|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 21, 2017 14:45:23 GMT
This year Marvel seems to have fixed their villain problem for me at least. i really liked Ego, Vulture and Hela, even tho i didn't like Ragnarok. They maybe did it just in time for Thanos It's not like all their villains (aside from Loki) were weak. I loved Jeff Bridges in Iron Man 1 and Redford was great in Winter Soldier. Zemo was good for what he was, and Nebula was fine in GOTG1. yeah, not saying all were bad, just some of them were. I also really liked Zemo and Redford |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Nov 21, 2017 14:48:54 GMT
Thor: Ragnarok is better than The Dark Knight. According to DC-Fan's Favorite ListIt's doubtful that Justice League will even crack the top 50. Now that's baaaad! |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Nov 21, 2017 14:50:32 GMT
Thor: Ragnarok is better than The Dark Knight. According to DC-Fan's Favorite ListIt's doubtful that Justice League will even crack the top 50. Now that's baaaad! Thor is not better than The Dark Knight, even though I loved it. More proof that these lists mean nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 21, 2017 14:55:51 GMT
Thor Ragnarok - 10/10
Justice League - 9/10
Of course this is just my opinion. Everyone else is also stating opinions.
|
|
|
|
Post by harpospoke on Nov 21, 2017 16:20:14 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Justice League is better than Thor: Ragnarok. It's pretty simple. In Justice League, Superman was a real bad-ass. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real sissy. Thor screamed like a little baby when a 94-year-old man was going to cut his hair. Thor also screamed like a sissy when the Grandmaster fried the guy tied up in the chair next to Thor. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete sissy. I thought critical reactions were "proof" of how good a movie is and personal opinions don't count? So this means the Nolan movies aren't really "better" than other CBMs? |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Nov 21, 2017 16:43:14 GMT
So an MCU fan asked why Justice League is better than Thor: Ragnarok. It's pretty simple. In Justice League, Superman was a real bad-ass. Meanwhile, in Ragnarok, Thor was a real sissy. Thor screamed like a little baby when a 94-year-old man was going to cut his hair. Thor also screamed like a sissy when the Grandmaster fried the guy tied up in the chair next to Thor. Ragnarok made the God of Thunder look like a complete sissy. I thought critical reactions were "proof" of how good a movie is and personal opinions don't count? So this means the Nolan movies aren't really "better" than other CBMs? Wow, so a "complete sissy" beat Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Flash and Cyborg at the box-office? I guess Batman should have packed some "sissy" repellent in his utility belt. |
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 21, 2017 17:29:56 GMT
I thought critical reactions were "proof" of how good a movie is and personal opinions don't count? So this means the Nolan movies aren't really "better" than other CBMs? Wow, so a "complete sissy" beat Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Flash and Cyborg at the box-office? I guess Batman should have packed some "sissy" repellent in his utility belt. That would be called "Bat Sissy Repellent" at least in the 1966 series. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 22, 2017 2:33:50 GMT
Thor 3 was great. Thor was more badass than ever in it. Thor was a sissy in Thor 3. He screamed like a baby not once but TWICE! He beat the Hulk and beat Hela. Thor didn't beat Hela. Thor couldn't beat Hela. That's why he had to destroy Asgard. Because he was too weak to beat Hela and save Asgard. |
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Nov 22, 2017 3:43:31 GMT
Wow those are possibly the most retarded reasons why a movie is better than another I’ve ever heard.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 22, 2017 4:30:21 GMT
Thor was a sissy in Thor 3. He screamed like a baby not once but TWICE! And Superman moped around for most of BvS. The movie chose not to take the lazy way out DC would take, and had Thor make a real sacrifice to save everyone. Something Batman or Superman would be unwilling to do. |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Nov 22, 2017 12:12:42 GMT
Thor 3 was great. Thor was more badass than ever in it. Thor was a sissy in Thor 3. He screamed like a baby not once but TWICE! He beat the Hulk and beat Hela. Thor didn't beat Hela. Thor couldn't beat Hela. That's why he had to destroy Asgard. Because he was too weak to beat Hela and save Asgard. Thor was stronger in Thor 3 than any other character in the MCU so far. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2017 13:08:24 GMT
Yeah, it was.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2017 13:09:44 GMT
Thor Ragnarok - 10/10 Justice League - 9/10 Of course this is just my opinion. Everyone else is also stating opinions. How the heck is Thor: Ragnarok a 10/10? I liked it as did most but no one thought it was 10/10. But I guess you did say IMO, but still. |
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 22, 2017 13:57:38 GMT
Thor Ragnarok - 10/10 Justice League - 9/10 Of course this is just my opinion. Everyone else is also stating opinions. How the heck is Thor: Ragnarok a 10/10? I liked it as did most but no one thought it was 10/10. But I guess you did say IMO, but still. I didn't like Thor but there's nothing wrong with rating the movie based on how much you enjoyed it. If he thought it's worthy( see what i did there? ) of a 10, then good for him, i'm glad he had a great time at the cinema. I also rate some movies higher than the majority |
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Nov 22, 2017 15:21:03 GMT
Thor Ragnarok - 10/10 Justice League - 9/10 Of course this is just my opinion. Everyone else is also stating opinions. How the heck is Thor: Ragnarok a 10/10? I liked it as did most but no one thought it was 10/10. But I guess you did say IMO, but still. I was thoroughly entertained throughout the entire movie. I can't ask for more than that. If you want to get picky maybe it was a 9.5 and I rounded up to 10. |
|
|
|
Post by judgejosephdredd on Nov 22, 2017 17:57:26 GMT
Well the critics don't think its a better movie, neither do most of the movie going public and it shows in box office figures - the movie is gonna cost Warner Bros. serious money and its gonna put a lot of upcoming DC film projects on ice. There is also a pretty good chance some actors from the DCEU( or DC Cinematic Universe, whichever you'd like to call it) will decidedly exit : many are expecting Ben Affleck to come out and announce "I'm done as Batman" to the public right now, few think he's gonna stay on board even for Matt Reeves' solo Batman trilogy( Heck, Reeves might even jump ship to another project if Warner won't let him have his way). Ezra Miller has been said to voice disappointment in Justice League and the handling of The Flash solo movie, so what's stopping him from saying "You know what guys? I'm done, find another Barry Allen"? Kiersey Clemons may end up getting recast as Iris as she is apparently not particularly happy she ended up on the cutting room floor. Henry Cavill has one more DC film in his contract, whichever that will be nobody knows. Gal Gadot and Jason Momoa are only guaranteed to play their parts for as long as possible because they don't really have another franchise to latch onto to that's gonna keep them on top of the Hollywood chain.
If you're a DC fan, right now you should be worried about the future of the DCEU as opposed to trying to convince Justice League is a better movie than Thor: Ragnarok - Which is outperforming it and is delivering on all accounts to Disney stockholders.
|
|
|
|
Post by _ on Nov 22, 2017 18:16:11 GMT
If you're a DC fan, right now you should be worried about the future of the DCEUThere is no future. If WB continues spending money on this crap after WW2, they are morons. |
|
|
|
Post by londonbridge115 on Nov 22, 2017 18:34:42 GMT
Funny thing is even tho i enjoyed JL very much and didn't care at all for Ragnarok, i can't say JL is a better movie. All i can say is i enjoyed it way more I agree! I enjoyed watching JL more than Ragnarok. I even went to see it twice. I have no interest in seeing Ragnarok again. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 22, 2017 21:20:24 GMT
^ agree, but neither of these two was a masterwork, just dumb fun movies that were entertaining enough but could have been so much more.
|
|
|
|
Post by merh on Nov 23, 2017 14:51:04 GMT
Thor 3 was great. Thor was more badass than ever in it. Thor was a sissy in Thor 3. He screamed like a baby not once but TWICE! He beat the Hulk and beat Hela. Thor didn't beat Hela. Thor couldn't beat Hela. That's why he had to destroy Asgard. Because he was too weak to beat Hela and save Asgard. He had to sacrifice Hela's power source to defeat her. That means he defeated her by destroying Asgard. |
|
