|
|
Post by darkpast on Sept 3, 2017 7:07:45 GMT
even earlier?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2017 14:03:17 GMT
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Sept 3, 2017 15:57:54 GMT
That was the question I asked on my first ever post here, and I took some flak for asking it.
Many months later I have found that the consensus is that everything we like is "classic", even if released yesterday, and a lot of stuff we do not like is classic as well if it is old enough. The younger the poster, the more recent the cut-off date, but most people put it around the 1970s.
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Sept 3, 2017 16:12:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by bonerxmas on Sept 3, 2017 16:17:31 GMT
That was the question I asked on my first ever post here, and I took some flak for asking it. Many months later I have found that the consensus is that everything we like is "classic", even if released yesterday, and a lot of stuff we do not like is classic as well if it is old enough. The younger the poster, the more recent the cut-off date, but most people put it around the 1970s. well "classic" is supposed to mean "selected" not "old", classics are the few old things that deserve to be recommended, shakespeare is a classic but robert greenes plays are not, even though they are older, if it means everything before a certain date it should just be called "old" |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 3, 2017 16:17:53 GMT
Only in the sense that it was produced in that time. There was still crap being made too like The Babe Ruth Story or The Conqueror.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wesley Crusher on Sept 3, 2017 19:48:56 GMT
|
|
