|
|
Post by blade on Mar 2, 2017 19:02:37 GMT
Guessing you're not a subscriber to Bode's Law. Bode's law applies to orbiting bodies in general, not just whatever happens to be classified as a "planet". For example, the discovery of Ceres was, in part, enabled by the law. Cine how long have you wanted to be a cowboy? |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 2, 2017 22:10:55 GMT
Let's put it this way Ada, you are f<>king desperate, a failure and I would say you are beyond help. You are also not very clever, so I don't know why you even bother to post on here. You make no impact whatsoever and it's a wonder that you have gotten this far in your homophobic and ignorant little life. God despises a foul and vile hypocrite like you and you are going to be cast in the fiery pits of hell for all your sins against man. I wouldn't go so far as to say that. Only God knows for sure who is saved and who is not. Who\What is God though? You don't know do you? |
|
|
|
Post by blade on Mar 2, 2017 22:11:58 GMT
I wouldn't go so far as to say that. Only God knows for sure who is saved and who is not. Who\What is God though? You don't know do you? You mad bro? |
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Mar 2, 2017 22:13:49 GMT
Yup.
They can't get teleportation right without splicing themselves with flies!
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 2, 2017 22:15:04 GMT
Who\What is God though? You don't know do you? You mad bro? Not as mad as you though, you bible bashing, homophobic, psycho, Jesus Freak! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2017 22:16:05 GMT
Scientists They think they know everything Truly, a statement that could only be made by somebody who has never spent any time at all actually talking to a scientist. |
|
|
|
Post by blade on Mar 2, 2017 22:18:56 GMT
Not as mad as you though, you bible bashing, homophobic, psycho, Jesus Freak!  |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 2, 2017 22:20:44 GMT
Not as mad as you though, you bible bashing, homophobic, psycho, Jesus Freak! Is that demon imp you psycho, underfoot? |
|
|
|
Post by blade on Mar 2, 2017 22:37:58 GMT
Is that demon imp you psycho, underfoot? That would be you, sodomite.
|
|
|
|
Post by filmfan95 on Mar 2, 2017 22:59:58 GMT
I wouldn't go so far as to say that. Only God knows for sure who is saved and who is not. Who\What is God though? You don't know do you? God is the guy that saved me. And I'm not homophobic or racist or anything like that. I love all people, regardless of their religion, race, orientation, political beliefs, etc. I have friends of all sorts, and we get along well, regardless of our differing beliefs. |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 2, 2017 23:20:28 GMT
Yes I am for the most part but yours is not an answer. So, you really do think that 1. Biochemists are unaware of Pasteur's seminal experiments. 2. His experiments have relevance to current theories on abiogenesis. Do you have any idea what his experiments entailed? Of course I do. That's the kind of thing taught to 10 year olds How is 'abiogenesis' any different from what Pasteur refuted? |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 2, 2017 23:51:05 GMT
Who\What is God though? You don't know do you? God is the guy that saved me. And I'm not homophobic or racist or anything like that. I love all people, regardless of their religion, race, orientation, political beliefs, etc. I have friends of all sorts, and we get along well, regardless of our differing beliefs. Save yourself! |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 2, 2017 23:57:39 GMT
That would be you, sodomite. Yes, we all know that is what you secretly desire, and your obsession with sodomy is bordering on a pathological disorder. Have you sought help for it? |
|
|
|
Post by dividavi on Mar 3, 2017 5:12:07 GMT
So, you really do think that 1. Biochemists are unaware of Pasteur's seminal experiments. 2. His experiments have relevance to current theories on abiogenesis. Do you have any idea what his experiments entailed? Of course I do. That's the kind of thing taught to 10 year olds How is 'abiogenesis' any different from what Pasteur refuted? In 1859, Pasteur showed that boiled (then cooled) broth will not spoil if deprived of access to microbes. In 1952, there was a famous chemical experiment that simulated the conditions thought at the time to be present on the early Earth, and tested the chemical origin of life under those conditions. The University of Chicago experiment confirmed the hypothesis that assumed conditions on the primitive Earth favored chemical reactions that synthesized more complex organic compounds from simpler inorganic precursors. In 2007, scientists examining sealed vials preserved from the original experiments were able to show that there were actually well over 20 different amino acids produced in the original experiments. That is considerably more than what was originally reported, and more than the 20 that naturally occur in life. In other words, the 1859 and 1952 experiments addressed different questions. Pasteur showed that in present atmospheric conditions that living organisms do not arise from non-living predecessor material. The later experiment showed that amino acids can arise from the conditions of billions of years ago. Now, do you deny that the University of Chicago scientists (1952) were quite familiar with what Louis Pasteur had accomplished nine decades earlier? |
|
|
|
Post by RedRuth1966 on Mar 3, 2017 8:32:20 GMT
So, you really do think that 1. Biochemists are unaware of Pasteur's seminal experiments. 2. His experiments have relevance to current theories on abiogenesis. Do you have any idea what his experiments entailed? Of course I do. That's the kind of thing taught to 10 year olds How is 'abiogenesis' any different from what Pasteur refuted? Including 10 year old future Biochemists? Either you don't know what Pasteur's experiments entailed or you know nothing about current abiogenesis research. Here's a hint - one of them involves boiling some nutrient broth (to kill any microorganisms) and leaving it for a few days in a flask that is open to the air and one that isn't then seeing if anything grew in them. The other isn't. The hubris of some religious people is stunning, you really believe you know better about biochemistry than someone like Jack Szostak. Perhaps you should email and remind him about Pasteur's work, maybe in all the hard work and excitement of getting a Nobel Prize he forgot, molbio.mgh.harvard.edu/szostakweb/ |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 3, 2017 9:53:07 GMT
Of course I do. That's the kind of thing taught to 10 year olds How is 'abiogenesis' any different from what Pasteur refuted? Including 10 year old future Biochemists? Either you don't know what Pasteur's experiments entailed or you know nothing about current abiogenesis research. Here's a hint - one of them involves boiling some nutrient broth (to kill any microorganisms) and leaving it for a few days in a flask that is open to the air and one that isn't then seeing if anything grew in them. The other isn't. The hubris of some religious people is stunning, you really believe you know better about biochemistry than someone like Jack Szostak. Perhaps you should email and remind him about Pasteur's work, maybe in all the hard work and excitement of getting a Nobel Prize he forgot, molbio.mgh.harvard.edu/szostakweb/The time and effort you spent bitching could have been spent explaining why abiogenesis is different from superstition |
|
|
|
Post by puvo on Mar 3, 2017 10:02:39 GMT
Including 10 year old future Biochemists? Either you don't know what Pasteur's experiments entailed or you know nothing about current abiogenesis research. Here's a hint - one of them involves boiling some nutrient broth (to kill any microorganisms) and leaving it for a few days in a flask that is open to the air and one that isn't then seeing if anything grew in them. The other isn't. The hubris of some religious people is stunning, you really believe you know better about biochemistry than someone like Jack Szostak. Perhaps you should email and remind him about Pasteur's work, maybe in all the hard work and excitement of getting a Nobel Prize he forgot, molbio.mgh.harvard.edu/szostakweb/The time and effort you spent bitching could have been spent explaining why abiogenesis is different from superstition Imagine what you could have achieved without all the time spent on the snarky bitching on forums like this. You could have looked up things like abiogenesis yourself! |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 3, 2017 10:21:57 GMT
The time and effort you spent bitching could have been spent explaining why abiogenesis is different from superstition Imagine what you could have achieved without all the time spent on the snarky bitching on forums like this. You could have looked up things like abiogenesis yourself! So you don't know either? I thought I was asking an expert, isn't Ruth one? But she would rather moan than tell me. |
|
|
|
Post by puvo on Mar 3, 2017 10:30:21 GMT
Imagine what you could have achieved without all the time spent on the snarky bitching on forums like this. You could have looked up things like abiogenesis yourself! So you don't know either? I thought I was asking an expert, isn't Ruth one? But she would rather moan than tell me. Thats funny, I've could have sworn in the past you have said things along the lines of 'im not here to educate you, look it up yourself' |
|
|
|
Post by awhina on Mar 3, 2017 11:35:38 GMT
So you don't know either? I thought I was asking an expert, isn't Ruth one? But she would rather moan than tell me. Thats funny, I've could have sworn in the past you have said things along the lines of 'im not here to educate you, look it up yourself' No again, you are wrong as I have never said that. To one person who ignored my links I have said that I am not repeating myself so he can look it up, but that is obviously different. |
|
