|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 6, 2017 13:30:47 GMT
Nah, you didn't cite a page number. Don't need to, the book is enough. Nah, without the page and paragraph numbers the citation is incomplete. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 6, 2017 13:51:55 GMT
Don't need to, the book is enough. Nah, without the page and paragraph numbers the citation is incomplete. Doesn't matter, the book is enough. Where's your proof that it's not? |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 6, 2017 14:02:41 GMT
Nah, without the page and paragraph numbers the citation is incomplete. Doesn't matter, the book is enough. Where's your proof that it's not? So basically you concede the point. Excellent. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 6, 2017 15:02:04 GMT
Doesn't matter, the book is enough. Where's your proof that it's not? So basically you concede the point. Excellent. Nope, got the book and everything. You have to prove it's not in there and that it's not an ancient nursery rhyme. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 6, 2017 15:50:00 GMT
So basically you concede the point. Excellent. Nope, got the book and everything. You have to prove it's not in there and that it's not an ancient nursery rhyme. Nah, I already won. We're done with this one because I say so. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 7, 2017 1:18:34 GMT
Nope, got the book and everything. You have to prove it's not in there and that it's not an ancient nursery rhyme. Nah, I already won. We're done with this one because I say so. No. Prove it's not in the book. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 7, 2017 1:39:00 GMT
Nah, I already won. We're done with this one because I say so. No. Prove it's not in the book. Without a specific page number, I don't have to; you haven't cited it properly. Nice try, though. Thanks for playing. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 7, 2017 2:07:18 GMT
No. Prove it's not in the book. Without a specific page number, I don't have to; Yeah, you do. I brought up the book, which is more proof than anything you have to the opposite. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 7, 2017 2:54:08 GMT
Without a specific page number, I don't have to; Yeah, you do. I brought up the book, which is more proof than anything you have to the opposite. Nah, still not enough information. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 7, 2017 2:54:43 GMT
Yeah, you do. I brought up the book, which is more proof than anything you have to the opposite. Nah, still not enough information. More than you countered with. I gave the book, if you want more you read the book. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 7, 2017 2:55:31 GMT
Nah, still not enough information. More than you countered with. I gave the book, if you want more you read the book. Nah, gonna need the page number. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Aug 7, 2017 3:25:21 GMT
More than you countered with. I gave the book, if you want more you read the book. Nah, gonna need the page number. Page 323. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 7, 2017 3:41:37 GMT
Nah, gonna need the page number. Page 323. Oh. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Aug 7, 2017 15:01:12 GMT
Vision is pretty boring. Scarlet Witch still has potential though.
|
|
