|
Post by Jonesy1 on Mar 8, 2017 18:42:56 GMT
It's easier for people to justify bigotry if they see it as a choice. I agree, but I'm waiting for afeena to admit that. I may be waiting forever, though. Probably longer than that.
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 8, 2017 22:10:48 GMT
awhina now seems to be intentionally avoiding my posts. Just in case she missed it, for the third time: I gave four links that contained (between them) links and references to dozens of studies on the subject, all of them supporting the "born that way" hypothesis. They've gone about this in different ways, but all of them involved analyzing different aspects of how homosexual brains differ from heterosexual brains. You've yet to argue why any (much less all) of this research is invalid or why it doesn't support the "born that way" hypothesis. You made the claim here: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/66892/thread that "Everyone is heterosexual until/unless they choose otherwise." and you have done absolutely nothing to support that claim. So, again: All available science supports "born that way." No available science supports "choice." Yet you believe it's a choice because...? Sigh. I have answered you but contrary to the Ada-meme I don't have unlimited time. Your desperate baby yells for attention have been heard but if you keep being abusive will actually be ignored.
|
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Mar 8, 2017 22:20:41 GMT
awhina now seems to be intentionally avoiding my posts. Just in case she missed it, for the third time: I gave four links that contained (between them) links and references to dozens of studies on the subject, all of them supporting the "born that way" hypothesis. They've gone about this in different ways, but all of them involved analyzing different aspects of how homosexual brains differ from heterosexual brains. You've yet to argue why any (much less all) of this research is invalid or why it doesn't support the "born that way" hypothesis. You made the claim here: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/66892/thread that "Everyone is heterosexual until/unless they choose otherwise." and you have done absolutely nothing to support that claim. So, again: All available science supports "born that way." No available science supports "choice." Yet you believe it's a choice because...? Sigh. I have answered you but contrary to the Ada-meme I don't have unlimited time. Your desperate baby yells for attention have been heard but if you keep being abusive will actually be ignored. Nice dodge. Bet you didn't read any of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 0:47:04 GMT
There have been a lot of "notices of being blocked" this evening. Pretty soon this thread is going to slow to a crawl...
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 9, 2017 16:40:05 GMT
awhina now seems to be intentionally avoiding my posts. Just in case she missed it, for the third time: I gave four links that contained (between them) links and references to dozens of studies on the subject, all of them supporting the "born that way" hypothesis. They've gone about this in different ways, but all of them involved analyzing different aspects of how homosexual brains differ from heterosexual brains. You've yet to argue why any (much less all) of this research is invalid or why it doesn't support the "born that way" hypothesis. You made the claim here: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/66892/thread that "Everyone is heterosexual until/unless they choose otherwise." and you have done absolutely nothing to support that claim. So, again: All available science supports "born that way." No available science supports "choice." Yet you believe it's a choice because...? Sigh. I have answered you Your only "answer" was that you didn't find them worth commenting on. You haven't addressed why any of them are invalid or not strong evidence for the "born that way" hypothesis. If you disagree, then link to the post where you did this.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 9, 2017 16:45:30 GMT
Sigh. I have answered you but contrary to the Ada-meme I don't have unlimited time. Your desperate baby yells for attention have been heard but if you keep being abusive will actually be ignored. Bet you didn't read any of them. Of course she didn't. She was asking earlier about how they analyzed the brains of living homosexuals, and she was doing this AFTER I posted the links. The second link I offered explained how they did this, so she obviously didn't read them. Here's where I first posted them: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/70369/threadHere's her first response: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/70974/threadNotice the ridiculous statements/questions. She's asking where the links to the studies are when I posted two actual studies and the first two links contained links to the studies at the bottom of the post. The second link is the one that talks about using MRIs to scan the brains, yet here she is asking how they studied living brains: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/84662/thread
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 9, 2017 16:49:51 GMT
Bet you didn't read any of them. Of course she didn't. She was asking earlier about how they analyzed the brains of living homosexuals, and she was doing this AFTER I posted the links. The second link I offered explained how they did this, so she obviously didn't read them. Here's where I first posted them: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/70369/threadHere's her first response: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/70974/threadNotice the ridiculous statements/questions. She's asking where the links to the studies are when I posted two actual studies and the first two links contained links to the studies at the bottom of the post. The second link is the one that talks about using MRIs to scan the brains, yet here she is asking how they studied living brains: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/84662/threadShe was also arguing that you'd only posted two links when she even quoted four links in your post. It was like watching a car crash.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 9, 2017 17:09:44 GMT
Of course she didn't. She was asking earlier about how they analyzed the brains of living homosexuals, and she was doing this AFTER I posted the links. The second link I offered explained how they did this, so she obviously didn't read them. Here's where I first posted them: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/70369/threadHere's her first response: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/70974/threadNotice the ridiculous statements/questions. She's asking where the links to the studies are when I posted two actual studies and the first two links contained links to the studies at the bottom of the post. The second link is the one that talks about using MRIs to scan the brains, yet here she is asking how they studied living brains: imdb2.freeforums.net/post/84662/threadShe was also arguing that you'd only posted two links when she even quoted four links in your post. It was like watching a car crash. Indeed.
|
|