|
Post by thisguy4000 on Nov 10, 2017 18:35:16 GMT
Reactions seem fine.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 18:42:09 GMT
They seem ok, but somewhat uninspired from what I've read. If I had to guess their ratings it would average a 6 based on what they're saying.
Considering what JL is, I don't that I would call that fine at this point.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 18:44:22 GMT
If you think they're "fine" then your expectations must have lowered? These reviews tend to be better than the real ones as a rule. ![](https://s26.postimg.org/m8f14k0ih/yes.gif)
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Nov 10, 2017 18:45:53 GMT
They seem ok, but somewhat uninspired from what I've read. If I had to guess their ratings it would average a 6 based on what they're saying.
Considering what JL is, I don't that I would call that fine at this point.
They’re generally positive from what I’ve seen. In other words, they’re fine.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 10, 2017 18:52:24 GMT
They seem ok, but somewhat uninspired from what I've read. If I had to guess their ratings it would average a 6 based on what they're saying.
Considering what JL is, I don't that I would call that fine at this point.
They’re generally positive from what I’ve seen. In other words, they’re fine. So far: Don't mind the fat slob arf arf, he is too fanatically dumb to realize how stupid he is. He now soiled his pants bc he hoped for a disaster.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 18:57:10 GMT
They seem ok, but somewhat uninspired from what I've read. If I had to guess their ratings it would average a 6 based on what they're saying.
Considering what JL is, I don't that I would call that fine at this point.
They’re generally positive from what I’ve seen. In other words, they’re fine. In the it's ok but nothing special sense they're positive, I agree. I don't think that's what JL is going for though, so I wouldn't describe that as fine for the film that it is.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Nov 10, 2017 18:58:28 GMT
They’re generally positive from what I’ve seen. In other words, they’re fine. In the it's ok but nothing special sense they're positive, I agree. I don't think that's what JL is going for though, so I wouldn't describe that as fine for the film that it is. I was never expecting it to be viewed as a genre-defining masterpiece, so anything that leans towards being generally positive is fine by me.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 19:00:20 GMT
In the it's ok but nothing special sense they're positive, I agree. I don't think that's what JL is going for though, so I wouldn't describe that as fine for the film that it is. I was never expecting it to be viewed as a genre-defining masterpiece, so anything that leans towards being generally positive is fine by me. Fair enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 19:03:09 GMT
A lot of these reviews are basically saying the writing is bad, the story is rushed but it's okay because it's fun. JL will probably be a good time at the cinemas, nothing more.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 19:09:43 GMT
A lot of these reviews are basically saying the writing is bad, the story is rushed but it's okay because it's fun. JL will probably be a good time at the cinemas, nothing more. The writing and story would be the only parts I care about. If it's just one of those have 3 beers and turn your brain off to enjoy it type of things, that's really low praise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 19:10:54 GMT
A lot of these reviews are basically saying the writing is bad, the story is rushed but it's okay because it's fun. JL will probably be a good time at the cinemas, nothing more. The writing and story would be the only parts I care about. If it's just one of those have 3 beers and turn your brain off to enjoy it type of things, that's really low praise. It sounds like Suicide Squad all over again to me. ![](https://s26.postimg.org/m8f14k0ih/yes.gif)
|
|
|
Post by kevin on Nov 10, 2017 19:11:15 GMT
Seems to be pretty much what I expected. The reviews will probably be better than Suicide Squad and BvS, but nowhere near Wonder Woman. Maybe a 60% - 70% Rotten Tomatoes rating and 50 - 65 on Metacritic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2017 19:14:45 GMT
Seems to be pretty much what I expected. The reviews will probably be better than Suicide Squad and BvS, but nowhere near Wonder Woman. Maybe a 60% - 70% Rotten Tomatoes rating and 50 - 65 on Metacritic. Using Dennis Tzeng off Collider as a barometer (as he is usually kinder than he should be but basically honest), I'd say it's sounding more like 50% RT....if you're lucky. ![](https://s26.postimg.org/m8f14k0ih/yes.gif)
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 19:15:53 GMT
Seems to be pretty much what I expected. The reviews will probably be better than Suicide Squad and BvS, but nowhere near Wonder Woman. Maybe a 60% - 70% Rotten Tomatoes rating and 50 - 65 on Metacritic. 70 is starting to sound like a top end score for sure. It may actually be 50-70 at this point. You're definitely going to get a decent % of critics who just crush it.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 19:19:57 GMT
Seems to be pretty much what I expected. The reviews will probably be better than Suicide Squad and BvS, but nowhere near Wonder Woman. Maybe a 60% - 70% Rotten Tomatoes rating and 50 - 65 on Metacritic. Using Dennis Tzeng off Collider as a barometer (as he is usually kinder than he should be but basically honest), I'd say it's sounding more like 50% RT....if you're lucky. ![](https://s26.postimg.org/m8f14k0ih/yes.gif) I enjoyed his post where he laughed hysterically at that idiot reaction that it was so good Marvel would panic.
|
|
|
Post by primeone on Nov 10, 2017 19:20:14 GMT
They seem ok, but somewhat uninspired from what I've read. If I had to guess their ratings it would average a 6 based on what they're saying.
Considering what JL is, I don't that I would call that fine at this point.
They’re generally positive from what I’ve seen. In other words, they’re fine. Exactly lol. Some of the people here were just hoping for more negatives.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 19:22:49 GMT
They’re generally positive from what I’ve seen. In other words, they’re fine. Exactly lol. Some of the people here were just hoping for more negatives. Just look at the reaction. It's sounding like a 60-65 type of RT. Is that fine?
|
|
|
Post by primeone on Nov 10, 2017 19:26:19 GMT
Exactly lol. Some of the people here were just hoping for more negatives. Just look at the reaction. It's sounding like a 60-65 type of RT. Is that fine? No, it sounds like a 70-75 type of RT which is fine. Even if it were to get 60-65, that is still fine after the previous DCEU movies and it was expected for a while. A good film is what most people care about and a lot of these reviews say it’s good.
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Nov 10, 2017 19:29:22 GMT
They’re generally positive from what I’ve seen. In other words, they’re fine. Exactly lol. Some of the people here were just hoping for more negatives. Yes but only the usual trolls without any life. 27 positive, 4 mixed but with positive connotation and there seems only one negative so far. Better than I expected so far.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 10, 2017 19:30:45 GMT
Just look at the reaction. It's sounding like a 60-65 type of RT. Is that fine? No, it sounds like a 70-75 type of RT which is fine. Even if it were to get 60-65, that is still fine after the previous DCEU movies and it was expected for a while. A good film is what most people care about and a lot of these reviews say it’s good. So that's a pretty low bar, and I would say 70 is about top end at this point.
When they're using the word good, they mean in a well it's not bad type of way, not in a must watch type of way.
|
|