|
Post by sandwichclegane on Sept 24, 2017 12:54:54 GMT
I count the EVENTS as cannon, Hulk destroying NY and stuff, but not the movie its self. This is because of the actor change ( i HATE it when that shit happens )
before IW P1 airs in cinemas i may have an epic binge of MCU movies in the correct timeline ( starting with cap america the 1st avenger ) and i will skip the hulk in that binge. The only reason im not gunna skip fellow actor - change headach film Iron man 1 is because its Iron mans origin story and really important to the MCU
but yeah the hulk can go fuck himself, and u Edward Norton if ur reading this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 13:04:49 GMT
Pretty much. I do like William Hurt though. If only CA: CW was better.
|
|
|
Post by sandwichclegane on Sept 24, 2017 13:14:41 GMT
Pretty much. I do like William Hurt though. If only CA: CW was better. I wonder if Edward Norton and Terrance Howard regret dropping out, seeing the sheer force that the MCU has become?
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 13:37:48 GMT
I count the EVENTS as cannon, Hulk destroying NY and stuff, but not the movie its self. This is because of the actor change ( i HATE it when that shit happens ) before IW P1 airs in cinemas i may have an epic binge of MCU movies in the correct timeline ( starting with cap america the 1st avenger ) and i will skip the hulk in that binge. The only reason im not gunna skip fellow actor - change headach film Iron man 1 is because its Iron mans origin story and really important to the MCU but yeah the hulk can go fuck himself, and u Edward Norton if ur reading this. I honestly don't understand why people can't accept actor changes. As a Bond fan I can tell you an actor change is basically a time for celebration. The same thing with Batman. Do you hate those changes or is this a different circumstance? It just seems like the mature point of view is to understand that in reality sometimes actors change and you can deal with the fact that it's the same character. I agree you probably don't want it happening too much, but with a series this large, to expect it to not happen at all is kind of silly.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 13:40:31 GMT
Pretty much. I do like William Hurt though. If only CA: CW was better. I consider it the best comic book film ever. How much better could it get?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 13:41:51 GMT
Pretty much. I do like William Hurt though. If only CA: CW was better. I consider it the best comic book film ever. How much better could it get? As good as its predecessor for a start.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 13:41:59 GMT
Pretty much. I do like William Hurt though. If only CA: CW was better. I wonder if Edward Norton and Terrance Howard regret dropping out, seeing the sheer force that the MCU has become? Oh they have to right? I actually am glad Cheedle is in instead honestly, but I do sometimes wonder how Ed would have played any time there is a Banner scene.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 13:42:18 GMT
I consider it the best comic book film ever. How much better could it get? As good as its predecessor for a start. It is.
|
|
|
Post by sandwichclegane on Sept 24, 2017 14:15:03 GMT
I count the EVENTS as cannon, Hulk destroying NY and stuff, but not the movie its self. This is because of the actor change ( i HATE it when that shit happens ) before IW P1 airs in cinemas i may have an epic binge of MCU movies in the correct timeline ( starting with cap america the 1st avenger ) and i will skip the hulk in that binge. The only reason im not gunna skip fellow actor - change headach film Iron man 1 is because its Iron mans origin story and really important to the MCU but yeah the hulk can go fuck himself, and u Edward Norton if ur reading this. I honestly don't understand why people can't accept actor changes. As a Bond fan I can tell you an actor change is basically a time for celebration. The same thing with Batman. Do you hate those changes or is this a different circumstance? It just seems like the mature point of view is to understand that in reality sometimes actors change and you can deal with the fact that it's the same character. I agree you probably don't want it happening two much, but with a series this large, to expect it to not happen at all is kind of silly. Bond, Batman...yeah but those films are NOT part of a continuity based film series, dumbass.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 14:27:45 GMT
I honestly don't understand why people can't accept actor changes. As a Bond fan I can tell you an actor change is basically a time for celebration. The same thing with Batman. Do you hate those changes or is this a different circumstance? It just seems like the mature point of view is to understand that in reality sometimes actors change and you can deal with the fact that it's the same character. I agree you probably don't want it happening two much, but with a series this large, to expect it to not happen at all is kind of silly. Bond, Batman...yeah but those films are NOT part of a continuity based film series, dumbass. ok, so you can't accept that it's the same character? also nice name calling.
|
|
|
Post by sandwichclegane on Sept 24, 2017 14:54:33 GMT
Bond, Batman...yeah but those films are NOT part of a continuity based film series, dumbass. ok, so you can't accept that it's the same character? also nice name calling. you are welcome, dicknuts =]
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 15:01:06 GMT
ok, so you can't accept that it's the same character? also nice name calling. you are welcome, dicknuts =] ok
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 24, 2017 15:37:47 GMT
Man, why people dislike the Norton movie so much? Yeah Ruffalo is better but he did fine. It actually had action. The only downside is William Hurt. I liked Sam Elliott way more as Ross.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Sept 24, 2017 16:07:24 GMT
Man, why people dislike the Norton movie so much? Yeah Ruffalo is better but he did fine. It actually had action. The only downside is William Hurt. I liked Sam Elliott way more as Ross. I actually loved Hurt as Ross, he represented the character better on screen than Elliot did, even though Elliot is the better actor in general.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Sept 24, 2017 17:11:38 GMT
I count the EVENTS as cannon, Hulk destroying NY and stuff, but not the movie its self. This is because of the actor change ( i HATE it when that shit happens ) before IW P1 airs in cinemas i may have an epic binge of MCU movies in the correct timeline ( starting with cap america the 1st avenger ) and i will skip the hulk in that binge. The only reason im not gunna skip fellow actor - change headach film Iron man 1 is because its Iron mans origin story and really important to the MCU but yeah the hulk can go fuck himself, and u Edward Norton if ur reading this. Well, MCU doesn't consider The Incredible Hulk to be cannon either. That's why they haven't made another Hulk movie and even replaced the actor playing Bruce Banner in the hope that people would forget there was ever a Hulk movie in MCU.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Sept 24, 2017 17:13:33 GMT
I honestly don't understand why people can't accept actor changes. As a Bond fan I can tell you an actor change is basically a time for celebration. The same thing with Batman. Do you hate those changes or is this a different circumstance? It just seems like the mature point of view is to understand that in reality sometimes actors change and you can deal with the fact that it's the same character. I agree you probably don't want it happening two much, but with a series this large, to expect it to not happen at all is kind of silly. Bond, Batman...yeah but those films are NOT part of a continuity based film series, dumbass. Agreed. MCU's biggest hype has been that they constantly remind people that they're a shared cinematic universe and their movies are all connected. So when they hype that up as their biggest selling point and then they replace an actor in a major role after he was in just 1 movie, then that's a HUGE FAIL for continuity.
|
|
|
Post by sandwichclegane on Sept 24, 2017 17:15:05 GMT
I count the EVENTS as cannon, Hulk destroying NY and stuff, but not the movie its self. This is because of the actor change ( i HATE it when that shit happens ) before IW P1 airs in cinemas i may have an epic binge of MCU movies in the correct timeline ( starting with cap america the 1st avenger ) and i will skip the hulk in that binge. The only reason im not gunna skip fellow actor - change headach film Iron man 1 is because its Iron mans origin story and really important to the MCU but yeah the hulk can go fuck himself, and u Edward Norton if ur reading this. Well, MCU doesn't consider The Incredible Hulk to be cannon either. That's why they haven't made another Hulk movie and even replaced the actor playing Bruce Banner in the hope that people would forget there was ever a Hulk movie in MCU. its credited as being cannon in many lists
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 17:24:16 GMT
Man, why people dislike the Norton movie so much? Yeah Ruffalo is better but he did fine. It actually had action. The only downside is William Hurt. I liked Sam Elliott way more as Ross. I agree, Sam Elliott is just a bad ass. Hurt is just fine, but Elliott was perfect.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 24, 2017 17:25:06 GMT
Well, MCU doesn't consider The Incredible Hulk to be cannon either. That's why they haven't made another Hulk movie and even replaced the actor playing Bruce Banner in the hope that people would forget there was ever a Hulk movie in MCU. its credited as being cannon in many lists It is 100% cannon, and that isn't even in debate. What are you two talking about?
|
|
|
Post by sandwichclegane on Sept 24, 2017 17:28:07 GMT
its credited as being cannon in many lists . What are you two talking about?
|
|