|
|
Post by ᵗʰᵉᵃᵘˣᵖʰᵒᵘ on Sept 6, 2017 15:31:42 GMT
But censor his poems for what reason? He harms no one. He is never rude or abusive. He just does his own thing. Since when is that a reason for censorship? Funny how thefleetsin gets blocked for poems (I don't click on them myself, they're not my cup of tea), yet there's a Soapbox poster named Bluebell who, every. single. effing. day, bumps weeks- and months-old threads with nonsensical single sentences — and, despite complaints, no one does shit about it. In the words of Seinfeld’s George Costanza, “there are no laws in this place! Anything goes! It's Thunderdome!” |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 6, 2017 15:42:08 GMT
But censor his poems for what reason? He harms no one. He is never rude or abusive. He just does his own thing. Since when is that a reason for censorship? Funny how thefleetsin gets blocked for poems (I don't click on them myself, they're not my cup of tea), yet there's a Soapbox poster named Bluebell who, every. single. effing. day, bumps weeks- and months-old threads with nonsensical single sentences — and, despite complaints, no one does shit about it. In the words of Seinfeld’s George Costanza, “there are no laws in this place! Anything goes! It's Thunderdome!” there is a long history here (brought over from the imdb board) of an almost emaciated whining associated with anyone who dares shine a light on any and all things spirit voodoo. it's likened unto a feud, a feud i might add, carries with it enough baggage to fill a carousel at los angeles international airport. i don't participate in these feuds. i have more important things to do. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Sept 6, 2017 21:51:17 GMT
Funny how thefleetsin gets blocked for poems (I don't click on them myself, they're not my cup of tea), yet there's a Soapbox poster named Bluebell who, every. single. effing. day, bumps weeks- and months-old threads with nonsensical single sentences — and, despite complaints, no one does shit about it. In the words of Seinfeld’s George Costanza, “there are no laws in this place! Anything goes! It's Thunderdome!” You post on the Soapbox? You have my sympathies. Not. This is not the Soapbox. |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 7, 2017 15:47:13 GMT
as many beautiful men
in a response to
the increase in christ-based
homophobia
i set myself a goal
to document
as many beautiful
men
as is humanly possible.
for religions
are truly remarkable
at
circumcising joy
if you let them tool your life.
i remember this
with each and every passing night
one of my brothers
is
struck down in
a self righteous spite
only
a god of love
could have dreamed up.
sjw 09/07/17 inspired at this very moment in time by jeff sessions and the tools of fools.
from the 'bigot series' of poems
|
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 7, 2017 19:34:13 GMT
baptizing the blessed in the florida keys
when millions of tons of water
splatter
endless amounts of
human fodder
can a god be bothered
with
a quickie baptism
right before the sharks and otters
dine on what
used to be your sanctiifed
sisters and brothers?
blessed are those who float
in
tremendous amounts
of
salted water.
sjw 09/07/17 inspired at this very moment in time by the consequences of electing a moron.
from the 'blitzkrieg series' of poems
|
|
|
|
Post by Morgana on Sept 8, 2017 8:14:12 GMT
But censor his poems for what reason? He harms no one. He is never rude or abusive. He just does his own thing. Since when is that a reason for censorship? Did you even read the linked post? None of the poems was censored. They are all still there. It's the spamming that has been restricted. And I agree with that. I did read the post. I meant the censoring by not allowing him to post his poems as before. |
|
|
|
Post by Morgana on Sept 8, 2017 8:16:06 GMT
But censor his poems for what reason? He harms no one. He is never rude or abusive. He just does his own thing. Since when is that a reason for censorship? He can still write poems Morgana and give his views in any thread that is posted here. There was no censorship. Is there a function on this site where I can block fleetsin completely, where I don't even see the existence of his worthless posts? Because I was joyful when the admin restricted him to one thread. It is really fucking annoying that the whiners won the day, but if there is a way I can completely block this idiotic spammer completely from my sight, I won't be so pissed off. Is there such a way? It is the idiot called science is god who is bumping posts of fleetsin. The moron scienceisgod who is a known anti-Semite, homophobe, misogynist and a racist is shouting that fleetsin has been censored. Many of the new breed of conservatives and liberals have no idea what freedom of speech or censorship actually mean. Restrictions based on not following rules/ethics/responsibilities is the new "you can't dictate me what to do" or "you can't control my thoughts" argument. Thank you for explaining, Ajune. I think I should get off my flag waving pedestal now. |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 8, 2017 14:08:49 GMT
He can still write poems Morgana and give his views in any thread that is posted here. There was no censorship. It is the idiot called science is god who is bumping posts of fleetsin. The moron scienceisgod who is a known anti-Semite, homophobe, misogynist and a racist is shouting that fleetsin has been censored. Many of the new breed of conservatives and liberals have no idea what freedom of speech or censorship actually mean. Restrictions based on not following rules/ethics/responsibilities is the new "you can't dictate me what to do" or "you can't control my thoughts" argument. Thank you for explaining, Ajune. I think I should get off my flag waving pedestal now. yes, bogus rhetoric is always best exposed when its author rinses and repeats it. |
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Sept 8, 2017 14:55:46 GMT
He can still write poems Morgana and give his views in any thread that is posted here. There was no censorship. It is the idiot called science is god who is bumping posts of fleetsin. The moron scienceisgod who is a known anti-Semite, homophobe, misogynist and a racist is shouting that fleetsin has been censored. Many of the new breed of conservatives and liberals have no idea what freedom of speech or censorship actually mean. Restrictions based on not following rules/ethics/responsibilities is the new "you can't dictate me what to do" or "you can't control my thoughts" argument. Thank you for explaining, Ajune. I think I should get off my flag waving pedestal now. But, Morgana, thefleetsin is restricted from starting any new threads, and is the only poster restricted in that way. Other posters can start an unrestricted number of posts, both on-topic and off-topic. Is that fair? Just asking... why a rule for one and not all? |
|
|
|
Post by Vegas on Sept 8, 2017 15:03:13 GMT
But, Morgana, thefleetsin is restricted from starting any new threads, and is the only poster restricted in that way. Other posters can start an unrestricted number of posts, both on-topic and off-topic. Is that fair? Just asking... why a rule for one and not all? Pretty much this^ I get that some don't like/get steve's poems... or how they take up space on the board. (Seriously, tho... this board isn't the fast paced hub of discussion that it once was... Are you really upset that a thread is bumped to Page 2 in 2 days instead of 3?  ) If one doesn't care for steve.. they could put him on IGNORE... End of problem. I don't really get the need to involve divine intervention and a decree from above. |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 8, 2017 16:12:11 GMT
"I don't really get the need to involve divine intervention and a decree from above."
but i do.
and so i write.
and so i have written close to twenty thousand little scribblings. some expressly answering your above statement.
|
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Sept 8, 2017 19:18:43 GMT
" I don't really get the need to involve divine intervention and a decree from above." but i do. and so i write. and so i have written close to twenty thousand little scribblings. some expressly answering your above statement. Just an OT question from an organization freak - do you have them all archived and sorted by date or series? |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 8, 2017 22:31:58 GMT
"Just an OT question from an organization freak - do you have them all archived and sorted by date or series?
i do have a database i started back in 1994. although i am behind in entering everything into it. i save everything by date and title.
from 'baby' to 'beauty' to 'beethoven' to 'blasphmey' and beyond. there are many series BUT they all begin with a 'b'.
:-)
|
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Sept 8, 2017 23:11:45 GMT
But, Morgana, thefleetsin is restricted from starting any new threads, and is the only poster restricted in that way. Other posters can start an unrestricted number of posts, both on-topic and off-topic. Is that fair? Just asking... why a rule for one and not all? Because others haven't spammed as much. A repeat offender usually gets punished worse than a first-time offender. I have no problem with it. |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 9, 2017 0:24:07 GMT
the static between the wheels
once the spokes are
tightened
and
the wheels aligned
it's practically impossible
to stop a bicycle
clearing
pathways once
clogged by the divine.
still this is why
there is no stopping the sublime
hidden there
between the lines
of
our hearts
strewn in verse.
sjw 09/08/17 inspired at this very moment in time by my rico.
from the 'beauty series' of poems
|
|
|
|
Post by Morgana on Sept 9, 2017 10:45:25 GMT
Thank you for explaining, Ajune. I think I should get off my flag waving pedestal now. But, Morgana, thefleetsin is restricted from starting any new threads, and is the only poster restricted in that way. Other posters can start an unrestricted number of posts, both on-topic and off-topic. Is that fair? Just asking... why a rule for one and not all? So I was right. And no, it isn't fair at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Sept 9, 2017 11:10:02 GMT
But, Morgana, thefleetsin is restricted from starting any new threads, and is the only poster restricted in that way. Other posters can start an unrestricted number of posts, both on-topic and off-topic. Is that fair? Just asking... why a rule for one and not all? So I was right. And no, it isn't fair at all. You weren't right at as there was no censorship. Fleet just posted one of his yet another poem just above your post. Some members are restricted from starting threads. Koolguy, a notorious member on politics board was stopped from starting a thread. Fleet was accounting for 35% threads here and about 90% of them were reply less and rest got negative attention. Fleet was restricted for bombarding the board with insane proportion of threads which were driving users away. You might call it unfair or whatever but administrators make decisions based on what they think is best for the board. Fleet can still post his poems on any thread that is posted here. |
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Sept 9, 2017 19:18:44 GMT
So I was right. And no, it isn't fair at all. |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Sept 10, 2017 18:42:30 GMT
I don't like censorship.
I'm a grown-up.
|
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Sept 10, 2017 18:56:20 GMT
Good thing it didn't happen here. |
|
