Are The Snyder Films The Worst Comic Trilogy Of All Time?

i don't know why you keep using the death of heath ledger as the main reason for TDKs success, sound a bit disgusting.  and TDKR is only inflated probably because of the 1-2 hit of Inception and TDK, combined with people wanting to have loved it; similar to Indiana Jones4 and Episode I, the desire to love it was far too great for people to accept the flaws initially.

What does the RT score even equate to really, MOS has a "rotten" rating but if you look at it's score in terms of what it was judged on average it's above 60, all that actually meant is no one hated it and most people actually liked it.

I wish people would stop using the RT % as some undeniable proof because it's not and anyone with half a brain could see that, a film can get a 100% on RT but only be graded as a 6/10, so whilst the % implies it's an all time great the actually grade says it's an ok-good film and that's it, people need to get their heads out of RT's arse crack ffs.

Nolan drives me crazy.
I don't know how people see his Batmovies as so perfect. 

He makes characters who change on his whim to finish his movie. 

Joker is JD from Heathers. Watch it. Joker is convinced people are rotten at the core & does all his crap to prove it. JD believes the only place all the social groups can get along is heaven so he does all his stuff, plot to blow up the school, to prove his point. The fact Joker has no past easily goes along with JD seemingly blowing up at the end.

Joker's scars are a sad variation on Kakihara (Tadanobu Asano-Hogun in Thor) from Ichi the Killer. 

But what really galls me is Nolan is held up as being so realistic.

Really?

It's been awhile since I watched it so I've forgotten many of the issues, but we get this speech about how Gordon wants to walk the straight & narrow so as not to give Joker wiggle room, yet he lets a vigilante in to beat the prisoner up? What happened to not giving Joker room to get a mistrial?

And you know what?
I look at mug shots every day at work. I've seen smudged makeup on gals from crying, but I have never seen any suspect left in any form of Halloween style make-up for the mug shot picture. Of course they can't get an ID on the guy. I get a dozen BOLOs a day, usually grainy security footage. 

No.

So we are stuck in some strange reality where some billionaire can play vigilante?

At least the MCU is firmly grounded in fantasy. Tony Stark exists in a world similar to ours, but one which holds fantasy elements like Norse Gods walking the earth & where radiation turns scientists into giant green rage monsters.

First Avenger is a great film. I grew up hearing WWII stories since that was my parents' childhood, the era of their fond memories & the film captures that hope & faith of young men lying about their age to join the army to fight Nazis. 

Why is DC fighting to change Supes? He SHOULD be a big blue & red clad boy scout like Cap. He is a child of the same era. We shouldn't see his parents telling him to be selfish. He is, as the most famous actor to play the role said, a friend. He doesn't see himself as a god, but as a citizen of the planet he grew up on & he wants to do good. Why should that be so hard?

Dude, I would put the first 3 Superman higher than Nolan's trilogy. The 3rd movie? I don't even remember, but the first 2 were a better embodiment of the character. 

Burton's 2 Batmovies are far superior to Nolan's 

And the Crow by itself is better than any superhero movie Nolan has had his hands on.

Wow.

That film is amazing.

Yeah, a lot of people seem to be wowed by it. IMO a very overrated film.

Let's be honest. Cap1 is dreadful and CW is really an Avengers movie, and not a very good one. IM2 and 3 are pretty dire, Thor 1 and 2, well least said soonest mended and all. And I will mention Avengers as CW is an Avengers movie, AOU was awful. But my critical view doesn't count on the RT ratings and frankly I don't give a toss because if I hate a film or enjoy it, it isn't because RT have told me to. I have never looked at the RT website and have no intention of doing so. I will say it as I see it. Incidentally, if you think I am hating on MCU then you would be wrong. I loved The Avengers and Iron Man. Thor: Ragnarok was a fun ride, even though it isn't the "Citizen Kane" you make out out to be.  

But how else are idiots supposed to argue in regards to how good a movie is without it? I mean RT makes it clear that movie critics opinions have to be taken as facts right? I mean how else am I supposed to form an intelligent opinion in regards to whether or not a film is good without knowing if it's certified fresh?! HOW I ASK YOU HOW?!