|
|
Post by primeone on Sept 2, 2017 21:33:30 GMT
Really?
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 2, 2017 22:15:38 GMT
No. I'll give credit the both of them. For better or worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Sept 2, 2017 23:15:03 GMT
I can't care about the news anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Sept 2, 2017 23:43:06 GMT
Rob Liefeld certainly doesn't count as Everyone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2017 23:51:43 GMT
I WISH this was Whedon's film. He actually understands the characters.
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Sept 3, 2017 1:02:33 GMT
I just want it to be good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Sept 3, 2017 1:49:29 GMT
My prediction for the film:
It ends up being good: YAY JOSS WHEDON!!!
It ends up being bad: BOO ZACK SNYDER!!!
Make sure to bring the popcorn, kids!
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Sept 3, 2017 2:22:34 GMT
My prediction for the film: It ends up being good: YAY JOSS WHEDON!!! It ends up being bad: BOO ZACK SNYDER!!! Make sure to bring the popcorn, kids! That's precisely how it'll go. Pretty sad, but true.
|
|
|
|
Post by dknaveed23 on Sept 3, 2017 14:36:21 GMT
Well the internet seems to do so. Someone heard from their neighbour's dog's previous owner's ex-wife's employer that JL is Joss Whedon's film and the internet gobbles it up, it's crazy. I swear ColliderNews has just started making shit up on the spot now just to give themselves some sense of legitimacy in the world of journalism. Some people can't seem to accept the obviously realistic scenario which is Whedon is simply adding to the film- you can add to a film within two months but sure as hell can't drastically remake it. I reckon it's still very much Snyder's film with Whedon just adding to it, you know, what the studio actually said was going on. There really is a crazy amount of sensationalism when it comes to DCEU stories it's bloody mental.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 3, 2017 16:20:49 GMT
My prediction for the film: It ends up being good: YAY JOSS WHEDON!!! It ends up being bad: BOO ZACK SNYDER!!! Make sure to bring the popcorn, kids! That's precisely how it'll go. Pretty sad, but true. All the while, Chris Terrio gets off the hook again.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Sept 3, 2017 17:57:08 GMT
My prediction for the film: It ends up being good: YAY JOSS WHEDON!!! It ends up being bad: BOO ZACK SNYDER!!! Make sure to bring the popcorn, kids! Pretty much. Because of it being said to be unwatchable before all the changes, it will be seen as bad because of Snyder. But if it is good, Whedon fixed it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Sept 3, 2017 18:03:48 GMT
That's precisely how it'll go. Pretty sad, but true. All the while, Chris Terrio gets off the hook again. He's never off the hook. It's just that nobody knows who he is. Tell you the truth I thought Goyer wrote it. The story gets a lot of the grief.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2017 19:31:32 GMT
Well the internet seems to do so. Someone heard from their neighbour's dog's previous owner's ex-wife's employer that JL is Joss Whedon's film and the internet gobbles it up, it's crazy. I swear ColliderNews has just started making shit up on the spot now just to give themselves some sense of legitimacy in the world of journalism. Some people can't seem to accept the obviously realistic scenario which is Whedon is simply adding to the film- you can add to a film within two months but sure as hell can't drastically remake it. I reckon it's still very much Snyder's film with Whedon just adding to it, you know, what the studio actually said was going on. There really is a crazy amount of sensationalism when it comes to DCEU stories it's bloody mental. WB brought it on themselves by being completely incompetent in getting a series off the ground.
|
|