Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 20:16:46 GMT
This is a self portrait from 1786 by the french painter Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun with her daughter Julie. And it was seen as a vulgar painting. Why do you think people viewed it as vulgar ?  |
|
|
|
Post by nausea on Nov 15, 2017 20:47:39 GMT
There is no evidence of illeal activity here!
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman 猫的主人 on Nov 15, 2017 20:56:34 GMT
Either too much bare skin or the celebration of motherhood.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Nov 15, 2017 20:56:57 GMT
She's her daughter AND her sister!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 21:15:30 GMT
Either too much bare skin or the celebration of motherhood. Sorry that is wrong |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 21:15:45 GMT
She's her daughter AND her sister! That is also wrong |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 21:22:41 GMT
This is a self portrait from 1786 by the french painter Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun with her daughter Julie. And it was seen as a vulgar painting. Why do you think people viewed it as vulgar ? It's because LeBrun was a single mother. That is also wrong it was not because she was a single mother. Anyway she was not even a singel mother. She was married to Jean-Baptiste-Pierre Lebrun they married in 1776, Julie their daugther was born in 1780. |
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Nov 15, 2017 21:51:21 GMT
She's her daughter AND her sister! That is also wrong |
|
|
|
Post by Sandman on Nov 15, 2017 21:55:55 GMT
This is a self portrait from 1786 by the french painter Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun with her daughter Julie. And it was seen as a vulgar painting. Why do you think people viewed it as vulgar ? OK. Why is it vulgar? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 21:58:46 GMT
This is a self portrait from 1786 by the french painter Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun with her daughter Julie. And it was seen as a vulgar painting. Why do you think people viewed it as vulgar ? OK. Why is it vulgar? Well it's vulgar for a really stupid reason and this is not even a joke. The reason it was viewed as vulgar was because you can see her teeths. |
|
|
|
Post by Sandman on Nov 15, 2017 23:31:40 GMT
Well it's vulgar for a really stupid reason and this is not even a joke. The reason it was viewed as vulgar was because you can see her teeths. Would have never guessed that. If this picture was from back then they would have probably stoned her to death.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2017 23:39:25 GMT
Well it's vulgar for a really stupid reason and this is not even a joke. The reason it was viewed as vulgar was because you can see her teeths. Would have never guessed that. If this picture was from back then they would have probably stoned her to death. They did not stone people in the 1780s France. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 16, 2017 0:09:44 GMT
Good question. I guess it looks as though she's breastfeeding but it's obscured in such a while that Julie could simply be turning her head around.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandman on Nov 16, 2017 0:27:46 GMT
Would have never guessed that. If this picture was from back then they would have probably stoned her to death.
. Did not mean they would have literally stoned her. I was just making the point that if they thought the first picture was vulgar with that little bit of teeth showing they would have really been upset by the second picture.  |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Nov 16, 2017 0:28:48 GMT
This is a self portrait from 1786 by the french painter Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun with her daughter Julie. And it was seen as a vulgar painting. Why do you think people viewed it as vulgar ? Because she's smiling? |
|
|
|
Post by nausea on Nov 16, 2017 0:38:57 GMT
the dirty slut
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2017 0:48:04 GMT
This is a self portrait from 1786 by the french painter Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun with her daughter Julie. And it was seen as a vulgar painting. Why do you think people viewed it as vulgar ? Because she's smiling? No anyway i have already said the correct answer. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Nov 16, 2017 0:56:50 GMT
No anyway i have already said the correct answer. What was the correct answer? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2017 1:05:21 GMT
No anyway i have already said the correct answer. What was the correct answer? Just look in the thred. |
|
|
|
Post by shannondegroot on Nov 16, 2017 1:35:36 GMT
I didn't find it vulgar. Therefore it is not a vulgar painting.
|
|
