Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2017 15:28:30 GMT
Why does this get no love? On AMC right now. It's tremendous. 7/10 beers 
|
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Oct 23, 2017 20:47:45 GMT
It's probably my favorite of the sequels. It has a reay nice autumnal atmosphere, Donald Pleasance is a very welcomed presence, and Danielle Harris is actually great for her age in the role. It's got some goofy and I'll conceived moments, but all around I think it's mostly very successful in continuing the first two movies. I recorded it today and am looking forward to watching it again tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by NewtJorden on Oct 24, 2017 2:31:37 GMT
My favorite of the sequel
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Oct 24, 2017 3:17:53 GMT
Would have been funny if that were the actual title.
And it gets a lot of love. I believe it is the best rated sequel after II. The only criticism I hear is for the mime mask. And that it's kind of retread of 1, which to be fair, it kind of is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Oct 24, 2017 4:46:35 GMT
You forgot to add: “If you don’t love this movie, don’t reply and leave this thread. RIGHT FUCKING NOW.”
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Oct 24, 2017 7:35:42 GMT
It's ok, but it really isn't a patch on II or H20, which is a better follow up. Myers burned to a crisp at the end of II and there was no way he or Loomis were coming back and the film-makers wouldn't have thought so either at the time. I also hated some of the stupid characters in it, like the slutty girl and they didn't even film it in the cinemascope ratio.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Oct 24, 2017 8:11:26 GMT
I guess I should thank you for this thread. I’ve only seen Halloween 4 once but I remember liking it. This thread inspired me to watch it and all of the Halloween movies (including Rob Zombie’s) again. Time to unwrap Scream Factory’s Halloween The Complete Collection Blu-ray box set. 
|
|
|
|
Post by simest on Oct 24, 2017 13:12:17 GMT
Part of the problem for me is that the Myers story was over at the end of HALLOWEEN II.
It's a big ask to entertain the idea of Loomis and Myers still being around to cross paths once again after both would surely have been incinerated in that fiery finale. In this sense I feel the movie was sailing against the wind from the outset.
However, even if you can put that aside and watch the movie on its own merits, HALLOWEEN 4 for me comes across like a jaded, fan-made rehash of the original but without the stylish cinematic touches that made that movie resonate. Instead, HALLOWEEN 4 is well produced and nicely shot but has little to offer other than what had by then already become routine and familiar.
While it's nice to see Pleasence back in his trademark role, he looks frail and tired here, while Myers looks rather bloated and ends up in a mask more reminiscent (though less scary) of Data from Star Trek TNG than the famed Captain Kirk! Consequently, their characters don't command the screen as effectively as we had seen them do previously.
There also seems to be an abundance of fog machines operating in Haddonfield on this movie that give the film an unwanted and unflattering resemblance to a cheap 80s pop video.
Some will be entertained - and that's good - but I was disappointed at the time with what I saw as an unimaginative, workmanlike reconstruction of a movie done far better 10 years prior.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2017 13:45:09 GMT
Part of the problem for me is that the Myers story was over at the end of HALLOWEEN II. It's a big ask to entertain the idea of Loomis and Myers still being around to cross paths once again after both would surely have been incinerated in that fiery finale. In this sense I feel the movie was sailing against the wind from the outset. However, even if you can put that aside and watch the movie on its own merits, HALLOWEEN 4 for me comes across like a jaded, fan-made rehash of the original but without the stylish cinematic touches that made that movie resonate. Instead, HALLOWEEN 4 is well produced and nicely shot but has little to offer other than what had by then already become routine and familiar. While it's nice to see Pleasence back in his trademark role, he looks frail and tired here, while Myers looks rather bloated and ends up in a mask more reminiscent (though less scary) of Data from Star Trek TNG than the famed Captain Kirk! Consequently, their characters don't command the screen as effectively as we had seen them do previously. There also seems to be an abundance of fog machines operating in Haddonfield on this movie that give the film an unwanted and unflattering resemblance to a cheap 80s pop video. Some will be entertained - and that's good - but I was disappointed at the time with what I saw as an unimaginative, workmanlike reconstruction of a movie done far better 10 years prior. 
|
|
|
|
Post by simest on Oct 24, 2017 13:56:32 GMT
Part of the problem for me is that the Myers story was over at the end of HALLOWEEN II. It's a big ask to entertain the idea of Loomis and Myers still being around to cross paths once again after both would surely have been incinerated in that fiery finale. In this sense I feel the movie was sailing against the wind from the outset. However, even if you can put that aside and watch the movie on its own merits, HALLOWEEN 4 for me comes across like a jaded, fan-made rehash of the original but without the stylish cinematic touches that made that movie resonate. Instead, HALLOWEEN 4 is well produced and nicely shot but has little to offer other than what had by then already become routine and familiar. While it's nice to see Pleasence back in his trademark role, he looks frail and tired here, while Myers looks rather bloated and ends up in a mask more reminiscent (though less scary) of Data from Star Trek TNG than the famed Captain Kirk! Consequently, their characters don't command the screen as effectively as we had seen them do previously. There also seems to be an abundance of fog machines operating in Haddonfield on this movie that give the film an unwanted and unflattering resemblance to a cheap 80s pop video. Some will be entertained - and that's good - but I was disappointed at the time with what I saw as an unimaginative, workmanlike reconstruction of a movie done far better 10 years prior.  Well.....you did ask.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamesbamesy on Oct 25, 2017 0:44:20 GMT
Why does this get no love? On AMC right now. It's tremendous. 7/10 beers  I love it. Was the very first Halloween film I ever saw, on AMC's Fear Fest. Sure it may not be quite as good as H20 or (God forbid) the original, but it's definitely a lot of fun to watch. Pleasance and Harris were great and it has a nice Halloween feel to it. Not to mention that twist ending, which got me excited to see the next one (Halloween 5), but not until a year or so later...and after hearing people talk about that one, I knew I was in for a letdown. It was okay at best but not nearly as good as 4. And yeah it definitely serves as a great Part III, as opposed to Season of the Witch, which while not terrible like fans make it out to be, felt unneeded after the success of the first two movies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2017 0:50:37 GMT
Why does this get no love? On AMC right now. It's tremendous. 7/10 beers  I love it. Was the very first Halloween film I ever saw, on AMC's Fear Fest. Sure it may not be quite as good as H20 or (God forbid) the original, but it's definitely a lot of fun to watch. Pleasance and Harris were great and it has a nice Halloween feel to it. Not to mention that twist ending, which got me excited to see the next one (Halloween 5), but not until a year or so later...and after hearing people talk about that one, I knew I was in for a letdown. It was okay at best but not nearly as good as 4. And yeah it definitely serves as a great Part III, as opposed to Season of the Witch, which while not terrible like fans make it out to be, felt unneeded after the success of the first two movies. 
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Oct 25, 2017 2:33:46 GMT
I found it very silly how they decided to bring back Loomis despite his arc being neatly wrapped up in II. Also didn't character about Jamie nearly enough s a character either.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2017 2:41:17 GMT
I found it very silly how they decided to bring back Loomis despite his arc being neatly wrapped up in II. Also didn't character about Jamie nearly enough s a character either.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Oct 25, 2017 3:41:53 GMT
I found it very silly how they decided to bring back Loomis despite his arc being neatly wrapped up in II. Also didn't character about Jamie nearly enough s a character either. you keep posting cute videos?.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Oct 25, 2017 5:06:55 GMT
Good movie, but there are two things that really suck about it:
1. Michael’s mask. It looks like shit! His mask looked so much more menacing in the first 2.
2. You don’t get to see that chick’s huge tits! What a tease!
|
|
|
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 28, 2017 6:27:42 GMT
Hey Simest, how have you been? Glad to see you posting. Have you been to tmdb lately?
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Oct 28, 2017 15:24:45 GMT
I love it. Was the very first Halloween film I ever saw, on AMC's Fear Fest. Sure it may not be quite as good as H20 or (God forbid) the original, but it's definitely a lot of fun to watch. Pleasance and Harris were great and it has a nice Halloween feel to it. Not to mention that twist ending, which got me excited to see the next one (Halloween 5), but not until a year or so later...and after hearing people talk about that one, I knew I was in for a letdown. It was okay at best but not nearly as good as 4. And yeah it definitely serves as a great Part III, as opposed to Season of the Witch, which while not terrible like fans make it out to be, felt unneeded after the success of the first two movies.I don't quite get what you mean by unneeded. HIII, was NOT a Myers outing, it wasn't promoted as such, and it was just a Halloween themed film from Carpenter, who gave us a suspenseful, intriguing and even original little horror opus. If anything was unneeded, it was H4. It was old hat by the time it arrived, it was routine with boring kills, and it made no sense that Myers and Loomis were still alive. It also contained none of the essence or horror aesthetic that made the first 2 Halloweens work so well. And more importantly, it wasn't very scary, or even that creepy. The first Halloween worked due to style and atmosphere, and there was very minimal blood and gore. The second one worked, due to the clever construct of continuing on the same night as the first, and still had a gritty style and a creepy atmosphere and setting about it. It also gave us a decent body count. It had more blood than the first and had more interesting kills. H2, contained sharp, pointed and mean-spirited violence, and while there have been more gory slashers before and since, to me, it also has a more potent squeamish factor about it than most. I cringe at the little boy with razor blades stuck in his mouth, at the blood being drawn from Laurie by the doctors, at the scalpels and needles that slash and pierce, and at the hot water that scalds into blisters, not to mention the arbitrary and accidental killing of a poor teenaged kid, as the fire whips and crackles around his body to decimate it. What did H4 have that matched anything that H 1, 2 or even 3 did with it's scares, suspense and violence?
|
|
|
|
Post by theshape25 on Oct 29, 2017 1:20:32 GMT
I love it. Was the very first Halloween film I ever saw, on AMC's Fear Fest. Sure it may not be quite as good as H20 or (God forbid) the original, but it's definitely a lot of fun to watch. Pleasance and Harris were great and it has a nice Halloween feel to it. Not to mention that twist ending, which got me excited to see the next one (Halloween 5), but not until a year or so later...and after hearing people talk about that one, I knew I was in for a letdown. It was okay at best but not nearly as good as 4. And yeah it definitely serves as a great Part III, as opposed to Season of the Witch, which while not terrible like fans make it out to be, felt unneeded after the success of the first two movies.I don't quite get what you mean by unneeded. HIII, was NOT a Myers outing, it wasn't promoted as such, and it was just a Halloween themed film from Carpenter, who gave us a suspenseful, intriguing and even original little horror opus. If anything was unneeded, it was H4. It was old hat by the time it arrived, it was routine with boring kills, and it made no sense that Myers and Loomis were still alive. It also contained none of the essence or horror aesthetic that made the first 2 Halloweens work so well. And more importantly, it wasn't very scary, or even that creepy. The first Halloween worked due to style and atmosphere, and there was very minimal blood and gore. The second one worked, due to the clever construct of continuing on the same night as the first, and still had a gritty style and a creepy atmosphere and setting about it. It also gave us a decent body count. It had more blood than the first and had more interesting kills. H2, contained sharp, pointed and mean-spirited violence, and while there have been more gory slashers before and since, to me, it also has a more potent squeamish factor about it than most. I cringe at the little boy with razor blades stuck in his mouth, at the blood being drawn from Laurie by the doctors, at the scalpels and needles that slash and pierce, and at the hot water that scalds into blisters, not to mention the arbitrary and accidental killing of a poor teenaged kid, as the fire whips and crackles around his body to decimate it. What did H4 have that matched anything that H 1, 2 or even 3 did with it's scares, suspense and violence? The needle in the eye was pretty brutal as well as the nurse that bled out. Those had to be horrible ways to go.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamesbamesy on Oct 29, 2017 17:20:45 GMT
I love it. Was the very first Halloween film I ever saw, on AMC's Fear Fest. Sure it may not be quite as good as H20 or (God forbid) the original, but it's definitely a lot of fun to watch. Pleasance and Harris were great and it has a nice Halloween feel to it. Not to mention that twist ending, which got me excited to see the next one (Halloween 5), but not until a year or so later...and after hearing people talk about that one, I knew I was in for a letdown. It was okay at best but not nearly as good as 4. And yeah it definitely serves as a great Part III, as opposed to Season of the Witch, which while not terrible like fans make it out to be, felt unneeded after the success of the first two movies.I don't quite get what you mean by unneeded. HIII, was NOT a Myers outing, it wasn't promoted as such, and it was just a Halloween themed film from Carpenter, who gave us a suspenseful, intriguing and even original little horror opus. If anything was unneeded, it was H4. It was old hat by the time it arrived, it was routine with boring kills, and it made no sense that Myers and Loomis were still alive. It also contained none of the essence or horror aesthetic that made the first 2 Halloweens work so well. And more importantly, it wasn't very scary, or even that creepy. The first Halloween worked due to style and atmosphere, and there was very minimal blood and gore. The second one worked, due to the clever construct of continuing on the same night as the first, and still had a gritty style and a creepy atmosphere and setting about it. It also gave us a decent body count. It had more blood than the first and had more interesting kills. H2, contained sharp, pointed and mean-spirited violence, and while there have been more gory slashers before and since, to me, it also has a more potent squeamish factor about it than most. I cringe at the little boy with razor blades stuck in his mouth, at the blood being drawn from Laurie by the doctors, at the scalpels and needles that slash and pierce, and at the hot water that scalds into blisters, not to mention the arbitrary and accidental killing of a poor teenaged kid, as the fire whips and crackles around his body to decimate it. What did H4 have that matched anything that H 1, 2 or even 3 did with it's scares, suspense and violence? I can totally understand your opinions. Though H4 had some damn good deaths in it. Remember Michael stabbing that girl with the shotgun? Or when he ripped that guy's throat out in the truck? This one was creepy in its atmosphere too, like the first two, just with a tiny bit of cheesy elements here and there. What matters is how you enjoy the movies for what they are. And I know that II (which I also really like) might be a technically better Halloween movie than 4, due to how it still had that same eerieness as the original, but it was a bit boring at times and Laurie basically did nothing but sit in a bed throughout the movie, despite being the one to shoot Mikey in the eyes (classic moment). As for HIII, I meant that if John Carpenter wanted the 2nd movie to be a different story, why did they make it a sequel anyway? If so, having two movies connected with each other, and then creating a 3rd film having nothing to do with the previous ones makes no sense. Not hating on the movie at all, just saying.
|
|