|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Nov 18, 2017 5:08:55 GMT
I think you should post this on every thread ever made on this site. Do it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2017 9:15:54 GMT
O yeah its a given. Obviously bots HIRED BY WB. 86% by users? ? Give me a break.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2017 18:13:35 GMT
There is no bias against DC movies from critics. Did you ever think that they just don't like bad movies? And does the Wonder Woman movie ring a bell? It got a 92% rating. You're just looking for ways to defend DC movies and you'll say you love them even if you know you don't. I mean, look at your name on here.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 18, 2017 18:19:53 GMT
There is no bias against DC movies from critics. Did you ever think that they just don't like bad movies? Except for the fact that the critics didn't say it was bad movie. The reviews are fake. And when RT posts fake reviews using accounts of people who didn't post, that's clear evidence that there's a bias against DC and it can no lnger be dismissed as pure speculation. You're just looking for ways to defend DC movies and you'll say you love them even if you know you don't. I mean, look at your name on here. The DC in my username stands for Dallas Cowboys. That's why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star.
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Nov 18, 2017 18:40:51 GMT
right......
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 18, 2017 18:47:31 GMT
Respectfully, DC-Fan, if you didn’t intend your username here to show how much you like DC Comics movies, one wonders why you didn’t choose a username more Cowboys-related—"Dallas fan" or "Cowboys fan," or even simply "Dallas Cowboys fan," rather than "DC Fan," which indicates something specific as the majority of your posts are about comic-book movies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2017 18:56:36 GMT
There is no bias against DC movies from critics. Did you ever think that they just don't like bad movies? Except for the fact that the critics didn't say it was bad movie. The reviews are fake. And when RT posts fake reviews using accounts of people who didn't post, that's clear evidence that there's a bias against DC and it can no lnger be dismissed as pure speculation. You're just looking for ways to defend DC movies and you'll say you love them even if you know you don't. I mean, look at your name on here. The DC in my username stands for Dallas Cowboys. That's why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star. Oh. So you read every single negative review fully and not just the few sentences that are shown on RT? The reviews are not fake. And there's no bias against DC, because if there was, Wonder Woman would have scored low, but it didn't. It was 92% positive. How odd that you didn't say a word about that and that you didn't even include me talking about that in your quotes. I should have thought more about your username on here. I was just so taken aback by your posts on here, the ridiculousness of them, that I didn't fully think there.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 19, 2017 0:37:21 GMT
Respectfully, DC-Fan , if you didn’t intend your username here to show how much you like DC Comics movies, one wonders why you didn’t choose a username more Cowboys-related—“Dallas fan” or “Cowboys fan,” or even simply “Dalas Cowboys fan,” rather than “DC Fan,” which indicates something specific as the majority of your posts are about comic-book movies. Had a similar situation on a different film review forum where my name was 'Indy' and everything thought I was a Colts fan.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Nov 19, 2017 0:39:57 GMT
politicidalAh, but were the majority of your posts there about the Colts, as DC-Fan's are about DC comics movies?
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 19, 2017 0:44:19 GMT
politicidal Ah, but were the majority of your posts there about the Colts, as DC-Fan 's are about DC comics movies? Of course not. Don't even watch football.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Nov 19, 2017 0:52:14 GMT
I mean its a studio product, created edited and made by the studio,and Joss Whedon doesn't help.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 19, 2017 1:59:14 GMT
Respectfully, DC-Fan , if you didn’t intend your username here to show how much you like DC Comics movies, one wonders why you didn’t choose a username more Cowboys-related—"Dallas fan" or "Cowboys fan," or even simply "Dallas Cowboys fan," rather than "DC Fan," No need to wonder. The reason is simple. I use the same username for all my online banking, investing, and shopping accounts. That way I only have 1 username to remember instead of having to remember which username I used for which site.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 19, 2017 2:00:09 GMT
Except for the fact that the critics didn't say it was bad movie. The reviews are fake. And when RT posts fake reviews using accounts of people who didn't post, that's clear evidence that there's a bias against DC and it can no lnger be dismissed as pure speculation. The DC in my username stands for Dallas Cowboys. That's why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star. I should have thought more about your username on here. I was just so taken aback by your posts on here, the ridiculousness of them, that I didn't fully think there. Like I said, my username stands for Dallas Cowboys. That's why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2017 2:06:45 GMT
There is no bias against DC movies from critics. Did you ever think that they just don't like bad movies? E xcept for the fact that the critics didn't say it was bad movie. The reviews are fake. And when RT posts fake reviews using accounts of people who didn't post, that's clear evidence that there's a bias against DC and it can no lnger be dismissed as pure speculation. You're just looking for ways to defend DC movies and you'll say you love them even if you know you don't. I mean, look at your name on here. The DC in my username stands for Dallas Cowboys. That's why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star. Actually the majority of critics do not like the movie. RT isn't the only critic source. www.metacritic.com/movie/justice-league
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2017 4:33:57 GMT
Justice League, what went wrong? They didn't fire Snyder's sorry ass the instant they got the bad news about Batman v Superman.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2017 11:14:46 GMT
I should have thought more about your username on here. I was just so taken aback by your posts on here, the ridiculousness of them, that I didn't fully think there. Like I said, my username stands for Dallas Cowboys. That's why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star. I know and I said I was wrong about what I thought. So I already addressed that. You of course ignore this once again. "Oh. So you read every single negative review fully and not just the few sentences that are shown on RT? The reviews are not fake. And there's no bias against DC, because if there was, Wonder Woman would have scored low, but it didn't. It was 92% positive. How odd that you didn't say a word about that and that you didn't even include me talking about that in your quotes."You don't say a word about it because it proves your "critics being biased" wrong...You're ridiculous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2017 19:14:58 GMT
70 MILLIONless than BvS
People utterly hate that movie, how else can you explain this abysmal opening?
WB is utterly moronic to release Justice League movie onto the heels of Marvel smash hit.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 20, 2017 14:06:11 GMT
Seems Wonder Woman was an anomaly not the new normal. I know DC fans loathe when these films get compared to Marvel movies, but Warner Bros. should have taken a note from the MCU, allowing a string of solo films Nothing went wrong. It's not as great as Wonder Woman but it's still a great movie and better than many of the CBms this year (including GotG2, Homecoming, and Raganarok). It's a 9 out of 10. And no, they didn't need a string of solo movies. There's more than 1 way to create a shared universe. And the DCEU has done it successfully. MCU fans keep trying to ignore the fact that the DCEU's 1st 4 movies had a better combined box office than MCU's 1st 4 movies. That means DCEU is ahead of MCU's pace and will eventually surpass MCU. The DCEU movies cost more to make and market and they feature DC's big guns, the MCU ones feature lesser known characters and they cost overall less to make. So MCU still wins. DCEU isn't surpassing anything.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 22:05:13 GMT
Warner bros OVERESTIMATED the final domestic total box by 2 mullion!!!!! Yeez
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Nov 21, 2017 21:56:05 GMT
They should have gotten Snyder off the project immediately after the horrible reception towards BvS. They also could've delayed the release of the film by a few months as well (apparently reshoots/rewrites were taking place up to 1 month before release). I personally think Whedon should have taken over from the very beginning. He couldn't save it in time. At this rate we won't be getting that solo Batman movie from Matt Reeves (which I was looking forward to). ^^^This.
|
|