|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 2, 2017 3:26:07 GMT
In this case you don't have to take anyone's word, just follow the link (it links to the middle of this thread showing the OP admitting that he edited his OP). All you have to believe is that this website is showing accurately what the OP wrote. Thank you. (The problem is that the man making that claim is not known for his truthfulness, his clique aren't generally) |
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 2, 2017 3:29:40 GMT
In this case you don't have to take anyone's word, just follow the link (it links to the middle of this thread showing the OP admitting that he edited his OP). All you have to believe is that this website is showing accurately what the OP wrote. The problem is that the man making that claim is not known for his truthfulness  $100 if you can name one thing I've ever been untruthful about. Your lie about me claiming to be a scientist doesn't count. |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Mar 2, 2017 3:33:25 GMT
Mmm, so you say, and I am going to have to trust you as I am here many hours later.  You don't have to trust me: I linked to his post where said he modified it. There are two posters on the first page that quoted what he originally said. Forgive the culturally irrelevant relic from the past. She is searching for something to argue about. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 2, 2017 4:15:34 GMT
Wow. Hitler just made a witticism. It sucked, but at least he tried, the senile old dick.  He tried, but oh, what a spectacular fail! |
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 2, 2017 6:58:14 GMT
Mmm, so you say, and I am going to have to trust you as I am here many hours later. (It goes against the grain to take your word for anything, still I suppose your track record of "mis-statements" is nowhere as bad as EEH for instance)
Haduh, you're forgetting that we all know you, your need to lie constantly and your ability to be wrong about pretty much everything. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 2, 2017 7:10:17 GMT
Sorry but your desperate plea for attention failed.
Seek help
|
|
RedRuth1966
Sophomore
@redruth1966
Posts: 113
Likes: 42
 
|
Post by RedRuth1966 on Mar 2, 2017 7:47:44 GMT
At one time, scientists believed in spontaneous generation. Then science discovered that that was untrue. Yet, now, some scientists are claiming that life came spontaneously from some primordial soup. Is that a joke or do you really believe that spontaneous generation is comparable to current theories about abiogenesis? Do you honestly believe that today's Biochemists are unfamiliar with Pasteur's experiments? |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 2, 2017 8:04:45 GMT
At one time, scientists believed in spontaneous generation. Then science discovered that that was untrue. Yet, now, some scientists are claiming that life came spontaneously from some primordial soup. Is that a joke or do you really believe that spontaneous generation is comparable to current theories about abiogenesis? Do you honestly believe that today's Biochemists are unfamiliar with Pasteur's experiments? Well spotted as they do seem unacquainted with Pasteur. It smacks rather of desperation. |
|
RedRuth1966
Sophomore
@redruth1966
Posts: 113
Likes: 42
|
Post by RedRuth1966 on Mar 2, 2017 8:21:41 GMT
Is that a joke or do you really believe that spontaneous generation is comparable to current theories about abiogenesis? Do you honestly believe that today's Biochemists are unfamiliar with Pasteur's experiments? Well spotted as they do seem unacquainted with Pasteur. It smacks rather of desperation. Are you serious? |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 2, 2017 9:38:46 GMT
Well spotted as they do seem unacquainted with Pasteur. It smacks rather of desperation. Are you serious? Yes I am for the most part but yours is not an answer. |
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Mar 2, 2017 10:58:33 GMT
I think one of the most common disagreements of science is whether or not Pluto is a planet. First it is, then it isn't, then it is, then it isn't, then it is, etc. I would think if science were always right that the observations would be the same every time. I think you are overstating this. Its not a common disagreement in science, but something among some astronomers. As far as i'm aware it was officially discovered in 1930, and was reclassified as 'not a planet' once in 2006. It has nothing to do with differing observations. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 2, 2017 11:25:03 GMT
I think one of the most common disagreements of science is whether or not Pluto is a planet. First it is, then it isn't, then it is, then it isn't, then it is, etc. I would think if science were always right that the observations would be the same every time. I think you are overstating this. Its not a common disagreement in science, but something among some astronomers. As far as i'm aware it was officially discovered in 1930, and was reclassified as 'not a planet' once in 2006. It has nothing to do with differing observations. Guessing you're not a subscriber to Bode's Law. |
|
puvo
Sophomore
@puvo
Posts: 575
Likes: 78
|
Post by puvo on Mar 2, 2017 12:10:17 GMT
I think you are overstating this. Its not a common disagreement in science, but something among some astronomers. As far as i'm aware it was officially discovered in 1930, and was reclassified as 'not a planet' once in 2006. It has nothing to do with differing observations. Guessing you're not a subscriber to Bode's Law. Relevance? |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 2, 2017 12:26:13 GMT
Sorry but your desperate plea for attention failed. Seek help Let's put it this way Ada, you are f<>king desperate, a failure and I would say you are beyond help. You are also not very clever, so I don't know why you even bother to post on here. You make no impact whatsoever and it's a wonder that you have gotten this far in your homophobic and ignorant little life. God despises a foul and vile hypocrite like you and you are going to be cast in the fiery pits of hell for all your sins against man. No such thing as "homophobia." It's just a political term invented by sodomites. |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Mar 2, 2017 13:38:40 GMT
The ultimate "duh" thread title?
|
|
|
|
Post by MooseNugget on Mar 2, 2017 15:43:07 GMT
Scientists They think they know everything If they thought that you'd figure they would quit on the whole trying to learn more things thing. |
|
filmfan95
Sophomore
@filmfan95
Posts: 383
Likes: 141
|
Post by filmfan95 on Mar 2, 2017 17:20:30 GMT
Sorry but your desperate plea for attention failed. Seek help Let's put it this way Ada, you are f<>king desperate, a failure and I would say you are beyond help. You are also not very clever, so I don't know why you even bother to post on here. You make no impact whatsoever and it's a wonder that you have gotten this far in your homophobic and ignorant little life. God despises a foul and vile hypocrite like you and you are going to be cast in the fiery pits of hell for all your sins against man. I wouldn't go so far as to say that. Only God knows for sure who is saved and who is not. |
|
RedRuth1966
Sophomore
@redruth1966
Posts: 113
Likes: 42
|
Post by RedRuth1966 on Mar 2, 2017 18:19:42 GMT
Yes I am for the most part but yours is not an answer. So, you really do think that 1. Biochemists are unaware of Pasteur's seminal experiments. 2. His experiments have relevance to current theories on abiogenesis. Do you have any idea what his experiments entailed? |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 2, 2017 18:35:44 GMT
I think you are overstating this. Its not a common disagreement in science, but something among some astronomers. As far as i'm aware it was officially discovered in 1930, and was reclassified as 'not a planet' once in 2006. It has nothing to do with differing observations. Guessing you're not a subscriber to Bode's Law. Bode's law applies to orbiting bodies in general, not just whatever happens to be classified as a "planet". For example, the discovery of Ceres was, in part, enabled by the law. |
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 2, 2017 19:02:37 GMT
Guessing you're not a subscriber to Bode's Law. Bode's law applies to orbiting bodies in general, not just whatever happens to be classified as a "planet". For example, the discovery of Ceres was, in part, enabled by the law. Cine how long have you wanted to be a cowboy? |
|
