|
|
Post by OrsonSwelles on Mar 9, 2017 19:03:45 GMT
Why was this thread allowed to stay on film general? The OP's starting post brings up politics. Lock and/or move this mess.
|
|
|
|
Post by conspirologist on Mar 9, 2017 19:13:04 GMT
Why was this thread allowed to stay on film general? The OP's starting post brings up politics. Lock and/or move this mess. How does it feel to be oligophrenic?
|
|
|
|
Post by OrsonSwelles on Mar 9, 2017 19:20:14 GMT
Why was this thread allowed to stay on film general? The OP's starting post brings up politics. Lock and/or move this mess. How does it feel to be oligophrenic? What did I say to make you feel the need to insult?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr_K_Pratt on Mar 9, 2017 19:21:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by conspirologist on Mar 9, 2017 19:25:52 GMT
How does it feel to be oligophrenic? What did I say to make you feel the need to insult? It's funny how oligophrenics feel being insulted when called oligophrenics.
|
|
|
|
Post by OrsonSwelles on Mar 9, 2017 19:38:46 GMT
What did I say to make you feel the need to insult? It's funny how oligophrenics feel being insulted when called oligophrenics. Oh, I should take it as a compliment? Sorry but my oligophrenicy keeps me from accepting such compliments.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 20:44:02 GMT
Yea, but it is LEARNED behavior. That is quite obvious. Except it's not. Of course it is. No one is genetically gay. There is no such thing. Why do liberals ignore science all the time? There are many such sexual preferences that are learned. Are people born pedophiles, too? Oddly enough, there is a group of liberals who want pedophilia to be recognized the same as homosexuality. Next time you make fun of someone about their religion and 'faith', please remember that your belief that people are born gay is purely based on faith without an iota of scientific evidence to back it up.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Mar 9, 2017 20:46:26 GMT
Of course it is. No one is genetically gay. There is no such thing. Why do liberals ignore science all the time? There are many such sexual preferences that are learned. Are people born pedophiles, too? Oddly enough, there is a group of liberals who want pedophilia to be recognized the same as homosexuality. Next time you make fun of someone about their religion and 'faith', please remember that your belief that people are born gay is purely based on faith without an iota of scientific evidence to back it up. Didn't say it was genetic. Don't you feel foolish now?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 20:53:13 GMT
Of course it is. No one is genetically gay. There is no such thing. Why do liberals ignore science all the time? There are many such sexual preferences that are learned. Are people born pedophiles, too? Oddly enough, there is a group of liberals who want pedophilia to be recognized the same as homosexuality. Next time you make fun of someone about their religion and 'faith', please remember that your belief that people are born gay is purely based on faith without an iota of scientific evidence to back it up. Didn't say it was genetic. Don't you feel foolish now?
If it's not genetic, it is not something you are born being. Period. Then it becomes learned behavior based on experiences, which is by far the more logical choice. This doesn't dismiss that gay people exist. It merely states that no one is born gay. Just as no one is born a pedophile or a fan of Raiders football or loving pizza. These are likes (or dislikes) we acquire. But, biologically, no one is born gay. No matter what you say. You WANT it to be that way because you want to make it seem a gay person has no choice in the matter. Am I right? And, if you didn't have your head stuck up your liberal ass, you would realize that nothing I said alters that.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Mar 9, 2017 20:56:13 GMT
Didn't say it was genetic. Don't you feel foolish now?
If it's not genetic, it is not something you are born being. Period. Then it becomes learned behavior based on experiences, which is by far the more logical choice. This doesn't dismiss that gay people exist. It merely states that no one is born gay. Just as no one is born a pedophile or a fan of Raiders football or loving pizza. These are likes (or dislikes) we acquire. But, biologically, no one is born gay. No matter what you say. You WANT it to be that way because you want to make it seem a gay person has no choice in the matter. Am I right? And, if you didn't have your head stuck up your liberal ass, you would realize that nothing I said alters that. Well, the fact of the matter is they DON'T have a choice in the matter. You can't help being what you are and feeling what you do, now; do you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 21:03:01 GMT
If it's not genetic, it is not something you are born being. Period. Then it becomes learned behavior based on experiences, which is by far the more logical choice. This doesn't dismiss that gay people exist. It merely states that no one is born gay. Just as no one is born a pedophile or a fan of Raiders football or loving pizza. These are likes (or dislikes) we acquire. But, biologically, no one is born gay. No matter what you say. You WANT it to be that way because you want to make it seem a gay person has no choice in the matter. Am I right? And, if you didn't have your head stuck up your liberal ass, you would realize that nothing I said alters that. Well, the fact of the matter is they DON'T have a choice in the matter. You can't help being what you are and feeling what you do, now; do you? Exactly. I can't help that science and logic rule my thinking. When liberals sell a lie, which happens a LOT, people need to hold them accountable. No one is born gay. This is real progress!
|
|
|
|
Post by TheOriginalPinky on Mar 9, 2017 21:04:22 GMT
Well, the fact of the matter is they DON'T have a choice in the matter. You can't help being what you are and feeling what you do, now; do you? Exactly. I can't help that science and logic rule my thinking. When liberals sell a lie, which happens a LOT, people need to hold them accountable. No one is born gay. This is real progress! How arduous your everyday life must be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 22:54:01 GMT
I voted no. And I will not allow my children to watch any kid or family movie rated G or PG if it has gay characters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 23:40:11 GMT
No. What purpose is there for such characters other than to brainwash kids into thinking homosexual acts are great things to do? They watch a superhero movie, and they want to act like superheroes. We've all seen that. I wouldn't to have my son coming come and saying :"Hey Dad! Golly gee, I just saw the new Disney movie and boy, do I ever want to suck a great big cock! A BLACK cock too!"  Yep. Just like the increase of girls who wanted to get into bestiality after seeing the 1991 film. That was horrific....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2017 0:11:02 GMT
The liberals the liberals the liberals! "The liberals did it," is the new "the butler did it!" Animated movies should have gay affirmative action, if only to be another reason that Alex Jones, Fox and Saudi Friends, say the world is going to end. Flamboyant characters must be labeled as gay neo conservatives. It is not enough to be assumed. btw I just kidding 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2017 0:23:59 GMT
So, you're trying to dismiss the fact that kids are influenced by movies with an idiotic example like that? keep trying... Hey, your example set the bar for the idiocy of the examples presented. I'm just following your lead, Billy....
|
|
|
|
Post by Nightman on Mar 10, 2017 0:28:12 GMT
Sure. No reason not to. They're no different from straight characters, and they let kids or younger people feel better about themselves.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2017 0:55:49 GMT
Sure. No reason not to. They're no different from straight characters, and they let kids or younger people feel better about themselves. Horse hockey! It only makes adult liberals feel good about themselves as they indoctrinate children to the 'proper' way of thinking. Let the parents raise the kids and there is NO REASON to sexualize these films. If the parents want to discuss these issues, then fine. But to suggest this is to make kids feel better is laughable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nightman on Mar 10, 2017 0:59:33 GMT
Sure. No reason not to. They're no different from straight characters, and they let kids or younger people feel better about themselves. Horse hockey! It only makes adult liberals feel good about themselves as they indoctrinate children to the 'proper' way of thinking. Let the parents raise the kids and there is NO REASON to sexualize these films. If the parents want to discuss these issues, then fine. But to suggest this is to make kids feel better is laughable. The presence of gay characters don't sexualize movies any more than straight characters do. People like to see characters like themselves in fiction for some reason. Gay characters do let gay kids (or more accurately, gay teens, because I don't know if kids even have orientations) feel better, because it makes them feel more "normal".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2017 1:05:08 GMT
Horse hockey! It only makes adult liberals feel good about themselves as they indoctrinate children to the 'proper' way of thinking. Let the parents raise the kids and there is NO REASON to sexualize these films. If the parents want to discuss these issues, then fine. But to suggest this is to make kids feel better is laughable. The presence of gay characters don't sexualize movies any more than straight characters do. People like to see characters like themselves in fiction for some reason. Gay characters do let gay kids (or more accurately, gay teens, because I don't know if kids even have orientations) feel better, because it makes them feel more "normal". Then why change the character in the first place? It makes no sense whatsoever unless it's simply to push an agenda and using a movie Disney knows will be successful to secure a vast audience. If it isn't 'sexualizing' then why bring it up at all?
|
|