|
|
Post by Vits on Sept 17, 2017 9:31:34 GMT
JEFF SMITH has been chosen to replace a senator in the capital of the U.S. No, not New York. Why would you think that's--Ohhh... Anyway, JIM TAYLOR (a political boss) and SENATOR JOE PAINE think that his nice personality will be people-pleasing and easy to manipulate. It has become popular to hate the concept of patriotism, because a lot of people think that it means to love their country blindly. Now I present to you a movie that's patriotic in a true way. It attacks the government by showing that most politicians are corrupt... and it still delivers an idealistic message about what makes a nation great. ------------------------------------- You can read the full review in my blog (in English, in Spanish or in Italian) and/or watch the video review:
|
|
|
|
Post by telegonus on Sept 17, 2017 16:57:42 GMT
A fine classic film, Mr. Smith was a major hit in its day and still enjoys classic status. Retrospectively it seems somewhat overshadowed, in director Frank Capra's canon by both Meet John Doe and It's A Wonderful Life. It was very topical in its day and still captures a moment in time just prior to the outbreak of World War II. Things were very edgy back then, post-Munich, and Mr. Smith's unvarnished, guileless idealism reflected the national mood.
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Sept 17, 2017 17:00:42 GMT
I've been thinking about this film lately. I don't have a copy but I'm keen to see it again, because of the circus in Washington and how intense the media coverage has been. I think it inspired me alot when I was a teenager watching the classics. Great movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by spiderwort on Sept 17, 2017 17:06:10 GMT
A fine classic film, Mr. Smith was a major hit in its day and still enjoys classic status. Retrospectively it seems somewhat overshadowed, in director Frank Capra's canon by both Meet John Doe and It's A Wonderful Life. It was very topical in its day and still captures a moment in time just prior to the outbreak of World War II. Things were very edgy back then, post-Munich, and Mr. Smith's unvarnished, guileless idealism reflected the national mood. Beautifully said, telegonus, and I agree. I would just add that I love Stewart's performance in the film. His idealism also carries a portent of his dramatic potential, revealed even more powerfully in It's a Wonderful Life. The war figured strongly in both films and performances, I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by telegonus on Sept 17, 2017 17:25:46 GMT
Thanks, Spiderwort. True about Stewart as Mr. Smith. A sort of dry run for George Bailey in the later film. The "white knight" older senator was an interestingly ambiguous father figure (gone bad). Claude Rains performance was more restrained than usual, or maybe I should say he didn't deploy his usual tricks. Watching him sitting in the senate chamber while young Sen. Smith is filibustering is like looking at a man in the grip of madness. I mean before his big breakdown scene. Low key and realistic from an actor I often find difficult to wholly believe; that he's the character he's playing, I mean; but not here.
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Sept 18, 2017 4:07:06 GMT
Harry Carey, Sr. as "President of the Senate. He was NOMINATED for an Oscar for Best Actor in a Supporting Role (as was Claude Rains)  
|
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Sept 19, 2017 3:56:02 GMT
Great for its time, I found it after IAWL. Might make my top 500 if I had one.
I'm kinda glad I went in somewhat chronological order for Stewart's filmography viewing.
|
|
|
|
Post by BATouttaheck on Sept 19, 2017 5:20:31 GMT
Mr Smith Goes to Washington
and
Dave
Should be required watching for all who are involved in politics in any capacity, in any country, anywhere !
|
|
|
|
Post by rateater on Sept 19, 2017 5:25:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by OldAussie on Sept 19, 2017 9:23:48 GMT
My favourite Capra film. 9.5/10
|
|
|
|
Post by joekiddlouischama on Sept 19, 2017 10:57:17 GMT
I viewed Mr. Smith Goes to Washington twice in the theater in July. I had seen the film once before, in 2005 on Turner Classic Movies, but I enjoyed and appreciated it more on these occasions—the film is very good. Stewart is not quite masterful, as he would be in It's a Wonderful Life several years later, but he conveys youthful naiveté and idealism very effectively. What really struck me in July, though, was how subversive the movie happens to be—how it frankly shows corporate interests buying politicians, using extralegal security forces, and even controlling the police, who stunningly use fire hoses on anti-establishment demonstrators twenty-four years before such a scene would become infamous and indelible in Birmingham, Alabama. As noted earlier in the thread, the concern with, and warning about, fascism's rise is unmistakable.
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington thus speaks to concerns of its time while previewing iconic events in American history and maintaining absolute relevance in our current day. Also striking is Capra's brief use of a young black boy (does anyone know who played him?) late in the film, offering a curiously integrationist note at a time when America essentially constituted a segregated country. Historically (and still to this day, unfortunately), populist fervor has tended to run against, rather than with, the quest for racial equality. Perhaps Capra was suggesting, however innocuously given the era's constraints, that populism and racial equality should be part of the same movement. Intriguing, too, is the autonomy and sense of prerogative that Capra grants the black porters early in the movie, where in a brief scene they show some independence and desire of their own rather than symbolizing servility. And then there is the teary-eyed black man reading the inscription at the Lincoln Memorial—a relatively safe image, to be sure, yet one that many of the era's filmmakers would not have bothered with. Frankly, the use of African-Americans in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, however brief, is fascinating and perhaps mildly daring given the historical context.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 19, 2017 12:55:57 GMT
I've the sickening feeling that this would actually happen. And it'd be directed by Uwe Boll somehow.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Sept 19, 2017 13:32:32 GMT
joekiddlouischama I very much enjoyed reading your remarks on this film. A Sicilian immigrant, Capra was as idealistic and reverent towards the U.S. as any of his protagonists, but candid about its failings - which were deeply felt - and no stranger to prejudice. Even his pugnacious boss Harry Cohn (who seemed to have combative relationships with pretty much everyone) nicknamed Capra "Dago" in a spirit he supposed encompassed both affection and intimidation. And as a rebellious outsider among the other major studio moguls, Cohn wasn't shy about rocking boats and upsetting apple carts. Neither was Capra, for that matter, and I have to presume their respective sensibilities - some complementary; some not - contributed to the qualities you observe. That subversiveness in particular upset many D.C. apple carts, according to Capra's autobiographical account of a pre-release screening (and its aftermath) one rainy night in that city. I have also to imagine the film's relevance will endure decades past its centennial, by which time no more about the practical realities of the system it depicts will have changed than has in the nearly 80 years since its production.
|
|
|
|
Post by joekiddlouischama on Sept 27, 2017 6:02:30 GMT
joekiddlouischama I very much enjoyed reading your remarks on this film. A Sicilian immigrant, Capra was as idealistic and reverent towards the U.S. as any of his protagonists, but candid about its failings - which were deeply felt - and no stranger to prejudice. Even his pugnacious boss Harry Cohn (who seemed to have combative relationships with pretty much everyone) nicknamed Capra "Dago" in a spirit he supposed encompassed both affection and intimidation. And as a rebellious outsider among the other major studio moguls, Cohn wasn't shy about rocking boats and upsetting apple carts. Neither was Capra, for that matter, and I have to presume their respective sensibilities - some complementary; some not - contributed to the qualities you observe. That subversiveness in particular upset many D.C. apple carts, according to Capra's autobiographical account of a pre-release screening (and its aftermath) one rainy night in that city. I have also to imagine the film's relevance will endure decades past its centennial, by which time no more about the practical realities of the system it depicts will have changed than has in the nearly 80 years since its production. ... informative comments, eloquently expressed. I had not known about Capra's immigrant background, and the fact that he apparently upset some folks in the capitol indeed suggests that his film struck a nerve. You know, modern media coverage of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington seems to conjure an image of an "Apple Pie" type of movie, idealistic and innocuous. And surely, the film expresses idealism, but it mixes that quality with an iconoclastic sensibility and a sense of uncomfortable frankness, rather like John Ford's The Grapes of Wrath from the same year. And having just seen Wall Street (Oliver Stone, 1987) a few days ago in the theater (I am going back again tomorrow evening), that film strikes me as quite similar to Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, only with the location being New York and the subject being finance and the stock market.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2017 6:27:14 GMT
A good film.
|
|