Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2017 4:31:53 GMT
7.5 rounded up to a 8/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny-Come-Lately on Oct 18, 2017 4:34:24 GMT
7/10. Good film.
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Oct 18, 2017 5:15:23 GMT
9/10 - Loved It. In my top 10 favorite movies of the 2000s.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Oct 18, 2017 9:21:12 GMT
5/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2017 15:30:02 GMT
A 7 for me, not a bad movie at all, a lot better than for instance "Eastern Promises" imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Aug 21, 2020 10:44:16 GMT
The atmosphere and themes in A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE are great. By the way, would you like me to tell you a history of violence? Me beating the crap out of Viggo Mortensen. Why? I was mad at his weak performance. Mario Bello and Ed Harris' performances are fine. It's hard to say in regards to William Hurt. His screen time is too small and, during his scenes, he transitions from very subtle to very over-the-top. When it was revealed that TOM was JOEY CUSACK, I was a little disappointed. I mean, I was expecting the movie to continue giving the audience clues and TOM's family to start doubting if he was telling the truth, so that the movie would have an ambiguous end for the audience to debate about it. However, I still kept an open mind to see what was coming next. Well, it dragged too much, specially the scene with RICHIE which was unnecessary. No, I'm not saying it wasn't deep; it was. It showed the world TOM/JOEY came from. I'm just saying that, if it had been cut, the film's messages would've still been delivered. 6/10 ------------------------------------- You can read comments of other movies in my blog. |
|
|
|
Post by sjg on Jan 5, 2023 8:27:14 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Jan 5, 2023 11:31:20 GMT
3/10
I did not care for it.
|
|
