|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 21, 2017 5:29:00 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Justice League is better than Thor: Ragnarok. It's pretty simple.
In Justice League, Superman was a real bad-ass. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real sissy. Thor screamed like a little baby when a 94-year-old man was going to cut his hair. Thor also screamed like a sissy when the Grandmaster fried the guy tied up in the chair next to Thor. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete sissy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 21, 2017 5:34:19 GMT
No, it's not and the DCEU is fading faster than a UK pop star. Hee hee hee...
|
|
|
|
Post by nemesis617 on Nov 21, 2017 6:23:27 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Justice League is better than Thor: Ragnarok. It's pretty simple. In Justice League, Superman was a real bad-ass. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real sissy. Thor screamed like a little baby when a 94-year-old man was going to cut his hair. Thor also screamed like a sissy when the Grandmaster fried the guy tied up in the chair next to Thor. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete sissy. I agree. Thor:Ragnarok was garbage. I was clapping at the end, not because I thought it was good but because it finally ended. A talking Hulk, an undeveloped script, and uninteresting villain are just some of the problems with this film. It's amazing how this film was certified fresh on RT. I enjoyed the first Thor but this one was bad. 2/10. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 21, 2017 6:28:03 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Justice League is better than Thor: Ragnarok. It's pretty simple. In Justice League, Superman was a real bad-ass. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real sissy. Thor screamed like a little baby when a 94-year-old man was going to cut his hair. Thor also screamed like a sissy when the Grandmaster fried the guy tied up in the chair next to Thor. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete sissy. I agree. Thor:Ragnarok was garbage. I was clapping at the end, not because I thought it was good but because it finally ended. A talking Hulk, an undeveloped script, and uninteresting villain are just some of the problems with this film. It's amazing how this film was certified fresh on RT. I enjoyed the first Thor but this one was bad. 2/10. It helps to wear warm socks when you venture out in the cold to see these types of movies. Better luck next time, my friend. |
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Nov 21, 2017 6:28:06 GMT
Delusion is very strong with the JL fans.
|
|
|
|
Post by _ on Nov 21, 2017 7:00:26 GMT
Delusion is very strong with the JL fans. "The Force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded." |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2017 7:21:01 GMT
Delusion is very strong with the JL fans. "The Force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded." Like they are trapped or something. |
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 21, 2017 9:21:14 GMT
Funny thing is even tho i enjoyed JL very much and didn't care at all for Ragnarok, i can't say JL is a better movie. All i can say is i enjoyed it way more
|
|
|
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 21, 2017 10:31:42 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Justice League is better than Thor: Ragnarok. It's pretty simple. In Justice League, Superman was a real bad-ass. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real sissy. Thor screamed like a little baby when a 94-year-old man was going to cut his hair. Thor also screamed like a sissy when the Grandmaster fried the guy tied up in the chair next to Thor. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete sissy. I agree. Thor:Ragnarok was garbage. I was clapping at the end, not because I thought it was good but because it finally ended. A talking Hulk, an undeveloped script, and uninteresting villain are just some of the problems with this film. It's amazing how this film was certified fresh on RT. I enjoyed the first Thor but this one was bad. 2/10. I have to disagree, I thought Ragnarok was a fun movie (not the complex, dark comedy some on here are trying to make it out to be) but a fun film and way better than the 1st Thor which was average and so much better than Dark World which was an unmitigated disaster, |
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Nov 21, 2017 10:35:09 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Justice League is better than Thor: Ragnarok. It's pretty simple. In Justice League, Superman was a real bad-ass. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real sissy. Thor screamed like a little baby when a 94-year-old man was going to cut his hair. Thor also screamed like a sissy when the Grandmaster fried the guy tied up in the chair next to Thor. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete sissy. But how can we be sure if, when or how you saw either or both these films? You lie about seeing films when you haven't (proven), and the ones you do are shitty cam recordings off the web (admitted). |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2017 11:00:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 21, 2017 12:36:51 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Ragnarok is better than Justice League. It's pretty simple. In Justice League, Superman was a real psycho. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real hero. Superman was ready to murder the entire Justice League like a maniac when the world needed him. Thor treated the Hulk with respect when he asked him for help and as a result the Hulk acted reasonable to him. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete character. Fixed. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 21, 2017 12:52:36 GMT
I'll know for myself on Thursday, I'm looking forward to seeing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Nov 21, 2017 13:12:22 GMT
Thor 3 was great. Thor was more badass than ever in it. He beat the Hulk and beat Hela. He discovered new powers and maybe became the most powerful Avenger. I have not seen Justice League yet though. I cannot wait.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 21, 2017 13:38:10 GMT
Thor 3 was great. Thor was more badass than ever in it. He beat the Hulk and beat Hela. He discovered new powers and maybe became the most powerful Avenger. I have not seen Justice League yet though. I cannot wait. Actually, what I enjoyed the most was how they subverted the whole "Discover your inner power" cliche. In WW, she suddenly gains these Godlike powers at the last minute and easily defeats Ares...and then doesn't show this level of power again, getting manhandled by Steppenwolf. In Thor, he gains a power boost at the end. And it STILL isn't enough. The only way to stop Hela is to get help from a villain and sacrifice their physical home while maintaining their survival as a species. Great way of subverting expectations. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 21, 2017 14:18:52 GMT
Thor 3 was great. Thor was more badass than ever in it. He beat the Hulk and beat Hela. He discovered new powers and maybe became the most powerful Avenger. I have not seen Justice League yet though. I cannot wait. Actually, what I enjoyed the most was how they subverted the whole "Discover your inner power" cliche. In WW, she suddenly gains these Godlike powers at the last minute and easily defeats Ares...and then doesn't show this level of power again, getting manhandled by Steppenwolf. In Thor, he gains a power boost at the end. And it STILL isn't enough. The only way to stop Hela is to get help from a villain and sacrifice their physical home while maintaining their survival as a species. Great way of subverting expectations. Hela is literally the opposite of a weak villain. |
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 21, 2017 14:36:59 GMT
Actually, what I enjoyed the most was how they subverted the whole "Discover your inner power" cliche. In WW, she suddenly gains these Godlike powers at the last minute and easily defeats Ares...and then doesn't show this level of power again, getting manhandled by Steppenwolf. In Thor, he gains a power boost at the end. And it STILL isn't enough. The only way to stop Hela is to get help from a villain and sacrifice their physical home while maintaining their survival as a species. Great way of subverting expectations. Hela is literally the opposite of a weak villain. This year Marvel seems to have fixed their villain problem for me at least. i really liked Ego, Vulture and Hela, even tho i didn't like Ragnarok. They maybe did it just in time for Thanos |
|
|
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 21, 2017 14:43:51 GMT
Hela is literally the opposite of a weak villain. This year Marvel seems to have fixed their villain problem for me at least. i really liked Ego, Vulture and Hela, even tho i didn't like Ragnarok. They maybe did it just in time for Thanos I agree with Hela as a villain, I just thought that she was underused. And Skurge was a complete waste of time. So much more that could have been done with Skurge. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 21, 2017 14:44:03 GMT
Hela is literally the opposite of a weak villain. This year Marvel seems to have fixed their villain problem for me at least. i really liked Ego, Vulture and Hela, even tho i didn't like Ragnarok. They maybe did it just in time for Thanos It's not like all their villains (aside from Loki) were weak. I loved Jeff Bridges in Iron Man 1 and Redford was great in Winter Soldier. Zemo was good for what he was, and Nebula was fine in GOTG1. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 21, 2017 14:44:46 GMT
Hela is literally the opposite of a weak villain. This year Marvel seems to have fixed their villain problem for me at least. i really liked Ego, Vulture and Hela, even tho i didn't like Ragnarok. They maybe did it just in time for Thanos I liked Thor Ragnarok but, I can certainly understand why other people wouldn't like it. The Vulture and Hela were my two favorite villains of the year. |
|
