|
|
Post by NewtJorden on Nov 15, 2017 20:50:24 GMT
8/10 to the UE, 6 to the theatrical version.
|
|
|
|
Post by reelreviews2 on Nov 16, 2017 0:10:10 GMT
Write in vote for:
0/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Ecstasy on Nov 16, 2017 5:12:00 GMT
This movie was as boring as Ang Lee’s Hulk.
3/10
|
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Nov 16, 2017 5:31:09 GMT
Ambitious film, doesn't all work, but fun ride
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter B. Parker on Nov 16, 2017 11:25:43 GMT
3. Some good performances, but alas, rather messy and incoherent
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2017 15:00:49 GMT
I rate it a 6
It was not as bad as many people said i think. But it could have been done so much better.
Affleck was great as Bruce Wayne\Batman
But i hated that they had Batman using guns.
|
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 27, 2017 15:05:50 GMT
A 10 and a 9? Come on, whoever you are that put those in, let's be serious alright? Nobody believes you think that. You're kind of the reason these types of poles look silly, and the same goes for whoever is going to mark it a 1. We all know it's bad but it ain't "the room" bad. so...someone who sees the movie has no right to rate it high even if they enjoy it. But you, having not seen the film have all the right to rate it 2 or 3 or wahatever. sounds legit On topic: what version are we rating? because for me it's a noticeable difference |
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Nov 27, 2017 15:07:30 GMT
A 10 and a 9? Come on, whoever you are that put those in, let's be serious alright? Nobody believes you think that. You're kind of the reason these types of poles look silly, and the same goes for whoever is going to mark it a 1. We all know it's bad but it ain't "the room" bad. so...someone who sees the movie has no right to rate it high even if they enjoy it. But you, having not seen the film have all the right to rate it 2 or 3 or wahatever. sounds legit On topic: what version are we rating? because for me it's a noticeable difference You can rate both, but I rated the theatrical cut. |
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 27, 2017 15:10:02 GMT
so...someone who sees the movie has no right to rate it high even if they enjoy it. But you, having not seen the film have all the right to rate it 2 or 3 or wahatever. sounds legit On topic: what version are we rating? because for me it's a noticeable difference You can rate both, but I rated the theatrical cut. Then i gave the theatrical cut a 6 and the extended cut an 8 |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Nov 27, 2017 17:23:51 GMT
The theatrical cut is like a 6, the director's cut is a solid 7, like a 7.6.
Their biggest mistake was not writing for Superman, they ask him to speak in haikus, emote and ponder; and while I got and was fine with the route they wanted to take, they could have done more for him, because he didn't connect with most people..... I saw a confused/lost superman and people saw an bored/annoyed superman.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 27, 2017 17:26:29 GMT
The theatrical cut is like a 6, the director's cut is a solid 7, like a 7.6. Their biggest mistake was not writing for Superman, they ask him to speak in haikus, emote and ponder; and while I got and was fine with the route they wanted to take, they could have done more for him, because he didn't connect with most people..... I saw a confused/lost superman and people saw an bored/annoyed superman. I would say more aloof and cold but, why split indestructible hairs? Hee hee hee... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2017 17:30:59 GMT
Can we take guesses on which person (I almost wrote idiot here but that would be an insult) voted for 10/10? I have someone in mind...
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Nov 27, 2017 17:34:08 GMT
Can we take guesses on which person (I almost wrote idiot here but that would be an insult) voted for 10/10? I have someone in mind... Be my guest. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2017 17:36:23 GMT
Donald McHandegg gave BvS a 10/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ecstasy on Nov 27, 2017 19:22:42 GMT
Ambitious film, doesn't all work, but fun ride I think calling it ambitious is a stretch. |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Nov 27, 2017 20:17:34 GMT
The theatrical cut is like a 6, the director's cut is a solid 7, like a 7.6. Their biggest mistake was not writing for Superman, they ask him to speak in haikus, emote and ponder; and while I got and was fine with the route they wanted to take, they could have done more for him, because he didn't connect with most people..... I saw a confused/lost superman and people saw an bored/annoyed superman. I would say more aloof and cold but, why split indestructible hairs? Hee hee hee... That's probably a more accurate description of what people saw. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Dec 3, 2017 16:17:55 GMT
A 10 and a 9? Come on, whoever you are that put those in, let's be serious alright? Nobody believes you think that. You're kind of the reason these types of poles look silly, and the same goes for whoever is going to mark it a 1. We all know it's bad but it ain't "the room" bad. so...someone who sees the movie has no right to rate it high even if they enjoy it. But you, having not seen the film have all the right to rate it 2 or 3 or wahatever. sounds legit On topic: what version are we rating? because for me it's a noticeable difference Nobody is talking about rights. Rate it a 12 if you want. All I said was it's silly because it means you have no standards in your rating system. A 10 means you're saying it's the best version of that film possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Dec 4, 2017 5:45:29 GMT
so...someone who sees the movie has no right to rate it high even if they enjoy it. But you, having not seen the film have all the right to rate it 2 or 3 or wahatever. sounds legit On topic: what version are we rating? because for me it's a noticeable difference Nobody is talking about rights. Rate it a 12 if you want. All I said was it's silly because it means you have no standards in your rating system. A 10 means you're saying it's the best version of that film possible.
you didn't see the movie,so nobody cares about your opinion |
|
|
|
Post by reelreviews2 on Dec 4, 2017 6:32:39 GMT
People who want to give it 0/10 are jerks. Yep. Lets play nice and put it somewhere realistic in the middle. Does it HAVE to be an extreme when it comes to you and the DCEU? sheesh At least two of us here (eattheeloi and myself) want to rate the movie a 0/10. That is our HONEST opinion of this worthless stinking turd. We're not doing it to be "jerks". You asked our opinion so we're giving you the hard truth. If the movie had ANY redeeming qualities, I would say so. It doesn't. The fact Batfleck v. Psuedoman even exists is a slap in the face to fans of these characters, and even to movie audiences in general. It is truly tragic they managed to screw up Batman and Superman's first on screen appearance together on the big screen so badly that it makes Batman & Robin look good in comparison. At least that movie you can have fun mocking how dumb it is. I'm not going to rate it "somewhere in the middle" because I don't think its an "average" movie. I am certainly objective and don't rate all movies 0 or 10. I rated Star Wars: The Force Awakens a 6/10 because it was decent and fun, but ultimately shallow and pointless. I'll rate Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets a 5/10 because it looks stunning visually and has some clever quips but is a lame predictable action movie that is a waste of time. The Howling II get a 4/10 because its an embarrassing mess but has a great theme song, a clever premise, and Christopher Lee's gravitas is his first and only werewolf movie. Batfleck v. Pseudoman is complete garbage and insults me by the very fact that it exists and WB gave Hack Snyder and David Goyer MORE money to continue their "vision" for Superman AFTER they screwed it up so badly in the first place. A 1/10 is too good for this pile of dung and implies the movie did something right 10% of the time. It didn't. It FAILS on ALL levels. 0/10 |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Dec 4, 2017 12:48:18 GMT
Nobody is talking about rights. Rate it a 12 if you want. All I said was it's silly because it means you have no standards in your rating system. A 10 means you're saying it's the best version of that film possible.
you didn't see the movie,so nobody cares about your opinion correct |
|
