|
|
Post by thepeopleschamp24 on Oct 25, 2017 15:48:07 GMT
I want to watch it on Blu-Ray
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 25, 2017 16:42:13 GMT
Final Cut
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Oct 25, 2017 18:11:20 GMT
I want to watch it on Blu-Ray Watch the Original Theatrical Version first and then the Final Cut in that order so you can see the two most widely varying versions. Your original Blade Runner experience will be complete. They come in a boxed set.
Then go see Blade Runner 2049 which is also awesome.
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Oct 25, 2017 18:13:12 GMT
Funny, I asked the same question about what blu ray set was the best to get. Most seem to be pretty expensive (and out of print). The 30th Anniversary set seems pretty appealing, but it's going for between $30 to $100 on ePAY. There is also a 5 disc set that is pretty pricey.
Only one I've ever seen is the old 1999 DVD of the Director's Cut. That was years ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by egon1982 on Oct 25, 2017 18:20:16 GMT
Final Cut
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Oct 25, 2017 18:49:34 GMT
The Final Cut
|
|
|
|
Post by thepeopleschamp24 on Oct 25, 2017 19:17:51 GMT
Some of you saying final cut, some saying original theaterical and THEN final cut. Which is it? |
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Oct 25, 2017 19:23:38 GMT
Some of you saying final cut, some saying original theaterical and THEN final cut. Which is it?
Watch both. I think the crucial differences between the Theatrical Version and Final Cut give you different perspectives of the film. One implies Deckard is a replicant while another one doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 25, 2017 19:56:34 GMT
Some of you saying final cut, some saying original theaterical and THEN final cut. Which is it? Just watch the Final Cut. It's the best version of the film. There's no reason to watch the original theatrical version because that isn't the movie Ridley Scott wanted to make. |
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Oct 25, 2017 20:03:24 GMT
Some of you saying final cut, some saying original theaterical and THEN final cut. Which is it?
Watch both. I think the crucial differences between the Theatrical Version and Final Cut give you different perspectives of the film. One implies Deckard is a replicant while another one doesn't.
Both versions imply it, one more heavily than the other. It doesn't change the plot of the film one way or the other, it's just a talking point for fans. There's no reason to make someone sit through the theatrical cut if they only plan on watching one version of the film. Ford's droning narration (which he deliberately mailed in because he hated doing it) adds nothing to the film, and the tacked on 'happy ending' feels as contrived as it was. Whether or not Deckard is a replicant was never the point of the film, I don't understand why people are so fixated on this. |
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Oct 25, 2017 20:07:56 GMT
Deckard is not a replicant.
|
|
|
|
Post by outrider127 on Oct 25, 2017 20:27:12 GMT
Only saw the theatrical version, which bored me to death
|
|
