Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2017 23:15:31 GMT
Roy Moore, the latest pin-up boy of Breitbart is apparently a paedo. No surprise, if you've heard the guy talk... just in general, southern hick / nutjob, like most rabid republicans these days! isn't he typically regarded as the worst '007' james bond?
|
|
|
|
Post by mangekyoalleluia on Nov 9, 2017 23:29:19 GMT
No surprise, if you've heard the guy talk... just in general, southern hick / nutjob, like most rabid republicans these days! isn't he typically regarded as the worst '007' james bond? This is correct.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2017 23:30:54 GMT
isn't he typically regarded as the worst '007' james bond? This is correct. Roger Roger 
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Nov 9, 2017 23:32:01 GMT
Roy Moore, the latest pin-up boy of Breitbart is apparently a paedo. No surprise, if you've heard the guy talk... just in general, southern hick / nutjob, like most rabid republicans these days! Didn't you just say in this thread not to believe everything you read on the internet? Aren't OVERWHELMINGLY most of these sick rapeo freaks liberals? So basically you're a rape apologist unless some person you're bigoted against is accused then you're ready to lynch them. A bit hypocritical and more than a bit creepy, innit?
|
|
|
|
Post by GiantFan1980 on Nov 10, 2017 1:51:32 GMT
For fucks sake! I turn on the TV and now CNN is reporting Louis C.K is in deep shit with 5 Women accusing him of sexual misconduct.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 10, 2017 13:08:16 GMT
For fucks sake! I turn on the TV and now CNN is reporting Louis C.K is in deep shit with 5 Women accusing him of sexual misconduct. Dude that story has been out there for years. Odd that nobody gave a shit about it until now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Nov 10, 2017 13:12:22 GMT
Uhh, do you realize that what you just did was call women who are sexually abused liars? You are scum. If you believe anyone simply because they claim something, there's another word for you: gullible. You don't assume that people are lying, but you don't assume that they're telling the truth either, especially when they're accusing someone of committing a crime, when there's no other evidence that the crime was committed or that the person in question committed it. (The only time you should do that is if you're part of law enforcement, and then you believe them to the extent that you investigate their claim.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Nov 10, 2017 13:12:33 GMT
Louis does look like a pervert to be fair.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Nov 10, 2017 13:13:39 GMT
For fucks sake! I turn on the TV and now CNN is reporting Louis C.K is in deep shit with 5 Women accusing him of sexual misconduct. Dude that story has been out there for years. Odd that nobody gave a shit about it until now. It doesn't bode well for my view that it should be legal to be nude in public and to masturbate in public.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 10, 2017 13:17:51 GMT
It's irrelevant. There will almost always be zero evidence but if there are enough voices, you're pretty much fucked anyway (but at least you won't go to prison). Agreed, I've pretty much done a 180 on this since we talked about it a few weeks ago. All of this could've been avoided if any of these accusers had come forward and told the police instead of their publicist. Maybe they were concerned for their careers, but jesus, there's a line you simply shouldn't cross when it comes to that stuff. And for all we know at this point it's a witch hunt, where anyone with an ax to grind in Hollywood can accuse anyone of anything and the public will believe it because apparently it's an epidemic. Let's be clear, the creeps that have been doing this stuff for years deserve whatever is coming to them; but I have little sympathy for those who essentially enabled them all this time. This isn't victim blaming, it's a shame the accusers had to go through this. But so many people had an opportunity to do something about this problem years ago and chose to go with the flow until it became convenient (and even trendy) to do otherwise. For that matter, shame on the machine that is the relationship between the media and the general public. I've heard comedians talk about the accusations against Louis CK for years-- yet somehow it's only now gaining traction? Now that it's trending on twitter it's an issue we're willing to accept? That, I think, is the biggest tragedy of all here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 10, 2017 13:22:50 GMT
Dude that story has been out there for years. Odd that nobody gave a shit about it until now. It doesn't bode well for my view that it should be legal to be nude in public and to masturbate in public. Hey, at least you aren't hiding anything. Surely the NSA can appreciate that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Nov 10, 2017 13:51:35 GMT
Let's be clear, the creeps that have been doing this stuff for years deserve whatever is coming to them That attitude I think is problematic though. There's such a wide variety of stuff that we're talking about. Why don't people care what the details are, and why do they seem to categorically be morally and perhaps legally opposed, so (close-to-)unanimously, to all of it regardless of the details? It seems like an aversion to critical and independent thought to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 10, 2017 14:07:29 GMT
Let's be clear, the creeps that have been doing this stuff for years deserve whatever is coming to them That attitude I think is problematic though. There's such a wide variety of stuff that we're talking about. Why don't people care what the details are, and why do they seem to categorically be morally and perhaps legally opposed, so (close-to-)unanimously, to all of it regardless of the details? It seems like an aversion to critical and independent thought to me. Well in some cases people have denied the allegations, in others people have immediately publicly apologized and 'entered treatment' or whatever. So obviously some of the stories are legit. So when I say they deserve what's coming to them, the guilty are who I'm talking about. How many are guilty is anyone's guess, and that number could go in either direction. But yeah, as I said earlier, there's real witch hunt potential here because now anyone can say anything about anyone and there's a good chance people will believe it. Remember the case of Garrett Wittels, a baseball prospect whose career was put in jeopardy by false rape accusations? ESPN did a great piece on the saga a few years ago. It turns out it never happened and the girl's father set the whole thing up as an extortion attempt. Despite this, years later when Wittels came up to bat in the minors, somebody in the crowd yelled, "Rapist!" Once the story is out there, it's out there. People will believe what they want to believe.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 15:04:16 GMT
All of this could've been avoided if any of these accusers had come forward and told the police instead of their publicist. You're a good man Rey, but I don't think I would be quite so quick to be judgemental about these people who didn't come forward. Earlier in this thread I made a 'stolen bike' analogy, which I realise was crass, but there was a serious point behind it. I don't think it is that easy walking into a police station to report a crime or make an allegation, especially when there is little or no evidence except for your word. And especially when you feel you might be partly to blame (like I was when I didn't lock my bike up), then you feel you'll be the joke of the cop shop if you walk in there and tell them what an idiot you've been. It would be humiliating, and women who have been raped have to go through the extra ordeal of having their genitals poked around with. And also, there are a few people in this thread who seem to be taking "their career (or future career) could be ruined" thing quite lightly. I dunno, but I think if you were in two minds over whether to report something to the police in the first place, and knowing that your career might well be left in tatters if you did so, I think that would be enough to sway you into the "not going to the police" camp. I'm reminded of the harrowing stories either earlier on this year or last year of the mountain of ex-footballers who came on British television tearfully making accusations against some specific coaches who abused and raped them when they were teenagers. Almost all of them said the same thing, first of all they froze when the abuse started, then they thought they wouldn't be believed if they did tell someone, and even if they did come forward they knew their careers would likely be ruined. It is interesting, that no one blamed these guys for thinking of their careers, no one blamed them for not coming forward, and there wasn't even a murmur that any of them were making it up (to be honest, it would be impossible not to believe them, they would have to be the greatest actors of all time if they were making it up!). Okay, we can say it might be different for guys who are abused, that it might be harder to come forward, but I doubt it would be easy for anyone to come forward. And I'm not saying that every person who comes forward is telling the truth, of course there are false accusations, too many, and even when the accusations are essentially true there might be a temptation to lie about certain events to cast yourself in a better light. But the legal process is there for a reason, and we can't drop the standard of proof just to get more convictions, as we don't want innocent people going to prison, so there is no way round it unfortunately so a lot of men are going to get away with it. I mean you look at Donald Trump, the recorded tape admissions of grabbing pussies and sneaking into women's dressing rooms alone should have been enough to finish any politician, but now he is the President of the United States. So that shows how seriously certain people are taking sexual assault. Large segments of the population actually. And also, I do think it is a different world today compared to just 20 years ago. 20 years ago I was a teenager at school, and we used to have these one hour lessons once a week, where we'd go over sex education, safe sex, drugs, bullying, all that kind of shit, and I'm pretty sure the headline back then was rape was when a women said 'no'. That definition has clearly changed somewhat in the past 20 years, both legally and in most people's perceptions, so if you were a woman who was abused or raped 20 years ago, and you were one of those who just froze, like the boys did in the football coach allegations, I think you might have been a little less forthcoming in coming forward. Anyway, sorry, look at Stan getting all serious on a Friday afternoon, tl;dr etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by klawrencio79 on Nov 10, 2017 15:33:20 GMT
And to take it a step further from what Manly Stanley said, dollars to donuts many of the people did actually come forward but nothing came of it. Are there instances where the alleged victim didn't come forward at all for one reason or another? Undoubtedly. But let's not kid ourselves into thinking that there weren't a significant number of people who did come forward (to the powers that be of the particular studio/company, the police, etc.) and it was swept under the rug.
I'll give you a real life example. From my previous law firm, one of the top partners, a guy who had about $10m annually in billings, was accused by a junior associate of improper conduct. It was no allegation, it actually happened. Some of us saw it happen. So what did the firm end up doing? Did the partner get fired by management? No way. They gave the junior associate some cash and then fired her. Multiply that by various orders of magnitude and it's a mere microcosm of what goes on in these huge media empires and studios. They aren't going to risk having their cash cows suffer either criminal chargers or trial by media so they simply make the problems go away by either giving hush money or just doing absolutely nothing about it knowing that golden rule will always win out. Short of there being physical evidence of a crime that is impossible to ignore, these are situations that are all too often nipped in the bud one way or another.
That isn't to say that some of these allegations are perhaps unfounded, but it's simply wrong of us to assume that so many of them are cries for attention, or that it represents more convenient timing and nothing more.
|
|
|
|
Post by NewtJorden on Nov 10, 2017 15:35:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Nov 10, 2017 15:45:53 GMT
That attitude I think is problematic though. There's such a wide variety of stuff that we're talking about. Why don't people care what the details are, and why do they seem to categorically be morally and perhaps legally opposed, so (close-to-)unanimously, to all of it regardless of the details? It seems like an aversion to critical and independent thought to me. Well in some cases people have denied the allegations, in others people have immediately publicly apologized and 'entered treatment' or whatever. So obviously some of the stories are legit. So when I say they deserve what's coming to them, the guilty are who I'm talking about. How many are guilty is anyone's guess, and that number could go in either direction. But yeah, as I said earlier, there's real witch hunt potential here because now anyone can say anything about anyone and there's a good chance people will believe it. Remember the case of Garrett Wittels, a baseball prospect whose career was put in jeopardy by false rape accusations? ESPN did a great piece on the saga a few years ago. It turns out it never happened and the girl's father set the whole thing up as an extortion attempt. Despite this, years later when Wittels came up to bat in the minors, somebody in the crowd yelled, "Rapist!" Once the story is out there, it's out there. People will believe what they want to believe. Why is no one engaging in critical thinking about just what actions we're considering morally or legally problematic? Someone can accuse someone of sexual harassment or misconduct, and the person they accused might admit that they did what they were accused of, and everyone goes "YEAH-BURN 'EM!" etc., but why are we never saying--"Wait a minute. Should that particular action be considered morally or legally problematic? Why/why not?" (Where we're doing some "hard thinking" about why/why not and not just landing on a bunch of what I call "telemarketing responses"--basically canned replies that no one is thinking about, they're just popular canned replies.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 10, 2017 15:58:09 GMT
All of this could've been avoided if any of these accusers had come forward and told the police instead of their publicist. You're a good man Rey, but I don't think I would be quite so quick to be judgemental about these people who didn't come forward. Earlier in this thread I made a 'stolen bike' analogy, which I realise was crass, but there was a serious point behind it. I don't think it is that easy walking into a police station to report a crime or make an allegation, especially when there is little or no evidence except for your word. And especially when you feel you might be partly to blame (like I was when I didn't lock my bike up), then you feel you'll be the joke of the cop shop if you walk in there and tell them what an idiot you've been. It would be humiliating, and women who have been raped have to go through the extra ordeal of having their genitals poked around with. And also, there are a few people in this thread who seem to be taking "their career (or future career) could be ruined" thing quite lightly. I dunno, but I think if you were in two minds over whether to report something to the police in the first place, and knowing that your career might well be left in tatters if you did so, I think that would be enough to sway you into the "not going to the police" camp. I'm reminded of the harrowing stories either earlier on this year or last year of the mountain of ex-footballers who came on British television tearfully making accusations against some specific coaches who abused and raped them when they were teenagers. Almost all of them said the same thing, first of all they froze when the abuse started, then they thought they wouldn't be believed if they did tell someone, and even if they did come forward they knew their careers would likely be ruined. It is interesting, that no one blamed these guys for thinking of their careers, no one blamed them for not coming forward, and there wasn't even a murmur that any of them were making it up (to be honest, it would be impossible not to believe them, they would have to be the greatest actors of all time if they were making it up!). Okay, we can say it might be different for guys who are abused, that it might be harder to come forward, but I doubt it would be easy for anyone to come forward. And I'm not saying that every person who comes forward is telling the truth, of course there are false accusations, too many, and even when the accusations are essentially true there might be a temptation to lie about certain events to cast yourself in a better light. But the legal process is there for a reason, and we can't drop the standard of proof just to get more convictions, as we don't want innocent people going to prison, so there is no way round it unfortunately so a lot of men are going to get away with it. I mean you look at Donald Trump, the recorded tape admissions of grabbing pussies and sneaking into women's dressing rooms alone should have been enough to finish any politician, but now he is the President of the United States. So that shows how seriously certain people are taking sexual assault. Large segments of the population actually. And also, I do think it is a different world today compared to just 20 years ago. 20 years ago I was a teenager at school, and we used to have these one hour lessons once a week, where we'd go over sex education, safe sex, drugs, bullying, all that kind of shit, and I'm pretty sure the headline back then was rape was when a women said 'no'. That definition has clearly changed somewhat in the past 20 years, both legally and in most people's perceptions, so if you were a woman who was abused or raped 20 years ago, and you were one of those who just froze, like the boys did in the football coach allegations, I think you might have been a little less forthcoming in coming forward. Anyway, sorry, look at Stan getting all serious on a Friday afternoon, tl;dr etc. I hear where you're coming from, it's pretty much what I was saying to painbow a couple weeks ago. If you get laughed out of the police station or your agent's office, where do you go from there? You either accept the garbage that comes with the job or you give up and go home; neither seem particularly enticing when you're trying to advance your career. But there has to be a limit, and in many of these cases people are saying, 'Everyone knew so and so was a creep.' Seems to me somebody with real clout could take a stand if everyone knew. One of these big name actresses could've outed these guys years ago when they achieved star status, instead they chose to keep their heads down and let it happen to who knows how many more. Hell, surely there are a group of A-list directors and actors who knew about Weinstein or Spacey or whomever and decided to do nothing about it. If it's Weinstein or Spacey vs. some no name actor or production assistant or whatever, the odds are against the nobody. But if it's a group of A-listers coming out against one of those guys, I think people take notice. It's fascinating to me that it took a platform like social media to bring real change. The upside is these aren't just whispers anymore; victims now have an entire support group on social media where they've found out they're not alone. The public as well as the industry can no longer turn a blind eye to these issues. The downside as I discussed earlier is that anyone can hurl accusations for everyone to see, and soon people will stop concerning themselves with the validity of these accusations.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Nov 10, 2017 16:00:13 GMT
Tell me more. Do they have a brochure or perhaps a recruitment video we can get our hands on?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 16:21:17 GMT
You're a good man Rey, but I don't think I would be quite so quick to be judgemental about these people who didn't come forward. Earlier in this thread I made a 'stolen bike' analogy, which I realise was crass, but there was a serious point behind it. I don't think it is that easy walking into a police station to report a crime or make an allegation, especially when there is little or no evidence except for your word. And especially when you feel you might be partly to blame (like I was when I didn't lock my bike up), then you feel you'll be the joke of the cop shop if you walk in there and tell them what an idiot you've been. It would be humiliating, and women who have been raped have to go through the extra ordeal of having their genitals poked around with. And also, there are a few people in this thread who seem to be taking "their career (or future career) could be ruined" thing quite lightly. I dunno, but I think if you were in two minds over whether to report something to the police in the first place, and knowing that your career might well be left in tatters if you did so, I think that would be enough to sway you into the "not going to the police" camp. I'm reminded of the harrowing stories either earlier on this year or last year of the mountain of ex-footballers who came on British television tearfully making accusations against some specific coaches who abused and raped them when they were teenagers. Almost all of them said the same thing, first of all they froze when the abuse started, then they thought they wouldn't be believed if they did tell someone, and even if they did come forward they knew their careers would likely be ruined. It is interesting, that no one blamed these guys for thinking of their careers, no one blamed them for not coming forward, and there wasn't even a murmur that any of them were making it up (to be honest, it would be impossible not to believe them, they would have to be the greatest actors of all time if they were making it up!). Okay, we can say it might be different for guys who are abused, that it might be harder to come forward, but I doubt it would be easy for anyone to come forward. And I'm not saying that every person who comes forward is telling the truth, of course there are false accusations, too many, and even when the accusations are essentially true there might be a temptation to lie about certain events to cast yourself in a better light. But the legal process is there for a reason, and we can't drop the standard of proof just to get more convictions, as we don't want innocent people going to prison, so there is no way round it unfortunately so a lot of men are going to get away with it. I mean you look at Donald Trump, the recorded tape admissions of grabbing pussies and sneaking into women's dressing rooms alone should have been enough to finish any politician, but now he is the President of the United States. So that shows how seriously certain people are taking sexual assault. Large segments of the population actually. And also, I do think it is a different world today compared to just 20 years ago. 20 years ago I was a teenager at school, and we used to have these one hour lessons once a week, where we'd go over sex education, safe sex, drugs, bullying, all that kind of shit, and I'm pretty sure the headline back then was rape was when a women said 'no'. That definition has clearly changed somewhat in the past 20 years, both legally and in most people's perceptions, so if you were a woman who was abused or raped 20 years ago, and you were one of those who just froze, like the boys did in the football coach allegations, I think you might have been a little less forthcoming in coming forward. Anyway, sorry, look at Stan getting all serious on a Friday afternoon, tl;dr etc. I hear where you're coming from, it's pretty much what I was saying to painbow a couple weeks ago. If you get laughed out of the police station or your agent's office, where do you go from there? You either accept the garbage that comes with the job or you give up and go home; neither seem particularly enticing when you're trying to advance your career. But there has to be a limit, and in many of these cases people are saying, 'Everyone knew so and so was a creep.' Seems to me somebody with real clout could take a stand if everyone knew. One of these big name actresses could've outed these guys years ago when they achieved star status, instead they chose to keep their heads down and let it happen to who knows how many more. Hell, surely there are a group of A-list directors and actors who knew about Weinstein or Spacey or whomever and decided to do nothing about it. If it's Weinstein or Spacey vs. some no name actor or production assistant or whatever, the odds are against the nobody. But if it's a group of A-listers coming out against one of those guys, I think people take notice. It's fascinating to me that it took a platform like social media to bring real change. The upside is these aren't just whispers anymore; victims now have an entire support group on social media where they've found out they're not alone. The public as well as the industry can no longer turn a blind eye to these issues. The downside as I discussed earlier is that anyone can hurl accusations for everyone to see, and soon people will stop concerning themselves with the validity of these accusations. Yeah, still a huge amount of pressure to come forward though isn't it... I mean even if you are anonymous, it is going to be a massive story, but if you are an A-list celebrity, it is going to be the biggest story on the planet, overshadowing any wars and invasions going on, and if no one else comes forward and backs you up it would probably overshadow everything you've ever worked for. And you might not even know for sure if you were the only one it ever happened to, let alone whether you'll be believed or get a conviction out of it (which you probably wont), in fact it could be you being put on trial for libel if it becomes a war of words via the media. While everyone treats it as popcorn material, because let's be real, that's what we often do. And when exactly is the right time to come forward if you didn't come forward immediately? After your first big break? After your third blockbuster? Your fifth, when everything is going so well? I dunno, until you've walked a mile in another person's shoes, it is hard to know what you would do... I can quite imagine, right or wrong, being the sort of person who would think to myself "this just isn't worth the aggro".
|
|