not hold up and gets somewhat boring second time. This is also supported by the fact that the movie has no real legs, dropping quicker per week than any MCU movies before (62%, 50%). Also, rule of thumb: if at the time of hype you are not sure if it's better than/on par with the classics (SM 1 and 2), then it is not, and will later be regarded worse.
To be fair, I find the Sam Raimi movies a bit boring on rewatches, despite how much I like them. Plus, this is my strategy for nearly every movie I see. And more often than not, I still like the movie on rewatches. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2017 14:29:32 GMT
I'm fine with the profanity. There was probably a time when many thought Batman should remain a child- friendly entity. Then you wouldn't have The Dark Knight.
|
|
janice
Freshman
@janice
Posts: 72
Likes: 44
|
Post by janice on Jul 25, 2017 14:43:09 GMT
I saw it a second time and still thoroughly enjoyed it. For me, it stood up to second viewing a lot better than Wonder Woman did. On par with "the classics"? I thought so. and that is fine, but it will count more what the broad general public thinks in time than some nerds and fanboys.
Speaking of the latter: I found SMH insipid, juvenile and redundant and would not watch it a second time. But then again I never liked any of the SM movies that much (not even the heralded classics), I dislike (most) teen highschool movies, and am fed up with that fattening MCU formula.
As for WW, not my favorite either, but gimme some corny old fashioned "love heals everything" storytelling anytime over these pointless, unispired character re-reboots. This one will be a classic for sure, just watch those legs fly!
Spoken like a true DC-fantard. You guys are so bad at pretending that you are giving a true and honest account of any MCU film. Your hatred for the MCU just reeks in your posts. You and your pal DC-Fan Better stick to crappy DCEU movies. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jul 25, 2017 15:54:05 GMT
and that is fine, but it will count more what the broad general public thinks in time than some nerds and fanboys.
Speaking of the latter: I found SMH insipid, juvenile and redundant and would not watch it a second time. But then again I never liked any of the SM movies that much (not even the heralded classics), I dislike (most) teen highschool movies, and am fed up with that fattening MCU formula.
As for WW, not my favorite either, but gimme some corny old fashioned "love heals everything" storytelling anytime over these pointless, unispired character re-reboots. This one will be a classic for sure, just watch those legs fly!
Spoken like a true DC-fantard. You guys are so bad at pretending that you are giving a true and honest account of any MCU film. Your hatred for the MCU just reeks in your posts. You and your pal DC-Fan Better stick to crappy DCEU movies. lol at how butthurt you got, janice dear. DC fantard, Marveltards, all the same. Don't let that sand get into your vagina, and look up my Imdb profile (Tristan_Jones) including ratings, to irrefutably demonstrate how stupid your assertions are. Take it like a girl: SMH is only a movie (for children).  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2017 16:27:56 GMT
and that is fine, but it will count more what the broad general public thinks in time than some nerds and fanboys.
Speaking of the latter: I found SMH insipid, juvenile and redundant and would not watch it a second time. But then again I never liked any of the SM movies that much (not even the heralded classics), I dislike (most) teen highschool movies, and am fed up with that fattening MCU formula.
As for WW, not my favorite either, but gimme some corny old fashioned "love heals everything" storytelling anytime over these pointless, unispired character re-reboots. This one will be a classic for sure, just watch those legs fly!
Spoken like a true DC-fantard. You guys are so bad at pretending that you are giving a true and honest account of any MCU film. Your hatred for the MCU just reeks in your posts. You and your pal DC-Fan Better stick to crappy DCEU movies. You're wasting your time with that degenerate. There is no low Tristan won't sink to just to insult other people. Block him and forget him. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 25, 2017 17:48:28 GMT
Oh they'll be fine. They swear worse than Joe Pesci and Samuel L. Jackson combined when their parents aren't paying attention.
|
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Jul 25, 2017 20:23:00 GMT
It really was terrific.
I wasn't that interested in seeing it really, as I thought it was a mistake to have him in Civil War and it turned me off of the whole idea of this new reboot, but it was a really great movie.
Great superhero movie, great teen movie, and the scene in the car is one of the best moments of dramatic tension in any movie you will likely see this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by mcufan on Jul 26, 2017 14:05:24 GMT
It was so awesome! I felt like I was reading the comics, it was so accurate in tone. They even managed to fit in an issue #33 moment, and it nearly made me cry. If there's anything I would change, I would tone down some of the uses of profanity, as a lot of families with kids will probably be seeing this movie (since Spider-Man is the superhero most little kids want to see), but other than that, it was a great movie. it was a great movie. The tone of the character was spot on. I was worried about im stealing the show but just the right amount of him to flow with the rest of the MCU. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Jul 27, 2017 3:37:38 GMT
It was so awesome! I felt like I was reading the comics, it was so accurate in tone. They even managed to fit in an issue #33 moment, and it nearly made me cry. If there's anything I would change, I would tone down some of the uses of profanity, as a lot of families with kids will probably be seeing this movie (since Spider-Man is the superhero most little kids want to see), but other than that, it was a great movie. it was a great movie. The tone of the character was spot on. I was worried about im stealing the show but just the right amount of him to flow with the rest of the MCU. The movie was presumably a piece of steaming fucking shit if the box office is to be believed. I didn't see it, because I'm smarter than the average bear and owed ten dollars. |
|
|
|
Post by Grabthar's Hammer on Jul 27, 2017 7:21:08 GMT
I saw it a second time and still thoroughly enjoyed it. For me, it stood up to second viewing a lot better than Wonder Woman did. On par with "the classics"? I thought so. and that is fine, but it will count more what the broad general public thinks in time than some nerds and fanboys.
Speaking of the latter: I found SMH insipid, juvenile and redundant and would not watch it a second time. But then again I never liked any of the SM movies that much (not even the heralded classics), I dislike (most) teen highschool movies, and am fed up with that fattening MCU formula.
As for WW, not my favorite either, but gimme some corny old fashioned "love heals everything" storytelling anytime over these pointless, unispired character re-reboots. This one will be a classic for sure, just watch those legs fly!
Did you see the new Power Rangers? I kind of liked that aspect of the movie. That they all needed to care about each other to make being a Power Ranger work. I was like "Awww. They need to love each other so they can save the world." EDIT: I don't know how to get rid of this spoiler thing... it was an accident... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2017 8:13:03 GMT
and that is fine, but it will count more what the broad general public thinks in time than some nerds and fanboys.
Speaking of the latter: I found SMH insipid, juvenile and redundant and would not watch it a second time. But then again I never liked any of the SM movies that much (not even the heralded classics), I dislike (most) teen highschool movies, and am fed up with that fattening MCU formula.
As for WW, not my favorite either, but gimme some corny old fashioned "love heals everything" storytelling anytime over these pointless, unispired character re-reboots. This one will be a classic for sure, just watch those legs fly!
Did you see the new Power Rangers? I kind of liked that aspect of the movie. That they all needed to care about each other to make being a Power Ranger work. I was like "Awww. They need to love each other so they can save the world." EDIT: I don't know how to get rid of this spoiler thing... it was an accident... Yep. The whole "love and friendship" thing was always a part of the Power Rangers show, and the filmmakers chose to make it a literal factor into their ability to change into superheroes. I actually liked that part of an otherwise decent, but very flawed movie. |
|
