|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jul 27, 2017 20:42:18 GMT
Vegas ineptly tries to make fun of people he ridiculously thinks seek the approval of other posters. Vegas starts this thread. Yeah, no reason to laugh there at all. But he got the kiddie-fiddler to post the best example of projection we've seen in a week so at least something was accomplished.
|
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 27, 2017 20:53:52 GMT
As far as I can perceive, there is really only one person who is consider a laughing stock of the board in that nobody except himself takes him seriously. I won't mention his name but he believes in "chemtrails", and quite possibly that the earth is flat as well. Actually, he doesn't believe the earth is flat... he's merely willing to consider the possibility.  I assume he is still collating the information. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
 
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 27, 2017 21:03:40 GMT
Vegas ineptly tries to make fun of people he ridiculously thinks seek the approval of other posters. Vegas starts this thread. Yeah, no reason to laugh there at all. But he got the kiddie-fiddler to post the best example of projection we've seen in a week so at least something was accomplished. How is it projection? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jul 27, 2017 21:14:21 GMT
I think the trio of extreme Dunning-Krugeroids (captainbryce, Cash and rabbit/cupcakes) are the most amusing on the board.  You truly injure me, carmb my lad/young adult/middle-aged/old friend.
---
How about a months later one from you?
carmb09 / saoradh: But the only situation in which sex with children is moral and should be allowed is when the child is capable of Informed consent. Now obviously a 7 year old can't do that but a 12 year old at the very least could.
---
Reply 10: Re: Is Sex with Children a bad thing?
carmb09 / saoradh replied 11 months, 3 weeks ago
Definitely, I would estimate around 5 or 6 is the maximum age where they wouldn't be able to, but I really don't know.
---
carmb / saoradh: Many children after they consent to sex with an adult are brainwashed into thinking they were raped and abused but that's just not true. |
|
Moviefan
Sophomore
@allaby
Posts: 565
Likes: 284
|
Post by Moviefan on Jul 27, 2017 21:17:13 GMT
No, you are not the board's laughingstock. If this board had a laughingstock, I suspect it would be ErJen.
|
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Jul 27, 2017 21:43:06 GMT
Vegas ineptly tries to make fun of people he ridiculously thinks seek the approval of other posters. Vegas starts this thread. Yeah, no reason to laugh there at all. But he got the kiddie-fiddler to post the best example of projection we've seen in a week so at least something was accomplished. How is it projection? Pretending to have "linguistic competence" after displaying stunning levels of linguistic incompetence, while telling other posters who have not displayed linguistic incompetence that they lack linguistic competence... That's a textbook case of overestimating your abilities. A good example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Incidentally: Which subject have I claimed to be particularly competent about? If you can't tell, then we have two examples for your projection of the Dunning-Kruger effect. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 27, 2017 21:54:19 GMT
Pretending to have "linguistic competence" after displaying stunning levels of linguistic incompetence, while telling other posters who have not displayed linguistic incompetence that they lack linguistic competence... That's a textbook case of overestimating your abilities. A good example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Incidentally: Which subject have I claimed to be particularly competent about? If you can't tell, then we have two examples for your projection of the Dunning-Kruger effect. 1) Again, that was me lacking linguistic performance not competence. I suggest you make yourself aware of the distinction 2) What mKes you think I am not merely just fucking stupid as opposed to projecting? This is just armchair psychoanalysis 3) You obviously believed yourself to be skilled to a degree at recognising linguistic incompetence when you didnt even realise you were actually pointing out examples of me lacking linguistic performance. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 27, 2017 21:57:46 GMT
Pretending to have "linguistic competence" after displaying stunning levels of linguistic incompetence, while telling other posters who have not displayed linguistic incompetence that they lack linguistic competence... That's a textbook case of overestimating your abilities. A good example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Incidentally: Which subject have I claimed to be particularly competent about? If you can't tell, then we have two examples for your projection of the Dunning-Kruger effect. 1) Again, that was me lacking linguistic performance not competence. I suggest you make yourself aware of the distinction 2) What mKes you think I am not merely just fucking stupid as opposed to projecting? This is just armchair psychoanalysis 3) You obviously believed yourself to be skilled to a degree at recognising linguistic incompetence when you didnt even realise you were actually pointing out examples of me lacking linguistic performance. Making a semantic dodge (and a poor one) to hide your incompetence. Good work. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 27, 2017 22:06:08 GMT
1) Again, that was me lacking linguistic performance not competence. I suggest you make yourself aware of the distinction 2) What mKes you think I am not merely just fucking stupid as opposed to projecting? This is just armchair psychoanalysis 3) You obviously believed yourself to be skilled to a degree at recognising linguistic incompetence when you didnt even realise you were actually pointing out examples of me lacking linguistic performance. Making a semantic dodge (and a poor one) to hide your incompetence. Good work. What the fuck is a semantic dodge? |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Jul 27, 2017 22:31:20 GMT
Making a semantic dodge (and a poor one) to hide your incompetence. Good work. What the fuck is a semantic dodge? An example might be to pretend that linguistic performance does not reflect linguistic competence. But that's just a guess on my part. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 27, 2017 22:32:32 GMT
Making a semantic dodge (and a poor one) to hide your incompetence. Good work. What the fuck is a semantic dodge? It's when you describe something as being different to another thing using synonyms to differentiate them. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 27, 2017 22:35:35 GMT
What the fuck is a semantic dodge? An example might be to pretend that linguistic performance does not reflect linguistic competence. But that's just a guess on my part. I have to be honest, I do love the way that his defense is essentially "hey maybe I am just to stupid to word". |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 27, 2017 22:41:27 GMT
What the fuck is a semantic dodge? An example might be to pretend that linguistic performance does not reflect linguistic competence. But that's just a guess on my part. I never said that. Obviouslt it can reflect it but not always. can |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 27, 2017 22:46:15 GMT
An example might be to pretend that linguistic performance does not reflect linguistic competence. But that's just a guess on my part. I never said that. Obviouslt it can reflect it but not always. can If you had any kind of linguistic competency you would understand that you implied it. But tell you what, you called me out, show me where I display linguistic incompetence and then please differentiate this from linguistic performance. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 27, 2017 22:48:07 GMT
I never said that. Obviouslt it can reflect it but not always. can If you had any kind of linguistic competency you would understand that you implied it. But tell you what, you called me out, show me where I display linguistic incompetence and then please differentiate this from linguistic performance. Where did I imply it? |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 27, 2017 22:52:47 GMT
If you had any kind of linguistic competency you would understand that you implied it. But tell you what, you called me out, show me where I display linguistic incompetence and then please differentiate this from linguistic performance. Where did I imply it? now: show me where I display linguistic incompetence and then please differentiate this from linguistic performance. |
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 27, 2017 22:57:31 GMT
now: show me where I display linguistic incompetence and then please differentiate this from linguistic performance. Ok......how does that imply it? I will show you later. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 27, 2017 23:02:39 GMT
now: show me where I display linguistic incompetence and then please differentiate this from linguistic performance. Ok......how does that imply it? I will show you later. By distinguishing so heavily between the two you have indicated that performance is not reliant on competence. I doubt you can show me at all, your entire M.O is dodging to avoid being shown up in your claims. |
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Jul 28, 2017 4:05:21 GMT
Vegas starts this thread to point out... successfully mind you.. that you're wrong.. YET AGAIN... That, and you're a delusional twit for thinking that you speak for the entire board.... PSST!! Apparently... You don't.  So suck it, Scott Summers... |
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jul 28, 2017 5:55:24 GMT
Vegas ineptly tries to make fun of people he ridiculously thinks seek the approval of other posters. Vegas starts this thread. Yeah, no reason to laugh there at all. But he got the kiddie-fiddler to post the best example of projection we've seen in a week so at least something was accomplished. How is it projection? Because, like Vegas, you're an imbecile trying to pump yourself up by insulting people's intelligence when someone of just average intelligence is far more intelligent than you. Of course, as soon as someone replied you began your typical bullshit time-wasting act. No doubt you will continue to do so. |
|
