|
Post by brownstones on Aug 1, 2017 17:31:08 GMT
They should just toss SS2 out. No one wants it. Oh I so agree with this. Just let that nonsense go. No one wanted it to begin with...and the movie itself was just meh. Put it on the shelf and forget it! idk man, I think the general public liked it quite a bit.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Aug 1, 2017 21:07:44 GMT
Oh I so agree with this. Just let that nonsense go. No one wanted it to begin with...and the movie itself was just meh. Put it on the shelf and forget it! idk man, I think the general public liked it quite a bit. Exactly. It made way more money than anyone expected. If people don't want to see the sequel they don't have to.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Aug 2, 2017 1:52:23 GMT
Wonder who will eventually get it? Paul W.S. Anderson?
|
|
northernlad
Sophomore
@northernlad
Posts: 898
Likes: 620
|
Post by northernlad on Aug 2, 2017 4:52:36 GMT
Oh I so agree with this. Just let that nonsense go. No one wanted it to begin with...and the movie itself was just meh. Put it on the shelf and forget it! idk man, I think the general public liked it quite a bit. This is unfortunately true...but I don't know why they did. And I don't know why they would ever make such a movie/story/comic book.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Aug 2, 2017 8:45:14 GMT
idk man, I think the general public liked it quite a bit. This is unfortunately true...but I don't know why they did. And I don't know why they would ever make such a movie/story/comic book. I think they just had fun with it, Harley is entertaining, Will Smith is actually pretty good in this, there are pop songs scattered in the film, and.....idk. SS could have worked, but they went in the wrong direction.
|
|
Peter B. Parker
Sophomore
Watch the hands, not the mouth
@babygroot
Posts: 853
Likes: 411
|
Post by Peter B. Parker on Aug 6, 2017 7:26:31 GMT
they should give it to Guy Ritchie. That's exactly what I'm thinking as well.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 6, 2017 15:11:27 GMT
This is unfortunately true...but I don't know why they did. And I don't know why they would ever make such a movie/story/comic book. I think they just had fun with it, Harley is entertaining, Will Smith is actually pretty good in this, there are pop songs scattered in the film, and.....idk. SS could have worked, but they went in the wrong direction. The SS have always been a strange concept to wrap the head around, it's fairly nonsensical even by comic standards. Not exactly the best choice for a big summer movie.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 6, 2017 16:47:47 GMT
I think they just had fun with it, Harley is entertaining, Will Smith is actually pretty good in this, there are pop songs scattered in the film, and.....idk. SS could have worked, but they went in the wrong direction. The SS have always been a strange concept to wrap the head around, it's fairly nonsensical even by comic standards. Not exactly the best choice for a big summer movie. I don't really see what's so nonsensical about it. The government recruits/forces criminals to carry out black-ops missions in exchange for reduced sentences, among other things. It's pretty straightforward.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 6, 2017 16:49:58 GMT
The SS have always been a strange concept to wrap the head around, it's fairly nonsensical even by comic standards. Not exactly the best choice for a big summer movie. I don't really see what's so nonsensical about it. The government recruits/forces criminals to carry out black-ops missions in exchange for reduced sentences, among other things. It's pretty straightforward. Indeed, that's pretty much the same premise as any Vin Diesel movie ever made.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Aug 6, 2017 17:18:39 GMT
I think they just had fun with it, Harley is entertaining, Will Smith is actually pretty good in this, there are pop songs scattered in the film, and.....idk. SS could have worked, but they went in the wrong direction. The SS have always been a strange concept to wrap the head around, it's fairly nonsensical even by comic standards. Not exactly the best choice for a big summer movie. no.....it makes sense, it's just the Dirty Dozen, you're a criminal with special set of skills and i'm going to give you an ultimatum, either do the task i ask or i kill you, pretty straightforward. they just used the wrong catalyst to form the team in the film. they stated in the film that they want to put this team together to prevent an evil superman..........no.............that's wrong, laser eyes vs a girl with a bat? no. what they should have said was that they want to put the team together because after superman's death there have been more crimes, there are more terrorist groups, countries are suffering from military coups, etc etc etc. and they need to "maintain" world order and an influence.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 7, 2017 1:21:10 GMT
The SS have always been a strange concept to wrap the head around, it's fairly nonsensical even by comic standards. Not exactly the best choice for a big summer movie. no.....it makes sense, it's just the Dirty Dozen, you're a criminal with special set of skills and i'm going to give you an ultimatum, either do the task i ask or i kill you, pretty straightforward. they just used the wrong catalyst to form the team in the film. they stated in the film that they want to put this team together to prevent an evil superman..........no.............that's wrong, laser eyes vs a girl with a bat? no. what they should have said was that they want to put the team together because after superman's death there have been more crimes, there are more terrorist groups, countries are suffering from military coups, etc etc etc. and they need to "maintain" world order and an influence. At least the Dirty Dozen had the excuse that there was a major war going on, they were all Army personnel to begin with and killed all of them except for one survivor at the end. That sort of background stuff makes it more believable.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Aug 7, 2017 1:26:14 GMT
no.....it makes sense, it's just the Dirty Dozen, you're a criminal with special set of skills and i'm going to give you an ultimatum, either do the task i ask or i kill you, pretty straightforward. they just used the wrong catalyst to form the team in the film. they stated in the film that they want to put this team together to prevent an evil superman..........no.............that's wrong, laser eyes vs a girl with a bat? no. what they should have said was that they want to put the team together because after superman's death there have been more crimes, there are more terrorist groups, countries are suffering from military coups, etc etc etc. and they need to "maintain" world order and an influence. At least the Dirty Dozen had the excuse that there was a major war going on, they were all Army personnel to begin with and killed all of them except for one survivor at the end. That sort of background stuff makes it more believable. .......that's why I and we are saying, the idea behind SS is fine, simple and uncomplicated, they just went in the wrong direction within the film.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 7, 2017 1:30:34 GMT
At least the Dirty Dozen had the excuse that there was a major war going on, they were all Army personnel to begin with and killed all of them except for one survivor at the end. That sort of background stuff makes it more believable. .......that's why I and we are saying, the idea behind SS is fine, simple and uncomplicated, they just went in the wrong direction within the film. Well, yeah. Using the SS against a traditional Supervillain threat really doesn't make a lot of sense. Having them do some skeevy Black Ops stuff fits. Of course, that wouldn't work for a typical Summer Blockbuster. It fits an R Rated flick later or earlier in the year. Plus an R Rating would've given more room for Joker to strut his stuff. Imagine Leto in a scene like this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZoUx6sMWp0
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Aug 7, 2017 1:55:08 GMT
.......that's why I and we are saying, the idea behind SS is fine, simple and uncomplicated, they just went in the wrong direction within the film. Well, yeah. Using the SS against a traditional Supervillain threat really doesn't make a lot of sense. Having them do some skeevy Black Ops stuff fits. Of course, that wouldn't work for a typical Summer Blockbuster. It fits an R Rated flick later or earlier in the year. Plus an R Rating would've given more room for Joker to strut his stuff. Imagine Leto in a scene like this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZoUx6sMWp0well, we had The Dark Knight and Batman '89 which allowed the Joker to be himself more or less and those were PG13, the problem is that here he wasn't the main focus in SS (when he probably should have been) and the fact that he was going to be portrayed as an abuser, scenes which were filmed but then taken out, turning them more into Bonnie and Clyde rather than Sid and Nancy.
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Aug 7, 2017 23:10:29 GMT
Hope the sequel will be a hard R-Rated action movie, with real bad criminals, who swear and kills with no mercy.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 8, 2017 3:51:13 GMT
Hope the sequel will be a hard R-Rated action movie, with real bad criminals, who swear and kills with no mercy. People will just accuse them of ripping off Deadpool then.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Aug 8, 2017 6:34:40 GMT
Hope the sequel will be a hard R-Rated action movie, with real bad criminals, who swear and kills with no mercy. People will just accuse them of ripping off Deadpool then. I agree. They can't be too on-the-nose about it. I hope they do go darker, but with only a few select characters. They have Jared Leto as the Joker for goodness sake. He's a crazy, creepy, demented man when he wants to be. They need to allow him to go batshit crazy and shock the audience. The only real reason why my interest stayed throughout all of Suicide Squad's runtime is because of the Joker. He was the only interesting character.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 8, 2017 8:50:43 GMT
Hope the sequel will be a hard R-Rated action movie, with real bad criminals, who swear and kills with no mercy. People will just accuse them of ripping off Deadpool then. why so, and if so, so what?
The R rated approach seems the logical direction to go with the premise, unless they come up with a superb script and narrative not requiring such gimmicks. Considering the writing quality and originality mustered by MCU and DCEU so far, I seriously doubt the latter.
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Aug 8, 2017 14:08:18 GMT
Hope the sequel will be a hard R-Rated action movie, with real bad criminals, who swear and kills with no mercy. Sure if they want to lose a butt load of money, they could always go that route.
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Aug 8, 2017 14:47:15 GMT
Deadpool and Logan say hello.
|
|