|
Post by gadreel on Sept 26, 2017 1:18:42 GMT
No, because I'm not weak and corrupted. So still no detail on how the discovery of exoplanets causes a person to become a blasphemer? It seems like you just made that part up and have now become aware of how ridiculous it is. Is that so? Did you just make that part up and have now become aware of how ridiculous it is? This is the thing that bugs me. He plays it with such a poker face, but any thinking being must be aware how ridiculous his personality is on here. So that leaves us with two possibilities, either he actually believes the things he says, and is either unaware or does not care that it does not make up a cogent theory, that is to say there are huge gaps between what he claims to believe and his rationale for it, or he is playing this persona for the long con and is more dedicated to his act than that amateur Daniel Day Lewis could ever have been. Wait maybe that is why Daniel Day Lewis quit acting, he has read Erjens posts and realises he cannot compete.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2017 1:44:10 GMT
So still no detail on how the discovery of exoplanets causes a person to become a blasphemer? It seems like you just made that part up and have now become aware of how ridiculous it is. Is that so? Did you just make that part up and have now become aware of how ridiculous it is? This is the thing that bugs me. He plays it with such a poker face, but any thinking being must be aware how ridiculous his personality is on here. So that leaves us with two possibilities, either he actually believes the things he says, and is either unaware or does not care that it does not make up a cogent theory, that is to say there are huge gaps between what he claims to believe and his rationale for it, or he is playing this persona for the long con and is more dedicated to his act than that amateur Daniel Day Lewis could ever have been. Wait maybe that is why Daniel Day Lewis quit acting, he has read Erjens posts and realises he cannot compete. I try not to psychoanalyse people over the internet, but I've come to think that Erjen believes everything he says he does. It's fascinating if so. I had no idea there were people who were so completely disconnected from reality, and yet so completely convinced that they're the ones in the know and everyone else are the idiots. Maybe he's making it all up for pure entertainment and thinks it's hilarious. In the end, it doesn't really matter.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 26, 2017 1:49:15 GMT
This is the thing that bugs me. He plays it with such a poker face, but any thinking being must be aware how ridiculous his personality is on here. So that leaves us with two possibilities, either he actually believes the things he says, and is either unaware or does not care that it does not make up a cogent theory, that is to say there are huge gaps between what he claims to believe and his rationale for it, or he is playing this persona for the long con and is more dedicated to his act than that amateur Daniel Day Lewis could ever have been. Wait maybe that is why Daniel Day Lewis quit acting, he has read Erjens posts and realises he cannot compete. I try not to psychoanalyse people over the internet, but I've come to think that Erjen believes everything he says he does. It's fascinating if so. I had no idea there were people who were so completely disconnected from reality, and yet so completely convinced that they're the ones in the know and everyone else are the idiots. Maybe he's making it all up for pure entertainment and thinks it's hilarious. In the end, it doesn't really matter. I have some experience with 'woke' people, I went to an art school, and part of the beguiling nature of being 'woke' is that you know something that the rest of the population do not, no matter how complete the evidence is that you are wrong. Of course it also makes it much harder to admit you are wrong because you have already invested so much in believing you are cleverer than the rest of the 'sheeple' What a feedback loop, it's true that a little knowledge can be very dangerous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2017 1:59:13 GMT
I have some experience with 'woke' people, I went to an art school, and part of the beguiling nature of being 'woke' is that you know something that the rest of the population do not, no matter how complete the evidence is that you are wrong. Of course it also makes it much harder to admit you are wrong because you have already invested so much in believing you are cleverer than the rest of the 'sheeple' What a feedback loop, it's true that a little knowledge can be very dangerous. Indeed. Even just simple things like planets. Erjen clearly knows the Earth is a sphere. He knows it orbits the sun, and that the moon is a sphere that orbits the Earth. He knows that the rotation of the Earth causes day and night. And yet, he thinks that one day the sun or the moon could come up in a place that is thirty degrees away from normal... and that this could be something that most everyone would fail to notice. That like, a handful of people would notice it and everyone else would either not notice at all, or be all like "don't tell anybody or we'll get in trouble!" Which means that he has absolutely no understanding of how the motion of those three bodies works to produce the results it does. None whatsoever. And yet he is utterly confident that he's right. And the amazing thing is that he's SO certain that he's utterly immune to correction. Because anything that doesn't fit what he wants to believe is simply chucked on a pile labelled "things the powers that be use to trick you" and ignored. It's remarkable.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 26, 2017 2:07:16 GMT
I have some experience with 'woke' people, I went to an art school, and part of the beguiling nature of being 'woke' is that you know something that the rest of the population do not, no matter how complete the evidence is that you are wrong. Of course it also makes it much harder to admit you are wrong because you have already invested so much in believing you are cleverer than the rest of the 'sheeple' What a feedback loop, it's true that a little knowledge can be very dangerous. Indeed. Even just simple things like planets. Erjen clearly knows the Earth is a sphere. He knows it orbits the sun, and that the moon is a sphere that orbits the Earth. He knows that the rotation of the Earth causes day and night. And yet, he thinks that one day the sun or the moon could come up in a place that is thirty degrees away from normal... and that this could be something that most everyone would fail to notice. That like, a handful of people would notice it and everyone else would either not notice at all, or be all like "don't tell anybody or we'll get in trouble!" Which means that he has absolutely no understanding of how the motion of those three bodies works to produce the results it does. None whatsoever. And yet he is utterly confident that he's right. And the amazing thing is that he's SO certain that he's utterly immune to correction. Because anything that doesn't fit what he wants to believe is simply chucked on a pile labelled "things the powers that be use to trick you" and ignored. It's remarkable. Remarkable is certainly an apt word.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 26, 2017 8:06:12 GMT
Not only would they not notice it on their own, but also they would not understand or care even if it was shown to them. That's how dumbed-down they have become. Clearly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2017 11:26:50 GMT
Not only would they not notice it on their own, but also they would not understand or care even if it was shown to them. That's how dumbed-down they have become. Clearly. Which is a case in point. If the Earth's axis shifted by thirty degrees, then either there would be no arctic circle at all to speak of, or the arctic circles would cover a large portion of the world. Which would mean that it would, for example, be permanently daylight -or permanently dark - over almost the entire united states, the whole of Europe, half of China, the entire of Russia... etc. To think that people could miss this only serves to show that you are the dumbed down one.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 26, 2017 17:12:03 GMT
Not only would they not notice it on their own, but also they would not understand or care even if it was shown to them. That's how dumbed-down they have become. Clearly. Which is a case in point. If the Earth's axis shifted by thirty degrees, then either there would be no arctic circle at all to speak of, or the arctic circles would cover a large portion of the world. Which would mean that it would, for example, be permanently daylight -or permanently dark - over almost the entire united states, the whole of Europe, half of China, the entire of Russia... etc. To think that people could miss this only serves to show that you are the dumbed down one. I don't recall saying the earth's axis had shifted thirty degrees. I was probably talking about the elevation of the moon above the horizon from my vantage point. You either didn't understand or you are deliberately lying. Don't even bother replying to me anymore.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 26, 2017 18:10:28 GMT
Which is a case in point. If the Earth's axis shifted by thirty degrees, then either there would be no arctic circle at all to speak of, or the arctic circles would cover a large portion of the world. Which would mean that it would, for example, be permanently daylight -or permanently dark - over almost the entire united states, the whole of Europe, half of China, the entire of Russia... etc. To think that people could miss this only serves to show that you are the dumbed down one. I don't recall saying the earth's axis had shifted thirty degrees. I was probably talking about the elevation of the moon above the horizon from my vantage point. You either didn't understand or you are deliberately lying. Don't even bother replying to me anymore. So you think the moon itself has physically moved 30 degrees? What do you think about the moons position in the sky?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 26, 2017 18:17:29 GMT
I don't recall saying the earth's axis had shifted thirty degrees. I was probably talking about the elevation of the moon above the horizon from my vantage point. You either didn't understand or you are deliberately lying. Don't even bother replying to me anymore. So you think the moon itself has physically moved 30 degrees? What do you think about the moons position in the sky? I don't know. All I know is that what I've been seeing in the sky the last few years isn't normal. Why does it matter to you what I think? Enjoy your life, and I won't talk about it henceforth. And if I'm not talking about it, you'll have no reason to talk about it either. You can go back to talking about LGBT, and your other specialties.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 26, 2017 18:19:15 GMT
So you think the moon itself has physically moved 30 degrees? What do you think about the moons position in the sky? I don't know. All I know is that what I've been seeing in the sky the last few years isn't normal. Why does it matter to you what I think? Enjoy your life, and I won't talk about it henceforth. And if I'm not talking about it, you'll have no reason to talk about it either. You can go back to talking about LGBT, and your other specialties. I am interested, you have said previously that there is something wrong with the position of the moon, I would like to know what you think is wrong with it's position.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 26, 2017 18:25:33 GMT
I don't know. All I know is that what I've been seeing in the sky the last few years isn't normal. Why does it matter to you what I think? Enjoy your life, and I won't talk about it henceforth. And if I'm not talking about it, you'll have no reason to talk about it either. You can go back to talking about LGBT, and your other specialties. I am interested, you have said previously that there is something wrong with the position of the moon, I would like to know what you think is wrong with it's position. That's too bad, because I fancy that I've covered it well enough in the past. Besides, I'm leaving for work soon.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 26, 2017 19:24:45 GMT
I am interested, you have said previously that there is something wrong with the position of the moon, I would like to know what you think is wrong with it's position. That's too bad, because I fancy that I've covered it well enough in the past. Besides, I'm leaving for work soon. Yup that is kind of what I thought, you are not going to discuss it because it is yet another one of your crackpot theories that does not hold up under even the smallest scrutiny.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Sept 26, 2017 20:50:06 GMT
That's too bad, because I fancy that I've covered it well enough in the past. Besides, I'm leaving for work soon. Yup that is kind of what I thought, you are not going to discuss it because it is yet another one of your crackpot theories that does not hold up under even the smallest scrutiny. You don't say? Do tell! Is that so? Well why don't you sue me? [INSERT STOCK PHRASE]
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Sept 27, 2017 0:17:50 GMT
So still no detail on how the discovery of exoplanets causes a person to become a blasphemer? It seems like you just made that part up and have now become aware of how ridiculous it is. Is that so? Did you just make that part up and have now become aware of how ridiculous it is? This is the thing that bugs me. He plays it with such a poker face, but any thinking being must be aware how ridiculous his personality is on here. So that leaves us with two possibilities, either he actually believes the things he says, and is either unaware or does not care that it does not make up a cogent theory, that is to say there are huge gaps between what he claims to believe and his rationale for it, or he is playing this persona for the long con and is more dedicated to his act than that amateur Daniel Day Lewis could ever have been. Wait maybe that is why Daniel Day Lewis quit acting, he has read Erjens posts and realises he cannot compete. Didn't someone on the old IMBb suggest that Erjen is actually the creation of a group of undergrad boys at Oxford or Cambridge with a bit of free time? I think that might be the most plausible explanation.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 27, 2017 17:52:51 GMT
This is the thing that bugs me. He plays it with such a poker face, but any thinking being must be aware how ridiculous his personality is on here. So that leaves us with two possibilities, either he actually believes the things he says, and is either unaware or does not care that it does not make up a cogent theory, that is to say there are huge gaps between what he claims to believe and his rationale for it, or he is playing this persona for the long con and is more dedicated to his act than that amateur Daniel Day Lewis could ever have been. Wait maybe that is why Daniel Day Lewis quit acting, he has read Erjens posts and realises he cannot compete. Didn't someone on the old IMBb suggest that Erjen is actually the creation of a group of undergrad boys at Oxford or Cambridge with a bit of free time? I think that might be the most plausible explanation. That is actually very astute, and fitting, he is a social experiment, not a troll or an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 27, 2017 17:59:15 GMT
Didn't someone on the old IMBb suggest that Erjen is actually the creation of a group of undergrad boys at Oxford or Cambridge with a bit of free time? I think that might be the most plausible explanation. That is actually very astute, and fitting, he is a social experiment, not a troll or an idiot. When you said you were interested in what I had to say, you lied. You're not interested.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 27, 2017 18:04:09 GMT
That is actually very astute, and fitting, he is a social experiment, not a troll or an idiot. When you said you were interested in what I had to say, you lied. You're not interested. I am interested in what you have to say. What makes you think I am not?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Sept 27, 2017 18:18:09 GMT
When you said you were interested in what I had to say, you lied. You're not interested. I am interested in what you have to say. What makes you think I am not? This: And before I forget again, thanks for the poker face compliment, although honestly I think Arlon10 has a better than I do. Sometimes my righteous indignation is strong.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Sept 27, 2017 18:43:18 GMT
I am interested in what you have to say. What makes you think I am not? This: And before I forget again, thanks for the poker face compliment, although honestly I think Arlon10 has a better than I do. Sometimes my righteous indignation is strong. To be fair I was giving up as you are obviously not prepared to discuss your theory, as long as you do not discuss is I have to assume it is a crackpot theory that even you cannot support, otherwise why would you be reluctant to discuss it?
|
|